Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Torah & Science
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Torah & Science » Questions & Answers » Does the Theory of Evolution Jibe with Judaism?
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment195 Comments

Does the Theory of Evolution Jibe with Judaism?


Question:

I always get conflicting answers regarding the theory of evolution and Judaism. Could you clarify?

Response:

If you are getting conflicting answers, that’s most likely because you are asking Jews. Like they say, for every two Jews there are three opinions. That’s just part of Jewishness.

But now you’re asking me, so I’ll provide my opinion. And that is that evolution and Torah are two distinct paradigms. Evolution is an attempt to explain life in purely materialistic terms. Things happen out of chance and necessity. Torah, on the other hand, tells us that a singular, deliberate and intelligent force is to be found in all things and all events.

Or, put it this way: Evolution and Genesis both agree that human intelligence began as a hunk of mud. Evolution says that if you leave enough mud alone for long enough, it will eventually—through chance events and natural selection—become a human being who will build computers and spaceships. Genesis says that intelligence arises from a greater intelligence.

Or to simplify it even further: Evolution says the background of the universe is dumb matter, and intelligence is an accident. Genesis places intelligence at the core of the universe, and says that dumb matter is an illusion.

One step simpler: Evolution says that a dumb universe can create intelligent beings. Genesis says that an intelligent universe may sometimes look dumb, until you look deeper.

Mixing these two together is then an exttreme form of syncretism.

While I'm at it, please allow me to point out that "natural" and "selection" are mutually incompatible terms. Natural implies blind necessity dictated by the consistent patterns of nature. Selection implies intelligence. I won't be the first to point out that this term is an oxymoron. What I propose, however, is that the choice of such a term indicates that scientists subliminally recognize that there must be an intelligence at work here. Which is my point: It's much more intuitive to believe that the primal substance of the universe is not matter, but intelligence.

On the other hand, I’m not ready to believe that creationism is science. How it was, precisely, that a super-cosmic intelligence extruded all these beings from the primordial mud is something still beyond our science. Perhaps one day we will have theories that can explain some of this to us in terms we can grasp. Or perhaps not. At present, however, materialistic evolution is sorely deficient at explaining anything at all.

In fairness to your question, I should add that there have been those who have attempted to align Judaism and evolution, some of them quite respectable Torah scholars. None of them, however, have managed to make a plausible reading out of Genesis with their theories. Their error stems from the belief that evolution has been somehow scientifically proven. This is simply not the case. While Darwin’s theories and their modern counterparts may have proven a useful paradigm for certain studies, they cannot at all stand the rigor through which a theory must be put in the academic world in order to be accepted as “proven.” Their sole claim to acceptance is the human mind’s endemic fear of saying, “We don’t understand.”

There’s lots written on our site on this topic. Here is one useful article, written by an environmental scientist.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment195 Comments

By Tzvi Freeman   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

195 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Feb 8, 2012
He opened Darwin's eyes
Darwin was a scientist out to make a name for himself. though some say he refuted his theory on his deathbed.

I have a great respect for scientists especially if they find cures for illnesses and diseases which aids mankind, but how does evolution aid mankind except to turn mankind further away from our Creator, as we do not know if Darwin revered the Lord God in his heart, or was just out to make a name for himself.
Posted By Sientje Seinen, chilliwack , Canada

Posted: Feb 7, 2012
Evolution or reverse evolution
Since we think that evolution is in a positive progress ... it would also be possible to see the opposite occuring ... There is a law operating in the universe called entropy which basically allows every thing to break down into its simplest forms if not acted upon by some external force. you'll find that idea also expressed in the second section of Tanya where the Baal Shem Tov says that the very letters G-d used to create this universe are still standing before him and then the Rebbe ads were the letters to terminate the entire universe would return to absolute nothingness. Again depending on how you look at it the universe has been around for as long as it is the will of the Creator.

Posted By David Aharon Lndzon, Toronto , ON Canada

Posted: Feb 7, 2012
"Going 'round in circles" by Anonymous
Well said! In better words than I tried to explain myself, I agree with your statement. There is no conflict between G-d and Evolution because as you said:“G-d intended it that way.” G-d was the architect of the Evolution. I also said that one doesn’t reject the other one but instead complement each other. Who’s to say what G-d can or cannot accomplish? When doctors try to save the life of a person, both science and G-d are at work—one doesn’t go without the other.
Posted By Feigele, Boca Raton, Florida

Posted: Feb 7, 2012
The Torah is not all taken literally.
In fact, that is precisely why we had scholars who wrote books which complement the first 5 books in the Holy Scriptures. Is that not correct?
Posted By Karen Joyce Chaya Fradle Kleinman Bell, Riverside, CA, USA
via jewishriverside.com

Posted: Feb 7, 2012
Common descent
Your logic, rabbi, only fits your belief. If you accept common descent based on evidence then why not natural selection based on strong evidence? Evidence should not enter into your discussions because religion is not based on it, only science is. Religion is based on belief without evidential support.
Posted By A Scientist, Beverly Hills, Ca

Posted: Feb 7, 2012
Going 'round in circles
Rabbi Freeman, this is exactly what most of us in this comments thread are trying to explain to you - natural selection is NOT in conflict with the premise that the universe is the way it is because that's the way G-d wanted it to be.

Why not? Because, as so many people here have already said: why should it be impossible for G-d to have set in motion the process of natural selection, knowing in advance how it would turn out, and intending it in exactly that way?

Evolution does NOT say "There is no G-d, no original Intelligence, behind all this." Evolution does NOT, as Myriam Obadia so succinctly pointed out, say anything about this one way or the other, because that is not its concern. Evolution just says "This is what happened in the physical world that we can observe and measure". And Rabbi Freeman adds: "G-d would not have been capable of using natural selection to create the diversity of species."

I'll say it again: don't limit G-d!
Posted By Anonymous, Unspecified

Posted: Feb 7, 2012
The Demon Under The Microscope
I have been reading this fascinating biography of the man who discovered sulfa drugs. His life is astonishing in that it seems he moved from coincidence to coincidence.
He was hit by shrapnel and narrowly escaped death in WWI, he got off a train for a break and then missed his connection and escaped one of the worst train disasters in history, he discovered sulfa but before it could be properly tested his young daughter was accidentally stabbed by a needle she was carrying, got a raging infection and would have died had he not tried this drug on her. The story is remarkable and begs one to reconsider 'random'.

I would say evolution and all discovery very much appears dominated by that unseen Hand and to pretend otherwise... well for me it is not possible, particularly when I see this everywhere including my own albeit small life.
Posted By ruth housman, marshfield hills, ma

Posted: Feb 6, 2012
Nonexistent proof for Torah's elasticity,
"No. The observation referred to is confirmed sentient or scientific observation."

Are you saying such observation can't be made about all the extra business done by stores specifically on Saturday?

"If "Who translates a verse literally is a liar: Kiddushin 49a;" .

Then we must not keep Sabbath as it is stated we must do, in Torah."

"The quotation refers to translation that is uninformed by the tradition of the Sages. "

So where is any such tradition of the sages saying the Earth is more then 6000 years old or that Humans evolved from animals when no one ever saw it happen?

Also Rashi explained Torah literally no one calls Rashi a liar or says he is wrong.
Posted By Torah is literal, Somewhere, USA

Posted: Feb 6, 2012
in response to Rabbi Freeman's comment
There is a saying that "I love my teacher, but I love truth more." With that being said, I agree 100% with you that the universe is how it is because it's how Hashem wants it. But why couldn't He have made it the way He wants through evolution or natural selection? When He created the world and the laws of nature, He was able to to do so in a way in which the world would run the way He intended no matter what, and perhaps He wanted the world to develop and adapt more over time. If evolution is true, it certainly didn't happen against Hashem's will. I'm not saying that (micro)evolution/natural selection are definately true, but I don't agree that they are definately false either. Also, there is evidence proving adaptation (microevolution?), such as strains of bacteria which are resistant to antibiotics. These bacteria developed over time in response to their environment - they didn't all just start out that way. But I don't see how that conflicts with the basic premises of Torah.
Posted By Leah, Plainview, NY

Posted: Feb 6, 2012
what I believe
Hi Karen with the very long name. Thanking you! I will have to share some wonderful Maori words with you.

I think evolution is so about G_d. I think G_d wouldn't be playing a big joke on us in giving people these ideas. I am not a scientist but I do believe G_d is responsible for teaching us about evolution. He opened Darwin's eyes. And this did change the world in a lot of ways, and is studied and is part of what we "know" about life. G-d can do anything, and G_d could even make the world, this same world, in many ways, and confuse us. Or maybe we can't see yet how it comes together. Don't be hard on others.

Why pull science down? G_d made scientists too. We didn't know about the little creatures Leuwenhoek saw under his microscope, and people laughed at him.

Yes, I am reading, and I believe, and I think there is much more to be learned, and that G_d leads us all, all the time.

No one knows about one single thought and one single conception. Sorry. No one knows the mind of G_d
Posted By Mendel Fishbein, Blenheim, NZ



 


Torah & Science
How Old is the Universe According to Judaism?
Evolution vs. Creation
Does the Theory of Evolution Jibe with Judaism?
Can I Believe in Both Science & Torah?