The substance of time is motion and change: a static world would also be a timeless world. Nevertheless, time as forged by its Creator follows a seven-day cycle, consisting of six days of work (i.e., development, transformation, change), and a seventh day of rest. But how can a unit of time be defined as a day of *rest*, the very antithesis of time?

## The Circle

Time and space are closely related to each other; indeed, modern physics is wont to combine the two as “spacetime,” a four-dimensional grid against which all physical objects and events are measured. While time is the more abstract of the two, many of the characteristics of space are attributed to time as well: we speak of a “point” in time, a “stretch” of time, time “cycles,” even of the “condensation” or “fanning out” of time. 1 Indeed, many of time’s complexities can be better understood when we apply the space-quantifying models of geometry to our conception of time.

One such model is the circle, long considered the most perfect of spatial shapes. The circle’s primary features are: the *center*, the point from which the circle’s area extends uniformly in all directions; the *radius*, which is the distance from the circle’s center to its outer limit; and the *circumference*, the circle’s outer rim, which contains the area of the circle within it. The circumference is approximately
2 six times the length of the radius. This is true of all circles, regardless of size: the greater the radius, the greater the area of the circle, and thus the greater the circumference that encloses this area; but the proportion always remains the same—each additional inch (or yard, or mile) of radius will translate into (slightly more than) six additional inches (or yards, or miles) of circumference.

The geometric point possesses no area; as such, it would seem to hardly qualify as a component of space. In truth, of course, the very opposite is true: the point is the most basic component of all geometric forms—every line is defined by the points that mark its beginning, end, center, convergence with other lines, etc.; and every area is defined by the lines that frame it. Indeed, it is precisely *because* the point possesses no area itself that it can define and quantify the areas that relate to it.

This is exemplified by the circle’s center. A “mere” point, the center occupies none of the circle’s area; but it is precisely the center that makes the circle a circle. The radius extends from it, the diameter turns on it, the circumference is drawn in relation to it—virtually every feature and characteristic of the circle is derived from the point upon which it is centered.

To understand the week—the seven-day cycle which the Creator stamped into the very fabric of time—we must envision it as a circle. The exterior surface of this circle (its “circumference”) is the six workdays—days that are tracts of time, expanses of progression and change. The center of the circle is Shabbat. Shabbat is a timeless point in time, an island of tranquility in a sea of flux. Yet despite—indeed, because of—its “timelessness,” Shabbat is the axis upon which the most basic of time cycles, the week, turns.

For Shabbat is the day that embodies the purpose and end-goal of time—the objective of all the work, development and change in our restless existence. On Shabbat, our efforts of the past six workdays yield a holier and more G‑dly world, a world brought that much closer to the harmonious perfection that G‑d imbued in creation and charged us to develop. One day a week, we penetrate below the whirling perimeter of time to experience its tranquil core. One day a week, we enjoy a “taste of the world to come,” a taste of an age that is “wholly Shabbat and rest, for everlasting life”—the eternal Shabbat of Moshiach that we are striving towards. And it is this weekly taste of tranquil perfection that supplies us with the vision and fortitude to grapple with and transform the still imperfect world to which we return during the six workdays of the coming week.

Shabbat, then, is both the source and the goal of the six days of “conventional” time that form the circumference of the weekly cycle. It is thus the very essence of time, precisely because it is devoid of the motion and flux which characterize time—in the same way that the area of the circle derives from and is defined by its center point, precisely because of the center’s own arealessness.

## The Ratio

In the circle of time, the distance from center to surface is multiplied sixfold, resulting in a “circumference” that is six times the “radius”: six workdays result from the journey out of the tranquil center of the week to its moving surface. For life is a six-dimensional affair, reflecting the six divine attributes *(sefirot)* that G‑d invested in His creation. Thus, we have six days of creation, with Shabbat as its “timeless” core; we have the six directions of space, and the arealess center from which they extend; we have the six basic affections of the heart (attraction, rejection, synthesis, competitiveness, devotion and communicativity3), and the seventh attribute, *malchut* (“receptiveness”), which, while “possessing no qualities of its own”4 is the focal point and implementor of them all. The entirety of existence is comprised of these six basic elements, coloring every endeavor and experience with the six basic hues of reality.

Another law of circle geometry is that the greater the radius, the greater the circumference. The same is true of the circle of time. The further we depart from its timeless center, the more “body” time has: the more turbulent it is, the more it is at odds with the “Shabbat” at its core.

But no matter how great the surface flux of our life, it is inexorably bound to the tranquil axis, deriving from it and tending to it. Ultimately, the most tumultuous periods of our lives are generated by its quintessential purpose, and serve its harmonious end.

*Based on an entry in the Rebbe’s journal.5*

What then is the meaning we can attribute to the irrational "change" above 6 in the ratio of the circumference to the radius. I am in awe of this insight of the Rebbe, as usual, but I want to plumb it deeper and find an explanation for the remainder. This ratio is 6.28318530718... so the difference is .28318530718... Thoughts?