Contact Us

Matnot Aniyim - Chapter 7

Matnot Aniyim - Chapter 7

Show content in:

It is a positive commandment to give charity1 to the poor among the Jewish people,2 according to what is appropriate for the poor person3 if this is within the financial capacity of the donor,4 as [Deuteronomy 15:5] states: "You shall certainly open your hand to him." [Leviticus 25:35] states: "You shall support him, a stranger and a resident and they shall live with you," and [ibid.:36] states: "And your brother shall live with you."


מצות עשה ליתן צדקה לעניים כפי מה שראוי לעני אם היתה יד הנותן משגת שנאמר פתוח תפתח את ידך לו ונאמר והחזקת בו גר ותושב וחי עמך ונאמר וחי אחיך עמך:


Anyone who sees a poor person asking5 and turns his eyes away from him and does not give him charity transgresses a negative commandment,6 as [Deuteronomy 15:7] states: "Do not harden your heart or close your hand against your brother, the poor person."


וכל הרואה עני מבקש והעלים עיניו ממנו ולא נתן לו צדקה עבר בלא תעשה שנאמר לא תאמץ את לבבך ולא תקפוץ את ידך מאחיך האביון:


We are commanded to give a poor person according to what he lacks. If he lacks clothes, we should clothe him. If he lacks household utensils, we should purchase them for him. If he is unmarried, we should help him marry. And for an unmarried woman, we should find a husband for her.

Even if the personal habit of this poor person was to ride on a horse and to have a servant run before him7 and then he became impoverished and lost his wealth, we should buy a horse for him to ride and a servant to run before him.8 [This is implied by Deuteronomy 15:8 which] speaks [of providing him with] "enough to [fill the] lack that he feels."9 You are commanded to fill his lack, but you are not obligated to enrich him.10


לפי מה שחסר העני אתה מצווה ליתן לו אם אין לו כסות מכסים אותו אם אין לו כלי בית קונין לו אם אין לו אשה משיאין אותו ואם היתה אשה משיאין אותה לאיש אפילו היה דרכו של זה העני לרכוב על הסוס ועבד רץ לפניו והעני וירד מנכסיו קונין לו סוס לרכוב עליו ועבד לרוץ לפניו שנאמר די מחסורו אשר יחסר לו ומצווה אתה להשלים חסרונו ואין אתה מצווה לעשרו:


With regard to an orphan for whom people are seeking to find a wife for him to marry: First, we rent for him a house, provide for him a bed and all his household necessities and then we seek to find a wife for him to marry.11


יתום שבא להשיאו אשה שוכרין לו בית ומציעים לו מטה וכל כלי תשמישו ואחר כך משיאין לו אשה:


When a poor person comes and asks for his needs to be met and the giver does not have the financial capacity, he should give him according to his financial capacity.

How much? The most desirable way of performing the mitzvah is to give one fifth of one's financial resources.12 Giving one tenth is an ordinary measure.13 Giving less [than that] reflects parsimony. A person should never refrain from giving less than a third of a shekel a year.14 A person who gives less than this has not fulfilled the mitzvah. Even a poor person who derives his livelihood from charity is obligated to give charity to another person.


בא העני ושאל די מחסורו ואין יד הנותן משגת נותן לו כפי השגת ידו וכמה עד חמישית נכסיו מצוה מן המובחר ואחד מעשרה בנכסיו בינוני פחות מכאן עין רעה ולעולם לא ימנע עצמו משלישית השקל בשנה וכל הנותן פחות מזה לא קיים מצוה ואפילו עני המתפרנס מן הצדקה חייב ליתן צדקה לאחר:


When a poor person whose identity is unknown says: "I am hungry, provide me with food," we do not investigate whether he is a deceiver. Instead, we provide him with sustenance immediately.15 If he was unclothed and he said: "Cloth me," we investigate whether he is a deceiver. If we are familiar with him, we clothe him according to his honor16 immediately and we do not investigate the matter.17


עני שאין מכירין אותו ואמר רעב אני האכילוני אין בודקין אחריו שמא רמאי הוא אלא מפרנסין אותו מיד היה ערום ואמר כסוני בודקין אחריו שמא רמאי הוא ואם היו מכירין אותו מכסין אותו לפי כבודו מיד ואין בודקין אחריו:


We provide sustenance and clothing for the poor of the gentiles together with the poor of the Jewish people18 as an expression of the ways of peace.

When a poor person19 begs from door to door, we do not give him a large gift.20 Instead, we give him a small gift. It is forbidden to turn away a poor person who asks [for charity] empty-handed. Even giving him one fig [is sufficient], as [Psalms 74:21]: "Let not the dejected turn away in shame."


מפרנסין ומכסין עניי עכו"ם עם עניי ישראל מפני דרכי שלום ועני המחזר על הפתחים אין נזקקין לו למתנה מרובה אבל נותנין לו מתנה מועטת ואסור להחזיר את העני ששאל ריקם ואפילו אתה נותן לו גרוגרת אחת שנאמר אל ישוב דך נכלם:


When a poor person travels from place to place, we do not give him less than a loaf of bread that is sold for a punidyon21 when wheat is being sold for four se'ah a sela.22 We have already explained all the measures.23

If he stays overnight, we give him a mattress to sleep on, a pillow to place under his head, oil and beans. If he stays for the Sabbath, we give him food for three meals,24 oil, beans, fish, and vegetables.25 If we are familiar with him, we give him according to his honor.


אין פוחתין לעני העובר ממקום למקום מככר אחד הנמכר בפונדיון כשהיו החטים ארבע סאין בסלע וכבר בארנו כל המדות ואם לן נותנין לו מצע לישן עליו וכסת ליתן תחת מראשותיו ושמן וקטנית ואם שבת נותנין לו מזון שלש סעודות ושמן וקטנית ודג וירק ואם היו מכירין אותו נותנין לו לפי כבודו:


When a poor person does not desire to take charity, we trick him and give it to him as a present or as a loan.26 When a rich man starves himself, because he is miserly with his money, using it for neither food nor drink, we do not pay any attention to him.27


עני שאינו רוצה ליקח צדקה מערימין עליו ונותנין לו לשם מתנה או לשם הלואה ועשיר המרעיב את עצמו ועינו צרה בממונו שלא יאכל ממנו ולא ישתה אין משגיחין בו:


When a person does not want to give charity or desires to give less than what is appropriate for him, the court should compel him and give him stripes for rebellious conduct28 until he gives the amount it was estimated that he should give. We take possession of his property when he is present29 and expropriate the amount that is appropriate for him to give. We expropriate property for the sake of charity even on Fridays.30


מי שאינו רוצה ליתן צדקה או שיתן מעט ממה שראוי לו בית דין כופין אותו ומכין אותן מכת מרדות עד שיתן מה שאמדוהו ליתן ויורדין לנכסיו בפניו ולוקחין ממנו מה שראוי לו ליתן וממשכנין על הצדקה ואפילו בערבי שבתות:


It is forbidden to demand and to collect charity from a soft-hearted person who gives more than is appropriate to charity31 or from a person who causes himself difficulty and gives to charity collectors so that he will not be embarrassed. When a charity collector embarrasses such a person and asks him [for charity], [the charity collector] will be subjected to retribution in the future, as [implied by Jeremiah 30:20:] "I will visit My providence on those who pressure him."


אדם שוע שהוא נותן צדקה יותר מן הראוי לו או שמיצר לעצמו ונותן לגבאים כדי שלא יתבייש אסור לתובעו ולגבות ממנו צדקה וגבאי שמכלימו ושואל ממנו עתיד להפרע ממנו שנאמר ופקדתי על כל לוחציו:


We do not impose a levy for charity on orphans,32 even for the redemption of captives,33 and even if they possess many financial resources.34 If a judge imposed a levy upon them to heighten their reputation,35 it is permitted.

A charity collector may accept small [donations] from women,36 servants, and children, but not large donations. For we operate under the assumption that a large amount was stolen or robbed from others. What is meant by a small [donation]? Everything is calculated according to the wealth or poverty of the owners.37


אין פוסקין צדקה על יתומים ואפילו לפדיון שבויים ואף על פי שיש להם ממון הרבה ואם פסק הדיין עליהם כדי לשום להן שם מותר גבאי צדקה לוקחין מן הנשים ומן העבדים ומן התינוקות דבר מועט אבל לא דבר מרובה שחזקת המרובה גנבה או גזל משל אחרים וכמה הוא מועט שלהן הכל לפי עושר הבעלים ועניותן:


A poor person who is one's relative receives priority over all others. The poor of one's household receive priority over the poor of one's city. And the poor of one's city receive priority over the poor of another city, as [implied by Deuteronomy 15:11]: "[You shall surely open your hand to] your brother,38 the poor, and the destitute in your land."39


עני שהוא קרובו קודם לכל אדם עניי ביתו קודמין לעניי עירו עניי עירו קודמין לעניי עיר אחרת שנאמר לאחיך לענייך ולאביונך בארצך:


When a person went on a business trip and the people of the city to which he traveled levy an assessment for charity upon him,40 he should give it to the poor of that city.41 If there are many [such individuals]42 and an assessment for charity was made upon them, they must make the allocation43 and when they go [to return home], they take [the money] with them and use it to support the poor of their city. If there is a communal sage,44 they give it to him and he divides it as he sees fit.


מי שהלך בסחורה ופסקו עליו אנשי העיר שהלך שם צדקה הרי זה נותן לעניי אותה העיר ואם היו רבים ופסקו עליהן צדקה נותנין וכשבאין מביאין אותה עמהן ומפרנסין בה עניי עירם ואם יש שם חבר עיר יתנוה לחבר עיר והוא מחלקה כמו שיראה לו:


When a person says:45 "Give 200 zuz to a synagogue" or "Give a Torah scroll to a synagogue," we give it to the synagogue which he customarily [attends].46 If he would frequent two, [the sum] should be divided among both of them.47 If he says: "Give 200 dinarim to the poor," we give them to the poor of his city.48


האומר תנו מאתים דינר לבית הכנסת או תנו ספר תורה לבית הכנסת יתנו לבית הכנסת שהוא רגיל בו ואם היה רגיל בשנים יתנו לשניהן האומר תנו מאתים דינרין לעניים יתנו לעניי אותה העיר:


Sefer HaMitzvot (positive commandment 195) and Sefer HaChinuch (mitzvah 479) include this commandment as one of the 613 mitzvot of the Torah.


Note, however, Halachah 7.


I.e., his needs as defined by his social standing.


I.e., he is not obligated to borrow to give charity to a colleague. Alternatively, he is not obligated to give more than one fifth of his own resources, as stated in Halachah 5 (Rav Yosef Corcus).


The Tzaphnat Paneach states that the negative commandment is violated only when the poor person asks. If he does not, there is no prohibition.


Sefer HaMitzvot (negative commandment 232) and Sefer HaChinuch (mitzvah 478) includes this commandment as one of the 613 mitzvot of the Torah.


To announce his coming.


Ketubot 67b relates that a person from a dignified family became impoverished and the great Sage Hillel would hire a servant to run before him and announce his coming. Once Hillel could not find such a servant and performed this service himself.


Because of his previous lifestyle, this person feels a severe lack if he does not have these conveniences.


Thus there are times when providing a certain person with what he feels are his needs will require a greater expense than providing another with what he views as luxuries.

The Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De'ah 250:1) quotes the Rambam's ruling. The Rama states that this ruling applies to a collector of charity or to the community at large, but not to an individual person. An individual is not required to personally attempt to meet all of a colleague's needs. Instead, it is sufficient for him to inform the community of the problem. If, however, there are no communal resources, he is individually obligated to help the person if he has the capacity. See also Halachot 5 and 7 and notes.


I.e., first we provide him with those matters that are essential for him to maintain a household. Only afterwards do we assist him in marrying. See also Hilchot De'ot 5:11 which states that a person should build a home and find a profession before marrying.


This also reflects an upper limit. As Ketubot 50a states: "Even a person who distributes money to charity with largess should not distribute more than a fifth." This concept is derived from Jacob's vow to tithe (Genesis 28:22). There the verb which conveys the promise to tithe is repeated, allowing for the concept of giving two tithes. See also Hilchot Arachin 8:13 which cites Leviticus 27:28 which speaks of a person designating a dedication offering "from all that is his." The Rambam continues:

[Implied is that he should not give] "all that is his," as our Sages explained. This is not piety, but foolishness, for he will lose all his money and become dependent on others. We should not show mercy to such a person. In a similar vein, our Sages said: "A man of foolish piety is among those who destroy the world." Instead, a person who distributes his money for mitzvot should not distribute more than a fifth, and he should conduct himself as our Prophets advised [cf. Psalms 112:5]: "He arranges his affairs with judgment," both with regard to matters involving Torah and worldly concerns.

Yayin Malchut notes that in his Commentary to the Mishnah (Pe'ah 1:1), the Rambam writes that as an act of piety, a person may give more than a fifth. Nevertheless, there is not necessarily a contradiction between the two. In his Commentary to the Mishnah, the Rambam is speaking about giving to a needy person who asks for alms. In response to that acute need, one may give more that a fifth. Here the Rambam is speaking about giving to charity when there is no acute need. Hence a limit can be established. See also Ketubot 67b which states that these restrictions apply during a person's lifetime. He may leave a greater percentage of his resources to charity in his will.

In Iggeret HaTeshuvah, Rav Shneur Zalman of Liadi states that one may give more than a fifth of his resources to charity to atone for his sins, for just as one is not concerned with the amount one gives when it comes to healing a physical wound or blemish, so too, one should not be worried about cost when healing a spiritual blemish.


The Sifri derives this from the fact that Deuteronomy 14:22, the verse that conveys the Biblical command to tithe repeats the verb, implying an obligation to tithe - not only one's produce - but all income.


This is slightly less than seven grams of silver.


For hunger involves a risk to life. Clothing, by contrast, does not (Bava Batra 9a).


According to his social standing.


For we are familiar with his character and do not think that he will prove to be a deceiver.


One might interpret the Rambam's words as implying that only when a gentile comes together with a Jew should he be given charity, lest he feel that he is being subjected to discrimination. The Siftei Cohen 251:2, however, does not accept this interpretation and maintains that even if a gentile comes alone, he may be given charity.


This clause refers to a Jew.


For he is appealing to people at large for help. Hence, no one individual feels the onus to deal with his problem entirely.


Half a me'ah. A pundiyon is equivalent to eight barleycorns of pure silver, approximately .4 grams in contemporary measure


In his Commentary to the Mishnah (Pe'ah 8:7), the Rambam explains that this is a loaf of bread made from a quarter of a kab of flour. The commentaries explain that a loaf this size provides food for two meals. Thus the intent is that we provide him with the minimum necessary for his immediate needs.


In Hilchot Eruvin 1:12-13, Hilchot Shekalim 1:23, Hilchot Arachin 4:3-4.


Which must be eaten in honor of the Sabbath (Hilchot Shabbat 30:19).


The Radbaz adds that we should also provide him with a meal for Saturday night. We assume that he will have with him provisions for at least one meal which he will use Sunday morning.


For in this way, he will not be embarrassed to take.


I.e., we do not support him with charity.


A punishment instituted by the Sages in many instances including the failure to observe a positive Scriptural commandment.

Tosafot, Bava Batra 8b, questions this ruling, noting that Chulin 110b states that a court is not obligated to administer punishment for any positive commandment for which a reward is given for its observance. And charity is one of the mitzvot for which we are promised a reward in this material world. The Radbaz explains that according to the Rambam, there is no difficulty, because according to the Rambam, the commandment to give charity is reinforced by a negative commandment, not to refrain from doing so. In such a situation, the principle cited from Chulin does not apply. The Radbaz also explains that we are more stringent in this instance, because the welfare of the poor is involved.


But not in his absence (Ketubot 48a; Siftei Cohen 248:4). See also Hilchot Ishut 12:15.


I.e., we do not excuse a person from giving based on the rationale that he is preoccupied with his Sabbath preparations.


Taanit 24a relates that Rabbi Elazar of Birta would give all of his money to charity. The charity collectors would flee from him so that he would not see them.


I.e., orphans who are under majority.


Which is of the highest level of charity, as indicated by Chapter 8, Halachah 10.


The Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De'ah 248:3) quotes the Rambam's ruling. The Rama states that if the donation to charity is for a specific and limited purpose or that withholding the donation will bring shame upon the orphan's family, donations may be taken from them.


I.e., that they receive renown as persons of wealth. This is permitted if the court thinks that acquiring such a reputation will be to their benefit.

The Bayit Chadash (Yoreh De'ah 248) states that if the orphans already have a reputation as wealthy individuals, it is forbidden to assess such a levy upon their estate.


When quoting this law, the Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De'ah 248:4) emphasizes that if a woman's husband objects, it is forbidden to accept any donations from her.


Thus what would be considered a small donation for some would be considered as a large donation for others.


"Your brother" is mentioned first implying that a person's first responsibility is to his family.


I.e., the prooftext mentions "your land" to imply that one's first obligations is to give the poor that are in one's immediate proximity.

Although the poor of Eretz Yisrael are given priority over the poor of other cities, they are not given priority of the poor of one's own city (Siftei Cohen 251:6).


It was customary in Talmudic times, for a community to request that a percentage of the profits from business dealings be given to charity.


Since he is only one person, he cannot argue that his failure to give charity will have a significant effect on the fortunes of the poor of his own city.


The Radbaz states that we are speaking about an instance where the majority of the people in a city journey to do business in another city. Hence when they return home, it is proper that they take the money that they gave to charity with them so that they will be able to support the poor in their own city. For, otherwise, there will be no one to support them. Alternatively, he states that it applies even if only three people from one city go to another city. Since they are a significant group, they are considered as an independent entity.


And give it to the charity collector in that city to show that they respect the ordinances of that city (Rashi, Megilah 27a).


I.e., a Torah scholar charged with the administration of the needs of the city (ibid.:b).


The Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 253:23) quotes this law with regard to a person's division of his estate on his deathbed. This interpretation explains why we do not simply ask him to clarify his intent.


For it is most likely that this was his intent.


Our translation follows the gloss of the Radbaz. With regard to a Torah scroll that cannot be divided, it should be read in one synagogue half of the time and in the other, half of the time.


For we assume that he desired to give the gift to those who he is obligated to support.

Published and copyright by Moznaim Publications, all rights reserved.
To purchase this book or the entire series, please click here.
The text on this page contains sacred literature. Please do not deface or discard.
© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with's copyright policy.