ב"ה
Beitzah |
|
|
Sort by:
|
|
|
Beitzah: Talmudic tractate that discusses the generic laws that apply to yom tov, Biblical holidays—which greatly differ from the Shabbat laws, as many food-preparation related activities that are forbidden on Shabbat are permitted on yom tov, as well as the more stringent laws of yom tov with regard to muktzeh--items "separated" from a person
Related Topics
Tractate Bava Batra (12)
Bava Kama (12)
Bava Metzia (10)
Beitzah (6)
Tractate Berachot (10)
Chagigah (11)
Chullin (6)
Eruvin (6)
Gittin (9)
Horayot (13)
Ketubot (9)
Kiddushin (10)
Makot (14)
Megillah (12)
Menachot (2)
Moed Katan (13)
Tractate Nazir (6)
Nedarim (2)
Tractate Niddah (9)
Pesachim (11)
Rosh Hashanah (10)
Sanhedrin (10)
Semachot (4)
Shabbat (13)
Shavuot (4)
Sotah (134)
Sukkah (8)
Taanit (12)
Tamid (32)
Tractate Temurah (3)
Yevamot (5)
Yoma (5)
Zevachim (6)
Bechorot (3)
Meilah (2)
Keritot (3)
Middot (3)
Erchin (5)
Text-based Gemara classes
Discovering Talmudic Principles
This five-part Talmud series will be exploring and analyzing the second chapter of tractate Beitzah and the third chapter of tractate Pesachim, focusing on the mechanism of the ‘Eruv Tavshilin’—a Rabbinic legal procedure allowing one to cook on the Holida...
Studying Gemara: Daf Yomi
except for the case of dried figs and raisins in the midst of the drying process alone. These are fruits that are fit to be eaten fresh and were deliberately removed from use to allow them to undergo a drying process, during which time they are inedible; ...
With regard to one who invited guests to visit him from a town beyond his Shabbat limit, and they joined the Shabbat boundaries to enable them to reach his house, they may not carry in their hands back to their town any portions they received from him as ...
If he said to him: You are hereby prohibited to me by force of ḥerem, the one making the vow is himself prohibited to derive benefit from the addressee or from his property. If he said to him: I am hereby prohibited to you and you to me by force of ḥerem,...
And Rav Ashi said a different explanation as to why the spices, water, and salt are not subject to nullification: It is because any one of these ingredients is an object whose prohibition is temporary, as the prohibition against their being taken out of t...
If one’s single kav of wheat became mingled with ten kav of another’s wheat, shall the latter eat all eleven kav and rejoice? One does not allow his property to become nullified into someone else’s property. The same applies to water and salt in dough. Th...
And we discussed the following difficulty with regard to this teaching of Ayo: What is different about the case where two rabbis are coming to the two locations, one here and the other there, and one places two eiruvin, planning to decide on Shabbat which...
| |
|
|