Here's a great tip:
Enter your email address and we'll send you our weekly magazine by email with fresh, exciting and thoughtful content that will enrich your inbox and your life, week after week. And it's free.
Oh, and don't forget to like our facebook page too!
Contact Us

What Gives Us the Right to Kill Animals?

What Gives Us the Right to Kill Animals?

 Email

Dear Rabbi Freeman:

There is a quote from Henry Beston that lives in my heart. But so does G‑d, yet G‑d and Henry Beston seem to be at odds.

The quote is: "We patronize them for their incompleteness, for their tragic fate of having taken form so far below ourselves. And therein we err, and greatly err. For the animal shall not be measured by man. In a world older and more complete than ours they move finished and complete, gifted with extensions of the senses we have lost or never attained, living by voices we shall never hear. They are not brethren, they are not underlings; they are other nations, caught with ourselves in the net of life and time, fellow prisoners of the splendour and travail of the earth."

Our Torah condones, indeed encourages, us to take the lives of animals and eat their flesh. It even mandates animal sacrifices to G‑d. If one believes Henry Beston's words to be truth, would it go against our faith?

Susan G.

Tzvi Freeman: There is much truth in that quote, but only when read in a very different context than the author originally intended. And you need to know that context very well in order to do that. You need to understand the Torah's view of life, and life's purpose, and the place that each of G‑d's creations hold in that purpose...

Susan: How would the quote read in that different context you speak of?

We do patronize animals, no two ways about it. And too often are cruel to them. From man I expect good and bad. From G‑d I expected, past tense, only good. Until, way, way back, when I learned about the animal sacrifices. G‑d actually wants them. He doesn't mind the innocent animal's fear, slaughter and blood on His altar. I'm glad that temple is destroyed, and I dread the thought that, one day, it will be built again. Imagine, a place set aside for fear, for pain, for slaughter --and in a temple!

(I can't help but wonder, Rabbi, if you're smiling right now, the way an adult often smiles at a child when it takes things which are not serious to the "grown ups" seriously. It's a smile I've been quite familiar with, and one that doesn't exactly open me up to learning.

(Or maybe you're frowning because of the way I've talked about the Temple... I'm familiar with those frowns as well.)

And so I've been distant from G‑d for a very long time. At the same time, I've never lost my longing for Him. My longing for a G‑d who loves each of His creatures, and would not want pain inflicted upon them. Not even a moment's worth of pain (or fear), if it can be avoided.

Tzvi Freeman: Let's backtrack a minute: How is it that you were so enamored with G‑d until discovering the Temple sacrifices? Didn't you know that lions eat zebras, cheetahs eat antelope, tigers eat whatever they can kill? And most often, the killed are the helpless young, old and sickly. So who created these creatures and this order of nature? What makes the temple sacrifice any more cruel?

In truth, the cruelty of the jungle is only in our eyes. To the animals, it does not exist. As the frog told King David (Midrash, Perek Shira): "I have a mitzvah greater than any of yours. For there is a bird that lives by the swamp and hungers. And I sacrifice my life to feed it."

To the animals, to be eaten is only to be transformed, from one being to another in an endless cycle of metamorphosis. The leaves become a deer, the deer a cougar -- or a human being, the cougar or human returns to the dust and feeds the trees that produce leaves. And that is their fulfillment, their mitzvah of life.

The Torah adds another dimension, a supernatural dimension to the order of nature: The grass becomes a cow, the cow becomes a human and the human performs a G‑dly act and is swallowed into the world of the Divine. Better yet, the cow could enter directly the world of the Divine, swallowed by the fire of the altar and consumed by the angels above that are fed, according to the Kabbalah, by the sacrifices of the Temple. And then those angelic beings respond by returning life and holiness to all cows below in this world.

Nevertheless, Susan, your outrage is appropriate. And this is part of the paradox of being a Jew: We love G‑d and we are outraged by Him at once. And that is what He expects of us.

This needs a story to explain:

Babylonian Talmud, Baba Metzia 85a: Rabbi Yehuda HaNassi was a perfect tzaddik, yet he suffered great pain. How did it begin? Through a deed of his. He was walking through the marketplace when a calf being led to the slaughter ran to him and hid under his cloak. He told the calf, "Go. For this you were created." That is when his suffering began.

And it ended through another deed. His maid was sweeping the floor and found the young of a weasel nested beneath the boards. She began to sweep them away, when he stopped her. "It is written," he said, "that His compassion is upon all of His works." That is when his suffering ceased.

We are meant to not understand, because not understanding is what allows us to have compassion.

The Baal Shem Tov, in the years that he was a hidden mystic, would make his livelihood slaughtering chickens and beef for Jewish communities before a festival. When he left this occupation, a new slaughterer took his place. One day, the gentile helper of one of the Jewish villagers brought a chicken to the new slaughterer. As the new man began to sharpen his knife, the gentile watched and began to laugh. "You wet your knife with water before you sharpen it!" he exclaimed, "And then you just start to cut?"

"And how else?" the slaughterer asked.

"Yisroelik (the Baal Shem Tov) would cry until he had tears enough to wet the knife. Then he would cry as he sharpened the knife. Only then would he cut!"

The Torah commands us not to cause unnecessary pain to any living being. No distinction is made whether that living being is a cow or a lizard or a fly. Rabbi Sholom Dovber of Lubavitch once chided his son for tearing up a leaf of a tree, saying, "What makes you think that the 'I' of the leaf is the lesser than your own 'I'?"

Even when it is deemed necessary to consume the life of another, there are rules. An empty-minded person, the sages taught, has no right to eat meat. They also said to never eat meat out of hunger-first satisfy the hunger with bread. A person who eats meat solely for his palate and for his stomach degrades both himself and the animal. But if it is "mindful eating" -- eating for the sake of harnessing that animal's energies to do good; eating that lifts the animal into a new realm of being; eating to give at least as much to the animal as it gives to us -- then it becomes a way of connecting with the Divine and elevating our universe.

As for the angels and their part in the deal, "Once the Temple was destroyed," the Talmud tells, "the table of every man atones for him." Your table is an altar. The angels are invited. Eat with humility and with compassion and with mindfulness. Do your part in the Divine cycle of life.

Rabbi Tzvi Freeman, a senior editor at Chabad.org, also heads our Ask The Rabbi team. He is the author of Bringing Heaven Down to Earth. To subscribe to regular updates of Rabbi Freeman's writing, visit Freeman Files subscription. FaceBook @RabbiTzviFreeman Periscope @Tzvi_Freeman .
© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with Chabad.org's copyright policy.
 Email
Join the Discussion
Sort By:
118 Comments
1000 characters remaining
Ileen Ensley Iowa October 14, 2016

Rabbi Tzvi, This rationalization of eating meat, with your charming story, throwing in the angels for good measure, may be valid from the mystic point of view of living beings' metamorphosis into another. Even so, with all the mindfulness and humility that you speak of, it is barbaric. I grew up eating meat, fowl and fish, indoctrinated to the delicious tastes before I learned it wasn't a coincidence that there are chickens in the world and we eat something called chicken. Perhaps I wasn't as bright as someone more "worthy" to eat meat, because my parents never mentioned the connection? When I discovered the truth, my tastes had already been well established, and although very saddened, continued to eat flesh. I grew up cooking wonderful recipes that filled my home with tantalizing aromas, until it hit me one day, while admiring cattle on the side of the road: "Do I want to take a bite out of that?" I have been a vegetarian ever since. We are humans, not lions, and can opt out. Reply

Samuel St. Paul, Minn May 31, 2016

They were told that they could eat the fruit of any tree in the garden except the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

Noah, after the Flood, was told that he could eat meat, but he could not eat the flesh of a living animal, and he could not eat the blood of any animal.

At Mount Sinai, Gd told the Jews to eat only kosher animals, and you can find the stipulations of kosher animals in Leviticus 11:1-47. Read it for yourself. However, it applies only to Jews. Others may eat as they see fit, so long as they avoid eating blood and eating a limb taken from a living animal, for they are all descended from Noah and are bound by his promise. Reply

Anonymous NY, NY May 23, 2016

Who says were were Vegans "before the fall" ?? Where do you read this in the Torah?? (Judaism, by the way, does not refer to this as "the fall"...that is a Christian interpretation.) Reply

oscar MW May 23, 2016

It appears we were Vegans before the Fall in the Garden. After, we not only lost our innocence but enmity was manifest between Mankind and the Predatory beasts of the field, creating a need for protection and need to harvest flesh to sustain them. I do not believe we were intended to Eat Flesh, it only occurred due to the profound difficulties in food production facing early Man? We were designed to exist in Harmony with all living things. Reply

Pinchus BKLYN USA September 21, 2015

You can abhor killing predators (and apparently eating Veal, which I also do not eat, but only because I do not like the taste), but that is far from supporting bloodthirsty murderers who enjoy killing anyone they decide is not politically correct.

Nor did you even address the vicious attacks on the man's daughter when she did not even have anything to do with it.

Supporting the barbarism of murdering fully alive babies, under the excuse that "they do other things that are good'" can be said of any dictatorship or terrorist group.

If those doing it cared in the slightest about the other services, they would have no problem shutting down PP, and starting another center, that had nothing to do with abortions (and did not spend years lying about the utter Barbary that they tried to cover up.

Also, health care for everyone would far cheaper if government had bot ruined it with the Obama health scam plan. Reply

Hanalah Houston September 20, 2015

May the soul of this (whatever it is) be lifted up.

With Kavannah:

May the soul of these eggs be lifted up.

May the soul of this chicken be lifted up.

May the souls of these cacao beans be lifted up. Reply

Chaim Cleveland September 11, 2015

I eat meat, except veal. I believe in eating meat. I do not eat bread, rice, corn, or potatoes, or anything made from those crops, all of which are unhealthy. I prefer to eat grass-fed beef, or pasture-fed poultry (and their eggs) and I'm willing to pay more for them (and eat less of them), because such animals are happier and healthier. Their happiness is better for them and better for me.

I appreciate lions and abhor the killing of any predator, including wolves, since theirs is the most fragile animal lifestyle, because they are magnificent, and because they have a positive effect on the environment for other animals and for plants.

To those who have a daughter, daughter-in-law, or any female kin who needs to get an annual pap smear or breast exam or whose health demands that she stop having children: Planned Parenthood provides all those services affordably. Do you want your female kin to do without decent health care because it is too expensive? Reply

Pinchus bklyn ny September 1, 2015

I have already addressed (in the post you responded to), the issues of compassion, so please reread that part of that post.

As for 'hungry people' they are hungry not because of eating meat, but because cruel and corrupt regimes destroy farms and burn or steal crops for political reasons.
because oppressed and starving people are easier to control.

It is a myth to say that eating meat uses up natural resources more then eating other things.
I know the leftists love to claim that meat supposedly takes ten times the resources of vegetables, and grain.
but then a person has to eat at least ten times the amount to get just as full, so ultimately there is very little or no savings of resources by not eating meat.

So called "man made climate change" is likewise a myth.
None of those claiming that, can explain why the other planets in our Solar System are heating up at the same rate the Earth is.
RE: Diseases, see an old post of mine about female hormones in the, water.
That is a problem. Reply

Pinchus bklyn ny September 1, 2015

If you study Genesis with a qualified rabbi (such as at a Chabad yeshiva, for example) then you would learn that just because, meat was nor eaten before the time of Noah, does not mean, that that is a 'higher ideal' then eating meat.
If it was then the Temple would never have had all the meat offerings on the Mezbayach.





























































Also if we were to say that what went on in the earlier times was 'ideal' then it would also be ideal to learn nothing and to never wear clothes since that how it was in the first hours after Creation.

Eating meat is not uncompassionate or environmentely harmful and it's gluttony not eating meat which causes diseases.
In fact meat is a much better choice for diabetics then breads and cereals since it has necessary protein without so many carbohydrates. Reply

Richard Schwartz Staten Island August 31, 2015

This is a response to the comments (below) of Pinchas. Yes, G-d gave permission for people to eat meat, although G-d's first dietary wish was that people be vegans (see Genesis 1:29). So, we have a choice in our diets and shouldn't that choice consider the highest of Jewish values - that we should diligently guard our health, be compassionate to animals, protect the environment, conserve natural resources, help humgry people, etc. Shouldn't we consider how animal-based diets are causing an epidemic of diseases in Jewish and other communities and that the raising of animals is contributing to climate change and other environmental threats to all life on Earth? Reply

Pinchus bklyn ny August 26, 2015

Those who pretend they are supposedly so much more compassionate then G-d (or conversely falsely claim the rabbis made it up and are supposedly lying about what G-d said) because they are vegetarian or vegan, are being hypocritical.

Let's see them prove G-d did not give permission to eat meat, or that G-d does not exist at all.

They claim that they cannot be Torah following people because of the meat eating that Torah allows.
Well one reason I became religious in the first place, was specifically because of such people and the vicious and cruel way they treated other people, while pretending to care so much for the animals.

Look how the Animal Rights (AR), crowd vandalized the house of the dentist who killed Cecil, the lion and used thousands of phony Yelp, reviews to destroy the ballet teaching business of his daughter who had nothing to do with it.

The vast majority support the horrific evil done by Planned Unparenthood.

Such "compassion" only for animals, is phony. Reply

Dan SC CA via jewishsc.com July 31, 2015

I find that I can not believe that G-d would want us to slaughter animals. To me the descriptions of animal sacrifice and of things like the scapegoat are barbaric and they keep me from embracing some of Torah.
I can understand some sacrifices as a way to gather meat for food but the burnt offerings Etc. I find abhorrent. Reply

Anonymous Albany, NY July 28, 2015

We are the top of the food chain... No other explanation is needed Reply

penina south africa July 27, 2015

Not too sure about lifting up an animal's soul by inflicitng pain and suffering on them. I am sure we uplift ourselves by practising compassion, abstinence and kindness. I find it very difficult to love Hashem the way we are instructed to if sacrifice and slaughter are what he advocates. Science has shown how intelligent and sentient all animals are - much more so than we could ever have imagined. Their suffering at our hands is unimagineable and I cannot believe that having given them these qualities it is what G-d wants for them. It would seem to me that we can interpret G-d's words in any way we choose depending on what we wish to see there - most people find partaking in meat, eggs and dairy enjoyable and will therefore find a reason to do so never mind the suffering involved. Reply

Rebecca St. Louis September 26, 2013

or animal should be lifted up.

Another time I read that we should have kavannah that the holy sparks in that food be lifted up.

Another time I read that we should have kavannah that the food should nourish us and strengthen us to serve HaShem.

So I try to have that kavannah with each meal. All three of them. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't seem to, But I keep it up anyway.

The good of beef is that only one animal has to die to feed many people for many days, but many chickens must die to achieve the same. But beef is less healthy for us. So should we eat beef so as to kill fewer creatures? Or must we omit animal products? Reply

Munuzuri Qro/Mexico September 17, 2013

This writing is absolutely beautiful and passionate. However, what led me to read it, was the idea that its subject was the euthanasia exerted on pets on the slightest affliction, or even without any, just at the discretion of the owner. But it doesn't matter I learnt a lot from its reading. Thank you very much. Reply

Naomi El Paso September 17, 2013

That is, if you want a kosher chicken, you can't subject it to those conditions, because it will fail to pass kosher inspection. Its organs fail to develop and it is traif.

But I have a question for the rabbi.

Please answer.

The label on kosher brands of chicken say that the chickens are free range.
What does this mean? They are outdoors all day, like my grandmother's chickens?

Or, they are outdoors for one hour/day?

Or, what?

Meanwhile, I only eat organically reared eggs. The eggs at the health food store have a variety of labels.

A questino for someone who really knows (whoever you may be):
Which label is meaningful?

Reply

Anonymous Port Washington, NY September 16, 2013

It seems that many people only care about their own health and not these intelligent, sensitive beings, so I'll focus on that right now. Chickens' hormones are completely awry, and these creatures are made to grow abnormally fast. They have been genetically and hormonally tampered with possibly more than any farmed animal. Additionally, the bacteria in chicken is rampant and has been traced to many diseases. Former meat inspectors report that there is more bacteria in chicken than on one's toilet and they will never eat it again. Reply

Hanalah Texas September 16, 2013

One of the local rabbis invited us to go participate in kapparot. The chicken becomes a meal for a poor family. I went but I couldn't do it.

We are allowed to put money in a bag and swing the money around and say basically the same words. Then we give the money to the poor. That is much better. Then the family can use the money to buy food of their own choice. Reply

Marshall Queens, NY September 13, 2013

YOU HAVE TO FEEL IT. And "I feel" intuitively that eating meat is, a transgression of Gd and creation itself. If you don't feel it, you don't perceive this., you can't know. And you won't But I do. I think that things evolve, including society and religion should evolve too. To say that something is "the word of god" and written down in a book also mistaken.

You have to look inside yourself, "meditate", become aware and conscious of things that you/are/we/I were previously not conscious of. You breath, your mind, your heart, your food, the gap in-between your thoughts, the awareness of subtle stirrings from within our brain/mind/bodies/hearts/emotions. Nothing external can give us Spiritual Vision. It can only be contacted from within and I don't care if if a foundational document claims it's the word of God. I know sin, and I know goodness! Eating meat is sin. Feel it, take the time, research, feel/think about animals (we are also animals and we don't eat each other! Period. Reply