See Leviticus, ch. 14; Hilchot Tuma’at Tzara’at, ch. 11, which describe in detail the purification process a person afflicted by tzara’at must undergo to regain ritual purity.
For until then, he was barred from entering that city and indeed, any other walled city, as stated in ibid. 10:7; Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 7:13, Hilchot Bi’at HaMikdash 3:2.
During these seven days, he still imparts ritual impurity to others, as stated in Hilchot Tuma’at Tzara’at 11:2.
Generally, when a person becomes impure, he must immerse himself in a mikveh during the day. At nightfall, he regains ritual purity. After his immersion until nightfall, he is not pure, but his impurity is not as severe as before. For example, he may partake of the second tithe. See also other distinctions in Hilchot She’ar Avot HaTum’ah 10:2.
When he regains ritual purity.
As mentioned in Chapter 1, Halachah 3.
Since he was impure because of the tzara’at affliction, the lesser types of impurity were not significant, because they would not influence his status at all. For as part of his purification from tzara’at, he would immerse in the mikveh and that immersion would purify him from the lesser forms of impurity as well. Hence, we suspect that he became habituated to being careless with regard to these sources of impurity and would not realize if he contracted ritual impurity. Thus this immersion is a Rabbinic requirement that is not mandated by Scriptural Law.
See Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 5:7-8. There was a mikveh in that chamber.
After completing the first shaving and the beginning of the purification process.
Nazir 6:6 (see the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah) contrasts a person affiicted with tzara’at and a nazirite. In the latter instance, if he immerses himself on the seventh day and shaves on the eighth day, he may bring his sacrifices on that day, for he has already waited until the day after his immersion. He need not wait until the ninth day to bring the sacrifices. The difference is that the nazirite’s attainment of purity is dependent on the passage of time alone. The attainment of purity by an afflicted person, by contrast, is dependent on his shaving. If he immerses himself beforehand, it is not effective. Hence, his attainment of purity takes place at nightfall of the day on which he immersed himself after shaving.
The three sheep mentioned in Chapter I, Halachah 3.
In the previous halachah.
The easternmost portion of the Temple Courtyard; see ibid.:12. He waits there, because until his sacrifices are offered, he should not enter the Temple Courtyard (Kessef Mishneh).
But not under the Gate, for the area under the Gate is considered as part of the Temple Courtyard.
See Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 5:5.
I.e., facing the Temple Building. This reflects the commandment, Leviticus 14:11: “The priest... shall have the person being purified stand... before God, at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting.”
I.e., also zavim, zavot, and women after childbirth, as mentioned in Hilchot Mechusrei Kapparah, ch. 1.
For these individuals are forbidden to enter the Temple Courtyard until their sacrifices are brought [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Nega’im 14:9)].
As stated in Hilchot Sotah 3:3, a woman who is suspected of adultery is brought to the Temple and forced to drink water in which a curse that had been written on parchment was blotted out. She stands facing the Temple before this gate.
Waving it up and down and to all four directions. Although generally, the person bringing the sacrifice performs tenufah together with the priest. In this instance, the afflicted person may not enter the Temple Courtyard. Hence, the priest performs tenufah alone. Note the Tosefta, Nega’im, ch. 8, which maintains that the priest would take the sheep to the Gate of Nicanor and wave it together with afflicted person. The Ra’avad maintains that this teaching should be followed. Nevertheless, the Rambam relies on Menachot 5:6 which states that tenufah was performed in the eastern portion of the Temple Courtyard (Rav Yosef Corcus).
This is derived from Leviticus 14:12 which states that the waving must be “before God.” The implication is that one should be in the portion of the Temple Courtyard closest to the place where the Divine Presence rests.
The Gate of Nicanor, where the afflicted person is waiting.
Performing the rite of semichah. See Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot, ch. 3. As explained there (3:11), semichah must be performed in the Temple Courtyard. Since the afflicted person cannot enter, he inserts his hands so that the rite is performed in that holy place. Inserting one’s hands does not violate the prohibition against entering the Temple Courtyard in a state of impurity, as evident from Hilchot Bi’at HaMikdash 3:18.
As mandated by Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot 3:12. There are those who maintain that the sacrificial animal must be taken to the portion of the Temple Courtyard where the animals are usually slaughtered. Nevertheless, in Hilchot Beit HaBechirah 5:15-16, the Rambam explains that the northern portion of the Temple Courtyard where sacrifices of the highest order of holiness must be slaughtered extends from the wall of the Entrance Hall until the Eastern Wall of the Temple Courtyard. Hence, there is no need to move the animal.
The Sifra to Leviticus 14:14 explains that just as the priest applies the blood with his physical person, he must receive it with his physical person.
The affiicted person is forbidden to enter the Temple Courtyard. Nevertheless, it is forbidden to take the blood of the guilt-offering out of the Temple Courtyard. Hence, he must insert his head, hand, and foot, as described [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (Nega’im 14:9)].
See the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (loc. cit.) for a lengthy description of this portion of the ear.
A liquid measure equivalent to 346 cc. according to Shiurei Torah, 600 cc. according to Chazon Ish.
For Leviticus 4:27 states that the sprinklings must be “before God.”
He may not sprinkle the oil more than once for each dipping [the Rambam’s Commentary to the Mishnah (loc. cit.:10)].
See Chapter 5, Halachah 3, for an explanation of this statement.
As the Rambam mentions in Hilchot Bikkurim 1:4, 13, this is one of the 24 presents given to the priests.
See Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot 10:3.
This indicates that the Rambam considers the prohibition Scriptural in origin. Rashi (Zevachim 44a) considers it a Rabbinic decree.
See Hilchot Ma’aseh HaKorbanot 11:4.
