HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Chassidic Thought
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Kabbalah & Jewish Mysticism » Chassidic Thought » Anthologies » A Home for G-d » The River and the Pitcher
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment1 Comment

Idea of the Week
The River and the Pitcher


Shortly after landing my first job, I approached my employer with the following proposal: “You are a visionary, but are not pragmatically grounded. I lack your vision, but have a pragmatic knack for detail. I propose that you determine the overall vision for our company, and I will determine the detailed policy.” Needless to say, my employer was not amused.

While lacking in tact, I am convinced that my proposal was of sound logic. Every successful business must function on two separate tracks, the visionary and the practical.

In Judaism there are also two tracks. The vision consists of transcendence and inspiration, and the practical is the track of the actual mitzvot.

The Jewish visionary will meditate upon G‑d’s infinite greatness and inspire within himself a boundless love for Him. He will tremble in awe and revel in ecstasy. He will scale spiritual heights and delight in the transcendence of his soul.

Actualizing the vision is the practical track. When love for G‑d is channeled into fulfilling His will, when spiritual ecstasy is expressed in obedience to His commandments, when deep inspiration is poured into pragmatic detail, then the vision has been brought to practical expression.

In the vision, we are rewarded; in the mitzvot, G‑d is rewarded. In the vision, we serve our own spiritual needs; in the mitzvot, we serve G‑d’s interests.1

It is true that both tracks are necessary, but we must recognize which is the means and which is the end. Pursuit of the vision is glamorous and rewarding, but commitment to detail is what G‑d desires most.

Crossing the River

In the Parshah (Torah reading) of Vayishlach (Genesis 32:4–36:43), we read how Jacob and his family crossed the Jabbok River.2 Jacob planted one foot on the near bank and the other foot on the far bank to form a human bridge, and transferred his possessions across the river.

Realizing that he had forgotten a number of trivial items, he chose to leave his family and possessions behind and set off in search of those items. The Torah tells us that at this point “Jacob remained alone” on his side of the river.3

The Midrash suggests that in emphasizing Jacob’s “aloneness,” the Torah indicates that Jacob was comparable to G‑d. Just as G‑d is exalted and alone, so too was Jacob.4

How did Jacob attain this collegiality with G‑d? It was not through spiritual ecstasy or meditative inspiration; it was through his attention to detail. He had forgotten a simple earthenware pitcher and went back to retrieve it.

What is the significance of this pitcher? To answer that, we must first understand the purpose of Jacob’s sojourn in his uncle Laban’s home and his later encounter with his brother Esau.

His uncle’s home and his brother’s company were not conducive to personal spiritual elevation. But Jacob was not there to satisfy his own agenda; he was there to satisfy G‑d’s agenda.

An Aura Revealed

Though G‑d is transcendent, He projected an aura of divine presence into the universe. This aura lies concealed. It is not permitted to make itself known to mankind. The Patriarchs and their offspring were charged with revealing this aura through the propagation of divine knowledge and observance of the divine commandments.

It was Jacob’s task to reveal the auras concealed within the homes of Laban and Esau. Every object that Jacob touched was utilized for the worship of G‑d. In so doing, Jacob elevated these objects to a higher plane. He revealed the aura within them and realized their G‑dly potential.5

When he crossed the river and realized that he had left a few items on the other side, he went back to retrieve them. He knew that the aura within them would otherwise remain forever imprisoned in the unholy environment of his uncle’s home.6

Consider the Circumstances

After twenty years in exile, Jacob was finally returning home. During that time he was constantly on duty, always aware of his mission. Constantly on guard, always alert to the spiritual dangers. Surely, Jacob’s soul pined for the pure atmosphere of the home of his parents, the saintly Isaac and Rebecca.

Crossing the river was a significant step in that direction, a metaphoric crossing from impurity to sanctity.7 Jacob was moving from the pragmatic track of duty to the visionary track of transcendence. One might have expected Jacob to forge ahead and never hesitate.

But as he crossed the river, he paused. Could he be consumed by inspiration but not succumb to its temptation? Could he live in the world of vision and yet be committed to the duty of detail?

This may have been Jacob’s inner reason for straddling the river, one foot firmly planted on the practical bank, the other foot apprehensively planted on the visionary bank. He passed his family and possessions across the divide, and now had to make the move himself. Consumed with desire, yet riddled with anxiety, Jacob hesitantly let himself across.

He suddenly remembered that he had left a few items behind. At that moment, he knew that the future hung in the balance. The hosts of heaven had gathered to see which way Jacob would lean.8 He knew he had to act. He pulled himself back to the other bank and went in search of his items.

Eventually, Jacob did cross. But not before he demonstrated that he could find a balance between the two worlds.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment1 Comment
FOOTNOTES
1. Every time we fulfill a mitzvah, we draw some of G‑d’s energy into our world. The performer of the mitzvah is sanctified. The object with which it was performed is consecrated. The environment in which it was performed is hallowed. (Tanya, ch. 37)
This phenomenon, however real, lies concealed from the human experience. We cannot perceive the divinity as it is drawn into ourselves. There is no tangible sense of spiritual elevation. It remains, first and foremost, a duty. Contrast that with the experience of the vision (i.e., inspiration, joy and love) where we come away physically energized, knowing that we have just reached our spiritual summit. (Ibid. ch. 35)
2. An eastern tributary of the Jordan.
3. Genesis 32:23–25; Talmud, Chullin 91a; commentaries of Rashi and Siftei Chachamim on Genesis, ibid. For alternate views, see commentaries of Ibn Ezra and Baal Haturim.
4. Genesis Rabbah 71:1.
5. Torah Ohr, Bereishit, pp. 21a–22d, 24a–d.
6. Likkutei Sichot, vol. 15, p. 280.
7. The Torah refers to the first Jew as “Abraham the Ivri (Hebrew),” loosely translated as “from the other side of the [Euphrates] River” (Genesis 14:13; Joshua 24:2–4; Genesis Rabbah 42:8). The mystics have long seen this river as spiritually linked with the biblical “river that flowed from Eden to water the garden” (Genesis 2:10).
Mankind can trace its history to the Garden of Eden, the destination of that river. The Patriarchs had their spiritual roots on the far bank of that river, i.e., the source of the river, which is Eden. They were therefore given the compliementary title Ivri, meaning “from the other side of the river.”
As Jacob crossed the river (though physically a different river), he was metaphorically crossing into a supernal realm, beyond the mundane. (Torah Ohr, Bereishit 25a)
8. At that moment, the hosts of heaven rejoiced, but the angel of Esau was crestfallen. He engaged Jacob in a furious battle in an effort to restrain him. The Torah says that Jacob wrestled with an angel and bested him, forcing the angel to concede defeat (Talmud, Chullin 91a).
The classic interpretation is that this was the angel of Esau. The Midrash, however, relates a fascinating perspective. The struggle was actually against Michael, the angel of benevolence, who came to prove that Jacob could hold his own. You see, proclaimed Michael, as he proudly conceded defeat, you bested a prominent angel. You are worthy of carrying the torch; you are a worthy father to the Jewish nation, a worthy successor to Abraham and Isaac. (Eliyahu Kitov, Sefer Haparshiyot, Vayishlach, p. 127, and relevant footnotes there)
It may be possible to argue that both accounts are correct. Jacob’s struggle with himself at the river allowed him to demonstrate at once his spiritual prowess to the angel Michael and his superior strength to the angel of Esau.

By Lazer Gurkow   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Lazer Gurkow is spiritual leader of congregation Beth Tefilah in London, Ontario. He has lectured extensively on a variety of Jewish topics, and his articles have appeared in many print and online publications. For more on Rabbi Gurkow and his wrtings, visit InnerStream.ca.
About the artist: Sarah Kranz has been illustrating magazines, webzines and books (including five children’s books) since graduating from the Istituto Europeo di Design, Milan, in 1996. Her clients have included The New York Times and Money Marketing Magazine of London

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Dec 7, 2011
Across the Divide to STAND as did Hillel
I am reminded of the bridges we need to make between us, meaning diverse people, and also within Judaism itself, since we do not all agree, and this includes the practice of rite and ritual, and the mitzvot, and what constitutes a spiritual persona in the eyes of this same One Divine G_d, who presumably has created us all, and who also created these rifts, because I see it's ALL G_D.

I believe that spirituality and the performance of mitzvot can be equated but that they are not equal, and that it is tikkun olam that is the "man/date". And that means, increasing evolution towards compassion, non judgment and labelling, and this means acting on behalf of those who cannot give voice to their concerns, meaning the environment, meaning the animals, meaning the poor and uneducated, meaning those in dire circumstances. That for me is SOUL and the other, is not the mandate. So we do not see I to I, or eye to eye.

Who speaks for G_D?

to make a stand: the need to follow Hillel re Torah.
Posted By ruth housman, marshfield hills, ma



 




Idea of the Week:
Home

Idea of the Week:
The Abnormality of Jewish Life

Idea of the Week:
The Object

Idea of the Week:
The Schoolteachers of Beshenkovitz

Idea of the Week:
The Lunar Files

Idea of the Week:
Bachelors in Heaven

Idea of the Week:
Home of Stone

Idea of the Week:
Gangs of Angels

Idea of the Week:
The River and the Pitcher

Idea of the Week:
G-d's Nourishment

Idea of the Week:
Seventy Kopeks

Idea of the Week:
The Breakthrough

Idea of the Week:
Oxen and Cows

Idea of the Week:
The Sinai Files

Idea of the Week:
Ladies First

Idea of the Week:
The World a Home

Idea of the Week:
Anatomy of a Dwelling

Idea of the Week:
Why It's Frustrating to Have a Brain

Idea of the Week:
The Glory of the Single-Minded Person

Idea of the Week:
Where the Essence Dwells

Idea of the Week:
What is the Purpose of Existence?

Idea of the Week:
The Physical World According to Rabbi Schneur Zalman

Idea of the Week:
Discovery of Planet Earth



Magazine Options: