x
Make new version your default
|
|
Specialty Sites: |
|
|
All that G-d created, He said was good. Except for one: "It is not good that Man is alone." And so He made Woman, and it was very good.
If so, how is it possible that a man could despise the woman who took him from "not good" to "very good"?

N.E. Queens, New York, USA
baoston, ma
Adam- the source is " Forces in Creation " - a Chasidic Discourse by Rabbi Shalom DovBer Schneerson of Lubavitch. As you point out, context is often a key issue. If you read this short book, please let me know where i missed the meaning. The message is repeated several times, and consistently gives women/malchut/ 'extra binah ' the loftier level. That is what he maintains. i am not saying that makes him right. it works for me. it doesn't have to work for everybody.
in any event, i like to learn and i learn best from my errors. sexism is always a highly contentious issue. it is not a big issue for me, but it is very interesting to discuss. By discussion i don't mean winners and losers. those discussions only have losers. by discussion i mean sharing,learning and growth which is only possible through respect.
winnipeg, canada
In spiritual world we don't have male and female. Torah talking about Souls and Light. That it. God created desires and nothing else. Now, what do we have to do with those desires? Only one thing - direct those desires to the God.
Female is represented desires, male is intention. Put together - Correction.
In the beginning Chassidus (Ball Shem Tove) were just Kabbalah and hothing else. What we have now....But I stil believe each Soul will have to come back to own original root. We don't have another way except open books and study.
Hillsborough, NJ
I'd certainly love to see the source. (And I'm sure that context is very important too...)
The sexist part comes form The 5th Lubavitcher Rebbe Shalom DovBer Schneerson. It's Chssidus/kabbalistic.. If you want I will look up the source which is extensive, not just a one liner. I guess that my introduction into Chabad left me puzzled about the ' seemingly ' second class nature of women : separate prayer area, not called to Torah, not a part of minyan, no shaking hands, etc. It is the Rebbe DovBer description where I finally got 'my' answer. Now, I have just today read Rabbi Tzvi's popt " Two is One ". From this excellent titration, equality of man and woman is described. For me, It " evens up " the debate. All I can say now is that these opinions depend on context. Both commentaries hold truth given their context. This is not a cop out on my part. Rather, it is a better understanding than what I had about men and women. It makes Elina's message more palatable to me.
winnipeg, canada
P.S. Thanks Anonymous from Winnipeg for the sexist comment.
winnipeg, canada
Men are less dependent on women and less attached to them. This is Eve’s “condemnation following the sin,” which says: “Your yearning shall be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
Hillsborough, NJ
Palm Springs, California