Question:
What happens if a charity organization that you donated money to turns out to be fake? Does it still count as charity? How can one ever be sure that the money goes to the right cause?
Response:
Dear N___:
Until the times of Moshiach, there are going to be immoral people who will even play on people's charitable conscience to their own advantage. Scam charities were around in ancient times too. Here is an incident related in the Talmud (Ketubot 67b):
Rabbi Chanina would regularly send four zuz (a Talmudic era currency unit) on the Eve of the Sabbath to a certain man. One day he sent that sum through his wife, who came back and told him that the man was in no need of it. "What did you see?" asked Rabbi Chanina.
"I heard that he was asked, 'On what will you dine; on the silver colored cloths or on the gold ones?'" the rabbi's wife replied.
"It is in view of such cases," Rabbi Chanina remarked, "that the sages said, 'Come let us be grateful to the fraudulent! For were it not for them, we would be sinning every day… for anyone who shuts his eye to charity is like one who worships idols.'"
What did Rabbi Chanina mean by this? Quite simple: Theoretically, we should be obligated to give to everyone all of their requests. If we do not give, it is like idolatry. Deceitful people save us from this odious crime of idolatry by providing us an excuse for not giving in every instance--we can always say that we wanted to give, but didn't since it may have been a scam.
Not every case, however, can be judged by outward appearances. The same passage in the Talmud tells of one of the sages who would send charity to a particular individual. One day he sent his son to deliver the money. The boy came home and said, "They are not needy; I saw them drinking expensive wines."
The father doubled the sum and told his son, "On the contrary, they obviously were once people with high standards of living, and now have no money at all. For them to live a basic lifestyle which the charity would provide is still painfully lacking."
The mitzvah is to provide to each according to his needs, and sometimes what may seem unworthy to us, may actually be a mitzvah too.
Furthermore, even if the person you gave to was not at all needy--and so, you haven't really performed an act of charity--nevertheless, your act was still a charitable act. Charity has two aspects; the giver's sacrifice of self for the sake of a mitzvah, and the receiver actually benefiting from the charity. Even when the actual provision for the needy is not there, you have still made your sacrifice by giving.
All said and done, that sacrifice would have been better off in a real act of charity, given to someone who really needed it. Your mitzvah, in effect, was stolen from you. According to the Talmud,1 Jeremiah the prophet prayed that should the wicked give charity, it will go to an uniftting cause--so that they will not receive reward. Perhaps then we should thoroughly investigate the neediness of anyone who asks?
It depends: If you are giving to a fund that dispenses to others, the Torah encourages us to investigate and determine whether the administrators of the fund are reliable people.2 The same is true if an individual approaches you and asks you for a handout--it is your right to investigate whether he is truly impoverished. If, however, someone personally requests food, we are to give unquestioningly, and trust that G‑d will see to it that our charity should reach a worthy cause. This is so even if the one asking is totally unfamiliar to us. If the one asking is someone we know, then a request for clothing too, should be treated unquestioningly.
If you gave and didn't scrutinize to judge if the one requesting was truly deserving, don't take it to heart; you're in good company. G‑d continues to provide us with all our needs, and we hope He doesn't judge us based on a close-up scrutiny either.
Best wishes,
Rabbi Baruch S. Davidson
P.S. Chabad.org is in dire need of your help. No jokes, no scams!
Please click here and help us help others.
| FOOTNOTES | |
| 1. | Baba Batra 9b |
| 2. | This does not mean that we are to constantly demand accountability, rather that we ascertain that the administrator is known to be trustworthy. |
Charity Navigator rates many charities, checking the % going to administators and the % going to promote fundraising. It rates many Jewish charities very highly. 4 Star
Inwood, NY USA
Actually giving material goods through a governmental agency is less wicked than through a "charitable" institution of faith for they prozelitize in the name of religion. Though corruption is also true with governmental institutions it is also true of non-governmental bodies as well for reason stated above. Waste is rampant everywhere even with NGOs I'll have you notice. Real waste is in our selfish way of life, our inconsiderateness for the weak & poor to have the opportunity to feed themselves by themselves and not through any kind of relief programmes or charity. True charity is to live and let live, to share and not be greedy so as to enable everybody to live with dignity.
Ocala, FL
Then is another issue...how can we know the money or food given in charity is not feeding the wicked or the terrorists?...
"for anyone who shuts his eye to charity is like one who worships idols." Now for this part I fail to understand the correlation....Is it better to give charity to a wicked person or terrorists than say an Idol worshiper?
My point is, there is no way to know for sure. Charity is meant for relief of the good and the bad. Although judgment is required, charity is not a precise ART. It's an imperfect act of kindness!
Oak Park, MI
Ridgefield, Wa.-USA