Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Weekly Torah (Parshah)
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Weekly Torah (Parshah) » Bereishit - Genesis » Vayechi » Parshah Columnists » Inner Stream » Is Judaism Dogmatic?
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment4 Comments

Inner Stream
Is Judaism Dogmatic?


Judaism encourages us to think for ourselves and to question everything. We are not meant to blindly accept, but to explore, analyze, debate and conclude. True or false?

Two Names

Joseph had two sons. He named the first one, Manasseh because "Nashani Elokim," G-d allowed me to forget my hardships and my father's home. He named the second son Ephraim, because, "Hifarni Elokim," G-d made me prosperous in the land of my suffering.1

In his father's home, Joseph was hated by his brothers and was sold into slavery. In Egypt, he quarreled with his master's wife and was thrown into a dungeon. He was eventually liberated and was able to forget his troubles. Hence the name, Manasseh. In addition to finding peace he was appointed viceroy of Egypt. Hence the name, Ephraim.

Torah Study

Our sages offered a different interpretation. "Nashani Eolkimn," G-d enabled me to forget, the Torah that I studied in my father's home. "Hifrani Elokim," G-d made me prosperous, by restoring my Torah knowledge, in the land of my suffering.2

This interpretation is difficult to understand. We can appreciate Joseph's sentiments in naming Ephraim; he was grateful for his restored knowledge. But what motivated him to name his first son, Manasseh? Was he grateful to have forgotten the Torah he studied? We don't toil in pursuit of knowledge only to rejoice when we forget it!

Critical Thought

A teachers happiest moment is when the student challenges the material and demands a better explanation.

I know a professor who encourages his students to reject everything he teaches until they independently verify the information. These students will always closely examine the theories and materials they are taught and are not likely to be led astray.

So, too, Joseph wanted to learn how to research, analyze and understand the precepts of Torah for himself. He did not want to know them only because they were taught to him. Joseph wanted to sift through every piece of information and objectively determine its authenticity.

His studies with his father endowed him with the skills to do so, but those very studies also handicapped him. Joseph was incapable of objectivity with respect to the precepts he had learned from Jacob. Jacob was a Torah master par excellence and Joseph was inclined to believe that his father's teachings were valid. Yet, without the necessary objectivity, he was unable to independently determine the authenticity of those precepts.

It is for this reason that he prayed that he be granted amnesia with respect to the precepts his father had taught him. His selective amnesia provided him with a clean slate and he was able to begin anew. Unburdened by his inherent bias he could now devote himself to the analysis and corroboration of those precepts.

When he succeeded he was overjoyed and greatly relieved. Imagine his consternation if he were granted amnesia, but proved unable to reassemble the information. He would have been devastated. Surely this concern caused him no small measure of anxiety.

His immense relief is reflected in his second son's name. Ephraim, "who has made my studies prosper in my land of suffering." Reassembling the information was a time of anxiety and suffering. Succeeding in his endeavor and prospering in his studies provided immense relief.

Jacob's Choice

When Joseph asked his father to bless his sons, Jacob blessed Ephraim ahead of Manasseh. Joseph objected on account of Manasseh being the elder brother. Jacob replied that despite Manasseh's age, Ephraim's descendants would outshine those of Manasseh. Our sages taught that Jacob was speaking of Joshua, a descendant of Ephraim.3

Joshua was an incredible scholar in his own right. He was widely hailed as the greatest thinker of his time. His piety knew no bounds. He was a leader, a miracle worker and a prophet in his own right. Yet the Torah describes him as Moses' humble, self-effacing pupil. Moses. He drank in his master's every word and unquestioningly embraced the precepts that Moses taught.4

Jacob preferred Joshua's humble acceptance over Manasseh's objective thought. Joshua analyzed and debated every doctrine that Moses taught, but his ultimate reason for accepting the doctrines was not that he had understood them, but that Moses had taught them.

Before G-d gave the Torah at Sinai, he offered it's wisdom to our ancestors. At that time, Joseph's approach was appropriate. But when G-d gave the Torah to all of Israel at Sinai, he offered us its latent divinity and this required a new approach--that of receptiveness to the divine truth.

The Journey and the Destination

Does Judaism encourage critical thought? The answer is, absolutely yes. Critical thought is the precursor to wisdom. But critical thought alone is no longer enough because the Torah is no longer just a book of wisdom. It is now a book of divinity. And divinity is received through humility and acceptance.

Torah study is a journey of intellectual and spiritual inquiry. Questions and critical thought are the sign posts that direct our path. Humility and acceptance enable us to reach our destination.5

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment4 Comments
FOOTNOTES
1. Genesis 41:51-52.
2. Midrash Rabbah, Bereishit 97.
3. Genesis 48:12-19. See Rashi's commentary to verse 19.
4. See Nachmanides' commentary on Exodus 33:11.
5. This essay is based on the Shem Mishmuel commentary by Rabbi Shmuel Salir (1855-1927), Rebbe of Sochaczev.

By Lazer Gurkow   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Lazer Gurkow is spiritual leader of congregation Beth Tefilah in London, Ontario. He has lectured extensively on a variety of Jewish topics, and his articles have appeared in many print and online publications. For more on Rabbi Gurkow and his wrtings, visit InnerStream.ca.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Jan 2, 2007
Author's Response:
In response to Tzvi Freeman's posted daily dose: Chassidus teaches that intellect, all intellect, is objective. This is why Chassidus equates the intellect (not only Chochmoh) with humility.

The mind is devoted to the truth. Any subversive influence over this single minded devotion does not derive from the mind.

Chassidus does not posit that only faith can be objective, the mind is aso a perfect model of objectivity.
Posted By Lazer Gurkow

Posted: Jan 1, 2007
I could not have responded better myself
"If your belief system is based upon what makes sense to you, what you find most gratifying and what best accommodates your own self concept -- then you will undoubtedly fear intellectual inquiry. At best, your approach will be subjective and bribed. However, when your faith is based not upon your subjective self, but because this is the reality of your inner soul, a truth to which it is intrinsically bound --then you are not afraid to inquire. There is no apprehension of being proven wrong, only certitude that you shall understand more. Therefore, only true faith can be truly objective." (A Daily Dose of Wisdom from the Rebbe - by Tzvi Freeman)
Posted By AF

Posted: Jan 1, 2007
Both sons are part of the reevaluation of truth!
The professor does not make students recheck him so that they are never led astray or know he is right. By experiencing the journey toward the truth, one makes the truth part of themselves and know it much more intimately. Any fool can know that Einstein was right -- thousands of scientist checked him. But to know why and how, the student must critically go through every equation and argument.
Every descent is for the sake of ascent. G-d conceals the truth of his Light so that after the revelation through Asiyah this truth can shine brighter. The soul descends into this world so that the distance from G-d can enable it to know His Essence.
We cannot simply acknowledge the divinity of Torah and therefore agree it is true. We must know (know!) before that it is divine; we must know that our emunah pshutah is the emunah in emes. We must have humility not in the reason for believing but in acknowledging that the limit of our understanding does not mean the limit of truth.
Posted By AF, Boston, MA

Posted: Dec 31, 2006


This is a nice article,which discusses reasonably some important issues. I would suggest however that it is not right to say that at some point we should stop questioning and start accepting.

We know that in this life we can not come close to the Torah's author's infinite wisdom, thus we can say that really there is no point at whichwe should stop questioning and start accepting.

If we say however that we could continue to question while still humbly accepting, then will we not simply be reading and searching for points prooving our already decided minds? If so this is not productive.

The question raised by this article is a challenging one. Might a more plausible answer be that rather than reaching a point in this life where we can say it is time to accept dogmas, we continue to challenge and reach higher levels of understanding as much as possible, until the day on which we all understand fully and then can accept.

Thank-you Rabbi for an interesting article
Posted By Lois Menelsohn, Glasgow, Scotland



 


This Week's Torah Portion: Vayechi
Parshah Vayechi
Genesis 47:28-50:26
Text of Haftorah
 Parshah in a Nutshell
 Haftorah in a Nutshell
 Weekly Aliya Summary
 Text of Parshah with Rashi
 Parshah In Depth
 Kehot Chumash
 The Chassidic Masters
 Parshah Columnists
 Family Parshah
 Audio Classes
 Parshah Print Version (PDF)

 RSS Feed RSS Directory

Parshah Home » 


Other Parshas

Browse All Parshas