Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Lifecycle Events
 
Chabad.org » Lifecycle Events » Marriage » The Jewish Wedding » Readings & Tools » In Depth Readings » Is a "Double Ring" wedding ceremony okay?
  Finding Your Soulmate   The Jewish Wedding   Married Life
The Path to Marriage    |    Jewish Wedding: Step-by-Step    |    Wedding Handbook    |    Newlyweds    |    Readings & Tools
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment4 Comments

Is a "Double Ring" wedding ceremony okay?


A wedding ring is symbolic of many spiritual concepts and truths, and there are many laws and customs pertaining to it. It is interesting to note that although it is universally accepted Jewish custom to use a ring to affect the marriage, from a purely technical standpoint, the ring itself is merely a custom; the Talmud contains no actual reference to it.

Technically, the groom needs only to give the bride a gift of value (worth at least a perutah, a small coin used in Talmudic times). He could instead give her a cell phone or a blender and... mazel tov, they're married!

We won't delve into all the mystical symbolism of the wedding ring. However, in order to answer the question, let's examine what the ring given at a Jewish wedding represents legally, in terms of the validity of the wedding.

According to Jewish law, there are different ways to purchase something. One method is by giving cash, kesef. When a groom gives something of value (a ring or blender) to the bride, he is obviously not buying her. She is a human being, not a piece of property. So this is not a perfect analogy. However, he is acquiring exclusive rights to her hand in marriage. From this moment onwards no other man can be intimate with her. Thus the ring isn't merely a sentimental gift given to the beloved; it actually effects the "transaction."

When a woman gives a man a ring in return, they are simply exchanging articles of value. They could exchange blenders, too...When a woman gives a man a ring in return, they are simply exchanging articles of value. They could exchange blenders, too. Now they have just made a trade, and not effected a change of her status, to a married woman. The legal transaction implied by the groom giving the bride a ring has now been matched one for one, and thereby cancelled. Her status remains unchanged. It is as if the bride has not received anything at all, or as if she has given back the gift.

One may ask, but what about the feelings and intentions of the groom and/or bride as they give their rings? Don't the feelings and intentions count for something? What if the bride has in mind that she is giving a ring simply to express her profound love for her groom, and not for any legal purpose?

Nevertheless, a) the external factor is quite compelling. While one couple may have this intention, another may not. b) When dealing with a ceremony as sensitive and important as marriage – a ceremony whose ramifications will (hopefully) affect all future generations, we want to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

Under the chupah, the groom recites the words "You are betrothed to me...according to the laws of Moses and Israel." It is important, especially in matters with long-lasting ramifications such as a wedding, that we put aside our own desires and ask ourselves, what is the Torah really asking of me, and what is the law?

Jewish marriage is known as "kiddushin," which means holiness and separation. A Jewish bride and groom elevate themselves to new heights of holiness by going through a proper Jewish wedding ceremony. When it comes to such momentous occasions in life, it is important to respect halachah, so as to avoid creating any doubt.

If the bride feels that she must give a ring to your groom, it may possibly be done after the chupah is over, in private.

Getting married in a manner that is fully in keeping with Jewish law is the best way to start out your life together with blessings and happiness!1

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment4 Comments
FOOTNOTES
1.

Sources: Made in Heaven, by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan. Moznaim Publishers, 1983. The Jewish Way in Love and Marriage, by Rabbi Maurice Lamm. Jonathan David Publishers, 1991. The Laws and Customs of the Jewish Wedding, by Rabbi Gavriel Zinner. CIS Publishers, 1993.


By Yosef Resnick   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Yosef Resnick is a certified scribe, Torah educator, professional musician, and writer. His column on chassidut and parenting appears regularly in Natural Jewish Parenting magazine. He resides in Sharon, Massachusetts, with his wife and four children.
The content on this page is provided by AskMoses.com, and is copyrighted by the author, publisher, and/or AskMoses.com. You are welcome to distribute it further, provided you do not revise any part of it and you include this statement, credit the author and/or publisher, and include a link to www.AskMoses.com.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Aug 28, 2009
Re: Alternatives
Aside from the legalities, we are always concerned of the viewer's impression, as well as setting a precedent. All of these alternatives carry both dangers.

The best solution always is to explain matters clearly to all parties involved, in a way that they will accept. Most important is to stress that it's simply not worth it to sour a beautiful wedding over these details. Let the details pass the way they have been done for thousands of years, and let the marriage be one of harmony and joy.
Posted By Rabbi Tzvi Freeman

Posted: Aug 27, 2009
What about alternatives?
If it is important (to satisfy less-observant family) that there be an exchange of rings on the bimah, are there alternatives?

One I've heard is that the chassan buys both rings. So the kallah isn't giving a gift, but is merely placing the ring on his finger.

Or alternatively, could kiddushin be done with another object beforehand, in front of witnesses (perhaps when the ketuba is being signed) before the ceremony? But would it then be considered a bracha l'vatala (blessing in vain) to subsequently say "harei at mikudeshet li" (a second time) with the rings on the bima?
Posted By Anonymous, Vienna, VA

Posted: Jan 7, 2008
Re: a change in status
Your proposal is for the man to provide a ring to acquire the woman's dedication to him, while she would provide a ring to him to acquire his dedication to her.

Really, there's a question that should be asked prior to this: Where do we see in the marriage ceremony that the man commits himself to the woman and is "acquired" to her as her husband?

So let me explain a little further how the transaction works:

Getting married is not like buying a pair of shoes. With the shoes, you pay the cash and take the shoes and they are yours. The transaction happens once and is over and done with.

Marriage, on the other hand, is more like a service contract. It's an agreement that "as long as we are both providing our conjugal responsibilities to one another, we are married." If one partner or the other at some point stops providing---and continues refusing to provide after the court's intervention--the marriage must be dissolved.

In this sense, we can say that the marriage ceremony--unlike the transaction at the shoe store--never ends. At every moment of a couple's life together they are not just married, they are getting married, again and again.

Giving the ring, then, is not the entire transaction--it's just the beginning. You have to start somewhere. He provides her a ring, thereby saying, "I have begun to become your husband" and she accepts it, thereby saying, "...and in return, I have begun to be your wife."

If, however, she would return a ring to him, what would that be stating? She can't be "acquiring" him as a husband--he already committed to that by providing the ring. The obvious meaning of the transaction would be just, "Hey, that's a nice ring. Here's one for you too!"--thereby rendering his offer of marriage null and void.

There's also a deeper meaning to the dynamics of this transaction: You see that the man becomes a husband through an action. The woman, however, becomes a wife through a passive, quiet stance of receiving. In more abstract terms, the man is becoming, while the woman is being.

This aligns with the masculine and feminine roles as they are described in the Kabbalah. The masculine aspects are those that extend from the essence and revolve about it, while the feminine are those that manifest the essence itself. The essence, as soon as it moves, is no longer the essence.
Posted By Tzvi Freeman

Posted: Jan 6, 2008
A change in status
If by giving a ring to a women "he is acquiring exclusive rights" cannot the same be said of a ring being given to a man. The women is given the same exclusivity wither her husband and she gives him as his wife. Though not traditional, still it could be said that there is no harm in signifying this commitment. Both man and woman change status...single...married...for both
Posted By Anonymous, hosuton, tx



 


In Depth Readings
The Bridal Canopy (Chuppah)
Kiddushin -- Betrothal
The Wedding Band
Is a "Double Ring" wedding ceremony okay?
The Witnesses
The Ketubah
Customs for Second Marriages
Showing 3 - 9 of 11

Jewish Wedding—Step by Step