How should a person be judged -- by what he or she is, or by what s/he can
be? That, say the Chassidic masters, depends on who that person is.
If the person is yourself, you must judge yourself by your actions, not your potential.
You cannot say to yourself: "OK, I've been sort of lazy lately, and I've
messed up a bit, but I know that I can be better. That's the real me -- not the
person that the rest of the world sees." On the contrary, if you know that
you can do better, you ought to do better. Why else were your talents and
resources granted to you -- so that they should rot from misuse inside their
wrappings?
If, however, the person being judged is someone other than yourself, you must
take the opposite approach. After all, you have no way of knowing, and certainly
no way of truly understanding, the circumstances that are preventing that person
from actualizing his or her potential. So if you see someone who's a real mess,
don't look at what s/he is -- focus instead on what that person can be. In fact,
says Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi in his Tanya, the more messed up that
person is, the greater the admiration you should have for him or her.
Why is that? Rabbi Schneur Zalman bases his amazing statement on a saying by
the sages of the Talmud: "The greater a person is, the greater his evil
inclination." Indeed, it stands to reason: otherwise, how could we say that
G-d has granted every individual absolute freedom of choice? Don't we see people
who are challenged by addictions and temptations far greater than anything we
ourselves are ever subjected to? If such a person, too, has been granted the
power to control his or her life, that means that they have also been fortified
with spiritual strengths far beyond what the "average" person
possesses.
The implications of this are twofold: If you see a truly great
person, know that he or she has wrestled with demons more ominous and powerful
than anything you've ever had to deal with. And if you see someone who has sunk
to depths which you cannot even fathom, know that s/he is blessed with equally
unfathomable potentials.
This, says the Lubavitcher Rebbe, is the deeper meaning behind a curious
commentary by Rashi on the opening verses of the
parshah (Torah section) of Toldot (Genesis 25:19-28:9). Toldot
begins, "And these are the toldot ('generations') of Isaac, the son
of Abraham." Rashi explains: who are these "generations"?
"Jacob and Esau who are spoken of in the parshah." But isn't that
obvious? Why does Rashi need to explain?
The standard explanation is that, in the Torah, the word toldot can
have several meanings. It can mean "children" and
"descendents," and it can also mean "products" and
"deeds" (all of which are "generated" by a person). Since
the account of Jacob's and Esau's birth does not immediately follow the parshah's
opening verse, and since the parshah of Toldot also describes events and deeds
of Isaac's life, there can be some doubt as to how to translate the word toldot
in this context. So Rashi feels the need to tell us that, in this case, it
refers to "Jacob and Esau who are spoken of in the parshah."
But, says the Rebbe, there is also another meaning implicit in Rashi's
commentary. On a deeper level, Rashi is addressing the question: How do
such righteous and holy parents as Isaac and Rebecca, and a righteous and holy
environment such as their home, produce a wicked and violent man such as Esau?
After all, Esau was Jacob's twin, sharing the same gene-pool and upbringing.
Jacob makes sense. But where does Esau come from?
Indeed, says Rashi, the wicked Esau is not a "product" of Isaac and
Rebecca, but a monster of his own making. Who are the toldot of Isaac?
The Jacob and Esau who are spoken of in the parshah. The Torah's
Esau is a man of great potential for good -- as great as the evil he allowed
himself to succumb to.
To Esau this says: See what you could be. To us, this says: The next
time you see an Esau, look again.