In this context, it can be noted that Rashi begins his commentary to the Torah: “If the nations of the world say to Israel, ‘You are thieves for having conquered land that does not belong to you’…, the Jews can then reply to them...” Numerous parshiyos of the Torah – indeed, more than an entire book – were written in order to explain to the nations of the world that the conquest of Eretz Yisrael by the Jewish people does not constitute theft. All this, in order that they, too, agree to this. See also Toras Shalom, p. 70ff., which explains that the entire process of the shattering of the vessels of Tohu was “so that [the non-Jews] express themselves according to His will.”
Midrash Tanchuma, Parshas Naso, sec. 16, Parshas Bechukosai, sec. 3; Bamidbar Rabbah 13:6; Tanya, ch. 36.
Tanya, op. cit.
Sefer HaMaamarim 5628, p. 171. See also the maamar of this title delivered in 5629 (Sefer HaMaamarim 5629, p. 403ff.)
Berachos, the end of ch. 8.
Pri Etz Chayim, Shaar 11, ch. 1; Shaar HaKavannos, Inyan Kavannas Chazaras HaAmidah, discourse 5; sources cited in Or HaTorah, Vayikra, Vol. 4, p. 1156.
The four-letter name of G‑d, Yud-Hei-Vav-Hei, as pronounced in the study of Chassidus.
It is possible to explain that the unity of G‑d’s names Havayah and A-donai as reflected in the numerical equivalent of the word Amen, (where the two names combined equal the numerical value of one word), reflects a greater oneness than the oneness of the words שוע טווי ונוז in the word שעטנז (see above, sec. 2, note 6). The rationale is that it is not at all obvious that the numerical value of the word Amen is a combination of two distinct elements (whereas shaatnez is obviously a combination of שוע, טווי ונוז).
With regard to the explanation of the unity of G‑d’s names Havayah and A-donai, see also the maamar entitled Lehavin Inyan Rashbi, 5745, sec. 6 (Toras Menachem, Sefer HaMaamarim Melukat, Vol. 3, p. 181ff.)
Kessef Mishneh, Hilchos Avodas Kochavim, 5:7; Pardes, Shaar 19; Moreh Nevuchim, Vol. 1, ch. 61ff., Ikarim, Discourse 2, ch. 28.
There exists a lower level of G‑d’s name Havayah, which relates to the worlds. Indeed, the name Havayah is related to the word mehaveh, which means “bring into being,” i.e., Havayah reflects G‑d’s creative potential that brings the worlds into being (Zohar, Vol. III, p. 257b; Pardes, Shaar 1, ch. 9; Tanya, Shaar HaYichud VehaEmunah, ch. 4). Yet, even this level is above the framework of the worlds (i.e., it is above time and space), as explained in Shaar HaYichud VehaEmunah, ch. 7, which refers to G‑d’s name Havayah as it exists as the source that brings the world into being.* Certainly, it applies to G‑d’s essential name Havayah, which reflects His Essence.
* This is evident from the fact that the explanation in ch. 7 of Shaar HaYichud VehaEmunah follows the explanations appearing in ch. 4, that Havayah is related to the word mehaveh. The rationale why G‑d’s name Havayah transcends the concept of space is because it is He Who continually brings space into being at all times.
See Zohar, Vol. III, p. 65a.
See Ibid., Vol. II, p. 83b.
Bereishis Rabbah 17:4.
Adon, “master,” is the root of the name Adonai.
Tanya, Shaar HaYichud VehaEmunah, ch. 7, et al.
See Tanya, ch. 32.
The maamar entitled Mi Yitencha, 5565 (Sefer HaMaamarim 5565, Vol. 1, p. 489; published including the notes of the Tzemach Tzedek, Or HaTorah, Shir HaShirim, Vol. 2, p. 679ff.). See also Or HaTorah, Bamidbar, Vol. 3, p. 997; Sefer HaMaamarim 5662, p. 338; Sefer HaMaamarim 5678, p. 193; the series of maamarim entitled Yom-Tov shel Rosh HaShanah, 5666, p. 3, 445; Sefer HaMaamarim 5699, p. 84, et al.
The non-Jew’s blessing merely serves as a catalyst. The actual union of G‑d’s names is brought about by the Jew’s recitation of Amen.

Start a Discussion