Mishneh Torah (Moznaim)
Featuring a modern English translation and a commentary that presents a digest of the centuries of Torah scholarship which have been devoted to the study of the Mishneh Torah by Maimonides.
Mishneh Torah (Moznaim)
Featuring a modern English translation and a commentary that presents a digest of the centuries of Torah scholarship which have been devoted to the study of the Mishneh Torah by Maimonides.
The correct term would be the head (and similarly, the arm) tefillah, because tefillin is a plural term. Nevertheless, we have use the term tefillin even when only one tefillah is intended, because that is the popular usage.
Though all four Biblical passages state that the tefillin should be worn “between your eyes,” Menachot 37b establishes a correlation between these verses and Deuteronomy 14:1, “Do not place a bald spot between your eyes,” and explains that, just as in the latter verse, “between your eyes” refers to the skull, so, too, the verses which concern tefillin imply a place on the skull.
The Tur (Orach Chayim 27) states that the place for the head tefillin is the point of the skull, “the end of the hairline towards the face until the place where a child’s brain [can be felt] to pulsate.” In his commentary on the Tur, Rav Yosef Caro notes the difference in phraseology between the Tur and the Rambam, and in his Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 27:9), he quotes the Tur’s text.
Our translation is based on the Kessef Mishneh. Instead of “pulsate,” Rashi (Menachot 37a) interprets רופס as “is soft.”
However, to place the tefillin actually between one’s eyes is forbidden and is considered as heresy (Halachah 3; Megillah 4:7).
Mentioned in Chapter 3, Halachah 13.
The portion opposite the face. Care should be taken that the knot be positioned in the center of the nape of the neck; it should not move from side to side (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 27:10).
Menachot 37a brings a number of exegetical references which indicate that tefillin should be placed on the left arm. Among them, “It is written, ‘And you shall tie’ and ‘And you should write.’ Just as writing is done with the right hand, so, too, tying should be done with the right hand.” Tying tefillin with one’s right hand implies that they are placed on the left.
But not above the muscle (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 27:2; Mishnah Berurah 27:4).
Menachot 37b explains that though the verse literally states that tefillin should be placed on the hand, the exegesis of several verses indicates that they are placed on the muscle. The interpretation of the verse, “And these words...” quoted by the Rambam is one of the proofs cited there.
The tefillin, and, in particular, the yud of the knot, should be tilted to face the heart (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 27:1, 2).
This position implies that one should subjugate the desires and feelings of his heart to God (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 25:5).
In contrast to our Sages’ definition of the phrase, “on your hand.”
In contrast to our Sages’ definition of the phrase, “between your eyes.”
In his commentary on Avot 1:3, the Rambam writes that Tzadok and Baithos were students of Antigonus of Socho. When they heard their teacher declare, “Do not serve the master for the sake of receiving a reward,” they were upset, since they thought that he was implying that no reward would be given for the performance of mitzvot. They spoke about the matter between themselves and decided to reject the Torah.
They began splinter groups which rejected the core of Jewish practice, and coveted material wealth. They found that they could not convince the majority of the people to reject the Torah entirely, so they adopted a different tactic. They claimed that they were true to Torah, but the only Torah that was Divine was the Written Law. The Oral Law was merely a human invention.
This thesis was only a ruse to sway the people from the performance of the mitzvot. Accordingly, the Sages would frequently refer to all those who deny the Torah and its tradition to be Sadducees (“followers of Tzadok”) or Baithosees (“followers of Baithos”).
Megillah 24b, the source for this law, adds, “they are dangerous,” for they can fracture the person’s skull. Though absent in the standard published edition, this line is included in many texts of the Mishneh Torah. The Kessef Mishneh, however, explains the line’s omission since it does not teach us any halachic concepts.
Because, as stated in Chapter 3, Halachah 1, tefillin must be square.
Menachot 37a states that tefillin must be placed on the weaker hand. For a left-handed person, this is the right hand.
Note the Rama (Orach Chayim 27:6), who explains that everything depends on the hand with which the person writes. If he writes with his left hand, the tefillin should be placed on the right.
Rav Shlomo Kluger, the Tzemach Tzedek, and other later authorities have dealt with questions concerning people who are ambidextrous to varying degrees. Frequently, they have advised that such a person wear tefillin on one of his arms during the prayer service, and afterwards place them on the other arm, to make sure that he fulfills the mitzvah.
The arm tefillin is “tied,” while the head tefillin is “placed.” This reflects the commandment in Deuteronomy 6:8, “And you shall tie them... on your hand and they shall be... between your eyes.” We must actually tie the arm tefillin upon our bodies. In contrast, the mitzvah of the head tefillin is that “it be”—i.e., be positioned in its appropriate place.
In his Introduction to the Commentary on the Mishnah, the Rambam explains that, on Mount Sinai, Moses was given instructions how to observe all the mitzvot. This constituted the “oral tradition.” Though the Sages of the Talmud may have used certain verses from the Torah as allusions to these instructions, the fulfillment of the mitzvot began at Sinai (or shortly afterwards, depending on the mitzvah). The people did not need the allusions from the Torah to tell them how to fulfill the mitzvot, since they had already received this information orally from Moses.
To relate these concepts to the present context: Although the Sages mentioned several exegetical references to the places where tefillin are worn, it is not that the Sages discovered the proper position for tefillin. Rather, directly after they were given the commandment to put on tefillin, the Jews placed them on their arms and heads. Years later, the Sages sought allusions for these practices in the Written Law.
I.e., if a person does not have a head tefillin or is in a situation where it is inappropriate to wear the head tefillin (see Halachah 23), he should still wear the arm tefillin.
Or if a person lost the arm on which he should place tefillin.
The Kessef Mishneh mentions a version of the Rambam’s Commentary on the Mishnah (Menachot 4:1) which differs with this ruling. Rav Kapach explains that he is referring to the initial version of the Commentary on the Mishnah, which the Rambam later revised.
In that initial version, the Rambam explains (based on Menachot 44a) that the Sages feared that if a person were given license to wear only one tefillin, he might hesitate from purchasing the other one. Therefore, they allowed one to wear a single tefillin only when he already possessed the second one. When the Rambam reviewed that commentary, he emended the text to concur with the decision here.
Since there are two different commandments in the Torah, “And you shall tie... and they shall be...,” they are regarded as two separate mitzvot.
See the following halachah, where the Rambam explains that, generally, it is proper to recite only a single blessing.
It is possible to explain the difference in the two blessings as follows: With regard to the arm tefillin, the Torah states, “And you shall tie them,” requiring a deed, and hence the expression “put on.” In contrast, the head tefillin are required “to be... between your eyes.” Since less emphasis is placed on our actions, it is appropriate to praise God “concerning the mitzvah of...” (Rav Yehudah ben Yakar).
As mentioned in the previous halachah, at times one can put one on without the other. On such occasions, the appropriate blessing should be recited for each tefillin.
One after the other without interruption. (The rulings governing an interruption are discussed in the following halachah.)
This phrase can also refer to putting on the head tefillin, since both mitzvot share the same intent. Hence, if no interruption is made between the two, it is unnecessary—and therefore, we are forbidden—to recite a second blessing.
This ruling is quoted by the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 25:5) and is followed by all Sephardic authorities and some Ashkenazic authorities. The majority of the Ashkenazic community follows the opinion of Rabbenu Asher (quoted by the Rama, Orach Chayim, loc. cit.) which maintains that the two blessings should be recited even when no interruption is made between putting on the two tefillin.
This opinion agrees that the blessing “...to put on tefillin” also applies to the head tefillin. Therefore, even according to this opinion, it is forbidden to make an interruption between putting on the two tefillin; nevertheless, the Sages instituted a second blessing in recognition of the unique importance and holiness of the head tefillin.
The later authorities have added that because of the possibility that the second blessing is being recited in vain, one should recite the phrase “Baruch shem kavod malchuto le’olam va’ed” after putting on the head tefillin.
Rabbenu Asher and the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 25:11) write that one should put on the head tefillin directly after tying the tefillin to the arm, before continuing to wind the straps around the hand. Thus, no interruption at all will be made between the fulfillment of the two mitzvot.
There are, however, certain opinions (see the commentary of Rav David Arameah) that maintain that since tying the arm tefillin around the middle finger is an essential element of the mitzvah, this should be done before putting on the head tefillin.
Our present practice follows the Ari zal who would wind the tefillin straps around his forearm, put on the head tefillin, and then, tie the straps around his hand (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 25:24, Mishnah Berurah 25:38).
Following the order stated in the Biblical commandment (Menachot 36a).
For concerning the head tefillin, it is written “And they shall be as ornaments between your eyes.” Menachot 36b interprets this charge as implying that whenever tefillin are “between your eyes,” “they shall be.” The use of a plural term indicates that, at such a time, one should be wearing both tefillin.
For doing so would constitute an interruption between putting on the two tefillin. Other interruptions—e.g., to signal to a colleague or to wink at him—are also forbidden. They do not, however, require a second blessing.
The Rambam chooses this example because a person is required to show deference to his teacher. Accordingly, although normally one is forbidden to interrupt the recitation of the Shema, one may do so to greet his teacher or return his greetings, according to the rules outlined in Hilchot Kri’at Shema 2:15-16.
The comparison to a teacher is also significant from a different perspective. Hilchot Kri’at Shema (ibid.) discusses when one may interrupt one’s prayers “because of fear”—e.g., when one encounters a gentile king. Whenever an interruption is allowed in deference to such a king, one may also respond to Barchu, Kedushah, or Kaddish, for they are expressions of deference to the King of kings (Tur, Orach Chayim 66).
From the fact that the Rambam mentions the prohibition against talking between putting on the two tefillin in the context of deference to one’s teacher, one might assume that he would allow an interruption in the above situations when deference to God is involved. Though this opinion is accepted by many early and later authorities (Rabbenu Tam, Rav Shneur Zalman of Liadi), the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 25:10) forbids making such an interruption.
Since, by doing so, he obligates himself to recite a second blessing that would otherwise not be required. Reciting an unnecessary blessing violates the prohibition, “Do not take the name of God, your Lord, in vain” (Exodus 20:7).
Based on Deuteronomy 20:8, the Sages explained that the Jewish army should be composed only of righteous men. Any sinners were excused from military service. Significantly, there are opinions which consider this transgression significant enough for a person to be included in this category (Sotah 44b).
The Rama (Orach Chayim 25:9) requires that the person also repeat the blessing “...to put on tefillin” in this instance. According to his opinion, the blessing “...concerning the mitzvah of tefillin” was instituted as praise for the special holiness of the head tefillin, and is not recited for the performance of the mitzvah itself.
This halachah may be difficult for many people to comprehend, because they associate wearing tefillin with the prayer service alone. In truth, as explained in Halachot 10, 25, and 26, the mitzvah of tefillin applies throughout the entire day, and the restriction of wearing them only during the prayer service is a relatively recent development.
Every moment one wears tefillin, one fulfills a mitzvah. Therefore, it is proper to recite a blessing each time one puts them on.
The Rama (Orach Chayim 25:12) states that if a person removes his tefillin with the intent of putting them on again in the near future, it is not necessary for him to recite a blessing.
See Hilchot Berachot 11:2-8 for a discussion of this principle.
And not beforehand, so that the blessing is recited directly before the mitzvah is fulfilled (Kessef Mishneh). If, however, one did not recite a blessing at that time, he may recite one as long as he is wearing them (Hilchot Berachot 11:5).
I.e., tightening the knot around the muscle.
See the commentary on Halachah 3. One should recite the blessing for the head tefillin after placing it on one’s head, before adjusting the straps around the head (Rama, Orach Chayim 25:8).
This refers to the bag in which the tefillin are held, and not the cases in which they are usually placed. Based on Shulchan Aruch HaRav 25:3, it appears that as long as the tefillin are enclosed in these cases, the laws mentioned below would be modified slightly.
From Shulchan Aruch HaRav 25:3 and the Mishnah Berurah 25:3, it appears that “encounter” must be taken literally. One need not actually hold the tefillin for these laws to apply.
As explained in Halachah 5.
From the Rambam’s statements, it appears that even when one encounters the head tefillin first, it is proper to put on the arm tefillin first. Although there are authorities (e.g., Rabbenu Yerucham) who do not accept this decision, the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 25:6) rules in this manner.
This decision can be explained as follows: The concept not to bypass the performance of a mitzvah is a Rabbinic law. (Although below, a verse from the Torah is cited as the source for this concept, that verse is merely an allusion.) In contrast, the obligation to put the arm tefillin on first is derived from the Torah itself. Hence, it is given priority (Mishneh Berurah 25:23).
On Exodus 12:17, “And you shall watch the matzot,” the Mechilta comments, “Do not read ‘matzot’; read ‘mitzvot,’ and explains that just as matzot must be baked hurriedly so they do not leaven, mitzvot should be performed with eagerness, without delay.
The Rambam’s statements are quoted by the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 28:2). Shulchan Aruch HaRav 28:8 and the Mishnah Berurah 28:7, however, suggest that it is preferable not to place the arm tefillin directly above the head tefillin, because the head tefillin possess a higher level of holiness (Chapter 3, Halachah 17). Rather, a wide bag should be made, where they can be placed side by side, with the arm tefillin slightly above or towards the front.
Even once (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 42:3).
As will be explained, both these particulars are necessary.
E.g., to serve as a container for ordinary articles. If, however, when the container was made, the person had the intent to use it for tefillin only temporarily, and then to use it for another purpose, the Rama (Orach Chayim, loc. cit.) allows it to be used for mundane purposes.
This ruling depends on the principle mentioned in the commentary on Chapter 3, Halachah 17, that הזמנה, designating an article to be used for a sacred purpose, is not sufficient for holiness to be imparted to the article. It must first be used for the purpose for which it was intended.
Shulchan Aruch HaRav 42:4 and the Mishnah Berurah 42:24 explain that even if a person used a container for tefillin many times, as long as he never intended the container to be used for this purpose continually, it is not considered as holy. Should, however, a person even once consider the container as intended for tefillin, it may never be used for another purpose.
Shulchan Aruch HaRav, loc. cit., allows one to use the container for mundane purposes at the same time it is used for tefillin. The Mishnah Berurah 42:26, however, suggests that this does not show respect for the tefillin.
From a hook. Doing so is considered as disgracing the mitzvah.
Holding the head tefillin by the straps and letting the tefillin hang while putting it on is not included in this prohibition (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 40:1; Mishnah Berurah 40:2). It is, nevertheless, proper to put them on without letting the tefillin hang.
The laws concerning continuing to wear tefillin at night are discussed in the following halachah.
Significantly, the Tur (Orach Chayim 29, 30) and subsequent Ashkenazic authorities maintain that, according to Torah law, tefillin should be worn at night. We nevertheless do not wear them during those hours, because of a Rabbinic decree lest we fall asleep while wearing them.
Most commentaries on the Torah interpret “this statute” as referring to the Paschal sacrifice, and render the Hebrew מימים ימימה as “from year to year.” Though this is the accepted meaning with regard to the Torah’s simple interpretation, from a Halachic perspective the matter is the subject of a debate between the Sages (Menachot 36b), and the interpretation quoted by the Rambam is advanced by Rabbi Yosse HaG’lili.
The expression יום טוב generally refers to the days of the festival on which it is forbidden to do work—and not to chol hamo’ed, the intermediate days. Thus, it would appear that the Rambam requires wearing tefillin on chol hamo’ed. Similarly, the Kessef Mishneh cites Hilchot Sh’vitat Yom Tov 7:13 which also appears to indicate that one should put on tefillin on chol hamo’ed.
The Kessef Mishneh concludes by stating that, originally, it was customary to wear tefillin on chol hamo’ed. Afterwards, the later Rabbis discovered a statement of the Zohar Chadash (Shir HaShirim 1:3), which severely criticizes those who wear tefillin on these days, and the custom of not wearing tefillin spread.
The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 31:2) forbids wearing tefillin on chol hamo’ed. The Rama (loc. cit.) maintains that they should be worn and a blessing recited. At present, even those who wear tefillin on chol hamo’ed generally do not recite a blessing (Mishnah Berurah 31:8). In the Sephardic and Chassidic communities and, similarly, in all communities in Eretz Yisrael, it is customary not to wear tefillin on these days.
Not only are we not obligated to wear tefillin on these days, doing so is considered to be a disgrace to the Sabbath and a transgression of the prohibition forbidding us to add to the Torah’s commandments (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 31:1; Mishnah Berurah 31:5). (See also the Rambam’s Commentary on the Mishnah: Eruvin 10:1; Beitzah 1:10.)
The citation of this proof-text reflects a general pattern within the Mishneh Torah. As mentioned in Menachot (loc. cit.), there is a debate whether the verse, “And you shall observe this statute...” applies to tefillin or the Pesach.
Rabbi Yosse HaG’lili interprets the verse as referring to tefillin, and explains that it teaches that tefillin should not be worn at night, nor on Sabbaths and holidays. Rabbi Akiva differs and interprets the verse as referring to the Paschal sacrifice. Though he maintains that tefillin should be worn at night, he agrees that they should not be worn on Sabbaths and holidays, and derives that concept from the verse, “And they shall be a sign....”
The Rambam quotes the proof-texts cited by both the differing opinions because each one clearly alludes to the halachic principles he seeks to express (Radbaz, Vol. V, Responsum 1693). For this same reason, he sees no difficulty in quoting the verse, “And you shall observe these statutes...” in Hilchot Kiddush HaChodesh 1:7 according to the interpretation of Rabbi Akiva.
See Exodus 31:13: “It (the Sabbath) is a sign between Me and you.” This sign refers to the mitzvot associated with the Sabbath and holidays (Tosafot) or to the prohibition against performing work on these days (Rabbenu Asher).
Two witnesses are required by Torah law. Thus, at all times we must have two signs of our commitment to Torah. One is circumcision; the other, either tefillin, or the Sabbath or the festivals.
Rabbenu Yonah explains that tefillin are associated with sight because the Torah also mentions them in connection with that sense. Menachot 35b interprets the verse, “And all the nations of the earth shall see that the name of God is called upon you” (Deuteronomy 28:10), as a reference to tefillin.
The Jerusalem Talmud (Berachot 1:2) explains that this refers to a colleague with whom one shares occasional contact. One would recognize a close friend easily, and a person with whom one is not acquainted at all would never be recognized.
This time is between “dawn,” the first shinings of the sun’s rays, and “sunrise,” the appearance of the sun on the horizon.
More particularly, most authorities interpret the Rambam to be referring to the appearance of the stars. The Arizal, however, states that the tefillin should be removed at sunset (Mishnah Berurah 30:15).
Menachot 36a relates that Rav Ashi wore his tefillin at night.
One must, however, remove them before going to sleep. Sleeping in tefillin is forbidden, as stated in Halachah 15.
Lest the common people fail to treat the matter with the proper concern.
Lest one fall asleep while wearing them.
This prohibition is not, however, included as one of the 613 mitzvot, nor is it punished by lashes. The Radbaz (Vol. V, Responsum 1468) explains that since a person may continue wearing tefillin at night, we see that this prohibition does not have the same force as others. Therefore, its violation is not punished by lashes.
The word השמר and its derivatives connote a Torah prohibition (Menachot 36b).
The Rambam’s statements represent an intermediate position between the opinions of the Ashkenazic authorities, who maintain that the prohibition against wearing tefillin at night is merely a Rabbinic decree, and the practice of “the inhabitants of Eretz Yisrael who would recite the blessing, ‘Who sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us to observe His statutes’ before removing their tefillin at night.”
According to the Rambam, the prohibition against wearing tefillin at night stems from the Torah. A blessing, nevertheless, is not required when removing them.
Our translation follows the standard published text of the Mishneh Torah, which reflects Rashi’s commentary in Beitzah 15a.
Other versions of the text divide the halachah in two: with the first clause speaking about nightfall during the week, and the second clause speaking about the commencement of the Sabbath. The manner in which these laws are stated in the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 30:4) follows the latter version.
So that others will not see him and think that it is proper to wear tefillin at this time.
Since one wears tefillin like a garment, taking them home in this manner does not constitute a violation of the prohibition against carrying on the Sabbath.
According to the versions which state that this clause applies during the week, the person does not remove the tefillin and carry them during his journey, lest they fall from his hand.
In Talmudic times, the houses of study were located in the fields, and it was not safe to leave articles there.
The authorities agree that this refers to sunset and not the appearance of the stars, since it is forbidden to carry from sunset onwards.
This applies both on the Sabbath and during the week. Since the person has a safe place where the tefillin could be kept, he is not allowed to continue wearing them.
The Kessef Mishneh explains that, although in the previous halachah, the Rambam had also stated that it is permissible to continue wearing tefillin at night, people should not be informed about this leniency. In contrast, when one’s intent is to protect the tefillin, one may wear them without compunction (Kessef Mishneh). One may not, however, put on tefillin at night even for the purpose of protecting them (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 30:2; Mishnah Berurah 30:9).
This includes: a) women and Canaanite slaves (Hilchot Kri’at Shema 4:1), who are not obligated by either of these mitzvot, since these mitzvot are associated with certain time limits (מצות עשה שהזמן גרמא).
b) minors, who, according to Scriptural Law, are not obligated to perform any mitzvot. (There is, however, a Rabbinic obligation to educate them in the performance of mitzvot.)
c) individuals whose thoughts are unsettled or who are occupied with the performance of other mitzvot. (See the subsequent halachot of Hilchot Kri’at Shema, Chapter 4.)
Significantly, in Hilchot Tzitzit 3:9, the Rambam mentions that women and slaves may wear tzitzit or perform any other mitzvah which they are not obligated to fulfill. Perhaps he does not make that statement with regard to tefillin, because as the Rama (Orach Chayim 38:3) states, the obligation to concentrate one’s thoughts on the tefillin and to control one’s bodily functions is the reason that women should not take on the practice of wearing tefillin. Our Sages, nevertheless, cite the example of Michal, King Saul’s daughter, who would wear tefillin.
Who knows not to sleep, not to enter a lavatory, and not to release gas while wearing them (Shulchan Aruch, Rama, Orach Chayim 37:3).
In some Sephardic communities, it is customary for children to wear tefillin from the age of nine. In Ashkenazic communities, however, a minor begins putting on tefillin two to three months before becoming Bar-Mitzvah (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 37:3; Mishnah Berurah 37:12).
Many times throughout the Mishneh Torah—e.g., Hilchot Tzitzit 3:9, Hilchot Berachot 5:1, Hilchot Sukkah 6:1—the Rambam mentions a father’s obligation to educate his children regarding the performance of mitzvot.
Because he may release gas (see Halachah 15) and because he may not be able to concentrate on the tefillin.
If, however, one feels that he can control his bodily functions and thoughts for a limited time, he should wear them for that interval (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 38:2).
See Hilchot Sefer Torah 10:8.
The Jerusalem Talmud (Berachot 2:3) cites the example of Rabbi Yannai, who would not put on tefillin until the third day after he recovered from illness.
As explained in the following halachah.
Offering or partaking of the sacrifices.
While the sacrifices are being offered.
The three steps which separated the courtyard of the Israelites from the Priestly Courtyard. (See Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 6:2.)
This refers to the Israelites who were part of the ma’amadot and would attend the Temple service as emissaries of the entire Jewish people. (See Hilchot Klei HaMikdash 6:5.)
Since a person who is occupied with the performance of one mitzvah is free from the obligation of performing others (Rashi, Zevachim 19a).
That passage continues to explain that these individuals were allowed to wear tefillin—and would do so—with the exception of the priests, who would not wear the arm tefillin, for doing so would cause a separation between the priestly garments and their flesh. (See also Hilchot Klei HaMikdash 10:3, 6.)
Touching the arm tefillin before the head tefillin (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 28:1).
The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim, ibid.) quotes this law and adds that, in particular, one should touch the tefillin when reciting the verse, “And you shall tie them... and they shall be...” in the Shema.
The Mishnah Berurah (28:1) also mentions that one should check that they have not moved from their proper place.
As mentioned in the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 25:5), when putting on tefillin, a person should intend “to subjugate his desires and thoughts to God.” There is no need, however, for this intent to be in the forefront of one’s thoughts throughout the entire time one is wearing tefillin. On the contrary, in Talmudic times (see Halachah 25), tefillin would be worn throughout the day, even during one’s involvement in mundane affairs.
Accordingly, the Rabbis (see Shulchan Aruch HaRav 28:1; Mishnah Berurah 44:3) explain that here, by “diversion of attention,” the Rabbis meant that a person’s mind should not become focused on frivolous matters or on his bodily needs to the extent that he forgets about the fear of God. Thus, the Rama (Orach Chayim 38:4) states that a person who cannot control himself from thinking about lewd things should not put on tefillin, and Shulchan Aruch HaRav 38:8 and the Mishnah Berurah 38:30 free a person who is troubled by cold from the obligation of wearing tefillin.
The Sha’agat Arieh (Responsum 39), however, interprets the Rambam’s words very strictly and maintains that, according to the Rambam, even the slightest diversion of attention from tefillin is forbidden.
The Rambam emphasizes that because tefillin possess such great holiness, diverting one’s attention from them would be considered an act of disrespect, and is therefore forbidden (Likkutei Sichot, Vol. 14).
The head-plate worn by the High Priest. (See Exodus 28:36-38; Hilchot Klei HaMikdash 9:1-2.)
The words קדש לי-ה-ו-ה (consecrated unto God) are embossed on it.
In the passages from the Torah they contain.
In this context, Shabbat 130a cites the example of Elisha, ba’al hak’nafayim.
As mentioned in Halachah 13, a person who cannot control himself and feels that he must release gas is free from the obligation of wearing tefillin.
Shabbat 130a explains that the Rabbis forbade sleeping in tefillin lest one accidentally release gas. Significantly, the Rabbis did not consider sleeping a diversion of one’s attention from the tefillin (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 44:1; Mishnah Berurah 44:3).
The Kessef Mishneh interprets Sukkah 26a as indicating that this will keep the person’s attention focused on the tefillin and prevent him from releasing gas.
Lest this lead to sexual relations, which are forbidden in the presence of tefillin, as stated in Halachah 24.
This will prevent him from falling into a deep slumber in which he might lose control of himself.
If, however, he is merely holding them, it is forbidden, lest they drop from his hand (Kessef Mishneh). The Rama (Orach Chayim 44:1) states that if the tefillin are placed in a container, there are no restrictions.
Since he is not wearing them, there is no difficulty even if he were to release gas (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 44:1; Mishnah Berurah 44:6).
A meal of less than a k’beitzah, approximately 2 ounces in modern measure.
Lest he become drunk while eating and act in a manner unbecoming to the tefillin (Berachot 23b).
The Rambam discusses the obligation of washing after eating (mayim acharonim) in Hilchot Berachot 6:3.
Wearing tefillin while reciting grace will add to one’s concentration on the blessing.
In Talmudic times, the lavatories were outhouses in the fields.
Rashi (Berachot 23a) relates that this is a Rabbinic decree ordained lest one relieve himself while wearing them. There is no prohibition in the Torah itself against wearing tefillin in a place of filth.
[Note the contrast between this position and the prohibition against reciting prayers and other holy matters in a lavatory (Hilchot Kri’at Shema 3:2, 4). The latter prohibition appears to have its source in the Torah itself.]
Berachot 23b relates that once, a student of Torah left his tefillin in a hole in the wall of a public lavatory. A woman took them, and afterwards came to the house of study. She told the student’s colleagues, “See what so-and- so gave me as payment….”
When the student heard this, he climbed to the roof of the house of study to hide himself in shame. Shortly afterwards, he slipped and fell to his death. When the story became known, the Sages ordained that a person should bring his tefillin into a lavatory lest the story repeat itself.
The Beit Yosef (Orach Chayim 43) points out that Rashi and other Ashkenazic authorities do not require that the tefillin be covered.
Since a person uses his left hand to wipe himself (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 43:3; Mishnah Berurah 43:20).
The straps also possess a dimension of holiness, and hence, care should be taken regarding them.
When our Sages established the decree forbidding a person from wearing tefillin in a lavatory, they added this distance as a safeguard.
It must be emphasized that this and the following two halachot no longer apply, since, at present, homes are equipped with toilet facilities, and there is no longer a need to use public outhouses. At home, or in other places where one could keep the tefillin in a safe place, it is forbidden to wear tefillin in a lavatory (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 43:5).
See Halachah 11, which prohibits putting on tefillin after sunset.
As explained in Halachah 24, a container which is always used for tefillin or other sacred articles is considered as an accessory to the tefillin with no importance of its own. Thus, it is as if the tefillin are being held without any covering at all. Nevertheless, if it is a handbreadth in size, it is given halachic significance as an אוהל. Hence, it is considered to be a separation between the tefillin and the lavatory.
Needless to say, these laws apply only when the person does not have a safe place where he can deposit his tefillin. If such a place is available, he may not bring tefillin into a lavatory (Kessef Mishneh).
See Halachah 24, which forbids engaging in intercourse in a room which contains tefillin that are open.
Thus, it is feared that they may have touched the genitalia (Rashi, Sukkah 26b). Note the Rama (Orach Chayim 40:7), who prohibits a person from wearing tefillin if he has any traces of semen on his body.
This halachah is dependent on the description of a bathhouse in Shabbat 10a. There were three rooms: a waiting room, a dressing room, and the actual bathing room.
Shulchan Aruch HaRav 45:3 and the Mishnah Berurah 45:5 explain that this applies even when no one there is actually naked. Those sources also state that these laws apply only in bathhouses which contain filth. In contrast, there are no restrictions against wearing tefillin in the bathing room of a mikveh if no people are standing there naked. Compare also to Hilchot Kri’at Shema 3:3-4,16.
Even if he is not within four cubits of a grave (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 45:1; Mishnah Berurah 45:1)
Arm tefillin, however, need not be removed, for they can be worn under one’s sleeve. As mentioned in Halachah 4, the two tefillin are two separate mitzvot, whose observance is not necessarily dependent on each other. One must be careful, however, to cover the straps of the arm tefillin, even those around one’s hand and finger (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 45:2; Mishnah Berurah 45:3).
Proverbs 17:5 states: “One who mocks the poor (רש) reproaches his Creator.” Berachot 18a explains that the word רש can also refer to the dead, and states that performing mitzvot in the presence of a corpse or by his graveside would be, in a certain sense, mocking him, since he is unable to perform mitzvot. Accordingly, the Sages forbade Torah study, the recitation of the Shema, and the performance of other mitzvot in these situations.
Beyond this distance, one is not considered to be in the actual presence of the corpse. If a cemetery is surrounded by a wall, one may wear tefillin outside the wall even within four cubits of a grave, because the wall constitutes a separation (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 45:1; Mishnah Berurah 45:1).
From the Jerusalem Talmud (Berachot 2:3), it appears that, in addition to wearing a cloak over one’s body, one must also cover one’s genitalia before putting on tefillin.
Shulchan Aruch HaRav 45:3 and the Mishnah Berurah 45:5 associate this prohibition with the prohibition against standing naked in the presence of sacred texts.
Bava Metzia 105b considers this a lack of respect for the tefillin.
Or any other article which is not a garment and is not usually worn on one’s head (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 41:1).
Preferably, the tefillin themselves should not be covered. 44a).
These laws also apply with regard to sacred texts (Mishnah Berurah 40:4) and mezuzot (see Shulchan Aruch HaRav 40:5).
Covering the tefillin’s container with another garment is sufficient. There is no need for a second container. The bag in which the tefillin bag and the tallit are placed is also considered specific to the tefillin bag and another covering is necessary (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 40:3; Mishnah Berurah 40:7).
Or a hundred (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 40:2).
Note that in Chapter 10, Halachah 7, the Rambam offers a third alternative: setting up a partition ten handbreadths high between a Torah scroll and the bed. This is also acceptable for tefillin. See also the notes to that halachah.
Placing them at the foot of the bed is considered to be disrespectful to the tefillin and is forbidden, even though one is not sleeping together with one’s wife (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 40:3).
Our translation of כר and כסת is based on Rav Kapach’s text of the Rambam’s Commentary on the Mishnah, Shabbat 4:2. The Aruch renders the phrase, “between the mattress and the pillow.”
Placing them under one’s head would be tantamount to using them as a pillow and would be considered disrespectful to the tefillin. Hence, it is forbidden at all times (Shulchan Aruch, loc. cit.).
From thieves; alternatively, from mice (Rashi, Berachot 24a).
And they intend to engage in relations (Shulchan Aruch, loc. cit.).
See Halachah 14 above and also Hilchot Sh’vuot 11:11-12, where the Rambam equates the sanctity of tefillin with that of a Torah scroll.
Berachot 30b relates that when Rabbah reproached Abbaye for light-headedness, which he thought would lead to frivolous behavior, Abbaye answered him, “I am wearing tefillin,” implying that the tefillin would prevent him from losing self-control.
Menachot 43b states that a person who wears tefillin on his head and arm will surely not sin.
In Talmudic times, not only Torah scholars, but also common people would wear their tefillin throughout the entire day. In the later generations, this practice was generally followed only by Torah scholars, as the Hagahot Maimoniot relates in the name of Rav Amram Gaon: “We saw the Geonim, the heads of the court, and the giants of the previous generations... who would not remove their tefillin until after... the Shema of the Evening Service.”
Nevertheless, at present, even Torah scholars have accepted the practice of wearing tefillin only during the Morning Prayers. This practice was instituted since tefillin require “a clean body” (Halachah 15) and one cannot divert his attention from them (Halachah 14), and most people cannot meet these requirements (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 37:2).
Note the questions in the Pri Megadim and the Bi’ur Halachah (Orach Chayim 37): Is the mitzvah of tefillin to wear them all day, or is the mitzvah to put tefillin on once each day, with the remaining time one wears them being merely the continuation of the mitzvah?
Though we find Megillah 28a conveying such praise on Rav Zeira, there is no passage in the Talmud which describes Rav in these terms. Nevertheless, the responsa of the Geonim (Damesek Eliezer 178) include these among the ten acts of pious behavior for which Rav was noted.
See Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah 5:11, which describes such behavior as an example of Kiddush Hashem (the sanctification of God’s name).
The Bi’ur Halachah (37) mentions that some authorities suggest wearing them during the afternoon prayers as well. In most communities, however, it is customary to wear them only during the morning prayers.
If, however, a person is unable to obtain tefillin before the time passes for the recitation of the Shema and/or the morning prayers, he should recite these prayers and put on tefillin afterwards.
Since the Shema contains the command to wear tefillin, the failure to do so during its recitation is considered equivalent to false testimony.
Note the Rambam’s statement in his introduction to Sefer HaMitzvot (General Principle 9), which states that the Torah may repeat a mitzvah as encouragement and reinforcement. There are only two commandments concerning tefillin. Nevertheless, we should appreciate their importance from the fact that they were repeated several times.
See also Hilchot Teshuvah 3:5, which gives as an example of “the sinners of Israel with their bodies,” “one who never put on tefillin.” If a person’s mitzvot and sins are equally balanced, but among those sins is that he never put on tefillin, the balance is tipped to the negative side.
I.e., the name of God, שדי, whose letters are on the tefillin and its knots.
We have chosen to translate this phrase according to the exegetic interpretation given in Menachot 44a. Its simple meaning is different.