HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Ask the Rabbi
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Questions & Answers » Ask the Rabbi » Latest Questions » The Details » Why didn't Adam eat from the Tree of Life?
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment6 Comments

Why didn't Adam eat from the Tree of Life?


Question:

In the narrative at the beginning of Genesis, we read that G‑d planted the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge in the middle of the Garden of Eden (2:9). G‑d instructs Adam not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge (2:17). After Adam and Eve sin, G‑d banishes them from the Garden of Eden as a consequence of their sin—lest they eat from the Tree of Life and live forever (3:22).

Why hadn't Adam eaten from the Tree of Life until then? After all, G‑d had only forbade him to eat from the Tree of Knowledge?

Answer:

I did a bit of research and found in the commentaries several answers to your question. Here are two of them:

  1. The fruit of the Tree of Life were only effective when ingested by a mortal who would otherwise die, like a medicine that only holds potency for one suffering an illness. As death was only decreed upon the human being after – as a result of – the sin, Adam had no reason to eat of the fruit of the Tree of Life before that point.1
  2. An interesting answer suggested by Nachmanides2 gives much food for thought. He suggests that the name eitz hada'at, usually translated as Tree of Knowledge, would actually be more accurately translated as Tree of Desire, and he cites several biblical instances where da'at is translated as such.
    Prior to eating from the fruit of the tree, Nachmanides explains, Adam had no self-interests or desires—his sole objective was to serve his Creator.3 As such, he also had no motivation to eat from the Tree of Life, as G‑d had not instructed him to do so. Only upon Adam's consumption from the Tree of Desire was G‑d concerned that he would have an urge to eat from the Tree of Life, and therefore took preventative measures to prevent that from occurring.

Though he had no internal drive to deviate from G‑d's command, there was an external evil influence, the serpent, that ensnared Adam and caused him to sin. The serpent, however, made no effort to entice Adam to eat of the Tree of Life, as his goal was to cause Adam's to sin. And G‑d had not commanded Adam not to eat of the Tree of Life...4

Please let me know if this helps.

Yours truly,

Rabbi Baruch S. Davidson

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment6 Comments
FOOTNOTES
1.

Commentary of the Baalei Hatosafot to Genesis 3:22.

2.

In his commentary to Gen. 2:9 and 3:22.

3.

Though he had no intrinsic inclination to do wrong, and was therefore devoid of the internal struggle that characterizes man ever since the sin of the Tree of Knowledge, Adam was still possessed of free choice: his ability to either resist or give in to the evil embodied by the serpent.

4.

Commentary of the Ohr Hachaim on Gen. 3:22.


By Baruch S. Davidson   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Baruch S. Davidson is a member of the Chabad.org Ask the Rabbi team.
All names of persons and locations or other identifying features referenced in these questions have been omitted or changed to preserve the anonymity of the questioners.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Apr 14, 2012
why didn't Adam eat from the Tree of Life?
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could just sit down with our Creator and have him tell us what the truth really is. All these answers could be right or at least close to the truth. I agree and disagree with some of the answers. May G-d bless us someday with the knowledge of what He was really trying to convey to us. Thank you for taking the time to give us many many thoughts.
Posted By Irene McClure, Glen Burnie, Maryland USA

Posted: Nov 30, 2011
Tree of Life Explaination
I don't except this answer because there were no mortals in the Garden of Eden before Adam and Eve. Also, God Told Adam he could eat from "any" tree except from the Tree of Knowledge
Posted By Ronald, Honolulu, Hi.

Posted: Oct 31, 2009
re
But why would it matter if fallen Adam ate from the tree of life? It would not stop God from making Adam mortal again
Posted By Anonymous, b

Posted: Oct 7, 2009
Thank you
Thank you for answering that question for me. It's like G-d sent you to answer that for me. Once again thank you.
Posted By Desiree, Albemarle, N.C

Posted: Sep 11, 2009
Tree of Life
Chassidus explains that it was precisely after the sin of eating from the tree of knowledge, that it was not possible to eat from the tree of life. The impurity brought about through sin would then become perpetuated.

The Sages explain that eating from the tree of knowledge was to be permitted after the arrival of the Shabbes. The Chasam Sofer explains: the effect of the tree of knowledge is to bestow free will (Moreh Nevuchim, elsewhere). This is fundamental to the Torah- without it there cannot be reward and punishment.

But for man to choose freely between good and bad, he must experience both profane and holy. Hence, to be endowed with free choice before ever experiencing a shabbes would not make it possible for man to choose spiritual over material.

With the arrival of Shabbes, Adam could eat from the Tree of Knowledge, and use his free choice properly. At that point, he could then eat from the Tree of LIfe, and live forever.
Posted By Rabbi Baruch Myers, Bratislava, Slovakia

Posted: Sep 8, 2009
another way of reading it?
Couldn't it also be read this way:

It may be possible that Man was never immortal in Eden.

God curses Man in the preceding paragraphs, "to dust you shall return", but this doesn't actually say God had changed man at that point into a mortal. God may simply be describing the mortal nature of Man.

Then as we come to "lest they eat from the Tree of Life and live forever", this can now be read as, Man was not immortal in Eden at any prior point in time; but, because he did not have Knowledge, he had no awareness of his mortality, or the special powers of the Tree of Life; once Man acquires Knowledge, God is concerned that Man may seek the benefits of the Tree of Life and become immortal, which apparently is not the desired outcome.

This is actually the way I understood the passage the first time I noticed it.

The answer #1 you gave is a very different way of reading those same two passages.
Posted By Mark R, Reston, VA



 


The Details
Why Did the Animals Die in the Flood?
What Was Up With the Tower of Babel?
How Is a High Priest Selected?
How Many Blessings does a Jew Say Each Day?
Why Babylonian Names for Jewish Months?
Naming a Baby Girl at the Earliest Opportunity
What Sort of Fruit Tree was the Tree of Knowledge?
Why didn't Adam eat from the Tree of Life?
Can a Jew raise swine?
When were the angels created?
What is the fast of Behab?
What if the tenth guy walks out?
Personal Fast Days
Why can't Yom Kippur begin on a Saturday night?
Are Priests Descendant from the Tribe of Levi?
Showing 28 - 42 of 348