Here's a great tip:
Enter your email address and we'll send you our weekly magazine by email with fresh, exciting and thoughtful content that will enrich your inbox and your life, week after week. And it's free.
Oh, and don't forget to like our facebook page too!
Printed from chabad.org
All Departments
Jewish Holidays
TheRebbe.org
Jewish.TV - Video
Jewish Audio
News
Kabbalah Online
JewishWoman.org
Kids Zone
Letter & Spirit - Personal and Public Correspondence of the Lubavitcher Rebbe
Option
Send Us Your Letters Letter & Spirit - Personal and Public Correspondence of the Lubavitcher Rebbe
E-mail

In the summer of 1975, an encounter took place between Rabbi F.R., a Lubavitcher chassid, and Mr. A.P., a "modernized" American Jew. Rabbi R. was seeking to influence Mr. P. toward a greater commitment to Torah observance, which the latter dismissed as "archaic" and dismally outdated. In the course of the conversation, Mr. P. said, "Are you telling me that every law and practice mentioned in the Torah, written thousands of years ago, must be accepted at face value today?" "Certainly,” replied Rabbi R. "The Torah is eternal, and is equally pertinent to every day and age." "The Torah states that the sun revolves around the earth," countered Mr. P. "Do you believe that as well?" "Yes, I do," replied Rabbi R. "Well, you might believe that," said Mr. P., "but no rational, self-respecting inhabitant of the 20th century does. I’m sure your rebbe, Rabbi Schneerson, doesn’t!" "I’m sure he does," said the rabbi. "I’m willing to wager anything that he does not," said Mr. P. "In fact, I’ll say this: If the Rebbe states that he believes that the sun revolves around the earth, I will become a Torah-observant Jew and convince everyone I know to do the same!" "Would you put that in writing?" challenged Rabbi R. "No problem," said Mr. P.

Soon after, Rabbi R. received the following letter:

Dear Rabbi R____

As per our conversation of today... I did say to you, and am submitting the same in writing by means of this letter, that if the Rebbe would make a public statement to the effect that... since the Talmud states that the sun revolves around the earth, it is therefore his firm belief that the sun does indeed revolve around the earth, that I will:

(a) personally observe the laws of taharat hamishpachah, tefillin and Shabbat; and

(b) influence my friends and colleagues to do the same.

It is, however, more than obvious to me that the Rebbe will not, in any way, make such a ridiculous statement, because

(a) he does not wish to be labeled as a fool,

(b) he himself is not as foolish as some of his ardent but hypnotized followers.

I predict, with no hesitation, that I will not hear any more about this matter from you or from the Rebbe...

I must tell you that I feel a deep personal hurt when people such as you make such asinine, ridiculous statements and then hide your abysmal ignorance behind the facade of "Torah." Don’t you realize you can still be believers and not live 500 years behind the times?

Mr. P. received not one but two separate letters in reply from the Rebbe, plus a third, cover letter, which read as follows:

Greetings and blessings!

Your letter, addressed to Rabbi F____ R____, reached me ... In view of its content, I naturally take this first opportunity of replying to it.

Not knowing whether you are more interested in the practical implication, or/and in the scientific aspect, I am writing two separate replies, enclosed herewith, which you can read in the order you prefer.

With esteem and blessing,

M. Schneerson

P.S. It is surely unnecessary to add-though I am adding it for the record-that I take for granted that you will keep your commitments with regard to the practical aspects of your letter.

One letter read:

... In reply to your question relating to the matter of the motion of the sun and the earth, whether the sun revolves around the earth or the earth around the sun,

It is my firm belief that the sun revolves around the earth, as I have also declared publicly on various occasions and in discussion with professors specializing in this field of science.

In view of the above, I have no objection, of course, if you wish to make this view known to whomever you choose...

The other letter read:

... This is in reply to your inquiry on the question of the rotation of the sun and the earth in relation to each other, namely, whether the sun revolves around the earth, or the earth around the sun, and which view is to be accepted, etc.

I presume you have in mind the scientific view, i.e., what science has to say on this question, and I will address myself to this aspect.

It is well known that this was a controversial issue in ancient and medieval science. However, since about half a century ago, with the introduction of the theory of relativity, the latter has been universally accepted as the basis of modern science...

One of the conclusions of the theory of relativity is that when there are two systems, or planets, in motion relative to each other-such as the sun and the earth in our case-either view, namely the sun rotating around the earth, or the earth rotating around the sun, has equal validity. Thus, if there are phenomena that cannot be adequately explained on the basis of one of these views, such difficulties have their counterpart also if the opposite view is accepted.

Secondly, the scientific conclusion that both views have equal validity is the result not of any inadequacy of available scientific data, or of technological development (measuring instruments, etc.), in which case it could be expected that further scientific or technological advancement might clear up the matter eventually and decide in favor of one or the other view. On the contrary, the conclusion of contemporary science is that regardless of any future scientific advancement, the question as to which is our planetary center, the sun or the earth, must forever remain unresolved, since both view[s] will always have the same scientific validity, as stated.

Thirdly, it follows that anyone declaring that a person who chooses to accept one of these systems in preference to the other is a fool, while one who accepts the other is a wise man-such a judgment shows that the person making it is ignorant of the conclusions of modern science, or that he has not advanced beyond the science of Ptolemy and Copernicus...

A further point might be added, though perhaps not pertinent to our discussion. It is that every person, including modern scientists, actually has three options to choose from in this matter: (a) that A revolves around B, (b) that B revolves around A, (c) that A and B revolve around each other. But such a choice cannot be dictated by science; it would be one’s personal choice and belief.

What has been said above is-to repeat-the deduction of the theory of relativity, as it is expounded in various scientific texts, and it can be checked with any scientist who is thoroughly familiar with the said theory. Of course, on the elementary and high-school level, science in general, and the so-called Solar System in particular, is taught from relatively simple textbooks, and the change in the scientific attitude towards the subject under discussion is not emphasized. But, as stated, it would be quite simple to verify it with any scientist who knows this particular field...

© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with Chabad.org's copyright policy.
E-mail
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
Sort By:
Discussion (7)
April 7, 2014
To put our planet as the center is to belittle G-d
The first commandment is "I am your G-d." What does this mean? It means we must strive to know G-d. How? By reading Torah to learn about Him and our relationship to Him.

The Torah starts with G-d's creation of the universe, which teaches us that G-d is the creator of everything, and G-d is infinite. Is God limited to our planet? Of course not. Is G-d limited to our solar system? Of course not. Is G-d even limited to what our eyes can see? Again, of course not. God is limitless. And something limitless doesn't have borders. And something without borders doesn't have a center. Hence we are not at the center of G-d or the infinite universe He created.

To accept that Earth is not at the center of the solar system doesn't contradict the Torah; it embraces the first of the Ten Commandments and accepts the infinite nature of G-d.

Those who cling to the idea that the sun goes around the Earth are like those who built the Tower of Babel, trying to make themselves bigger by belittling G-d.
Anonymous
USA
August 10, 2010
RE: Rabbi Freeman
I completely agree with your statement that according to modern science there is no center to the Universe

Unfortunately for you, this *does* oppose the notion that the earth is at the center of all creation from a physical perspective. On cannot say "I believe the earth is at the physical center of the universe, and one who believes that the universe has a center is a fool."

Fortunately, the Torah is about the spiritual center of the Universe, and in this regard there is no necessary conflict.

Your abstract interpretation is all fine and good, but we both know that the Rebbe is actually making an (unnecessary) attempt to validate the cosmology of the Rambam, which is not correct under *any* frame of reference. Ironically, I believe that Rambam would have been the first to congratulate modern science on correcting the model he admits is inherited from the Greeks.

PS post-modernism is *not* science.
Matt Wetstein
Chicago, IL
August 10, 2010
Re: This is not intellectually honest
When considering the expansion of space within 4 dimensions, one must consider any frame of reference to be the center. The expansion of the surface of an expanding balloon provides a good model for this: From any point, the same pattern of red-shift will be observed.

Why is this significant? It may be that the Rebbe's underlying, albeit tacit, concern is not to quibble over whose model is better, but the overall cosmology as it affects our perspective of human significance. Meaning:

Torah places the human drama at the very center of all of creation. If the laws of physics inherently oppose such a view, something is very wrong. Therefore, the Rebbe points out that there is no inherent conflict.

I see no support in the Rebbe's words for a medieval system. Rather, this seems a very post-modern view.
Rabbi Tzvi Freeman
August 9, 2010
This is not intellectually honest
As a Torah observant scientist, I find this whole presentation to be utterly dishonest.

Yes, the point of relativity and equivalence is the notion that there is no preferred frame of reference.

This does not change the fact that there is no possible frame of reference in which the planets all, simultaneously with the sun, orbit the earth. It also does not change the fact that the sun exerts the largest gravitational field and that the relative dynamics of all of the bodies in the solar system are consistent with the sun being the primary driver of planetary motion.

What's the point of the Rebbe's argument? Even in a frame where the sun goes around the earth, nothing else goes around the earth. And, since orbits are elliptical, there is no frame of reference where the earth is perfectly in the center of anything anyway.

You cannot use modern science to defend Medieval thinking.
Anonymous
Chicago, IL
June 21, 2009
views like these...
Views like these are rare in the Jewish world and even in the gentile/Noahide world. To some it would be foolish to take the creation chapters in any wise literal to say that Deity created all in six normal days, let alone say that that descriptions about earth's stability and centrality and the sun's movement in scripture are not simply phenomenalogical (language of appearance) but can be taken literally and with the absolute view that heliocentrists (those who accept the sun-centred planetary system as True) espouse.

It's encouraging to see at least some Jews accept such a view. Makes the world a little less lonely. May your light not go out.
Mr. David Dryden
July 19, 2007
For Elozor Plotke
I think this article answers your question: Relativity and Geocentrism.
Tzvi Freeman
Thornhill, Ontario
July 17, 2007
The Wager
If the Rebbe is referring to the rotation of the Sun around the Earth in a yearly cycle, then I understand his letter, and seems to be consistent with the Relativity point-of-view. However, if the Rebbe's letter suggests the Sun rotating about the Earth in a daily cycle, then I need additional clarification. How does the Rebbe explain Geosynchronous satellites that remained at a fixed spot over the Earth, by rotating at ~17000 MPH CCW as the Earth rotates CCW? Given that, then the Sun and other celetial bodies are essentially stationary over the 24 period. I think it would be helpful to clarify, that the Relativistic viewpoint is in relation to a yearly cycle rather than a daily cycle.
Elozor Plotke
Los Angeles, CA
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG