Printed from Chabad.org
Contact Us
Visit us on Facebook
Meet the new Chabad.org
Switch to OLD version

Does the Theory of Evolution Jibe with Judaism?

Print
E-mail

Question:

I always get conflicting answers regarding the theory of evolution and Judaism. Could you clarify?

Response:

If you are getting conflicting answers, that’s most likely because you are asking Jews. Like they say, for every two Jews there are three opinions. That’s just part of Jewishness.

But now you’re asking me, so I’ll provide my opinion. And that is that evolution and Torah are two distinct paradigms. Evolution is an attempt to explain life in purely materialistic terms. Things happen out of chance and necessity. Torah, on the other hand, tells us that a singular, deliberate and intelligent force is to be found in all things and all events.

Or, put it this way: Evolution and Genesis both agree that human intelligence began as a hunk of mud. Evolution says that if you leave enough mud alone for long enough, it will eventually—through chance events and natural selection—become a human being who will build computers and spaceships. Genesis says that intelligence arises from a greater intelligence.

Or to simplify it even further: Evolution says the background of the universe is dumb matter, and intelligence is an accident. Genesis places intelligence at the core of the universe, and says that dumb matter is an illusion.

One step simpler: Evolution says that a dumb universe can create intelligent beings. Genesis says that an intelligent universe may sometimes look dumb, until you look deeper.

Mixing these two together is then an exttreme form of syncretism.

While I'm at it, please allow me to point out that "natural" and "selection" are mutually incompatible terms. Natural implies blind necessity dictated by the consistent patterns of nature. Selection implies intelligence. I won't be the first to point out that this term is an oxymoron. What I propose, however, is that the choice of such a term indicates that scientists subliminally recognize that there must be an intelligence at work here. Which is my point: It's much more intuitive to believe that the primal substance of the universe is not matter, but intelligence.

On the other hand, I’m not ready to believe that creationism is science. How it was, precisely, that a super-cosmic intelligence extruded all these beings from the primordial mud is something still beyond our science. Perhaps one day we will have theories that can explain some of this to us in terms we can grasp. Or perhaps not. At present, however, materialistic evolution is sorely deficient at explaining anything at all.

In fairness to your question, I should add that there have been those who have attempted to align Judaism and evolution, some of them quite respectable Torah scholars. None of them, however, have managed to make a plausible reading out of Genesis with their theories. Their error stems from the belief that evolution has been somehow scientifically proven. This is simply not the case. While Darwin’s theories and their modern counterparts may have proven a useful paradigm for certain studies, they cannot at all stand the rigor through which a theory must be put in the academic world in order to be accepted as “proven.” Their sole claim to acceptance is the human mind’s endemic fear of saying, “We don’t understand.”

There’s lots written on our site on this topic. Here is one useful article, written by an environmental scientist.

By Tzvi Freeman
The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
Print
E-mail
Sort By:
Discussion (475)
December 5, 2012
Dear Zev
Your grandmother's recipe is interesting but can you please relate it more directly to Creationism and Evolution for those of us who are trying to deal with the specific subject without digressing?
vivian
Queretaro Mexico
November 25, 2012
Sterile Environs & Environments
Mix some water & flour - leave it sit! It does not flower into bread. It needs to be kneaded, just like many people need to be needed; then you bake it (energize it) as you energize people. Leave a fertilized fertile egg just sitting there and it will sit there until it rots back in to dust. This be so whether it is in a shell and laid externally or carried internally. Give it the correct care & conditions; something will emerge. <My late mother, 2Oth כ of KiSLeV קסלב had me. She was not supposed to be able to get pregnant but if she did her chances of carrying to term were limited and the chances of such a child surviving infancy were slim to zilch. Yet, here I am just a few years short of the forced retirement-from-state-service in Israel. With thanks בס"ד to ..., I have even done the HAMAS grad program.
Z'ev זאב בן אהרהם Freed
באר שבע
November 22, 2012
G-d never made a mistake.
If he was ever 'sorry' about anything it was about having to punish people who deliberately did evil. But that was not G-ds mistake. It was human evil. He said he would never flood the entire world again to kill off most of humanity in a flood. That did not include smaller localized floods and G-d never ever said it would include, such local floods.
TGorah is literal
USA
November 20, 2012
Creation vs evolution
We seem to fall into 3 actegories: God created & it was finished , God started & evolution developed this, evolution is fact.
A few questions:
1. How does light exist & get to us. G-d said He did it. Could He make the full beam? And the eye!
2. How does unique fauna prove evolution?
3. transitional forms are only seen by evolutionists. How could fossils form without a flood.
4. Dating methods depend on the persons trust. Carbon dating is flaulty, & so is dating by rock strata-they assume evolution!
5.US & Asia fit because they drifted! Not because they evolved.
6.Read the Bible, the water came from under the earth, after the flood the mountains rose, & sea beds fell.
I refuse to believe in evolution, a sterile environment cannot form life. Life begets life, Entropy does not allow for the rising complication required for evolution. The Bible has the earth older than 6000 years, I do not trust the reading of a person who thinks the Bible dates the earth at 6000 years
Ern Wigzell
November 19, 2012
G-d, in and of G-d, changes.
For ex: when he said "sorry" and vowed to never have a flood. So, G-d changes. If we are shaped by G-d, then we, too, can change.
Karen Joyce Chaya Fradle Kleinman Bell
Riverside, CA, USA
jewishriverside.com
November 15, 2012
response to Daniel Rosenthal and Bert.
My last post (waiting approval as I post this one) refutes all your questions which are really accusations without going through each on individually because it did not need to (and would have taken up many separate posts, anyway) except the claim you made about there supposedly being two mutually exclusive creation stories in the Torah. So how about enlightening us with proof of you claim that these mutually exclusive stories, are both in Torah? Bert: I agree with what you said, provided that such scientists do not claim their human evolution form animals is supposedly a proven fact that supposedly disproves the facts of a less then 6000 years old Earth as Dawkins claims and as Hitchins claimed, before he died. Theories are one thing but laws like the ones outlawing circumcision based on claims of supposed 'proof' that G-d supposedly does not exist are nothing but a malicious attack on Torah and those who follow it.
Torah is literal
USA
November 15, 2012
Free choice is niether deceptive nor malicious.
I was taught in Chabad Yeshivah that the written Torah is literal when it talks about what things actually took place and slightly less literal when giving commends for us to follow (for example an eye for an eye does not mean to go out and blind someone, it means he must pay the value of eye he had put out, in the other person). But when it says what happened such as the Nile turning to Blood, it literally turned into actual physical blood. A teacher is not evil or deceptive or malicious for giving a trick question in the test to make sure the students know the subject thoroughly. If anyone can interpret the written Torah how they want then all G-ds commandments are null and void because there will always be massive loopholes, in them. Also the atheists will then say look how useless and capricious Torah is because it can mean whatever anyone wants it to mean at any given moment. There has to be exacting ways of understanding Torah and precise unchangeable laws. to be from G-d.
Torah is literal
USA
November 15, 2012
Daniel: List of Questions
I have two answers to your list of questions. 1) Genesis is an executive summary. 2) Time is relative.

The creation narrative takes about 5 minutes to read. There’s no explanation of how G-d goes about gathering and organizing all the atoms & molecules to build the first strand of DNA. It’s simply the will of G-d, summarized, so that a desert nomad can understand. Omission is not the same as deception.

We know that time is relative. It could be relative in ways we don’t understand. What if creation was 6 days from G-d’s point of view?

I’m not saying I take the Torah literally. I agree with Vivian’s statement, “He/She would make it accessible to the simplest of minds & also complex enough to satisfy the deepest seeking, delving & understanding of the eternal truths.” What I’m saying is that, even a literal reading of the Torah doesn’t conflict with science.
Bert
San Jose, CA
November 15, 2012
Applause to Daniel Rosenthal
I loved your post about the Torah being literal but it left me wondering what is the other creationist story you referred to? It set me thinking how can we prove it either way, if there was no one to witness it. There is no smoking gun and never will be. This agument applies to both creationist and evolutionist theories. Evolution is a theory and it is unfortunate that some people treat it as fact. It is a working hypothesis and a good one. Darwin called it the, 'origin of species, and not, 'the origin of Kinds'. I wish to defend Darwin. He cannot be blamed if some people mistake it for the origin of kinds. Many creationists appear to insist that they are right, as if Creationism is fact. It is a theory, belief and faith just as Evolution is and should be respected as such by both sides. Can the Creationists prove Creationism is fact? I would like ot see more humility and respect for both points of view because that is all that they are?
Vivian Crowhurst
Queretaro Mexico
November 14, 2012
Answer to "Torah is Literal"
You label anyone who accepts evolution as "radical atheists". Have you never
heard of theistic evolution--the idea that evolution is God's method of creation.
Or the idea that the "days" in the Book of Genesis" could be long time periods--
millions or billions of years, rather than 24 hour periods. Science may not be
able to prove anything but it certainly CAN disprove some things, and the idea
of a young Universe, young Earth, and literal 6 day creation has been disproved.
The distant starlight problem disproves the young Universe idea, and the only
way creationists can get around it is to assume that God is deliberately
deceiptful and plants false evidence such as the remnants of supernovae
(explosions of massive stars) that never occured, false radioisotope dates,
and fossils of animals and plants that (according to the creationist interpretation)
never existed. And are you aware that there is not one but two mutually
exclusive creation stories in the Bible?
Daniel Rosenthal
Show all comments
Load next 50
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG