HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Ask the Rabbi
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Questions & Answers » Ask the Rabbi » Latest Questions » The Big Picture » Why did Adam and Eve become aware of their nakedness only after they sinned?
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment18 Comments

Why did Adam and Eve become aware of their nakedness only after they sinned?


Question:

I'm studying to teach my children about the bible and creation but I can't seem to get past Genesis 2!

In Genesis 2 it says that Adam and Eve were both originally naked, "but they were not ashamed." After they ate of the Tree of Knowledge, we are told that "the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked."

Here is my question: Was the act of being naked a sinful thing? Why would G‑d have allowed then to walk around naked to start with if it was sinful? And if it was originally fine, how did their disobedience cause their nakedness to not be so good?

What am I missing?

Answer:

Your perceptive question is addressed by almost all the biblical commentaries… On the second verse you quote, "Then the eyes of both of them were opened and they realized that they were naked," Rashi, the primary commentator on the Torah points out, "even a blind person knows when he is naked." So what was it that they realized here?

Little children are notorious for trying to shed their clothes and run around naked. This is done with total innocence; the two-year-old does not see any difference between his face, his knees, and the parts of his body which we adults insist that he cover. Only adults feel that certain parts of the body must be covered. Why? Because those are connected with physical lust and passions, and should not be exposed.

Prior to their sin, Adam and Eve knew good from bad, right from wrong, but they had not internalized an evil inclination. So they could choose to do right and wrong, and were held responsible for their choices, but the urge to do evil did not come from within. This urge was represented by the serpent—the external tempter. Since the evil did not reside within them, they were "naturally" good, and their nakedness was innocent and in no way sinful. They saw no difference between a hand, whose purpose was to give charity and to do good deeds, a mouth with which one praises G‑d and says kind words to others, and the parts of the body which are used to "be fruitful and multiply." With every organ they could fulfill the will of G‑d or vice versa, so no organ was shameful, nor did anything need to be covered.

When they ate of the Tree of Knowledge, the evil inclination became a part of them. No longer did they need an external tempter to incite them to sin—now, that tempter resided within their psyches. And specifically, sexual passion – a passion which is much stronger than the desire to give charity or praise G‑d, a passion which is much more encompassing and has the potential to be seriously misused – became a part of them as well.

Hence the abovementioned verse. "The eyes of both of them were opened" – they became aware of physical lust "and they realized that they were naked" – and only now it was inappropriate for them to be unclothed.

I hope this has been helpful.

Chaya Sarah Silberberg,
Chabad.org

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment18 Comments

By Chaya Sarah Silberberg   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Chaya Sarah Silberberg serves as the rebbetzin of the Bais Chabad Torah Center in West Bloomfield, Michigan, since 1975. She also counsels, lectures, writes, and responds for Chabad.org’s Ask the Rabbi service.
All names of persons and locations or other identifying features referenced in these questions have been omitted or changed to preserve the anonymity of the questioners.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

18 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Jan 2, 2012
To evolve or not to evolve...
A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.
A scientific theory is a type of inductive theory, in that its content (i.e. empirical data) could be expressed within some formal system of logic whose elementary rules (i.e. scientific laws) are taken as axioms.
If one wishes to believe that evolution is "only a theory" they ought to take a course in the differences between "just a theory" and a scientific theory. I've no problem with Darwin, but I will accept his supposed "lies" than your inability to understand what a scientific theory is. I am a Jew. I also a scientist. Where did Darwin lie?
Posted By Barucha bat Etta Gold, Hurst, Texas

Posted: Dec 30, 2011
Adam and eve ashamed of being naked
They could have never been ashamed when their eyes were opened, because to be ashamed they would have had to know another accepted form of appearance. Since they were the only two people on Earth and the animals were naked, their appearance would have seemed in accordance with their environment. The emotion of shame would have not come into existence until they knew otherwise.
Posted By Paul Manocchio, Van Nuys, CA

Posted: May 25, 2011
Blessings J777
Right back atcha!
Posted By Adam Tousley, San Clemente, CA

Posted: May 25, 2011
Thank you
Thank you so much for giving me clarity on this subject, this article has definitely been a great help to me !! May the Lord bless you in abundance, Adam Tousley !!!
Posted By J777

Posted: Dec 15, 2010
Human Origin
We exist - we had to originate from man or human kind. Darwin's lies were proven to be lies we did not originate from primates
Posted By jD, fairfield, CA

Posted: Feb 15, 2010
Turning Away From Sin?
Hi Beverly,

Interesting Post. I'm beginning to understand the Levitical sacrifices and I thank you for reminding me about "flour" as a sacrifce for those unable to provide and animal. That's interesting

Sinning, whether intentional or unintentional is "missing the mark". Torah comes from the root word "yara". As a Hiphil verb it means to "point to" or "instruct". When we sin, we miss the instruction - intentionally or unintentionally.

Though I'm not Jewish, as wild branch I have been "engrafted" into the root of David and have been instructed not to "boast against the natural branches". There's a time coming that these natural branches will bear much fruit - even more than the Gentiles!

For it is written, then shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and shall turn ungodliness from Jacob: For this is my covenant unto them when I shall take away their sins! Jeremiah 31 has been hijacked by the Gentiles!

Blessing and shalom....Adam
Posted By Adam Tousley, San Clemente, CA USA

Posted: Feb 14, 2010
And if...
...the story of Adam and Eve is a parable, then my question remains, still more urgent: What good are clothes in preventing harmful actions?
Posted By jochanaan, Denver, Colorado

Posted: Feb 14, 2010
Did they exist?
The question can fairly be asked, "Did Adam and Eve exist?"

Personally, I think not. It is a parable. Sin and suffer the consequences, but as I originally stated, there is no such thing as "Original Sin," that is a Christian myth meant to keep people in their place which is subservient to their priests and even now in the non-Catholic churches preach that in order to "save" sinners from a supposed hell. Sorry, folks, man can never become G-d nor will G-d ever become man. Even if he did, G-d hates human sacrifice and no human blood can be shed for the forgiveness of sin, period. Blood sacrifices were never necessary EXCEPT for unintentional sins; even then, if a person couldn't afford an animal sacrifice, flour (in which there is no blood) could be given. What about INTENTIONAL sinning? Only true repentance and turning away from sin can bring forgiveness.
Posted By Beverly Kurtin, Hurst, TX

Posted: Feb 14, 2010
Sexual passion, nakedness and sin
Was it that sexual passion entered into Adam and Chavah with the Fruit? Or did they have sexual passion before, when G-d said, "Be fruitful and multiply"? It seems to me that evil entered not merely our generative organs but our hands, that become quick to strike in rage; our mouths, quick to curse; our feet, quick to run to evil and from good deeds. Nakedness makes no difference, either to those whose minds are pure and thus defended from immorality and lust, or to those whose minds are defiled, for they lust anyway. So what good are clothes in preventing immorality?
Posted By jochanaan, Denver, Colorado

Posted: July 31, 2008
Right!
Thats what I meant
Posted By Lisa
via lubavitchchabad.org



 


The Big Picture
Who is considered the first Jew and why?
Why does pregnancy last nine months?
How does one start thinking with his soul?
Do we see G‑d as our "Father"?
Do we believe in guardian angels?
Is maintaining cleanliness and personal hygiene a Jewish thing?
Why aren't customs reversible?
Why did Adam and Eve become aware of their nakedness only after they sinned?
I was born Jewish but I was baptized. Am I still Jewish?
Benefit of the Doubt for Terrorists?
I feel closer to my wife at her gravesite; am I just imagining this?
Can I have G-d without religion?
What if I only believe in the written text of the Torah?
How do you get a Jewish soul?
Can I be called to the Torah if I am a skeptic?
Showing 108 - 122 of 208