Question:
I started questioning G-d around the time of my Bar Mitzvah. I identified as an agnostic shortly after, an ideology that I still hold today. But I still feel Jewish. And this leads me to my question: Would you consider a self-proclaimed agnostic Jewish?
Answer:
Let's start with this idea that you are an agnostic. This is a term coined by Thomas Huxley in the middle of the 19th century. It is the "doctrine that humans cannot know of the existence of anything beyond the phenomena of their experience." Bertrand Russell wrote a sort of manifesto of the agnostic in these words:
That man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labors of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspirations, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the temple of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of the universe in ruins-all these things, if not beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair can the soul's habitation henceforth be safely built.
Is that really what you believe? I guarantee that Russell himself never believed it -- because he was a champion for human rights and ethics to his last day. Neither could any human being truly believe it and continue to breath for even a moment. We are, all of us, creatures of hope. We live, we work, we marry and have children because we all believe there is purpose -- also those of us who overtly deny holding to such a belief.
As the sixth Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn (1880-1950), told one self-proclaimed atheist, "We are all believers in G-d. It is just a matter of definition."
You need to come to a deeper understanding of what exactly it is that you don't believe. And more importantly, what it is that you do believe. Not through philosophy or introspection, but by simply examining the way of life towards which you are naturally moving and determining the implications of such a life. Why do you love your spouse? Why are you so concerned about your children's identity? Why do you hold this conviction that there is more meaning to life than making another buck and buying a bigger house? More than any course of study or spiritual searching, this will tell you who you are and in what you truly believe.
And I believe you will discover that you believe in your heart all that every Jew inherently knows and believes.
May G-d be with you as you return your father's heritage to its rightful place.
Elizabeth Grove, SA Australia
---
It's not "incorrect". It's what he believes.
You believe in God, which is neither correct or incorrect. It's what you believe.
God exists within our beliefs. Or not.
---
"...do you open up the hood of your car every morning..."
---
This is a twisted parable.
We have faith cars will work because humans are absolute experts on cars, and the info stands up to any scrutiny.
Miracles don't "prove God's realness" [except in terms of an individual's beliefs]. The opposite of 'miracles' happens all the time--tragic suffering, torture and injustice.
God hasn't revealed himself in the real world, [though the Bible says he did many years ago.] If God was more than a belief, you'd be able to prove his existence. In an indisputable way. You can't. Therefore "God" is an intangible personal value, and I am an Agnostic. God may exist in the physical world. I haven't seen evidence of it. Certainly no proof.
Boston, MA USA
Glastonbury
You say: : if nothing transcends the act of being, why care about being at all?
Our humanity is enough. Joys and sorrows are things we can all understand.
We care because we are human.
In that context, your comments would be especially helpful if you could explain why one who believes his own consciousness to be nothing more than "the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms" should care at all about what will happen after his own lifetime. Perhaps further: if nothing transcends the act of being, why care about being at all?
Or is it that you do in fact hold a belief in something transcendent, some sort of purpose or meaning of life. In which case, you fall directly into that of which the Rebbe refers. Your definition of my G-d is not the same definition as my own, and in fact we mostly have the very same G-d. What more is belief in G-d, after all, than a belief in purpose that transcends the act of being?
To define belief in God as a matter of definition is revealing. What if the definition has nothing to do with the horrors of the Bible? Of course that would be unacceptable
Boston, MA
I would never presume the value of a persons beliefs, but you as a religious person, are doing just that. You need to come to a deeper understanding. Really? My understanding isnt deep enough? How can you know that? Have believers in God shown themselves to be better people than Agnostic secular humanists? Definitely not!
Boston, MA
What does the sky have for breakfast?
The question has no meaning, Agnosticism is about KNOWING.
Therefore any agnostic can BELIEVE a number of things, relating to (or not) "faith" (hope accepted as conceptual reality).
Adelaide, Australia