Talmud: Makot 3
| Related Text: |
Talmud - Makot: 3a Talmud - Makot: 3b |
| Podcast: | Subscribe to Avraham Zajac - Talmud Study |
| Audio: | Listen to Audio | Download this MP3 |
| Related Text: |
Talmud - Makot: 3a Talmud - Makot: 3b |
| Podcast: | Subscribe to Avraham Zajac - Talmud Study |
| Audio: | Listen to Audio | Download this MP3 |
Why does the beis dins "bill" וחוייבנו ממון change the status from קנס to compensation? I mean even after a thief is handed his monetary obligation he's only sold for the compensation half not for the קנס part? So it seems even after the Beis Din rules that a קנס must be paid, it's not like a regular compensation obligation, so why does he pay based on his own admission?