Here's a great tip:
Enter your email address and we'll send you our weekly magazine by email with fresh, exciting and thoughtful content that will enrich your inbox and your life, week after week. And it's free.
Oh, and don't forget to like our facebook page too!
Printed from chabad.org
All Departments
Jewish Holidays
TheRebbe.org
Jewish.TV - Video
Jewish Audio
News
Kabbalah Online
JewishWoman.org
Kids Zone

Women in the Synagogue

Women in the Synagogue

An Answer to the Controversy

E-mail

Question:

Rabbi, you've done the gender-exclusion thing long enough. What may have been okay for ancient Babylonia and medieval Europe just won't cut it in today's world of gender equity and affirmative action.

Let's start with your bastion institution of the synagogue. How much longer do you imagine keeping it a men's club? How much longer do you expect the ladies to stay in the peanut gallery? How much longer will the high-point of your spiritual ritual -- the reading from the Torah scroll -- continue to exclude the fair voices of 50% of your membership?

Rabbi, change is knocking on your door and it's time to let her in -- before the whole building collapses.

Answer:

Change? How about if we adapt instead?

Ever heard Dr. Velvel Green's sci-fi story of the Great Meltdown? It goes like this: Some nuclear testing results in a rapid meltdown of the polar ice cap. Scientists warn the world that they have only three weeks left before the entire planet is submerged. Catholics run to Rome for salvation, Muslims to Mecca, Americans to their TV sets, etc. Meantime, a throng of Jews gathers in Brooklyn where a certain rabbi is just concluding the afternoon prayer. He turns to the microphone array and says, "Yidden! We have three weeks to learn to live underwater!"

This is the difference between changing and adapting. To change means to surrender -- to give up who you are because the circumstances seem so much more powerful than you. To adapt means to come to a better understanding of who you are and how you are able to meet this challenge.

A Brief, Skip-it-if-you-like, Synopsis of the Guadian Doctrine of Change

Each time we adapt to change, we learn more about who we are. Each time we surrender to change, we surrender that power of being who we are. Without a clear identity and cut off from our source, we become impotent, less radical -- less capable of effecting real change.

Change is what Torah is all aboutChange can be good (if you know anyone who would like to change places with our shul president, please let us know, ASAP). After all, change is what Torah is all about. Changing people's minds. Changing how things are done. Changing the world -- into something more wondrous, more glowing, more transparent to its essence. And how have we gone about effecting those deep, radical changes in our world very successful over the past 3,700 years? Basically, by staying the same.

Actually, your argument for change would have been a much stronger one earlier in history. Let's say we were living in the times of the Temple in Jerusalem, and you would challenge me, saying, "Why do you people have to do everything so differently than everyone else?" Then I would have had to respond principally out of faith. As in, "Well, G-d said so, so it's got to be right."

By now, however, we have the largest sample in clinical history of trial and observation under every possible social, geographical, economical, political and military condition. Each time, everywhere, anywhere and anytime, Torah worked. "Hey!" the brain says, "There's got to be something to it!"

There is. Torah doesn't belong to any time, system, society or circumstance. It's from outside the system. So it works everywhere.

Adaptation brings us closer to our essence. When we moved from nomadic society to agrarian to glorious civilization to exile to less glorious civilization to Hellenization to mercantile province to exile again to practically everywhere and everything to industrialization to pop-society and now to life in cyberspace -- each time we come to a deeper understanding of ourselves and of our Torah.

So, too, today's challenge of the rise of the feminine in society, perhaps the most significant trend of the past four hundred years. Suddenly, mysteries are brought to light that would previously pass unnoticed.

Take our behavior in shul (that's what we call it. We've got to get past this Greek antiquity "synagogue" thing). You describe this behavior as somewhat of an anachronism -- this is an insightful observation. We definitely are not part of the present. Put an anthropologist in our shul and he won't have any clue which era he's in (until Horowitz's nuisance cell-phone starts ringing, that is.) Where you err is in your implication that we belong to some era of the past. This is patently false. There was never a time when Jewish practice was in sync with the times. Not in medieval Europe and certainly not anywhere in the ancient world.

When everyone else was having a wild time with goddesses, priestesses, sirens and oracles, do you think it was cool and withit to have a male-only line-up for our Temple services? In that regard, it would have been the dullest show of its genre -- were it not for the fantastic daily miracle show and a great soundtrack from the (all-male again) Levite orchestra. Definitely an anomaly then, even more than now.

All those guidelines of prayer are to teach men how to pray like a woman!But there is something very deep about it. Something very resilient. Something that perhaps we still don't fully understand. So before we take out the knife and scalpel, let's just examine that mystery a little further. Would you pave a highway through a giant redwood forest before you've understood its underlying ecology? We're dealing here with a system of the same order and deeper.

Back to the Question

You brought up prayer and the all-male minyan. Yes, women can attend services, but all the dominant roles are handed to the men. And they stand on the other side of a partition or upstairs in the gallery. You don't know just how enigmatic this is. In fact, it is bewildering. Mysterious. Astonishing. Let me explain why:

How do we know how to pray? Most of the guidelines for prayer, we learned from a lady named Chana who lived about three thousand years ago, before the First Temple was built. That's right, Chana was a woman. Chana came to the Tabernacle in Shiloh -- the precursor of the Temple in Jerusalem -- and prayed for a child. She prayed quietly, her lips moving but her voice audible only to her own ears. She poured out her heart and demanded from G-d that He change the natural order of things for her sake. That He grant her not just any son, but a very righteous one, a special one. In return, she would dedicate his life to holy things.

All along, the High Priest of the Tabernacle -- his name was Eli -- kept an eye on this lady. Then he went over to her and accused her of attending Temple service while inebriated.

(Imagine that: A woman performs the ultimate prayer which becomes the model and ideal for all future generations, and a man who spends his day in holy activities surrounded by spiritual rituals and filled with spiritual wisdom mistakes her for a drunk! We'll deal with this later.)

At any rate, Chana tells him off quite respectfully by describing the bitterness of her soul that she is "pouring out before G-d." Eli takes her words seriously, blesses her, and a year later, Shmuel the prophet is born.

From the story of Chana, the sages of the Talmud learn many things. Including:

1) Prayer is a quiet act.

2) You still have to move your lips (and hear yourself).

3) Prayer is done by pouring out your soul.

4) Crying could only help matters.

5) You can make deals with the Boss.

6) If you beg hard enough, He may even break the rules for you.

7) Don't drink and pray.

In fact, the sages were so enamored with Chana's prayer, they composed the Amidah (also called Shmoneh Esreh or "Eighteen Blessings"-- the mainstay Jewish prayer) using 113 words for all the blessings, just because there were 113 words in Chana's prayer. Now if that isn't gilding it in gold, what is?

Do you get it? All those guidelines of prayer are to teach men how to pray like a woman!

After all, why did Chana look to Eli (a man) like a drunk? Because her emotions poured out unconstrained. Men have a hard time with that, much harder than women, even when those men really are drunk. The whole modality of prayer is a female thing: Men don't like to cry, to admit helplessness, to express their inner selves and discuss their true needs. These are things we generally associate with women. And, by the way, men especially don't do these things when there are women around. So the guidelines of prayer have to create a framework in which men can do all this.

In terms of multiple intelligence theory, prayer is a semantic thing. And the semantic mind -- communicating, connecting, emoting -- is where women rule. (Men, on the other hand, excel in symbolic intelligence -- mastering abstractions through well-defined symbols. We'll get to that later.)

So, too, you will find that in the Bible, song is generally a female thing. When the men sang to celebrate the crossing of the Red Sea, the women one-upped them whipping out cymbals and dancing, too. The two all-time hit songs of the prophets are the song of Devorah and the song of Chana. Even King Solomon's Song of Songs is set in two voices of a man and a woman -- with the woman's voice predominant.

Prayer is feminine, but temples are masculineLet's look at Kabbalah. Kabbalah is traditional Jewish theology. Consistently, you will find the Kabbalists describing the entire cosmos as a dynamic balance of the masculine and feminine elements and energies.

In Kabbalah, prayer is considered to lie in the feminine element. The Mother Of All Life strives to return Above, carrying all her world along with her.1

The feminine element is called by our sages "the Shechinah" -- meaning an indwelling or presence. How G-dliness invests itself within the creation to give it life and existence. In the language of Kabbalah, this is called "Malchut," meaning royalty. You'll also hear it called, "the Queen," "the Divine Word," "the cosmic soul" and "the permeating light." All refer to an immanence, as G-dliness is found within all things.

When we speak, on the other hand, of G-d as "He" -- "the Holy One, blessed be He," "the Father," "the Encompassing Light" and such -- we are speaking of G-dliness as it is transcendent and beyond. This is the masculine element.

We say that "G-d is one and His name is one" -- meaning that these two elements are only two modalities of a single entity which cannot be known or grasped in any form. Prayer, however, is a drama whereby the feminine element feels a separation and strives to mend it.

Now you can see it's not just puzzling -- it's downright bizarre: Song and prayer is principally a woman's thing, yet the shul is the domain of men!

Organized Religion

Of course, the difficulty is only if you insist that the shul is all about prayer. But it isn't.

The shul is a very good place for prayer (well, it would be, if old man Goldberg weren't always driving everyone nuts with his hurry to get to the last kaddish), but that's not what it is. What it is is a miniature clone of the original "Beit Hamikdash" -- the Temple that once stood in Jerusalem, may it soon be rebuilt. That Temple was also a great place to pour out your heart in prayer. But no one ever suggested that prayer is its exclusive theme. The central theme of the Temple is something related, but quite different: That space should be holy.

Here again is that balance I was talking about -- the masculine and the feminine. Prayer is feminine, but temples are masculine.

Let's go back to that story of Chana in the Tabernacle. Chana also thought the Tabernacle was a great place to pray. And her prayer proved, in fact, to be quite efficacious (it worked). But -- hold it! -- only after a brief meeting with Eli. And only after receiving his blessing.

Eli, you recall, was the High Priest, the Mr. Holiness of the Tabernacle operation. He was also the man who mistook Chana for a drunk. How does a holy man, steeped in the Divine mysteries of the Temple service, only two generations removed from Mount Sinai (AaronàPinchasàEli), how could he possibly mistake the ultimate prayer for its diametric opposite -- a drunken stupor? After all, a man such as Eli sees with more than his flesh eyes.

So you have to keep in mind that Eli was running a tight operation here. A Holy Tabernacle. Where services run seven days a week, 365 days a year, always on schedule, always strictly by the book, precisely choreographed and tightly supervised. Got a sin-offering? Here are the rules. A guilt-offering? Different set of rules. Just want to show your thanks and appreciation to the Almighty? You better follow the rules for that one as well, or else you'll be back to the sin and guilt package.

There are morning offerings, afternoon offerings and evening smoke-pillars. Sure, there's the music and colorful festivals as well -- but all go by the book. That tight choreography is meant as a vehicle for inspired action, meditative focus, cleaving of the soul to its Divine Source in sublime ecstasy -- but don't let any of that disturb the underlying order.

I'll give you an example: When it comes to the instructions for the lighting of the Golden Menorah in the tabernacle, the Torah tells us, "And Aaron did just what G-d told Moses he should do."2 And, the sages comment, this is praising Aaron, that he didn't make any changes.

Hold it: This is Aaron, brother of Moses, the first and ultimate High Priest of all time. He's going to make changes in G-d's explicit instructions? This is how you praise Aaron, that he follows the rules?

Yes. Because Aaron understood and was eminently conscious of all the implications of this service in worlds spiritually higher and higher and way beyond our own, all the way up to the Infinite Light. He saw the connection between these lamps that he lit and how they drew that supernal, unbounded light down through all those worlds to enlighten and elevate megahosts of angels, seraphim, souls, you-name-it, all the way down to the world he was standing in. At the time he performed the lighting ceremony, he was in a deep meditative state, pondering all this, his heart pounding, his soul soaring above and his mind on the verge of explosion. Now imagine sticking to the instructions in such a state.

But that's how Aaron understood his mission: To contain that fire in a hi-definition, earthly performance. And so did Eli.

Even the ultimate prayer is not good enough aloneIn Kabbalistic terms, Eli's job was to fit unbounded light into an order of time and space. Spontaneous outbursts and outpouring of the soul was just not part of his world.3

It may have been in an earlier time. And it certainly was in the times of King David -- his psalms reveal a soul of explosive, uncontainable passion. But it seems that in the time of Eli a bit of decadence had set in. The balance of passion and order had been lost with a preponderance of regulated, predictable ritual. Too much containment, not enough light -- as the Kabbalists would put it.4

So Eli says to Chana, "You're drunk." And she enlightens him a little, brings back memories of how things are really supposed to be. And he gets it. So he gives Chana a blessing. And then, only then, does the prayer work.

Why? We understand why Eli needs Chana. But why does Chana need Eli? Isn't her prayer good enough without him? Apparently not. Apparently, even the ultimate prayer is not good enough alone. Because prayer alone is a rocket ship without a landing mechanism. And what goes up must come down.

Traffic Control

Remember Jacob's ladder? Jacob slept at the place where the Temple was eventually to be built. In his dream, he saw a ladder firmly grounded on the earth and reaching up to the heavens. Angels climbed up the ladder to heaven while others returned down to earth.

The Zohar tells us this ladder is the ladder of prayer. A two-way express conduit connecting the earth with the heavens and the heavens with earth.

First, you go up. All the way up. Prayer, like everything else Jewish, is a gambit to break out of the system. Better: To break the system out of its system. To take all the concerns of daily life and raise them higher and higher to a place that has none of the limitations of the system. A place where anything and everything could happen, where an entirely new direction of events could be authored. To reach to the Author of the system and get Him to create a "new will" -- like we say in so many of our prayers, Yehi ratzon milfanecha... "May it be Your will (literally: May a will come into being from before You) that..."

A new will? There's nothing new under the sun, said wise Solomon. So if you want to create a new will and really change things, you've got to reach higher than the sun.

So that's where the ladder of prayer reaches: Beyond the sun. Beyond the whole system. That's where Chana climbed in her prayer -- all the way to the top of that ladder. And her whole life changed from it. Which is why the best we can do is to emulate her.

But she still needed Eli's blessing. Because a blessing does something a prayer cannot. True, a blessing doesn't reach as high as prayer. A blessing doesn't create anything new, either. But a blessing captures that new will created up in heaven, gives it substance, packages and shrink wraps it, and brings it to a safe landing down on earth.

That is what the shul is about. Like Aaron lighting the menorah, the shul is a place to bring spirituality within time, space and words. That's why you try to say your prayers there, if you can. Because prayers said there have a better chance of bearing fruit. Of making a safe landing.

Bipolar Order

"…because at the foundation and origin of the entire Torah lie two ideas: To lift the soul beyond its embodiment, higher and higher until the essence and origin of all worlds; and also to draw downward the Light of the Infinite One, may He be blessed, upon the Source of All Souls [the Shechinah]..."
-- Tanya, chapter 32.

The female role is -- principally -- to discover the heaven hiding within time and space -- and set it freeTorah is full of this two-way process. The Temple had Kohanim working (order, drawing down) while Levites were singing (inspiration, climbing up). The Jewish people were led out of Egypt by Moses (who brought the Torah down) and Aaron (who brought the people up). Our legal system is a resolution and harmony of the school of Hillel (down to earth) and the school of Shammai (up to heaven). We have study of Torah (bringing G-dly wisdom down to earth) and performance of mitzvahs (bringing earthly things up to heaven). In a Torah family, you have a mother (who tells you who you are) and a father (who is supposed to tell you how to be that).

In most general terms, this is the division of roles between men and women. The male role is principally to capture the unbounded, spiritual light of heaven and bring it within an earthly world of space, time and human grasp. The female role is -- principally -- to discover the heaven hiding within time and space -- and set it free.

That is why the Torah frees women from most time-bound responsibilities, such as tefillin, tzitzit, reciting the "Shema Yisrael" on time at strictly set times twice daily, making it to the minyan on time three times a day, etc.. Because organizing and packaging G-dliness into time slots is a male thing. Women are already very tied up with time and its cycles. Their role lies more in opening these packages up and extending them beyond time. The woman is the Mother of Life who unpackages life and nurtures it. She is the one who takes the present and ensures it will have a future. Where a man deals with the present, she deals with eternity.

Two Hemispheres

That is why the Torah does not discuss a man and a woman as two distinct entities, but as a single whole. "And G-d created the Adam in His image, male and female He created them."5 The Divine image is neither male nor female but the synthesis of both. In the world of Torah, a man or a woman alone is half a person. Not just in soul -- in body as well.

When G-d says, "Be fruitful and multiply," He is speaking to Adam as a whole.6 Only that the male half of the Adam gets involved in his male way and the female half in a very different (and somewhat more significant) way. So, too, with every precept of the Torah. G-d says, "Wrap on those tefillin!" He is speaking to the whole Adam. But which arm do those tefillin go on? On the left arm of the male half of the single male-female body. After all, why should one body wear two pairs of tefillin?

This also explains another distinction between gender roles in Torah: Where the man has a command to do a mitzvah, the woman often has a mitzvah -- but no command. Like in this mitzvah of having babies (which happens to be the first mitzvah in the Torah). The way our tradition reads it, the man is commanded. G-d tells him he must procreate. The woman is not commanded. It's optional. And yet, she has nine months of the mitzvah, plus most of the nurturing. Not much room to compare there.

So, too, in many other mitzvahs. Like hearing the shofar on Rosh Hashanah, sitting in the sukkah on Sukkot, studying Torah and more. A man must do these things. Women take it on voluntarily. Most of prayer is this way as well: Women have a minimal requirement in prayer, with no obligation to get to the minyan. What men are required to do, women take on voluntarily.

A man conquers, therefore G-d deals with him by conquering -- by commanding him to do. A woman carries the world upward spontaneously, from within. Therefore, her mitzvahs come as a natural response, from within.

In existential terms: there is Doing and there is Being. The man is about the causative -- making something be. The woman is about being and discovering that which is.

Oppression and Liberation

So the whole of Torah can be summarized as a unity, harmony and synthesis of these two cosmic forces: the masculine and the feminine. Until now, the feminine side has been derided, but that is changing. Until today, it was just obvious that muscle power, fighting wars, conquering the world and massacring the enemy was so much more glorious than creating and nurturing life.

Oy! A flashing memory! Fourth Grade. Old Mrs. Macdonald teaching history. Laura Brown asks, "But weren't there any great women in history?"

"Of course!" answers Mrs. M. "There was Joan of Arc! And Queen Elizabeth! And Catherine the Great!"

Why were they great? Because they fought wars, like men. (True, the Bible tells of a woman named Devorah who told the warrior, Barak, to make battle with the oppressor. But when Barak demanded that Devorah come along, she really laid into him for it.)

Still today, many women cling to the notion that liberation means the privilege to act like a man. As Timothy Leary put it, such women lack ambition.

"In the messianic era," the Kabbalists tell us, "the feminine will rise much higher than the masculine." That attitude has already begun to emerge, as feminine energy becomes an increasingly valued element of our society. And only once it is valued can there be a meaningful synthesis of the male and female paradigms.

Take our shul for example. The place is in desperate need of feminine values. The men have forgotten how to pray. They've lost contact with the feminine inside them. But the last thing we need is for women to take it over. Because then, two things will happen:

1) The men will leave it up to the women and we'll never see them again.

2) The women will get into all the technicalities of the synagogue prayer protocol and become like men.

It's like working with fire and water: Put them together and all you get is a lot of steam and big fizz. Either fire wins, or water, or neither. But keep each in its place with a utensil in between -- the water in the pot and the fire under it -- and now we're cooking.

The Real Question

So what is a woman supposed to do? I'm getting to that, but I still haven't explained what prayer really is.

I want to ask you seriously: Did you ever really think that

prayer books + ten men + shul + Torah reading = prayer ?

The Torah does not discuss a man and a woman as two distinct entities, but as a single wholeIf so, I've got news for you: I can teach you how to chant the entire Torah in perfect tune and all the shul protocol of who gets shishi and which haftarah to read. I can teach you the kaddish, the kedushah and barchu too. I can teach you the entire prayer book, including the meaning of each word and every prayer -- and I haven't taught you the first thing about prayer. Because prayer simply can't be taught. Prayer is not something you do. Prayer is something you have to be. Like King David says over and over in his prayers, "I am a prayer."

So what's the whole liturgy thing about? It's all about setting the table. About which dishes go out first and which second and third and where you put the little forks and where you put the big forks and all those very important details. But if there's no chili-con-kosher to serve, all that pretty china and silverware is going to look awful lonesome.

Or, back to our original context: All those words and ceremonies are about bringing spiritual energies down to earth. The sages and prophets who composed them knew exactly what needs to be brought down and in what order. But if nobody climbs up there and flips a switch to begin with (i.e., pours out their soul to the One Above), we'll be milking a dry cow.

The System

Now let me explain how the system works:

The Torah never says, "Thou shalt pray." But it does say to "serve G-d with all your heart." How do you serve G-d will your heart? "Simple!" the sages say. "Pray to Him."

Meaning that when your heart bursts with pain, pour it out to Him. When it yearns, speak to Him about that which you yearn for. When your heart is broken, ask Him to mend it. When your heart feels empty, ask Him to fill it. Wherever your heart is at, whatever it is being, connect that to His Being. Make your heart His sanctuary, the place where you find Him.

This is the essential aspect of prayer, where we make no distinctions of time, place or gender. Every heart can be a sanctuary, any time, any place.

Where we do make a distinction is as follows: Men are told, "Do this sanctuary thing together with us in our sanctuary at these prescribed times with all these words before and after. That way, just as your heart becomes a sanctuary, so we will have a general sanctuary for all our community, to propel all our prayers upward and grant those blessings a safe landing."

Women are told, "Be a sanctuary. Be that at least twice a day. Be that in our shul or elsewhere, with all the words before and after or without them, with us or without us. But your thing is not the institution, not the protocol. Leave the men to their domain and take yours."

A simile to sculpture: There is art created by painting onto a canvas. And there is art created by chiseling away at stone. So, too, the man's prayer is created through his duties to attend, while a woman's prayer is preserved by her restriction to not be wrapped up in the protocol.

After all, what are all those words before and after prayer all about? They were put there to bring men to a state of prayer similar to the state that Chana prayed in. The men must say them, but for a woman, it is up to her to decide if she needs them.

And what's the time and place of the shul all about? Because that is the man's thing: To draw the spiritual down into time and space. Leave us to what we do best -- we have some redeeming qualities after all. Leave us to our job to draw the light of the Shechinah down to earth. You do your thing: To be the Shechinah. To discover that inside yourself.

Think of it: With all the wonderful things we have to say about the time of prayer in the shul, that it is a time when all the glory of heaven is revealed and the portals of Infinite Light opened wide, when prayers can shoot upwards and blessings pour down -- nevertheless, the woman is told that if she is caring for a child, she should skip the whole thing. We find Abraham following a similar logic when he excused himself from a private interview with G-d in order to take care of his guests. Because, after all, what is the point of coming to receive the Shechinah when you can be the Shechinah?

Sometimes you need a spiritual boost. Sometimes you need to join with others to get there. But standing in the ladies' gallery and singing along with a nice chazzan doesn't always cut it.

So some women get together on the new moon or once a week to study and sing and dance together. It's not really an innovation, but it works for us today. The women who do it will tell you it works wonders. They don't need the trappings and protocol of the shul. They just need their souls and their voices. Perhaps their high will spill over into our shul and lift us up, as well.

The Unauthorized Prayer

Perhaps in this way, we can explain another fascinating puzzle: Chana's prayer, the paradigm of all prayers, was a prayer for a child. Look through your entire prayer book, you won't find a prescribed prayer to ask for a child. For health, for wealth, for rain, for dew, for wisdom, for redemption, for justice -- for everything else. But not for a child.

Torah can be summarized as a unity, harmony and synthesis of these two cosmic forces: the masculine and the feminineThere are some beautiful prayers to ask for a child. They won't be found in the standard prayer book, however. They were composed by women in their mother tongue and they are the most heartfelt prayers there are. But no respected rabbi would dare meddle in this domain -- the domain of the woman, who brings life into being. And no one would dare prescribe the words to say and the order to say them. Because in the woman's world, prayer comes from inside and pours outward. (Some such prayers are posted on this website.)

But Why the Mechitzah?

There remains one burning question: If woman is the essence of prayer and song, why is she silent? Where is her creativity and inspiration? Where is her song? Fine, she won't be part of the protocol management. But why can't her voice and presence be an inspiration in the shul?

Things weren't always this way. In the tabernacle and in the First Temple, there was no separation between men and women. Only after matters got out of hand in the Second Temple, was the community forced to create a balcony for women above, while men stayed below. Perhaps, in the messianic era, when we return to our former spiritual status and more, we will return to the original format.

However, as human nature stands today, the reasoning of the sages of the Talmud is still very apparent: Men mingling with women, or listening to a woman's voice -- especially a woman that they know and can see -- are not necessarily carried to spiritual heights, but unfortunately often in the opposite direction. Women don't seem to understand this -- they seem to have very high opinions of us. But if you ask men, and if they're honest with you, they'll admit that they would not be able to pray with proper concentration in a situation where they can see and hear the fairer sex. (But this is a man speaking. Why not read this intriguing woman's view of how the mechitzah looks from her side?

There is a deeper perspective to all this: This is galut. Exile. The Shechinah is in captivity, not in her place. She is ignored and despised. And she is quiet there. But in the world-yet-to-come, the messianic era that we are poised to enter, then we will hear, "Once again in the cities of Judah and the streets of Jerusalem, the voice of joy and the voice of rejoicing, the voice of the groom and the voice of the bride."7

The Shechinah will sing once again.8

FOOTNOTES
1. Pri Etz Chaim, Rabbi Chaim Vital, page 1.
2. Numbers 8:3.
3. Rashi comments that they were not accustomed to praying out loud then. I've interpreted this as a sign of decadence. In fact, the story goes on to tell of the decadent acts of Eli's sons as Kohanim, which lead to the eventual destruction of Shiloh and the Tabernacle. An alternative interpretation is also possible: that praying quietly was a result of a decrease in holiness. To understand what I mean, see the excerpt from Likutei Torah at the end of these notes.
4. In Likutei Sichot volume XX, page x, the Lubavitcher Rebbe gives a deeper explanation. (See Chana's Prayer by this author.) He explains that Eli understood prayer as a spiritual service, while asking for material things, such as a child, was a form of drunkenness. This is complementary to my much simpler explanation here.
5. Genesis 1:27.
6. For the whole megilla on this, see the Lubavitcher Rebbe's talk on Shabbat Parshat Noach, 5751. The concept is based on the Arizal's explanation of the mitzvah to be fruitful and multiply in Ta'amai Hamitzvot.
7. Jeremiah 33:10-11.
8. Just to prove I didn't make up all this stuff, I've brought you one of the most striking and indeed revolutionary passages from the classic work, Likutei Torah, a collection of lengthy meditations (maamarim) of Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, 1745-1813. Note that the terms, "groom" and "bride" refer to the masculine and feminine elements of the cosmos.
This is from Shir HaShirim 48b (for a proper understanding, the entire ma'amar, Al Kol Kvod Chupah, should be studied):

This is the inner meaning of the verse, "A woman of valor will be the crown of her husband": that the feminine element will shine a delightful, secret light of the Hidden Mind...

This is also why in the last two blessings of the marriage ceremony, we first say that, "He rejoices the groom and the bride -- placing the groom before the bride -- but then conclude, "He rejoices the groom with the bride" -- implying that the groom's rejoicing is of secondary significance to the bride's.

This is because now the bride receives from the groom, but in the time yet to come, they will be equal in their stature with a single crown as it was before the moon was diminished.

So, too, we say, "Once again will be heard in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem…the voice of the groom and the voice of the bride." For in the future, the bride will also have a voice. A voice reveals the hidden thoughts and emotions. In this case, we mean to say that the inner light of the feminine will come outward and be revealed. For then, as we said, "A woman of valour will be the crown of her husband" -- even beyond the groom…

Therefore, in our time, prayer is said quietly, since the bride does not yet have a voice -- because presently the realm of Divine speech has no significance before the higher realms of thought and emotion, as a woman is treated as secondary to her husband. But in the time-yet-to-come, after all is purified and healed, when the Hidden Mind of Delight and Consciousness will be revealed, then the bride will have a great voice without limitation. We will say the Shmoneh Esreh prayer in a loud voice. The sefira of Malchut will be dominant -- "A woman of valor will be the crown of her husband."

As it is known that in the ten sefirot of the Returning Light, Malchut becomes Ketter (the Crown) and Yesod (which now is the dominant influence of Malchut) will become Chochma (Wisdom).

Rabbi Tzvi Freeman, a senior editor at Chabad.org, also heads our Ask The Rabbi team. He is the author of Bringing Heaven Down to Earth. To subscribe to regular updates of Rabbi Freeman's writing, visit Freeman Files subscription.
About the artist: Sarah Kranz has been illustrating magazines, webzines and books (including five children’s books) since graduating from the Istituto Europeo di Design, Milan, in 1996. Her clients have included The New York Times and Money Marketing Magazine of London.
© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with Chabad.org's copyright policy.
E-mail
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
Sort By:
Discussion (112)
May 16, 2014
I love this, though I do admit I did not read the whole thing. People are so focused on this issue that they are incapable of stepping back and looking at it without prejudice. From my own experience, mechitzahs are very important. I know the most adamant anti-mechitzah people here are Jewish originally, so they may not be able to relate... I grew up going to church, and would like to point out what goes on between men and women in church. Especially between the teenagers, my goodness, flirting and texting back and forth. Do these kids get anything out of the religious experience? Nothing. at. all. And this counts for grown men and women too. There will always be some handsome man or woman to ogle. This is why the mechitzah exists, to help you concentrate and really get into the spirit of praying. Not to show that women or men are less than the other, or that somehow men are incapable of controlling their thought...
Saskia
May 2, 2014
Re. Kedusha
I think what Sara A. is saying is that she expects a whole lot more from Torah. That Gd and Torah could not possibly make foundational rules for life based on the ugliest, lowest level of human behavior. She's right.
Avigayil Chana
Boston, MA
April 30, 2014
Kedusha
Is a man more kodesh (holy) because of his gender? This is a simple question. If the answer is yes, then women must be second class. If the answer is no, then a woman should be able to wear tefillin and be equal to a man in all religious matters. Is murder wrong? it is wrong. Is slavery wrong? It is wrong. Is descrimination wrong? It is wrong. Saying women have different roles is hiding the truth. If I brought my daughter to shul, if any man in the shul looked at my daughter with lust or bad thoughts, I would expect the Rabbi to throw that man out and report him to the police. A man in shul should be focusing on prayer and holiness. If a man looks at a woiman and has bad thoughts, that is an indication of his lack of descency and it is horrible. To use this as an excuse to keep a woman behind a mechitza is to admit that men are allowed to have poor, sexual thoughts IN A SHUL WHILE PRAYING! How absurd. We are in shul to be close to God. rather than mechitzah give that man therapy.
sara abraham
staten enisland
April 30, 2014
Re. For Steve from NY
Dovid makes the correct point to Steve.

I would add, though, she should only "go ahead" with the OK from her Orthodox rabbi. And a woman like that (in the 0.0000001%) would get the OK.
Avigayil Chana
Boston, MA
April 30, 2014
For Steve from NY
Steve, you're saying great things. Absolutely we should go past the letter of the law and have enthusiasm in doing things the best way possible. But that doesn't mean circumventing the letter of the law - as i wrote before, if we're on a mission to do what G-d wants, first we have to make sure the letter of the law is being fulfilled, and then we can move past it. First we have to meet the expectations - the explicit rules - then we can reach past them with our own stringencies.
Tefillin have too much kedusha for 99.999999% of all people (men and women) to be worthy to wear on their bodies. Therefore, 99.99999999% of women are told not to wear them, but men are allowed to because we're commanded to. if a woman works on herself to become part of the 0.0000001% who are capable, then go ahead.
Dovid
Jerusalem
April 4, 2014
Who is Greater?
Re. Anonymous on April 3rd: No, it's not "gender exclusion in the other direction". What you should see in my post is gender equality. Being "spiritually greater" is not based on the person, but on the role, and the proximity to Source.

And it's not "on my part" because I didn't invent this. This is how Gd set it up. Check out Basi l'Gani. Blame Him. (Seriously -- blame Him, so He will end it today.)

Who blamed Him? The Moon, when she was made smaller. So Hashem made a sin offering for Himself -- for His sin -- on Rosh Chodesh. This is understood to be for His sin of social injustice in the world.

Why does Gd want social injustice? Once King David asked Gd to end poverty, because he saw the pain and suffering. Hashem refused, saying that He can't, since He created the world for the express purpose of charity.

This is not simple stuff -- it's downright hard to understand. But it's Torah. And mission-critical. And AWESOME.
Avigayil Chana
Boston
April 4, 2014
from the Gemorrah
Why can't we apply this to women who want to wear talis and tefilin today? There are many! "The Gemorrah describes in Baba Metziah how Rebbi Yochanan and his talmidim were walking in Yerushalim and found a wallet in the street. He pointed out that according to Hallachah, the person who lost the wallet was Meyayish, had given up hope of finding it again, and therefore the finders did not have to return it according to the strict letter of the law. But of course, if a person wanted to go beyond the law, and act lifnim meshuras hadin, he would certainly return it. The Second Bais Hamikdosh was destroyed, he said, because the Jews didn't go beyond the letter of the law.

A person who has only reached the level of Tahara is capable of not returning the wallet, especially if he has not shaken off the desire for material possessions. Look at the money he'd be giving up. But someone who is Kadosh certainly would return the wallet, because he would feel the pain of the person who lost it, and would have overcome the desire for the money. In these terms, perhaps the Bais HaMikdosh was destroyed because they felt satisfied with the level of Tahara and weren't striving hard enough to reach the level of Kedushah.
steve abraham
new york
April 3, 2014
For Steve in NY
Steve, there is no tallis and tefillin prohibition for women in the Torah; and unless you know Torah and its technical nuances as well as the authors of the Talmud (I for sure don't), you probably won't figure out their exemption either (without their help, that is). It was the "rabbi's interpretation," if you will - not the text's simple, objective reading. The reason women don't wear tefillin is simply because tefillin are so holy that really nobody is "holy enough" for them, but men are obligated, so what can we do? (Really, most men are probably LESS worthy to wear them, which is exactly why we need them in the first place). That's why extra-holy women like Rashi's daughters wore tefillin, and why men don't wear them all day but rather remove them once we fulfill our obligation during prayer.
In general, we hold off on the extras until we have mastered what we ARE obligated in. First come the basics like Shabbat and Kashrut. Then we can take on additional stringencies.
Dovid
Jerusalem
April 3, 2014
Who is greater?
Just more gender exclusion on your part in the other direction, eh?
Anonymous
April 2, 2014
Who is greater?
Women are in a role that is more distant from the top of the spiritual ladder down which flows Gdly influence. We began as an equal half of that person named ADAM, and all that Torah says about “him” applied equally to her. Later when the separated Chava made a choice, her curses included a demotion. Her holy role was defined by those curses, which are more of holy mission than a punishment. So, yes, women are, by definition, spiritually lower than men. (And men are lower than angels. So do you think an angel is greater than a Jew?) However, very soon, maybe today, when because of our mitzvos, the great Source of Light relocates to this lowest of worlds, i.e, when Moshiach comes and Gd dwells here, THEN women in their lower level will be closer to that Source, and men and angels will then be spiritually lower than women, and men will receive from women.
Avigayil Chana
Boston
Show all comments
Load next 50
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG