Fifteen years ago Margaret Thatcher, the then British Prime Minister
attempted to institute a poll tax. In addition to the regulation income tax, an
additional local property toll was introduced. No matter one's social position
or financial circumstances, an identical payment was levied on each adult
resident.
Mass demonstrations resulted. People rioted. She was sacked as PM.
I can understand the outrage. Isn't a tax that devolves on everyone equally,
regardless of his or her ability to pay, patently inequitable?
When Moses was commanded to raise funds to build the
Mishkan -- the traveling Temple that accompanied the Jews through the
desert -- voluntary contributions of building and decorating materials were
solicited, and the Jews, as is our wont, responded with generosity. So eager was
the nation to participate in the project that just two days after the public
appeal was initiated the builders found themselves oversupplied with the
requisite materials and had to beg people to stop.
Each man, woman and child donated voluntarily "out of the generosity of
one's heart" (Exodus 25:2) with one seemingly minor exception. The silver
sockets to hold up the walls of the Mishkan were funded by a compulsory
poll tax, exactly half a shekel per capita. Not only was this a required contribution, people could not even
choose their level of individual commitment; rates were fixed at a half-shekel
per head.
I don't get it. Why leave the whole enterprise up to each person's generosity
and then risk exciting the resentment of the masses by compelling them to donate
to just one subsection of the project?
People often complain about the perceived lack of autonomy in Judaism. Why
must we all pray the same words, the same way, at the same time? Surely prayer
should be a distinct journey of the untrammeled soul, individualized and
appropriate to self.
In truth this is a specious argument. There is huge scope for
self-determination in our religious lives. One's inclination influences one's
relationship with G-d. Some pray at length, some study all day and some choose
to concentrate their efforts in altruism and charitable giving.
During prayer however, there is less room for personal preference and the
same prayer book is appropriate to all. This is analogous to the sockets holding
up the building: prayer is the bedrock of our faith, the cornerstone of our day
and the articulation of our soul. This soul is identical in each of us and
underpins our common mission.
Though the sockets only cost a fraction of the entire outlay, they were the
foundation of the entire building. Insignificant in size or substance they may
well have been, but symbolically the whole framework and structure of the Temple
rested on them. By forcing every single Jew to assume an equal share in the
costs, G-d was announcing that the foundations of our faith are equally
applicable and dependent on all.
Following this comes the capacity for self-expression in Judaism. To each
their own "out of the generosity of one's heart." Once the commonality
that binds us has been expressed, then comes the scope for personal autonomy:
choose the path to religious gratification that suits you best; study to your
heart's content, give of yourself to others. Live up to whichever path to G-dliness
that best expresses your unique individuality.