A baby boy needs to be redeemed if he is the firstborn and he was born to Israelite parents. Let's look at what each of these means in detail.
The Torah's term for the firstborn is "the opener of the womb." This means that it is the mother's firstborn baby, if it is male, who is required to have a pidyon haben (redemption ceremony)—even if the father already has other children.
If a daughter is born first, then no redemption of a subsequent male child is necessary.
If the mother's first pregnancy ended in stillbirth, the subsequent child does not have a pidyon haben. If she miscarried within the first forty days of gestation, and a son is born next, he would need to have a pidyon haben. If she miscarried after the first forty days, a rabbi should be consulted whether the next child is considered "the opener of the womb."
The obligation only applies if both of the parents are IsraelitesIf the firstborn child was delivered via caesarean section, then no pidyon haben is held—not for the firstborn, and not for the next child, even if the next child was delivered naturally.
If twin boys are born, only the firstborn must be redeemed. If a boy and a girl are born, the boy must only be redeemed if he is born first.
The obligation only applies if both of the parents are Israelites. If either the father or the mother is the child of a father who is a kohen (priest) or Levite, the pidyon haben is not required.1
If a woman converts to Judaism (even whilst pregnant) her firstborn requires a pidyon haben. If a women who has already had children converts, her first Jewish-born son does not need to be redeemed.
The obligation to redeem the firstborn son rests upon the father. The mother has no responsibility to arrange for her son's redemption. The obligation on the father kicks in when the child reaches thirty days of age, and – in the event that the pidyon haben was not arranged in its proper time – continues until the child's bar mitzvah. Once the child has reached the age of adulthood, the mitzvah transfers to him, and he is required to redeem himself from a kohen. (A rabbi should be consulted for the exact procedure for "self-redemption.")
If the father is unavailable to redeem his son for whatever reason – e.g., he is deceased or is not Jewish – technically no one is obligated to redeem the child until his bar mitzvah, at which point the child is required to redeem himself. Nevertheless, the mother, a grandfather, or even the local Jewish community can redeem the child. (A rabbi should also be consulted in this situation, too, to advise as to the procedure of a "fatherless redemption.")
| FOOTNOTES | |
| 1. |
If the father is a chalal (a descendant of Aaron who had been stripped of priestly status), or if the mother is the child of a chalal, the pidyon haben is required. If the mother is the daughter of a kohen and she has ever had sexual relations with a non-Jew, her firstborn son needs to be redeemed. This is because having a relationship with a non-Jew causes her to lose her status as the daughter of kohen. However, if the mother is a Levite who had a relationship with a non-Jew, there is no change in status and her firstborn son still does not need to have a pidyon haben. |
Tucson, AZ
Thus 30 days is only when the obligation begins, not that it must be done on day 30 like bris on day 8, and even then it's the father who brings the boy for the ceremony. If the pidyon wasn't done before the bar mitzvah, the boy brings himself.
Thanks for reading and commenting!
Tsfat, Israel
30/31 days. How is this problem handled in the old days?
apeldoorn, Netherlands
brooklyn, ny
Pittsburgh, PA
So since then the levites were 'hallowed' instead of the now 'redeemed' first-borns who were actually the ones spared by the plague of the first-born in Egypt. All future first-borns must also be redeemed for money.
So it's clear based on the above that Levite men don't need to redeem their first born sons since they are hallowed.
The interesting thing is that even if the mother is a levite it exempts the son. This is harder to understand and is discussed in the Talmud. The reason given is that since it all relies on first of the womb (as opposed to first-born of inheritance which does not rely on the womb) and the womb is the mother even the mother being a levite exempts the child.
brooklyn, ny
Coral Springs
Philadelphia, PA
Coral Springs
silver spring, md