Question:
I recall learning about the story of Eliezer, Abraham’s servant, being sent to find a wife for his master’s son, Isaac. Recently, I was challenged by a friend to find how many times Eliezer’s name is mentioned in the Torah portion describing this story. To my surprise, his name is not mentioned even once! Why is that?
Response:
That is a great question. It does indeed come as a surprise to many that the central figure in the story goes nameless throughout the entire account.
After Eliezer had encountered Rebecca and realized that she was the one he was sent to find, he requested permission from her father and brother that she return with him to marry Isaac. His initial statement to them is, “I am a servant of Abraham” (Genesis 24:34). And indeed, throughout his journey, he is consistently referred to as “the servant.”
By his name not being mentioned, we learn that this was not about Eliezer the person; this was about the mission. Eliezer was so dedicated to Abraham that at no time did his own self-interest get in the way of fulfilling that mission. He was a mere servant—an extension of Abraham’s hand.
And this was central to the mission’s success. Eliezer was faced with the near-impossible task of finding a “rose among thorns” (Leviticus Rabbah 23:1). Had he relied on his own capabilities, he would have had no chance of success. It was his constant awareness that he was nothing more than Abraham’s servant that mapped his path through the every challenge and obstacle that lay before him (see Genesis 24:12). By making himself into nothing more than an extension of Abraham, he had all the power and merit of Abraham behind him.
He is even more worthy of recognition for loving his master in such a way that he "rejoiced" when he found Rivka.
He was pleased to accomplish the task, even when doing so, would rob him of material grateness
Greensburg, PA/USA
omaha, ne.usa
To which he replied, "What will you give me, since I am childless, and the heir of my house is Eliezer of Damascus?"
Abram had no heir so he was all set to leave his "estate", if you will, to his eldest and most trusted servant.
Then turn back to Genesis 24:2:
"Abraham said to his servant, the oldest of his household, who had charge of all that he owned . . ."
To me that's clear evidence that the reference was to Eliezer as the servant. I know that no one is debating whether or not it's him, but I just didn't see anyone reference Gen 15:2.
Mayberry, NC
I am not Jewish, but I would very much like to post a comment regarding the discussion you have been discussing. Eliezer, is the servant of his Master Abrham, so I wonder if it would be correct and accurate to take a step back and view Abraham from a typology persepective. That typology portraying Abraham as G-d, not that he is or ever could be, but from a spiritual perspective, and for educating individuals on the spiritual aspect of what G-d would be communicating to the student's studying the truth of the Torah. Eliezer was the servant of his master and did all that his master commanded following it to the full extent. My question is, would it be accurate to view Eliezer from a spiritual perspective or typology also? That perspective being the spiritual servant of his Master. The servant humbly seeks to please his Master, and does not involve his own affairs but diligently listen's for his instruction's and moves out to accomplish just that.
Murfreesboro, TN
Muncie, Indiana
As for a lesson for today: this is the proper approach when making a Shidduch, what is BEST for the two, not for you!
Phila. Balto, PA,MD
bkyn, ny
Laval, Ca
Perhaps the pearl in this story is that if we are to have our Master's mission in us accomplished, we have to take the "Me" out of the mix as well, so G-d can accomplish His work in and through us.
Allentown, PA