Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Ask the Rabbi
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Questions & Answers » Ask the Rabbi » Latest Questions » The Details » Did Solomon Marry Out?
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment20 Comments

Did Solomon Marry Out?


Question:

Solomon married a whole slew of pagan women. How was this allowed?

Response:

A cursory reading of those actions of King Solomon's does seem pretty incriminating. The verse states clearly that these women were of the gentile nations, from which we are warned not to marry.

Yet, in Kings I 3:3, after telling us that King Solomon married the Egyptian princess, the verse tells us that "Solomon loved G‑d, walking in the statutes of David his father." How is one who marries "of the nations about which G‑d had said to the Children of Israel, 'You shall not marry among them (Kings I 11:2)'" described as "a lover of G‑d" who "walks in the statutes of his father"?

This question troubled Maimonides too. The great 12th century philosopher and halachist addressed this in his Mishneh Torah, in the Laws of Forbidden Relationshps (13:14-16). The following is a free translation of his explanation to these seemingly conflicting verses:

"Do not imagine that Samson, the savior of Israel, or Solomon, king of Israel, who was called 'the beloved of the Lord,' married foreign women while they were still Gentiles. Rather, the key to this matter is as follows:

"The correct premise is that when a man or woman shall come to convert, we investigate if perhaps they came to convert for monetary reward, office they will receive, or out of fear. If the would-be convert is a male we investigate if perhaps there is a Jewish woman he has eyed for marriage, and if it is a women we investigate if there is a Jewish man she is eyeing. If we find that they have no ulterior motive, we inform them of the weight of the yoke of Torah and the burden of its fulfillment for a gentile, in order that they should abandon this quest. If they accepted, and did not abandon this quest, and we see that they truly came out of love, we accept them...

"Therefore, in the days of King David and King Solomon, the Jewish courts did not accept proselytes since in the days of David they possibly came out of fear, and in the days of Solomon perhaps they came for the kingdom, material goodness, and greatness that the Jews enjoyed at that time. For anyone who converts for personal gain is not a 'righteous convert' (accepted as a Jew). Nonetheless, numerous converts were made in the days of David and Solomon through ad hoc courts of non-experts. Such converts were neither pushed away – since they had already been immersed (i.e. the mechanics of conversion) – nor brought close by the High Court of Authority until it was seen how they turned out. Since Solomon had women undergo conversion and then married them; and likewise Samson had women undergo conversion and then married them, and it is known that they became Jewish only for an ulterior motive, thus their conversion was in defiance of the official court, therefore, Scripture considered them Gentiles. In addition, their subsequent behavior revealed their original mindset, when they worshiped their alien gods, and they constructed high-places for those gods..."

Best regards,

Rabbi Baruch S. Davidson

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment20 Comments

By Baruch S. Davidson   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Baruch S. Davidson is a member of the Chabad.org Ask the Rabbi team.
All names of persons and locations or other identifying features referenced in these questions have been omitted or changed to preserve the anonymity of the questioners.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

20 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: July 14, 2010
To ‘Nervous’ from Montreal
According to Wikipedia (which is always so trustworthy! :P) there are 2 different definitions of a tzadik. “According to Maimonides (based on Tractate Yevamot of the Babylonian Talmud, 49b-50a): "One whose merit surpasses his iniquity is a tzadik." According to the Tanya (based on passages in Tanach and the Talmud), the true title of tzadik can only be applied to one who not only never sins, but also has eradicated any inclination to do so”. Based on the Tanya definition, Solomon obviously was not a tzadik because he did commit "sins". But based on Maimonides’ definition, Solomon could have been a tzadik. But because tzadikim are obviously not “perfect”, then surely you’re allowed to point out and discuss their short-comings. If, however, the Tanya definition is right and tzadikim are perfect, then you can point out Solomon’s short-comings because he did sin and was not a tzadik.
Posted By Cathryn, Brisbane, Australia

Posted: Aug 4, 2009
Wisdom vs. Understanding
Some people miss the difference between wisdom and understanding. Wisdom says, "If my hormones as a man tell me I have the desire to populate a town, then there is nothing necessarily wrong with doing that," and I might craft myself a way to populate a town. And, who but the wise man says, "Fools rush in," as he knows it happened to him before when his pride was toppled. However, everyone cries foul in Soloman's understanding, not his wisdom, as a king possesses no understanding that marries a thousand woman and tries to populate a town. That is, there is no understanding that women don't appreciate polygamy. Understanding says, "Though I as a man am built with greater sexual desire than my wife or probably any woman that I won't seek another sexual outlet because she would be unhappy."
Posted By Craig Hamilton, Sandwich, MA

Posted: Aug 4, 2009
To Nervous
Nervous, don't be so nervous. Fear of G-d is wonderful. You raise a good point about Moses except there's one problem. Self-sacrifice that isn't the Will of G-d, is not the will of G-d. The whole point here is that we should aim not to deviate from the will of G-d, and that even the greatest of Tzaddikim, Mosheh Rabbeinu deviated from the will of G-d. I think it is just a great danger to airbrush Tzaddikim into flawless as it is to overemphasize the negative. We need to take an approach of the Golden Mean here. If we think Tzaddikim are on such a totally different plane, then we are in danger of saying we will never be such Tzaddikim, which is _NOT_ what G-d wants. You should do your best to be as righteous as you can, and in doing so, learn from the mistakes of others as well as the positive example. To ignore the mistakes and only focus on the positive examples, is unfortunately how mistakes are repeated. To overemphasize the mistakes is undue, and disrespectful.
Posted By Anonymous

Posted: Aug 2, 2009
This is making me nervous
I know that there's a concept of not speaking about tzaddikim in a negative light. They live on a completely different plane of existence and it's tricky business to be "trashing" the wisest of all men in a public forum. A leader of the generation who is attached to G-d can't really be discussed in the same manner as you'd discuss, for example, the foibles of fallen presidents and senators. I'd like to hear what a Chassidic Torah scholar would have to say about this subject. Moses, for example, had self-sacrifice to strike the rock to give the Jewish people the opportunity to access deeper wellsprings of the inner aspects of Torah. That deeper insight is not so well known... we only focus on his "mistake." I think this topic deserves a deeper look...
Posted By Nervous, Montreal, Quebec

Posted: Aug 2, 2009
Anonymous from Calgary
I like what Anonymous is getting at in this being totally inappropriate behavior=) It clearly isn't how someone of Israel is expected to live and that's why it says in the Tanakh that the kingdom was divided on account of this.
Posted By Anonymous, New York

Posted: Aug 2, 2009
Solomon
Lets see this another way: Queen Solomon loved the Lord. She was the wisest of the wise. You, the 547 converted husband of the Queen, might be expecting to have a wife. But she has no time. Husband # 578 is still in waiting, (and all before) and he is better looking. Would you would feel robbed, cheated and betrayed? Not only in your wife but in your new found religion? If this is how a Son of Israel is expected to live, you might think you have the wrong religion and G-d. How are we to see the Queen as the wisest of the wise? Wisdom starts in the home. But what home. How was the Lord honored in the Queen's decisions. If He is not honored, where is the wisdom?
Posted By Anonymous, Calgary, AB

Posted: Aug 1, 2009
Dark Ages and Medieval Kings
Jews are often quick to criticize the dark ages and medieval kings though they were descended of Judah and Tamar. I'd suggest that though Solomon was righteous that he was more or less like any other king. Whether its crusades and inquisitions or leading the people into idolatry and marrying foreign wives we humans somehow find that in order to know the law, we have to transgress it. Perhaps, Solomon did not know he was doing any wrong, but rather found out that it didn't end up like how he thought it would. Thus, a true court could not convict him ascertaining intent through an acceptance of a warning. It's a lot like the Adam and Eve story. I'd argue that we are sometimes able to see ourselves in the mirror through these historical kings, and that is why we study them.
Posted By Craig Hamilton, Sandwich, MA

Posted: July 26, 2009
Solomon
I have often wondered if G-d is perhaps, using his humor, a kind of dry irony, when he say Solomon is the wisest, then and now? Maybe we should catch the Joke and see what insights we could learn. A little humor can be a good thing.
Posted By Anonymous, Calgary, AB

Posted: July 17, 2009
Complete Tzaddikim do make mistakes just own their own level. G-d doesn't make mistakes, Moses made multiple. We're even shown recently how he lost his temper and forgot an important law about kashering. If that sounds disrespectful then we're missing the lessons that _we_ should be learning from other people's mistakes. Moses was Moses, but I don't think Moses would want us repeating his mistakes because we minimized them into 'deeper chassidic meanings,' which are often nice ways of keeping everything happy and smooth rather than really deeper in Emes (truth). On the other hand Anonymous from Montreal is correct, we need to be careful in how we portray such Tzaddikim and lay the foundation of our respect for them, otherwise the message is lost. That being said where's the wisdom in seeing what's obviously a mistake as not? We in our own lives should also own up to our mistakes, and ask G-d in His 13 Attributes of Mercy to cleanse our and Klal Yisrael's souls.
Posted By Anonymous

Posted: July 17, 2009
Can't Biblical heroes make mistakes too?
It usually depends on whether it's the simple meaning of the verse or the deeper Chassidic dimension. For example, viz. the circumstances behind the marriage of Dovid and Batsheva. The true intent of the Spies. The real intent of Korach. To say that complete tzadikim make mistakes can be overly simplistic and can become disrespectful unless carefully addressed (especially with children). Since the wellsprings of Chassidic wisdom have been opened to us, we have been blessed with the deeper dimension of many of these issues. Are there any that you know of in this case?
Posted By Anonymous, Montreal, Quebec



 


The Details
Can I delete G‑d’s name on a computer screen?
What day is it really?
Does the number 70 have any significance?
Naming after One who Recently Died
Eating Before Praying?
On which days is it forbidden to shave?
Which blessing is said upon seeing a rainbow?
Did Solomon Marry Out?
Why is chalitzah so humiliating?
Different Torah Readings in Israel
Is there any significance to "my" Torah portion?
"Evil Inclination" vs. "Animal Soul"
Why change pronouns midway through blessings?
Are Birthday Candles Jewish?
When Did We Start Naming After Ancestors?
Showing 50 - 64 of 319