A drama unfolded last week which captured the nation's attention. Seventeen
year old Jessica Santillan underwent heart and lung transplant surgery at Duke
University Medical Center on February 7th. Towards the end of the surgery a
horrific mistake was discovered. The donated organs were of a different
blood-type from Jessica's O negative. Her body naturally rejected the new
organs. Miraculously, a matching set was found and another surgery was
immediately performed in a desperate attempt to save Jessica's life.
Before the first transplant, Jessica's family paid a smuggler to get them
into the US from Guadalajara, Mexico. The family waited some three years before
the first organs were found. The fact that a second, and this time matching set,
was found so quickly is extraordinary.
Unfortunately this story did not seem to have a happy ending. The trauma of
having the wrong organs implanted at first, coupled with the radical surgical
procedures, caused irreversible damage to Jessica's brain, and she was pronounced
dead at 1:25 pm on Saturday, February 22, 2003.
The list of tragic occurrences in this story is long. Not
only did Jessica lose her life, but two other critically ill people will not be
receiving the organs that were used for Jessica. This devastating mishap
occurred because somehow the compatibility of Jessica and the donated organs was
not confirmed before the operation. Somewhere, someone must be losing sleep over
this terrible oversight. The anguish in Jessica's family, other families with
waiting recipients, and the Duke Medical community must be profound. Thankfully,
they have immediately put in place new procedures to preclude another incident
of this sort taking place.
The advance in medical technology that this sort of case brings to our
attention also raises numerous ethical questions. The policy is that once
someone is in our country they are placed on the same waiting list as anyone
else. On the other hand, only 5% of donated organs are allowed to benefit recent
immigrants. But then again, inmates in prisons are put on the same list --
conceivably a convicted murderer might have gotten those organs before the
innocent young Jessica.
This question opens up a virtual Pandora's Box of possibilities and dilemmas.
If we are to prioritize one life over another who is to decide the criteria?
Will someone who is obese be denied donated organs because of a life of
self-abuse? What if the overweight person has a genetic predisposition to
obesity? Perhaps in that case it is not really his fault? Once we have crossed
the line and decided that priorities will be established, are we any better than
the ancient Greeks who would leave sick babies on hilltops to die? They did this
so that the general society would not be depleted caring for the sick.
Cases precisely like this help us appreciate the Torah and its creed of
ethics. The Torah states that human life is sanctified and holy. Every human
being is created in the image of G-d. The decision on "Who is to live, and
who is to die," is G-d's to make. We simply apply the appropriate laws of
the Torah to the situation at hand.
Jessica's case teaches us something else as well. Each human is unique. One
person's life blood will be another person's death. This shows us that we all
have our own special role to play within creation. No one is superfluous; no one
can take another's place in the cosmic scheme of things. Our differences make us
stronger as the distinct strands of rope make it stronger.
When humankind finally appreciates the absolute sanctity of life, recognizing
that we all have certain unalienable rights, and at the same time recognizing
that we each have a specific and unique role to play, the world will be ready
for redemption. Let us hope and pray that this occurs speedily in our days!