Here's a great tip:
Enter your email address and we'll send you our weekly magazine by email with fresh, exciting and thoughtful content that will enrich your inbox and your life, week after week. And it's free.
Oh, and don't forget to like our facebook page too!
Contact Us

Judaism and Vegetarianism

Judaism and Vegetarianism



How does Judaism view vegetarianism? Is it favored or discouraged by the Torah?


The kosher dietary rules do rule out shrimp, lard, cheeseburgers, and lobster, but plain old beef is not on the Torah’s “don’t” list—if prepared following certain guidelines. For better or for worse, meat is an undeniable favorite on the kosher menu. Is this good? Let’s have a look.

The History

Upon his creation, Adam, the first man, is taught by G‑d the ways of the world: “Behold, I have given you every seed-bearing herb which is upon the surface of the entire earth, and every tree that has seed-bearing fruit; it will be yours for food.”1 Seed, herb, tree, and fruit—yes; anything else—no.

Several chapters (and over 1600 years) later, upon surviving the devastation of the great flood, Noah leaves the ark and is told by the Almighty, “Every moving thing that lives shall be yours to eat; like the green vegetation, I have given you everything.”2 His diet now includes meat as well.

It would seem that G‑d’s original (and ideal) plan was that we should not eat meat.3 One problem with this approach is that many statements in the Torah imply that meat-eating is ideal and encouraged, for example, to honor Shabbat and the holidays.4

So what is the deal? Would G‑d rather we be vegetarians like Adam, or meat-eaters like Noah?

The Philosophical Approach—Distinction of Responsibility

The fifteenth-century philosopher Rabbi Yosef Albo, author of Sefer ha-Ikkarim (“The Book of Principles”), understands G‑d’s instructions to Adam as an implication that the original G‑dly plan was that man should refrain from killing and eating meat. In his view, the killing of animals is a cruel and furious act, ingraining these negative traits in the human character; in addition, the meat of certain animals coarsens the heart and deadens its spiritual sensitivity.

The people of the first generations mistook this, however, to mean that human and animal were equal, with equal expectations and standards. This led to the degeneration of society into violence and corruption—for if the human being is but another beast, then killing a man is the equivalent of killing an animal. It was this attitude and behavior which prompted G‑d to cleanse the world with the great flood.

After the flood, G‑d laid down a new world order. People needed to recognize the moral obligations and divine purpose entrusted to humankind. To make this clear, G‑d told Noah that humankind can—indeed, must—eat the flesh of animals. Our dominion over animals highlights our superiority, and reminds us that we are charged with divine responsibility to perfect the world. To minimize its negative effects on the human being, when the Torah was given, G‑d forbade the flesh of those animals that have a coarsening influence on the soul.

(Is man really greater than animal? If so, how is he infused with energy by eating it? See footnote 5.)

According to this approach, meat-eating is not good, but it does serve a very important function.

The Kabbalistic Approach—Cosmic Perfection

While some question the right of man to kill an animal to fill his belly, the great sixteenth-century mystic Rabbi Isaac Luria questions the right of man to consume any organism for his own self-preservation. If everything in this word was created deliberately by G‑d, why is your blood redder than the purposeful existence of a tomato? And he answers that . . . it’s not. One who eats solely for his own selfish desires has swallowed the meaningful life of a vegetable with no excuse. “It’s not fair!” cries the helpless plant.

On the other hand, when we eat with the intention to use the energy to further our uniquely human service of G‑d, we have lifted the food up. When a person performs a G‑dly deed—a deed which transcends his natural self—the food he eats is elevated along with him, and is reunited with its G‑dly source.5

But there’s a difference between animal-based and vegetation-based foods. For starters, you can’t live without bread. If you’d eat bread only when you’re ready to elevate it, you might starve to death and never get a chance to try again. So we can’t restrict bread-eating to the spiritual-minded. Moreover, when eating simple, necessary foods like bread, it is easier to maintain a purposeful perspective. But meat is a luxury. And indulgence in this luxury makes one more materialistic than he was before eating. Therefore, one should only eat meat if one will be able to accomplish more with the meat than he would be able to with vegetation. One way to make your meat-eating worthwhile is to elevate not only its physical components, but its pleasure factor as well. Click here to read more about this. If you can do that, you have brought yourself and your lunch to greater spiritual heights and sensitivity than you can achieve by eating sprouts. On the other hand, if you don’t, you drag yourself—and the animal—to a more materialistic plane.6

Why is it that only the post-flood world can take the beef challenge?

The human race from Adam until Noah had the potential and charge to eat that which is indispensable to basic survival, with the intent to live a life of purpose; in this way, the man and food would have achieved their purpose. But eating meat requires much more than this. Meat, with its pleasure-inducing properties, naturally draws one towards materialistic lust. Elevating meat requires the ability to rise above the natural order, to bring new and altruistic life into something which is naturally the embodiment of materialism and self-indulgence. Pre-flood humanity and pre-flood meat didn’t allow for this.

Noah emerged from the ark to a changed world, a world where everything has the creative ability to go beyond its natural state of being and to assume a much greater identity. A new era of earthly potential was born.7 The world was now a place where man could elevate the very nature of earth’s components to supernatural heights—and even elevate their power of enticement and pleasure as well. Now man was given the ability to eat even meat and elevate its energy.8

Even for us, rarefied by the flood, eating meat is no simple feat. Before you sink your teeth in to that pastrami burger, here are a couple of things to keep in mind.

The sages declared that an empty-minded person has no right to eat meat.9 They also taught never to eat meat out of hunger; first satisfy your hunger with bread.10 (On an empty stomach, it is very difficult to keep focus on anything other than stuffing your face.) Only when “eating mindfully,” focusing on our divine mission, are we doing more for the animal than the animal is doing for us.

According to this approach, it may be cruel to not eat meat, because doing so robs the animal of its chance to serve a higher purpose.

Don’t be scared off. Get your act together and focus; the completion of G‑d’s universal plan is at “steak.”

Bon appetit!

Baruch S. Davidson

Author’s disclaimer: If for health purposes you do not eat meat, or you are absolutely repulsed by it, the above ideas are not meant to compel you to do so in disregard of your health or the like. Under such circumstances, the pleasure factor can be elevated through ice cream, soda, potato chips, etc. For alternative resources of the passionate love for G‑d which is fueled by meat, see your local Kabbalist.


In his writings, the late Chief Rabbi A. I. Kook (1865–1935) takes this approach, but insists that this ideal is not to be assumed as the norm until the coming of Moshiach, when human nature will be completely refined. Until then, he warns, such restrictions may have detrimental effects on man’s moral behavior. (Chazon ha-Tzimchonut veha-Shalom)


Lurianic Kabbalah teaches that creatures which are lower on the food chain originate on a level that is in fact higher. Their lofty origins enable them to journey forth to low and distant states, because a stronger source is capable of sending its offspring much further than a weaker source.
When we view the hierarchy from this perspective, we discover that the origin of the animals and vegetation is in fact higher then that of man. Man is not sustained by the food’s substance, but by G‑d’s energy within it, the spiritual origins contained within, which are indeed higher than he. To paraphrase the Psalmist (139:5), “You formed me before and—yet—after the rest of creation.”


According to the Kabbalah, the characteristics of physical objects are a result of their source in the spiritual realms. Red meat, once a home to warm blood, is a mirror of its source in the spiritual element of fire—leaping flames, which correspond to a passionate yearning for a higher existence. In a realm where the primary dimension is a yearning for a truth beyond its current state, there is less focus on illuminating the current reality, which leaves much room for the failings of those standing on the sidelines. Therefore, the meat of luxury, standing on the periphery of mindful and focused eating, is much more likely to fail and drag down its consumer, instead of being elevated by him or her.
If, however, when eating the meat one maintains focus, and succeeds at converting and harnessing the meat to further his or her uniquely human service of G‑d, than the leaping flames inherent in the meat translate into a passionate love of G‑d, a much greater love than one could achieve through harnessing “cold” vegetation-based foods. See R. Schneur Zalman of Liad, Likkutei Torah, Behaalotecha 31d and Vezot Haberachah 97d.


Alternatively, some explain that the animals became more refined, making possible their elevation. See R. Menachem Mendel of Lubavitch (Tzemach Tzedek), Ohr Hatorah, Bereishit 3:1270.


The change of potential which the flood brought about is expressed in the rainbow, the sign of G‑d’s covenant to never again destroy the world (Genesis 9:15). The spiritual density of the pre-flood matter was reflected in its physical properties. Pre-flood water vapor was too coarse to allow the light to sift through it and create a rainbow. Only after the refining effects of the flood could the moisture in the atmosphere refract the sunlight to make a rainbow.
The rainbow also symbolizes the new humanity. Moisture rises from the earth, catches the light of the sun, and creates a rainbow. This represents man’s ability to contribute to creation beyond its natural state, to produce new vistas of beauty and color.


Talmud, Pesachim 49b.


Ibid., Chullin 84a.

Rabbi Baruch S. Davidson is a writer who lives with his family in Brooklyn, N.Y.
© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with's copyright policy.
Join the Discussion
Sort By:
1000 characters remaining
Anonymous Saint Paul September 15, 2017

Producing meat for people requires 10 times more arable land, than it takes generate the equivalent number of calories from grains and vegetables. This results much more wear and tear on the land in terms of soil erosion and loss of nutrients than would be the case if people did not eat meat and dairy. The waste product from farm animals also contributes to global warming and generates significant water and air pollution. Stewardship of the Earth is another reason to go vegan in an age of rapidly growing human population and a fixed quantity of arable land. Reply

Anonymous Southeastern PA September 15, 2017
in response to Anonymous:

There is no statistically significant global warming in the years 1995-2016. There are tentative indicators of a possible cooling trend, which will have disastrous consequences for food production and lead to famine, as has happened during previous cooling cycles in human history.

I was a vegetarian for nearly 30 years and nearly wrecked my health, according to my endocrinologist. My craving for carnivorous food is replenishing the malnourishment I inflicted on myself. I am grateful to my rabbi for giving me a cosmic perspective on the environment. I realize I am part of the environment and my health matters too. Reply

Jay Tompkins Fulton September 15, 2017
in response to Anonymous:

In my experience my aunt and uncle in the 1950s had chickens and had only a lot large enough for the coop. Mostly, the chickens were for eggs but some chickens were killed for roasting. For beef, yes, it takes lots of land but not for poultry, not nearly as much, just a small lot, even in some city that allows poultry. Reply

st7672 January 15, 2018
in response to Anonymous:

Actually, according to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 16 out of the past 17 years have been the warmest on record. Carbon Dioxide, which is a major greenhouse gas, has increased from 300 parts per million to 400 parts per million in the atmosphere, 25%, since 1950. The 1950 levels were the highest the Earth has seen in 600,000 years for which we have data according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Indeed, CO2 levels rose more precipitously in the 20th century than at any other time in the past 600,000 years. Scientists first theorized about global warming 150 years ago. There is a large body of data supporting the fact that it is a reality. Reply

st7672 Saint Paul September 17, 2017
in response to Jay Tompkins:

The point here is there is a loss of efficiency of about 10 to 1 at each level in the food chain. Suppose you take a parcel of land and grow vegetable/grain/crops on it and that it produces enough food to feed 100 people for a year. Later on, you change your mind and decide that instead of using the land to feed people directly, you will use the land to produce food for farm animals that people will eat later on. It turns out that the land will now only feed enough farm animals to feed 10 people in a year. Before people eat them, the farm animals used some of the food they ate from the land to stay alive themselves. There is a loss of efficiency of 10 to 1 at each level in the food chain. You can look this up on the web for a better explanation of why this is so. Reply

Anonymous Southeastern PA October 16, 2017
in response to st7672:

And therefore what? What if people need to consume animal protein for their own health? Then this "inefficiency" you decry is just a part of life. Reply

st7672 November 19, 2017
in response to Anonymous:

There is no evidence that people must consume meat or animal protein for their own health. Harvard Medical School publishes information on the internet, that you can read, which says being vegetarian may improve long term health. Tens of millions of people are on vegetarian diets and there is no evidence that they are less healthy than their meat eating counterparts. At the same time, being vegetarian does not ensure that your diet is healthy. It is possible to eat vegetarian diets that are extremely unhealthy. This same is true for meat eating diets. The choices you make in either of these diets are very important Reply

Shelly atlanta August 30, 2017

Or perhaps Noah was told to kill and eat, as vegetation had not yet matured enough after the flood to supply food for him and his family. I see the addition of meat as a result of the evil on the earth. If man had not been evil, the pre flood world would not have been destroyed. If the world had not been destroyed, man would have been vegetarian. I'll keep my eating in the garden- I don't feel the need to subdue and destroy animals to elevate my soul. Reply

Anonymous Australia November 23, 2017
in response to Shelly :

Well said Reply

Anonymous January 14, 2018
in response to Shelly :

Eat everything in moderation Reply

Maria New York, NY November 3, 2016

Really? I don't know, I have the funny feeling that if you'd ask a cow, she would tell you she'd rather not be "elevated". Reply

Anonymous September 12, 2016

Very helpful article! Thanks for posting! Reply

Man From Neptune Lubbock August 26, 2016

One added point I guess what I am trying to say is that, for me, mammals being killed is not the way to go having seen the way they do go. If others feel differently, of course, that is their right. I recommend abandoning red meat for the health reasons listed.
I still eat chicken & fish, & (when I get up the courage) will likely try the Yemenite Jewish treasure known as grasshoppers. That's still killing animals, albeit ones with less developed brains.
Even plants have life, which means vegetarians also kill unless they restrict themselves to fruits, seeds, & nuts. In some ways, the best part of this for me is the Jewish part, you know, where we discuss the Torah, learn what the sages have said, & think very hard about these issues for an extended period. That, my friends, is a habit I would like to extend over all of my life. Reply

Yekaterina Seattle August 20, 2016

It is said "do not kill", it doesn't state what not to kill. It clearly states "do not kill"... I'm sticking to the ten commandments even if I am breaking the law of not eating meat. I will under no circumstances eat dead flesh of any living breathing being. All lives matter. Killing an animal to satisfy your earthly being is not on my list of a good life. Reply

Sarah K. France March 27, 2016

add Hallo, Maybe I should add to my previous comment that animals do contribute in H. creation, also if humans dont eat them. Best, S. Reply

Sarah K. France March 27, 2016

Elevating Hallo,
How can we do more for the animal by eating it ? Can we not help animals elevate spiritually with prayer without having to eat their meat ? Eg if we pray to help and elevate humans spiritually for peace, we dont have to eat any of them. During meat eating the animals soul is already gone, and so how can it be helped if we eat its dead meat ? Also a plant offers its life to us as foreseen by H. but how we help it to elevate spiritually by eating it?. Best, S. Reply

Man From Neptune Texas August 22, 2015

Just watch a few videos on animal slaughter in general. The usual nutjobs have been out for the past few years about the "cruelty" of Kosher slaughter. Being of a generous disposition, my eyes viewed dozens of slaughterhouse videos, both Kosher & non-Kosher, with an eye to finding out how horrible my religion was! The result - Kosher facilities may be 1/100,000'th more cruel than the best run non-Kosher facilities, but neither passes the smell test.

Abandoning red meat was the best decision of my life from a gastrointestinal perspective. It would also be true for you as well. You will less likely develop cancer & heart disease. You will far less likely develop a condition of the colon called diverticulosis, which can result in major surgery. Preventing needless death is the most important part of being Jewish to me. That, for me, means not eating red meat. Reply

Chad Bagel Chabad Poway March 8, 2015

Cruelty free The question is not is eating meat wrong but is torturing an animal wrong. Paying for an animal to be tortured. Commercial kosher industrialized animals no different. Do your research. This is not the days of free roaming shepard raised cows. Dairy cows treated so cruel it's unimaginable. All for the dollar and the lust of peoples palates. I live and Adam and Eve cruelty free diet. Reply

james davis usa March 2, 2015

vegetariansm I won't quote scripture but quote Isaac Bashevis Singer, "For the animals all carnivores are like Nazis and their lives are an eternal Treblinka." This isn't an exact quote, but the message is conveyed. Couldn't even a Frumer Yid be a vegan? The Kashrus allows the eating of certain meats but I don't think it commands eating them. Reply

Anonymous June 2, 2014

How so? @Michal,

"sounds like a little adaption"
an adaptation? No, not quite. Non vegetarian Jews simply go by alternate readings and Jewish scripture gives them all the freedom to do so. :) Reply

Anonymous Southeastern PA May 31, 2014

Michal Two things. 1) It's impossible to "murder" an animal. "Murder" is defined as the intentional, unjustifiable killing of a human being. Maybe if a wild animal attacks your baby, you'll be able to figure out the difference. 2) If you'd been a slave in Egypt, you'd never have made it out alive. HaShem commanded us to kill sheep - the Egyptian gods - to have their blood smeared on our ancestors' doorposts. You're commanded to have the shankbone on your Seder plate to this day. Perhaps HaShem knows what He's doing. Reply

Michal FL May 29, 2014

I am so proud to see so many responses in favor of abstaining from a cruelty filled life. GDs original plan makes more sense to me mainly because I dont see why GD would change his mind by guiding his people towards the murder of animals. Sounds a little like adaptation, similar to the "new testament." I would much rather face Hashem without the blood of his beautiful creatures on mine or my families hands. Reply

Anonymous January 3, 2014

neutral view How about a more neutral interpretation?

People who happen to be Jews and eat meat operate within gods' second plan with man.
People who happen to be Jews and don't eat meat operate within gods' original plan with man.
Obviously the vast majority of Jews back in the days were meat eaters. Does this mean Jews MUST be meat eaters? No, only that meat eating in Judeaism was seen as conventional, regarded as ideal by man backed by gods second plan he created grudgingly ("man is evil") and was later turned into a rule, by intolerant Jews that formed the majority. Reply

Anonymous Liverpool , U.K via July 31, 2013

Judaism and vegetarianism. If we were forbidden to eat meat Hashem would not have permitted us to do so, giving us specific laws for the method of shechiita,checking and koshering the animals also clearly stating which animals are permitted and which are forbidden to be eaten. Indeed, the shochet must have extensive training and be a learned and G-d fearing Jew. Reply

Daniel Masri modiin Israel July 31, 2013

Author’s disclaimer Those that have gained and reached such a pure and true lofty spiritual level and are not confused with "animal rights" nonsense, achieve similar levels of awareness of God regardless of their meatless diet. My daughter is that righteous woman. I ask you to consider this "disclaimer". (similar to women who need not don Tallit and Tefillin and other requirements of the more spiritually challenged man.) Reply

Simcha Sun Lakes, AZ July 30, 2013

HaShem Knows Best In Genesis 9:3 HaShem says it's ok to eat meat. A few verses earlier it says that "the devising's of mans mind are evil from his youth" I think it is a bit presumptuous of humans to think we are smarter than HaShem. That's probably where the "evil from their youth " comes from. The people who built the Tower of Babel thought they were smarter than HaShem too. If I recall that did not work out well.

As for me, I'll take HaShem's suggestion and enjoy the gifts that he has given me, including meat. Reply

Anonymous Staten Island March 28, 2013

Richard Schwartz Thank you for your insightful comments Richard Schwarts. Also thank you to David from NYC. Slaughter of animals is horrendous. Any one who twists this fact around to suit their own purposes is lying to themselves. I love the taste of meat but can no longer do so because I think of the torture and suffering of the animals. Reply

h Calgary October 17, 2017
in response to Anonymous:

HaShem given us this very beautiful world and how to take care what is around us.
I also eaten meat over of my middle age. I opened my eyes what is happening of the animals trough of personal experience.
Not a member of any "animal rights". Seen animals how they are killed I a non Kosher way. Killing them with electrical shock
and staying in there own pee and everything in there intestine.
I did seen before RoshHashana Jewish owned big truk's packed tightly with young lambs tire to get some air trough the
tiny hole. Some already passed of those who have been in the middle. I enjoying to watch the seen in Alberta's countryside
in the spring how the little ones are playing with there mom or
with each other. The list can go on and on. Unfortunately to many Jews are not Koser.
I have decided to go back to HaShems original plan
Since I am more healthy. Protein we can find in so many vegetable and nuts and we can provide for ourselves the most
enjoyable diet. I am healthy and fit. Reply

Peter Brooklyn January 2, 2013

relationship with sustenance My cousins still live in a small village in which they procure most of their food in harmony with their environment. They live on a mostly protein diet from the sea, salmon being their staple as well as other fish & seaweed also. Farming is not an option since it is too rocky. They are very robust, strong & live to be about 100 yrs old & still fishing! So to say protein is the cause of degenerative diseases is misinformation. Rather, my cousins are in harmony with where they live & have a relationship with the living animals/fish that sustain them. The problem in urban, industrial societies is that there is no relationship between the consumer & what is consumed causing a spiritual schizophrenia. This lack of rapport in which people come into contact with the packaging (styrofoam & shrinkwrap) & not the living creature comes with dire consequences. I am urban & do not procure my sustenance but procure a salary & purchase my sustenance therefore I must choose wisely to elevate sparks. Reply

Related Topics