Here's a great tip:
Enter your email address and we'll send you our weekly magazine by email with fresh, exciting and thoughtful content that will enrich your inbox and your life, week after week. And it's free.
Oh, and don't forget to like our facebook page too!
Printed from
Contact Us
Visit us on Facebook

Why did Adam and Eve become aware of their nakedness only after they sinned?

Why did Adam and Eve become aware of their nakedness only after they sinned?



I'm studying to teach my children about the bible and creation but I can't seem to get past Genesis 2!

In Genesis 2 it says that Adam and Eve were both originally naked, "but they were not ashamed." After they ate of the Tree of Knowledge, we are told that "the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked."

Here is my question: Was the act of being naked a sinful thing? Why would G‑d have allowed them to walk around naked to start with if it was sinful? And if it was originally fine, how did their disobedience cause their nakedness to not be so good?

What am I missing?


Your perceptive question is addressed by almost all the biblical commentaries… On the second verse you quote, "Then the eyes of both of them were opened and they realized that they were naked," Rashi, the primary commentator on the Torah points out, "even a blind person knows when he is naked." So what was it that they realized here?

Little children are notorious for trying to shed their clothes and run around naked. This is done with total innocence; the two-year-old does not see any difference between his face, his knees, and the parts of his body which we adults insist that he cover. Only adults feel that certain parts of the body must be covered. Why? Because those are connected with physical lust and passions, and should not be exposed.

Prior to their sin, Adam and Eve knew good from bad, right from wrong, but they had not internalized an evil inclination. So they could choose to do right and wrong, and were held responsible for their choices, but the urge to do evil did not come from within. This urge was represented by the serpent—the external tempter. Since the evil did not reside within them, they were "naturally" good, and their nakedness was innocent and in no way sinful. They saw no difference between a hand, whose purpose was to give charity and to do good deeds, a mouth with which one praises G‑d and says kind words to others, and the parts of the body which are used to "be fruitful and multiply." With every organ they could fulfill the will of G‑d or vice versa, so no organ was shameful, nor did anything need to be covered.

When they ate of the Tree of Knowledge, the evil inclination became a part of them. No longer did they need an external tempter to incite them to sin—now, that tempter resided within their psyches. And specifically, sexual passion – a passion which is much stronger than the desire to give charity or praise G‑d, a passion which is much more encompassing and has the potential to be seriously misused – became a part of them as well.

Hence the abovementioned verse. "The eyes of both of them were opened" – they became aware of physical lust "and they realized that they were naked" – and only now it was inappropriate for them to be unclothed.

I hope this has been helpful.

Chaya Sarah Silberberg,

Chaya Sarah Silberberg serves as the rebbetzin of the Bais Chabad Torah Center in West Bloomfield, Michigan, since 1975. She also counsels, lectures, writes, and responds for’s Ask the Rabbi service.
© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with's copyright policy.
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
Sort By:
Discussion (30)
July 5, 2015
Then why do people in Africa and in the Amazon still run around naked and feel no shame?
June 19, 2015
To add to what "Anonymous Dracula" said, I came here with a the same question, as I have heard that, "G-d created birds with feathers, animals with fur, so he didn't exactly create man completely naked, i.e., according to Psalm 8 he was "crowned with glory. . ." indicating a covering. I would like to know if that is a correct interpretation. This has been the most informative and enlightening article I have read on the subject, thank you so much.
February 26, 2015
Something I heard that makes a great deal of sense to me is that when God created them in His image, Adam and Eve were created with the Shikina Glory. Once they sinned, it was removed from them. Therefore their eyes were opened to their nakedness, because it was only then that they were truly naked. While this is something I have found intriguing, it is not necessarily given as fact in scripture. But, It certainly makes sense.
January 27, 2015
The sexualisation of the naked body. Nakedness wss natural but as soon as they had sex they sexualised themselves to save the nakedness only for sex . You see it a lot today.. no one wants to see people naked because they sexualise it instead of seeing it for just what it is
November 25, 2014
The answer is quite simple my friend, The problem was not their nakedness (Awareness) at all, the problem was the act of rebellion to God's order. To eat of the tree despite His mandate not to.

Their hiding was their consciousness of them sinning against God. And the consequences of Sure Death that would follow. One can conclude this after understanding that both Adam and Eve felt emotions they never knew before, And if shame was visible, I submit to you that so was fear, and anxiety, anger and frustration. And I bet they felt them all.
Los Angeles
September 8, 2014
Adam and Eve's nakedness
They did not have or need material covering because the glory of the image of God covered them, the light of righteousness surrounded them. When they sinned they lost that divine image and glory.
January 3, 2013
Same root word
I just found out that the Heb word for "naked" has the same root at the word for "aware."
Stephen Boggan
Paso Robles
January 3, 2013
The answer was more than right and on the point it's good to debate, but sometimes the truth is just the truth.
ca butler
jax, fl
October 23, 2012
But the argument in the answer is flawed. Adam and Eve did not know good from bad. God said it himself: And the Lord God said, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever." - and it's not man's fault for being ignorant because God made him that way. Or another thing: if they were "naturally good" then they could do no evil except when forced by an outside agent (the serpent). So again it's not man's fault if he was forced. And another thing if they were innocent and when they ate the apple they internalized evil why did God punish them? He could have removed the evil and not put evil in the garden of Eden in the first place. This last one seems like God's very sick joke. Also why did God create evil? If He is truly omnipotent then there is no reason for it whatsoever except if He is a sadist (but then He would not be all loving)... swiss cheese anyone?
Marco Polo
Iasi, Romania
August 26, 2012
When we know the truth
You don't put something that can alter the consciousness of people you created if you didn't plan for it to happen. Thats just like someone placing mines in the ground outside their house & not expect anyone to step on them & explode. The God I believe in plans out things to perfection. The question is, what is the contingency plan. How does the human race overcome it's nature to sin?
jacksonville , Florida