The term “dawn” refers to the first shining of the rays of the sun on the horizon, more than an hour before sunrise. See the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Tamid 1:2) which explains that the meaning of the term “the call of the gever” used by that source.
Our translation is based on the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Tamid 1:2) which refers to the Song of Songs 5:2: “The voice of my beloved comes knocking,” i.e., a gentle, beckoning knock.
As indicated by Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 8:11, the supervisor would come from the chayl and knock on the outer door of the Chamber of the Hearth where the priests slept. By knocking, he would wake them. They would open the door for him.
Now the Chamber of the Hearth was located in the middle of the wall on the north side of the Temple Courtyard. Half was consecrated and half was not. There were two gates leading to the Temple Courtyard from the Chamber of the Hearth. A large gate which would be opened at dawn and a smaller gate whose keys were hanging in the Chamber of the Hearth. The supervisor would take those keys and enter the Courtyard.
As described in Hilchot Beit HaBechirah, loc. cit.
See Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot 13:2 with regard to how this offering was prepared.
It appears that, according to the Rambam, these two lotteries were performed one after the other. The commentaries have noted that from Yoma 22a, 24b, it would appear that there was a span of time between the two.
See Chapter 4, Halachot 1, 5-6.
See Chapter 2, Halachah 12.
The Rambam does not mention the third array which was kept to maintain a fire, because that was kept burning at all times. Nevertheless, if it was necessary to place wood on it, the same priest would do so (Radbaz).
See Chapter 2, Halachah 2, and Chapter 4, Halachah 5.
The location of this chamber is not mentioned in Hilchot Beit HaBecghirah, nor in the Mishnah of Middot.
Tamid 3:4 speaks of removing 93 utensils.
See Chapter 1, Halachah 9.
See Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 4:6-7.
See Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot 5:5.
See Chapter 3, Halachah 4, and Chapter 4, Halachah 6.
See Chapter 3, Halachah 10, and Chapter 4, Halachah 6.
See Chapter 4, Halachah 6.
See Chapter 3, Halachah 16.
As described in Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot 6:1.
In his Commentary to the Mishnah, the Rambam explains that they were placed there so that they would be “before God,” closer to the entrance to the Temple.
I.e., to place them in an openly visible place.
Even though causing the salt to dissolve would be forbidden in other circumstances on the Sabbath.
Implied is that while bringing the limbs to the altar - which is part of the Temple service - there should not be any such intervening substances.
The blessing recited before the recitation of the Shema. The blessing Yotzer Or (which precedes Ahavat Olam in the prayer service) is recited afterwards, when the sun rises, because the order of the blessings of the Shema is not an absolute requirement [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Tamid 5:1)].
There the Rambam writes that the Ten Commandments were chosen because they comprise the fundaments of our faith. Indeed, they should be recited every day as part of the prayer service outside the Temple as well. Nevertheless, our Sages [Berachot 12a; Jerusalem Talmud (Berachot 1:5)] refrained from doing so, lest the heretics say that these alone are the foundation of the Jewish faith.
I.e., they read the three passages of the Shema. Even though the optimum time for the recitation of the Shema has not arrived, the priests are allowed to recite it early (and fulfill their obligation), because afterwards they will be occupied with the Temple services and we fear that they might forget to do so (Rashi, Yoma 37b).
The blessing that follows the Shema.
Two of the final three blessings of the Shemoneh Esreh. These blessings are chosen because they are all prayers for the sake of the Jewish people [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Loc cit.)].
After the conclusion of their week of service in the Temple, because the priestly watches switch on the Sabbath afternoon (Hilchot K’lei HaMikdash 4:3).
See Chapter 4, Halachot 7-8.
All authorities agree that an interruption is made between kindling the five lamps and kindling the two lamps. There is, however, a difference of opinion between the Sages and Abba Shaul with regard to the service that intervenes. Here the Rambam follows the opinion of the Sages that it is the offering of the incense. In our daily prayers, however, we read the passage “Abbaye would recount the order of the offerings on the altar... according to Abba Shaul” (Yoma 33a). That passage states that the blood of the daily sacrifice was offered on the altar between the kindling of the lamps and the incense was offered afterwards. The Eshkol explains that even though Abbaye’s reckoning does not follow the halachah in this instance, it is still included in the prayers, because it is a concise review of all the Temple services
See Chapter 3, Halachah 16.
Where they recite the priestly blessing, as stated in the following halachah.
The Kessef Mishneh maintains that on the basis of Tamid 5:6, this was performed when the priest entered the Sanctuary to offer the incense and not when he departed.
Tamid, loc. cit., states that its noise was so loud that no one in Jerusalem could hear his fellow man speaking to him at that time. And Tamid 3:8 states that the noise could be heard even in Jericho.
The prostration was not performed until after the continual offering had been offered.
In this instance as well, as indicated by the conclusion of the halachah, the singing did not actually begin until later, but the preparations were begun.
The term ma’amad refers to the Israelites who would be present during the offering of the sacrifices as explained in Hilchot K’lei Hamikdash, ch. 6.
In his Commentary to the Mishnah (Tamid 5:6), the Rambam explains that this refers to people who had been afflicted by tzara’at (a skin malediction similar to leprosy) and had been cured, but had not brought their offerings as of yet.
I.e., the Gate of Nicanor which is the main entrance to the Temple Courtyard. See also Hilchot Mechusrei Kapparah 4:2.
This follows the order initiated by Aaron, the High Priest, at the dedication of the altar who did not bless the people until he had completed the offering of the sacrifices (see Leviticus, ch. 9).
I.e., in contrast to the practice outside the Temple, the people would not respond after each blessing. Instead, when all three blessings are completed, they would say: “Blessed be the name of His glorious kingdom forever and ever” (Hilchot Tefilah UNesiat Kapayim 14:9).
lbid.:10. I.e., they would pronounce the name as it is written.
As stated in the above source, after the death of Simon the Just, the priests stopped using this name, lest it be learned by a person of improper character.
See Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot 2:1.
See Hilchot K’lei HaMikdash 3:2-4.
See Halachot 6-7. Hilchot K’lei HaMikdash 7:5
In his Commentary to the Mishnah (Tamid 6:6), the Rambam states that this refers to the marble table that was positioned to the west of the ramp. See Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 2:15.
The assistant to the High Priest. See ibid. 4:16.
The trumpets were sounded like the shofar is sounded on Rosh HaShanah: one long blast (tekiah), a series of staccato blasts (teruah), and then another long blast (tekiah).
See ibid. 7:7.
As a sign for the others to perform their activities.
The songs are recited at this time, because “song is recited only over wine” (Berachot 35a). The songs the Levites would sing are mentioned in Halachah 9.
I.e., a series of tekiah, teruah and tekiah blasts.
Each song had three bars.
I.e., three series of three.
Hilchot K’lei HaMikdash 7:5.
See Hilchot Shekalim 4:9.
See ibid 3:2 where the concepts mentioned here are explained in slightly greater detail.
These psalms are also recited as “the song of day” in our daily prayers to recall the Temple Service.
This psalm was associated with Sunday, for the world was created on Sunday and this psalm states how all existence is His [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Tamid 6:7, based on Rosh HaShanah 31a)].
For God’s greatness was manifest in the division of the waters, the creation of the second day (ibid.).
For on this day, the earth - the place where judgment is carried out - came into existence (ibid.).
On this day, the sun and the moon were created and this song is a prayer that God will take retribution against those who worship these celestial bodies (ibid.).
On this day, animal life was created. This is truly wondrous and arouses within man a desire to sing praises to the Creator (ibid.).
For on this day, with the creation of man, God’s work of creation was brought to its ultimate fulfillment, because man acknowledges God’s Kingship (ibid.).
For God rested on the seventh day (Rosh HaShanah 31b). And, as the Mishnah (Tamid, Loc. cit.) concludes, this is “a song for the ultimate future which will be entirely Sabbath and rest for life everlasting.”
I.e., the Hebrew letters are an acronym for the words which begin the verses of these segments: Ha’azinu (32:1), Z’chor (32:7), Yarkiveihu (32:13), Vayar (32:19), Lu (32:29), Ki (32:40).
I.e., as the Torah reading is divided up into aliyot. See Hilchot Tefilah 13:5.
The song of redemption after the splitting of the sea. They would read from the beginning of the song until “Who is like You” (Mi Chamocha, Exodus 15:1-11) on one Sabbath afternoon, and then from that verse until the end of the song on the next Sabbath afternoon. The standard published text of Rosh HaShanah, loc. cit., states that on the third Sabbath they would recite the song of the well (Numbers 21:17), but apparently the Rambam’s version of the text did not include that point.
For this psalm also includes the verse “Sound the shofar on the day of the new moon.”
When Psalm 81 was recited as the psalm of the day.
I.e., the second half of the psalm. Since the psalm was already recited in the morning, they did not desire to repeat it in its entirety.
Rashi (Rosh HaShanah, loc. cit.) explains that this verse recalls the sounding of the shofar at Mount Sinai.
There is no Rabbinic source which is extant that mentions which psalm was recited on Rosh Chodesh.
I.e., for the Musaf offering.
That had been on the Golden Table together with the showbread.
The Kessef Mishneh questions the Rambam’s source for the concept that the offering of the frankincense preceded the wine libation. Rav Yosef Corcus explains that were there not a verse that teaches otherwise, we would think that the offering of the frankincense takes precedence over the additional offering as well. Hence once the additional offering has been brought, it is offered next.
See Chapter 1, Halachah 10.
The ashes were, by contrast, removed from the Menorah and the inner altar in the afternoon, as stated in Chapter 3, Halachah 10.
See Chapter 2, Halachot 2 and 11, and Chapter 4, Halachah 8.
