This chapter—like its source, Keilim, ch. 24—focuses on sets of three, describing several keilim of which there are three types: a) one that people lie or sit upon and which is therefore susceptible to midras impurity; b) one that is used to perform tasks; if someone would sit upon it, he would be told: “Stand up and let us perform our tasks;” such an entity is susceptible to the impurity connected with a human corpse and other types of impurity, but not to midras impurity, and c) something that is not susceptible to impurity, because it is not considered as a k’li at all or for another reason.
See also Halachah 16 where the general principles involved are delineated.
Because a person sits on it. See Chapter 26, Halachah 6.
And other types of impurity aside from midras impurity. See Chapter 25, Halachah 15.
One containing more than 40 se’ah. See Chapter 3, Halachot 1-2.
Because it will be turned upside down so that a person can sit upon it. See Chapter 26, Halachah 7. The Ra’avad emphasizes that the owner must think of using it for that purpose, as stated in that source.
But not to midras impurity.
Surrounded by borders on three sides [the gloss of Rav Ovadiah of Bartenura (Keilim 24:2)].
It is used to transport articles. If a person would sit upon it, he would be told: “Stand up and let us perform our task” (ibid.).
Since it is used to transport large stones, it may have holes large enough for pomegranates to fall through in it. Holes of this size would prevent the wagon from contracting impurity (Chapter 6, Halachah 1).
Its sides are turned inward, protecting a person on all three sides. As such, it is fit to sit upon [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Keilim 24:1); Kessef Mishneh].
Our translation is based on the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit. and 23:2).
For it is not used to lie or sit upon [the gloss of Rav Ovadiah of Bartenura (op. cit.:1)].
Because it is too small to serve any purpose other than sport or playacting [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.)].
Our translation is based on the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.:5).
Because it is also used to sit upon (ibid.).
If a person would sit upon it, he would be told: “Stand up and let us perform our tasks” (Kessef Mishneh).
It is considered an entity that serves entities that serve man; see Chapter 24, Halachah 1.
Because it is also used to sit upon or to rest one’s feet upon.
It is considered as part of the table (the Jerusalem Talmud, Shabbat 17:2). The Kessef Mishneh states that it is impure, because food is served on it, like on the table itself.
This is speaking about an oversized closet which is therefore not susceptible to ritual impurity.
The Kessef Mishneh questions why this “bed” is susceptible to ritual impurity. Seemingly, like the leather wrappers on which olives are spread above (or like the bed used by weavers in this halachah), it does not benefit man directly. A possible resolution is found in the gloss of Tifferet Yisrael to Keilim 24:8. These “beds” have a border that causes them to be considered as receptacles.
In this instance, the “beds” do not have a border and hence are considered like flat wooden implements (ibid.).
The bracketed additions are based on the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Keilim 24:9).
Because it is fit to sit upon (the glosses of Tifferet Yisrael and Rav Ovadiah of Bartenura to Keilim, op. cit.).
Because it is considered as a container and is unfit to sit upon (Tifferet Yisrael, op. cit.).
For merchandise, household goods, and the like.
And thus unfit to sit upon and hence, not susceptible to midras impurity [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.)].
See Chapter 23, Halachah 1, and the lengthy explanation in the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.:10).
These are used as containers, but not to sit upon (Tifferet Yisrael to that mishnah). The Kessel Mishneh questions the Rambam’s ruling. He understands that these mats are used merely to place clothes upon. He, therefore, questions how they are different from the mats used for grapes mentioned in the following clause or the leather wrappers mentioned above.
For the beams in the vat and the like [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.].
Because they are not used as containers.
As stated in Chapter 4, Halachah 11, and Hilchot Metamei Mishkav UMoshav 7:8, since these are large containers, they are also used as seats. When they are initially made, there is an implicit intent to also use them for such a purpose.
For they are receptacles.
For all keilim made from the skin of fish- or for that matter, anything else growing in the sea—are pure. See Chapter 1, Halachah 3, and notes.
To place on the floor and sit upon [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.:12)].
See Chapter 24, Halachah 1.
To wrap clothes, knives, or needles [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.)].
I.e., a piece of leather from which these are cut [the Rambam's Commentary to the Mishnah (Keilim 24:8)].
I.e., it is still unfinished. See Chapter 7, Halachah 1.
Beitzah 14b relates that it is susceptible to impurity, because, from time to time, an attendant will wrap himself in a curtain to warm himself. Thus it is considered as a garment. See also Hilchot Kilayim 10:14.
I.e., for an apprentice learning to weave tapestries to copy [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.:13)].
I.e., rectangular pieces of fabric (Tifferet Yisrael, op. cit.:14).
Used to wipe one’s hands during a meal (ibid.).
Because one sits on it from time to time (ibid.).
See Chapter 22, Halachah 6.
The Levites in the Temple would wrap their harps in clothes. Most others would use leather containers (Tifferet Yisrael, op. cit.:14).
The Kessef Mishneh questions why a trapper might desire to rest against the glove. In his gloss to the Mishnah (op. cit.:15), Tifferet Yisrael explains that since these gloves are wide, at times, the trapper sits on them.
Thus it serves as a receptacle.
These are used to harvest soft fruits and protect one’s hands from getting soiled. As such, they are not considered to be serving man per se. See similar concepts above, Chapter 7, Halachah2.
Netlike headcoverings worn by women through which their hair could be seen [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (op. cit.:l6)].
Because the girl will take it off and sit upon it (ibid.).
Because it is a garment and will not be used to sit upon because its holes are larger (ibid.)
The holes of these hairnets are very wide. Since they are immodest, they are not considered as garments (Tifferet Yisrael, op. cit.:16).
Because they are supports for the feet.
Shoes of armor placed over an animal’s feet in war.
Shabbat 59a gives three reasons why these shoes are considered as receptacles and hence, susceptible to impurity: a) when no drinking utensils are available, soldiers use these shoes as cups, b) at times, they are worn by humans to protect their feet from brambles, thorns, and the like, and c) they are used as receptacles for oil.
This also refers to shoes made for animals (see Chapter 2, Halachah 7). If shoes were made for humans, even from such substances, they would be susceptible to impurity (Kessef Mishneh).
Thus when fashioning the k’li, it is considered as if the craftsman also had this intent in mind.
See Chapter 23, Halachah 1, and the sources mentioned there.
See Chapter 24, Halachah 11, et al.
Even though the liquids are merely derivatives of impurity (see Hilchot Sha’ar Avot HaTum’ah 7:1).
See Chapter 6, Halachah 2.
The Ra’avad objects to this ruling, following a different understanding of Keilim 24:17. The Kessel Mishneh explains the Rambam’s perspective.
The Rambam is citing the wording of the mishnah (Keilim 24:7). In his Commentary to the Mishnah, he states that the term “tablets” is being used loosely and refers to any two flat pieces of wood placed side by side, whether they are used as writing tablets or for other purposes.
This refers to a folding chair over which a scroll is placed to fuse it into a single entity (ibid.; see also ibid. 16:1). This conception is based on the simple meaning of the Rambam’s words here and Rav Kapach’s understanding of the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah. The standard published text of that source and the Kessef Mishneh follow a different understanding.
The wax was used to seal letters closed [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Keilim 17:17)].
For it is a k’li with a receptacle.
A simple, flat board.
Because they are small.
