Printed from Chabad.org
Contact Us
Visit us on Facebook
Meet the new Chabad.org
Switch to OLD version

The Multiculturalism Debate

Print
E-mail

An ongoing debate in many Western societies today revolves around the value of multiculturalism versus the importance of assimilating the various groups and segments which constitute a society into a homogeneous entity. As is the case with the majority of widely debated issues, both sides of this particular polemic bring valid points and convincing arguments to the discussion table.

On one hand, a society is enriched by diversity and exposure to a variety of cultures, languages and value systems. Coercing elements of society to conform to a particular mold -- no matter how splendid that mold may be -- is an attempt to stifle the soul of that element, and anathema to a culture that prides itself in allowing Freedom of Expression. As Kabbalah teaches, true beauty results from the harmonization of diverse colors and flavors.

We, too, struggle with the issue of forging a multicultural population into a singular Jewish nationOn the other hand, the smooth functionality of a nation depends largely on a united population that feels a strong kinship with each other. Diverse segments of a population which are constantly competing with each other make for an unhealthy society. Globally, much violence, strife, and many civil wars result from tensions between co-citizens of rivaling religions, values or ethnicities. Thus, the acculturation of a nation's citizens might sound harsh and nationalistic, but is actually the key to a unified, and ultimately a stable society.

The Jewish nation is also demographically diverse: Ashkenazim, Sephardim, chassidim, observant, not so observant, scholars, laymen, men, women, etc. We, too, struggle with the issue of forging a multicultural population into a singular nation. Sociologists attempting to resolve the Melting Pot issue would perhaps be well-advised to examine the Torah's perspective on e pluribus unum.

We are now ushering in the holiday of Sukkot. The two primary mitzvot of this holiday are dwelling in the sukkah and the taking of the Four Kinds. Jewish unity is one of the primary themes of this holiday, and these two mitzvot are symbolic of two approaches to Jewish unity; the sukkah champions the cause of Jewish nationalism and focuses on our nation as a homogeneous unit, while the Four Kinds symbolize the importance of "Jewish multiculturalism."

We sit in a sukkah in commemoration of the Clouds of Glory which miraculously encircled the Jewish people while they traveled in the desert. The clouds did not differentiate between one Jew and another -- all were equal beneficiaries of their shade and protection. We, too, sit together in a sukkah as a symbol of our unity. We focus on that what unites us -- our common values, mission, and souls -- rather than that which divides us. We leave behind our differences and unite behind one flag.

The Four Kinds, however, tell a different story. According to the Midrash, the four different species represent different sorts of Jews, spanning the spectrum from the most observant and scholarly to the simplest of our people. Nevertheless, we take the Four Kinds and hold them together, because we are one people despite the differences. But as opposed to the sukkah, this mitzvah doesn't attempt to achieve unity by ignoring our differences; rather it points out the differences, embraces them, and secures our unity in spite of them.

Unity achieved at the expense of disregarding our unique personalities and strengths is a flawed unityThis is because unity achieved at the expense of disregarding our unique personalities and strengths is a flawed unity. It means that the unity is very limited; limited to our shared goals and souls. Our daily lives which are so colored by our unique personalities remain unaffected by the sukkah-style unity.

But without the type of unity advocated by the sukkah, the multicultural approach of the Four Kinds would not succeed. For without an underlying unifying factor, diverse people have nothing to rally around. The Four Kinds is an endeavor to build on the unity of the sukkah by injecting our individual personalities with our pervading unity; by devoting our assorted strengths, talents, and natures to perpetuating the ideals that unite us; by recognizing that the different pieces of the puzzle may look dissimilar, but are all there to complete one picture.

By Naftali Silberberg
By Naftali Silberberg, based on the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe.
Rabbi Silberberg resides in Brooklyn, NY, with his wife Chaya Mushka and their three children.
The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
Print
E-mail
Sort By:
Discussion (3)
March 15, 2011
Rabbi, very good answer.
One problem in America with multiculturalism is that often the individual factions become so highly antagonistic that it spills over into areas that harm children. I am speaking of the Black Social Workers and their forceful denouncement of interracial adoptions. I even remember when they tore mixed race and black children from adoptive parents' arms and placed them back into the system, in foster care, until they could find a black family to adopt them. Often, they couldn't. So, the children suffered. In another case, they even said that a mixed race marriage couple where one was black and adopted a black child was not good enough. When the black parent died, the white father had the child taken away. This is horrible. I wish they would view multiculturalism with the same flexibility and understanding that you have.
Karen Joyce Chaya Fradle Kleinman Bell
Riverside, CA, USA
August 6, 2009
multiculturalism
This country has lost its way under the guise of multiculturalism. It has become the excuse for doing away with moral absolutes of right and wrong out of respect for other cultures. It has resulted in a country where we cannot even have a discussion about our country because we don't have a common language. People achieve citizenship yeat remain unable to fulfill obligations like jury service becuase the don't understand English. I can respect my heritage and theirs, yet still become part of this country. That is what is great about the US. I am NOT confined to a ghetto because of my "culture". I am free to live anywhere. But that does not mean I am free to ignore my responsibilities as a citizen!
Anonymous
Riverside, CA
jewishriverside.com
October 29, 2008
Take it to an extreme:
In English:
"The squeaky wheel gets the grease."
In Japanese:
"The nail that sticks up gets hammered in."

Both have made strong societies, that serve their populations well.

How good to be a Jew, with the freedom to be anything I want. and the strength of a group to lean on when I need it.
Sarah Masha
W.Bloomfield, MI/USA
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG