Printed from Chabad.org
Contact Us
Visit us on Facebook
Meet the new Chabad.org
Switch to OLD version

An Intimate View on Intimacy

Print
E-mail

Conventional wisdom says that sexuality is a natural instinct. It's a very common and innocent human activity, it's what happens between a man and a woman, it's what people do and all we need to do is relax and enjoy it, right?

To be intimate means to go into a place that is private, that is sacred, that is set aside It seems so simple. But if it were so simple, why do we need to be reminded over and over again that it's natural, it's innocent, it's pleasurable, it's what we do, it's what happens, relax and enjoy it? In fact, the media has bombarded us with that message for so long and in so many different ways with such ingenuity that you have to wonder why the message hasn't been accepted. Why are we still so uncomfortable, so unsure, so mystified by our own sexuality?

In the world that the Almighty created, there are three conditions. First, there is the secular, weekday, mundane condition--ordinary, common things that we possess. Second, there is the holy, Divine condition--so heavenly that we don't have these things at all. These two parts, so far, are pretty easily accepted and understood. The difficult part is the third condition, the sacred. Although sacred means set aside and unavailable, the sacred is not totally unavailable. The sacred is that which is holier than the ordinary, but not so holy that we can't approach it at all. It's something in between what we have and what we cannot have.

Confused? Let's use a simple example. The Almighty grants us the blessing of children. So, we have children. Your children. My children. But when we say "my children," is that a possessive "my"? Do I own my children? The answer, of course, is no. They're not really mine. They don't belong to me. When I say "my wife," is that a possessive thing? Does "my husband" means that which belongs to me? Of course not. And yet, we can use a term so familiar as "my" in referring to these things in life. That's the sanctity in life, and if we're not careful, in our arrogance, we can lay claim to things that will never belong to us and lose their sanctity.

So, where does sexuality fit in? By its very nature--not by divine decree, not by religious belief or dictate--sexuality belongs to the arena of the sacred. We experience it, but we cannot own it. We can go there, but we don't belong there. We can be sexual, but we cannot possess our own sexuality. The reason for it is very natural and very basic. To be intimate means to go into a place that is private, that is sacred, that is set aside. Sexuality means one person entering into the private, sacred part of another human being's existence.

You cannot own another person's intimacy. It's not available. Even if the person wants to give ownership. Can't do it. It's not sharable. It's one of those things in life that the Almighty gives us that we can never possess. I cannot possess my children. I cannot possess my spouse. I cannot possess my Creator. I can't even possess my life. I, certainly, cannot possess the other person's intrinsic, sacred and unsharable part.

Well, if it's that unavailable, if I can't possess it, then what connection, what relationship do I have with it?

This is the sanctity we can experience, but cannot own. And that is why the pleasure in intimate relations is more intense than any other pleasure. You can enjoy a good meal. You can enjoy good food, and it's great pleasure, but it's not the pleasure of sexuality because you possess the food. It's yours. You planted the vegetables, you grew them, you plucked them and you ate them. They're yours. With the sacred, you cannot afford to become familiar There's no awe involved. The pleasure of sexuality is that it's a combination of having and not having. It's a combination of ordinary and other worldly at the same time. It's something that you are granted, but you cannot own and possess. And when you feel that combination, the pleasure of being in another person's intimate space while at the same time remembering that you don't belong there--it's not your place and can never be your place--that's what makes sexuality different.

The key word is familiarity. With the sacred, you cannot afford to become familiar. With the truly divine, there's no danger. It's out of your reach--forget about it. With the secular and mundane, well, you should become familiar. So where does familiarity breed contempt? Where is familiarity really destructive and unwelcome? In sanctity. If you become familiar, too familiar, with the intimacy of another person's life, whether physical, emotional or mental, then you've compromised the sanctity.

In our tell-all world, visualizing the destructiveness of familiarity might be difficult. But you don't call your parents by their first name... because that's too familiar. We don't use the Almighty's name in vain... because it's too familiar. And for our grandparents and our great-grandparents, intimate relations was a sacred thing not to be talked about... because that would be too familiar. The relationship between a husband and wife was restricted to behind closed doors. It was a sacred thing, something you don't squander, share, or even speak about. That's why our grandparents could not talk about their relationship. They weren't keeping secrets--they were keeping something sacred.

Today, human sexuality is something you're supposed to become familiar with. We claim to already be familiar with our sexuality and we are ashamed to admit that we are not. We've removed the sanctity, all because we thought our uptight parents were keeping a secret from us. The media continues to bombard us with these brilliant, subtle messages of the "naturalness" and "openness" of human sexuality, and it's not convincing us. Try as we might, we cannot ignore what our bubbes and zaides knew: the marriage bed is a sacred thing and the only way it works is when you treat it with sanctity.

Still need proof? Look at those same bubbes and zaides a little closer. Those two people, who have been married fifty, sixty, seventy years, are still a little bashful with each other. They still blush with each other. They still excite each other. That is human sexuality. That is sanctity. And that is the last word on intimacy.

By Manis Friedman
Rabbi Manis Friedman, a noted Chassidic philosopher, author and lecturer, is dean of Bais Chanah Women's Institute of Jewish Studies.
Originally published in OLAM Magazine.
About the artist: Sheva Chaya created the art for TheJewishWoman.org homepage. An art graduate from Princeton University, Sheva Chaya works in watercolor and glass, vibrantly exploring Jewish and women's themes. Her work can be seen in her studio in Tsfat, Israel and on her website.
The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
Print
E-mail
Sort By:
Discussion (20)
March 23, 2011
holy and sacred
it seems in english to be one of the same.

but what is the difference in hebrew?
Kdusha is the sacred
Kdusha is also holy?
Is the point that Godliness isnt holiness. It isnt sacred until it is a mitzvah?
And that the most sublime and sacred pleasure is the mitzvah of intimacy?

Touching and not touching is only relevant
to the highest level in the keter (level of G-dliness), which is called "oneg". but there is the oneg of wisdom and the oneg of music etc. is that also an untouchable? but people can make new discoveries in torah and create music, new songs. . Doesnt it belong to them? Explain this to me?
hershel
beitar, Israel
December 25, 2010
Comment to Ariah
"Animals are on a much higher spiritual realm than what we humans will ever be." Show me in the Torah where that is even stated. If that's true then why would G-d give Torah to mankind rather than beast? Not feasible.
Uziel
Waco
November 1, 2010
Love is Worth Waiting Fort
Your the best Rabbi Manis Fredmann! I go out with my single girlfriends and some of them go sleep with a man then get upset the guy isn't calling them. Some of the guys I talk to tell me that these women start to like stalk them. I might sound like a dork, but I find intimacy sacred and my soul mate is worth waiting for if not in this then the next! I have the drive,but I am not willing to lower my values and hopes of making up for lost time once my soulmate comes into my life! Without G_ds appoval respect often seems to be lost! I can go out any night of the week and pick up a guy, but I deserve real love! Love is worth waiting for!!!
Michelle Andre
cc, fl
January 25, 2010
And who are you to judge me and my respect for Hashem? There is no reason to get defensive. I was merely pointing out that looking at the Bible, we have been created differently and should take after Hashem, and animals do not have the capacity or ability to observe. Adam was given charge over the animal kingdom. In the creation story everything Hashem created became more complex and more detailed as he created it, leading up to humans.
Also, if animals are not sinners then why are some animals clean and some animals unclean? Why are some animals blessed and others not blessed?
Ariah
Jackson, MS
January 25, 2010
Comment back to Ariah
Who are you to judge that animals dont have a spiritual soul or that they dont know the difference between sacred and mundane? Animals are on a much higher spiritual realm than what we humans will ever be. They were not given 613 Mitzvot to observe becouse they are not sinners and destroyers like humans are. Animals dont destroy their environmnt or kill unecessarily like humans do. Sounds like you do not have much regard or respect for animals and nature, which really shows that you do not have much regard or respect for God either.
Rivkah
January 25, 2010
Intimacy
Dear Rivkah,
To take the view that one should look at the animal planet and then emulate it is flawed. The soul of an animal is just that...an animal soul. While we as humans possess an animal soul and a spiritual soul. The animals do not know the difference between sacred and the mundane. The animals cannot sanctify G-d's name. The animals cannot observe the 613 mitzvot.
Secondly, if we are to emulate anything or anyone it should be G-d. In his temple he veiled his Holy of Holies. This place was G-d's intimacy...his sacredness. Did he have to veil it? No, but he did because we would have become too comfortable with G-d's intimacy if it was so easily attainable.
Ariah
Jackson, MS
November 17, 2009
Intimacy
I disagree with this article in many ways. First of all - the best way to understand how to feel sexual joy and happiness is to have a good look at nature and the plant and animal kingdom. They do not feel ashamed of their sexual nature or have to hide their feelings or naked bodies and they do not carry around the idea that what they are doing has to be considered so extremely "SACRED", otherwise how on earth would they be able to be so completely in touch with their natural primal instincts combined with the pleasurable act of sex? Sexuality tends to be as varied in the plant and animal kingdom as it seems to be in the human world in many ways. The bottom line of sexuality is not just the aim of total pleasure but it is also for survival and to produce offspring. Some humans seem to have forgotten this where as the plant and animal kingdom have not.
Rivkah
Sydney
March 31, 2009
beautiful
This has hit so clearly what my partner and I spoke about recently. Intimacy....an undefinable closeness. It happens behind closed doors, but not neccessarily. It is when our fingers interlink, when he brushes away a lock of hair or picks me up off my feet because the broth was too delicious. We confirm our love with the sacred act of sexuality, but also just as sacred are gestures of intimacy shared only with each other.
Anonymous
rome, italy
April 23, 2008
An Intimate View on Intimacy
I agree with most of what you are saying. I have met many people who have bought into the worldly view of sex, have had numerous partners and have led a promiscuous lifestyle. I know that they long for love but after having "sown their wild oats" when they do meet upon someone they really love they are unable to be functional or loyal. They have missed out on something precious. "Getting around" does not "get it out of one's system;" it "puts it into one's system.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008
Intimacy
Thank you for such a truthful article as I do believe G-d made sexuality to be sacred and only to be shared in the sanctity of marriage.
Anonymous
Naples, Florida
chabadnaples.com
Show all comments
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG