Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Weekly Torah (Parshah)
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Weekly Torah (Parshah) » Devarim - Deuteronomy » Ki Teitzei » Parshah Columnists » Comment » The Jew's Double Standard
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment6 Comments

Comment
The Jew's Double Standard


A time to kill, a time to heal
A time for war, a time for peace

Ecclesiastes 3:3,8

Double standards are supposedly unethical. Yet Judaism -- the ethos contained in the Bible and expounded by the sages of Israel -- abounds with double standards. In fact, these double standards are at the heart of how we live and what we have taught the world -- and at the heart of what makes an ethical person.

One example of an ethical double standard is the different ways in which we regard tragedy, depending on who is the victim. When something bad happens to myself, the Torah tells me to trust in G-d's help, justify His ways, and examine my ways for what I might have done wrong so that I may learn a lesson from what occurred. Which are precisely the things I'm not supposed to do regarding someone else's troubles. (See When Bad Things Happen.)

Another Jewish double standard -- also relating to a difference in how we treat ourselves and how we treat others -- is the potential/actuality question. Briefly stated, we're supposed to judge ourselves by what we've actually achieved, and judge others by what they're capable of achieving. (For more on this, see this essay.)

But perhaps the most fascinating -- and important -- double standard in Judaism is in the way we apply the Divine commandment "Do not kill."

Much has been written on the infinite value that the Torah places on every individual life. After the concept of monotheism (from which it derives), this is the most revolutionary idea which the Jew has introduced to mankind -- "revolutionary" in the sense that it flies in the face of everything everyone previously believed (as indeed in the face of common sense), and "revolutionary" in the way it has transformed the face of civilized society.

Placing an infinite value on every human life means an utter rejection of any "scale" by which to quantify and qualify its worth. A retarded baby's life has the same value as that of the wisest person on earth. An 80-year-old "vegetable" cannot be sacrificed to save the life of a 20-year-old genius. The Talmud tells the story of a man who was threatened by the hoodlum that ran his city that he'd be killed unless he kills a certain person. The great sage Rava told this man: "What makes you think that your blood is redder than that person's blood?"

Torah law goes so far as to rule that an entire city cannot be saved by giving up a single individual. Because each and every life is of Divine -- and therefore infinite -- significance. Ten thousand infinities aren't any "more" than one infinity.

(For further discussion of this principle see: The Sacred and the Good, What's So Terrible About Idolatry, The Practical Implications of Infinity, and The First Commandment.)

In light of the above, it is surprising to find the following law in the Torah (derived from Deuteronomy 22:26): Habah l'hargecha hashkem l'hargo -- "If someone is coming to kill you, rise against him and kill him first." (This law applies equally to someone coming to kill someone else -- you're obligated to kill the murderer in order to save his intended victim.)

This law seems to contradict the principle of life's infinite value. If no life can be deemed less valuable that any other, what makes the victim's life more valuable than the murderer's life? Furthermore, this rule applies to anyone who is "coming to kill you" -- he hasn't even done anything yet! Maybe he won't succeed? Maybe he'll change his mind? Nor does the law say anything about trying to run away. It says: If someone is coming to kill you, rise against him and kill him first.

The same Torah that tells us that G-d placed a spark of Himself in every human being, thereby bestowing upon his or her physical existence a G-dly, infinite worth -- that same Torah also tells us that G-d has granted free choice to every person. Including the choice -- and the power -- to corrupt his or her G-d-given vitality and turn it against itself, using it to destroy life. A person can choose to turn himself into a murderer -- someone who is prepared to destroy life in order to achieve his aims. In which case he is no longer a life, but an anti-life.

To kill an anti-life is not a life-destroying act, it is a life-preserving act. It is not a violation of the commandment "Do not kill," but its affirmation. Without the law, "If someone is coming to kill you, rise against him and kill him first," the principle of life's infinite value is nothing more than an empty slogan, a mere idea.

Judaism is not an idea. It is a way of life -- G-d's ideas made real.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment6 Comments

By Yanki Tauber   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Yanki Tauber is content editor of Chabad.org.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Sep 8, 2011
Double Standard
Hitler had a double standard. Aryans live and Jews were supposed to be exterminated. Now it seems another Shoah is in the planning stage where Israel is to be replaced by an Arab Spring.

It seems to me that G-d might have had something to say about all of this. And precisely: What does G-d say on this matter? After many centuries, it seems we are still trying to resolve the issue. Is it because the King of the Universe, who created all that is in the Universe, has a plan? And since He, Blessed be his Name, is truthful, when man is not, has promised Israel to all of Israel.We, who do not know the how and why of all this, are we presuming to fill in the blanks?

There is G-d, or there is not G-d. If not, who are we? If He is, who are we? What are we to do when face to face with those who would kill us? As such, they are a cancer in the community called the body. Excise the cancer, but be mindful the body cannot live if the lung goes to war with the liver.
Posted By Burton Dale, West Palm Beach, FL

Posted: Sep 7, 2011
double standard
what about Amalek? we are commanded to kill the nation of Amalek - men, women and children. are they considered "anti life"?
how can we place this kind of value to anyone's life? one of the 10 commandments - is do not murder/kill.
can we really justify this kind of action when perhaps an individual (one's whose intentions is to kill) could be persuaded not to follow through by using speech?
Posted By Anonymous, dallas

Posted: June 8, 2011
Bible interpretations
Because there can be many,many interpretations for every idea written in the Torah and the bible,there is no right or wrong opinion.
We should just try to conform to the code of ethics set forth to the best of our abilities.
Posted By Anonymous, Bayside, NY

Posted: Nov 14, 2010
Yes but again
To kill a fetus is, in my opinion, an act of murder. The fetus is innocent. And if a mentally insane person comes at you with a knife, must that act result in killing? Let the circumstance fit the act. I have been in such a circumstance.

I was able to reason with the person and the weapon was put down and I do not have his blood on my head. That same person was later killed by someone else who, in fear, sought protection by killing in self defense.

Who was right here, me in restraining, or the other in killing an insane person? Could it be both were right, but acting at different times? Or would I have been in error if the insane person had later killed, by my not killing? Would then the blood of an innocent man have been on my head?

It is my belief here that since the future is hidden to man, but not to G-d, I was correct in using restraint.
Posted By Mr. Burton Dale

Posted: May 16, 2010
The commandment says "do not MURDER" (at least in my Torah). Murder is a planned out thing, where killing is not (i.e. - you don't plan on killing someone who attacks you, it could happen in self defense). Murder is a planned out act.
What of that?
Posted By Anonymous, nebo, nc
via theshul.org

Posted: Aug 28, 2009
Yes but...
What if the person isn't even capable of making choices? What if is an unborn fetus? Or a mentally insane person coming at you with a knife? The Torah considers these two cases the status of "Rodef" which would then mean they are...anti-life? How can we say they are anti-anything and therefore deserve to be killed as this article suggests?
Posted By Anonymous, New York



 


This Week's Torah Portion: Ki Teitzei
Parshah Ki Teitzei
Deuteronomy 21:10-25:19
Text of Haftorah
 Parshah in a Nutshell
 Haftorah in a Nutshell
 Weekly Aliya Summary
 Text of Parshah with Rashi
 Parshah In Depth
 The Chassidic Masters
 Parshah Columnists
 Family Parshah
 Audio Classes
 Parshah Print Version (PDF)

 RSS Feed RSS Directory

Parshah Home » 


Other Parshas

Browse All Parshas