HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Spirituality
 
Chabad.org » Spirituality » Sci-Fi & Fantasy » Dear Guad » What Is G‑d?


Share thisPost a CommentPrintSend this page to a friendSubscribe
37 Comments Posted

What Is G‑d?



To the Grand Master of the Great Rubi-Cube of Life, Unraveller of Wrapped-up Truths, Beacon of Blinding Light for the farblungent ships at sea, the Magnificently Esteemed Chief Rabbi of Suburban Guadalajara,

Dear Guady,

Somewhere along the way, I misplaced G-d.

At first, I thought I had left Him on the night table when I to bed last night, but I turned on the lights and searched and He wasn't there. I searched the top of the dresser, the kitchen counter and even the glove compartment of my car.

Somewhere along the way I misplaced G‑d Back to the kitchen--I needed caffeine. As the muddy steam arose into my face, shaking me into a wakened state, a shuddering truth struck: G-d couldn't be in the glove compartment. He's too big. If you're looking for something, you've got to look in a place that's big enough for that thing to fit.

So I retraced my steps through the park where I went for a walk last night. Maybe some kid picked Him up and ran off with Him --I certainly couldn't find Him anywhere.

Thinking about that kid, I began to realize that in fact, I hadn't seen G-d in quite a while--probably not since childhood. There was the clue. Something traumatic had occurred back then when I was a small child, something so meganormous, so bazootling, so cryogenically mortifying that in the ensuing frenzy I had somehow managed to misplace G-d and never came back to pick Him up. Until now. And He's not there anymore.

Guady, you've got to help me retrace my steps back to that crucial moment. G-d is big stuff. If I had Him when I was a child, why shouldn't I have Him now? But I've got to know, just how and where did He get lost? Help me, Guady!

--Percy Plecks

Dear Percy,

You've got one clue, but you missed the other. It has to do with your language. Call it "thing-fixation."

That's probably the main disaster of your childhood --not being weaned, not leaving behind pampers for underpants, not sitting in a desk in first grade --but when you learned about things.

The entire world has been reduced in our minds to a mass junkyard of thingy stuff. So even G-d gets defined as a thing... I don't mean, "you learned about things of the world." I mean, you learned the idea of things. You learned that the world is made of stuff, objects, material goomp that's just "out there". Later in life, you started running after those things, accumulating them, amassing more and more mounds of things to fill your home, your backyard and your driveway. By now, the entire world has been reduced in your mind to nothing but a mass junkyard of thingy stuff. So even G-d gets defined as a thing --and you're trying to find the place where He fits. Because, after all, all things fit in places.

When you woke up to life as a small child, it wasn't like that. There were no things. There was just the experience of being. Of sensing, of living, of breathing and doing. Screaming, nursing, burping. Those were all real. Those are life. Things are not real. Things are fiction. They don't exist. We made them up.

The Birth of Thinginess

How did things come to be? Here's my catch on it. Call it "The Guadian Theory of the Origin of Things":

In the beginning, there were no things. All of humankind knew life as does a small child, even as they grew older and wiser. But then someone got it into his head to draw pictures of all the stuff he had. Eventually, pictures became glyphs, a nifty device for esoteric communication. Glyph-lovers--such as the cult-priests of ancient Egypt--created thousands of glyphs to represent all the stuff Pharaoh was accumulating. Soon the idea seeped into the spoken language, as well: the idea of a "thing"--a static snapshot of a distinct whateveritis in a frozen moment of time. Stuff was born. And the world was never again the same.

In Hebrew, verbs rule Evidence? Because in ancient, biblical Hebrew, there is no word for stuff. Or thing. Or object or anything similar. In raw, primal Hebrew, you don't say, "Hey, where's that thing I put over here?" You say, "Where is the desired (chefetz) that I put here?" You don't say, "What's that thing?" --you say, "What's that word?" That's the closest you can get to the idea of thing: a word. All of reality is made of words. Look in the creation story: The whole of heaven and earth is nothing but words.

In fact, in ancient Hebrew, there aren't really any nouns, either. In languages like English, nouns are the masters and verbs are their slaves, with adjectives and associated forms dancing about to serve them. In Hebrew, verbs rule. Big, little, wise, foolish, king, priest, eye, ear--all of these sound like things, but in Hebrew they are forms of verbs. In fact, according to Rabbi Yeshayahu Horowitz (1560?-1630), author of the classic Shnei Luchot HaBrit, everything in Hebrew is really a verb. Everything is an event, a happening, a process --flowing, moving, never static. Just like when you were a small child.

In Hebrew, there is not even a present-tense. There are participles, but the idea of a present tense only arose later. In real Hebrew, nothing ever is--all is movement.

That fits, because Hebrew was not written in glyphs. Hebrew was the first language we know of to be written with symbols that represent sounds, not things. 1 With the Hebrew alphabet--the mother of all alphabets--you don't see things, you see sounds. Even the process of reading is different: when you read glyphs, the order doesn't matter so much. You just sort of look and everything is there. Even modern Chinese glyphs can be written in any direction. With an alphabet, sequence is everything. Nothing has meaning standing on its own. Everything is in the flow.

Get The Flow

Things are not real. Things are fiction. They don't exist. We made them up. The flow is real. Things are not real. Ask a physicist: the more we examine stuff--what they call matter--we see that it's not there. All that's really there is events: waves, vibrations, fields of energy. Life is a concert, not a museum.

Think of writing music, as opposed to painting a portrait. The portrait artist stands back and beholds his art, his still rendition of a frozen moment--and he beholds it all at once. Then he politely asks his model to please return to the pose of that which has now become the prime reality, the portrait. A portrait of that which is but never was.

A composer of music cannot do this. You can't freeze a moment of music--it vanishes as soon as you attempt to do such. Like the fictional stuff they call matter: Frozen to absolute zero, without energy, without movement, it no longer exists. Because, in truth, all that exists is the flow of being.

The Name

The flow of being: now you have found G-d The flow of being: now you have found G-d. In fact, in Hebrew, that's His name. G-d's name is a series of four letters that express all forms of the verb of all verbs, the verb to be: is, was, being, will be, about to be, causing to be, should be --all of these are in those four letters of G-d's name. As G-d told Moses when he asked for His name, "I will be that which I will be."

In our modern languages that doesn't work. We quickly slip into the trap of thingness again. Who is G-d? We answer, "He is One who was, is and will be."

There we go with the "thing that is" business again. No, G-d is not a thing that is or was or will be. G-d is isness itself. Oy! The frustration of the language. We need new words: Ising. Isness. Isingness. Isifying. Isifier. In Hebrew you can conjugate the verb to be in all these ways and more. Perhaps in English one day we will do the same. Until then, we are like artists using pastels to imitate Rembrandt; like musicians trying to play middle-eastern strains in tempered C Major.

And the proof: We ask questions that make sense only in English, but in Hebrew are plainly absurd. Such as, "Does G-d exist?" In Hebrew, that's a tautology, somewhat the equivalent of "Does existence exist?"

There is no need to "believe" in this G-d--if you know what we are talking about, you just know. You will know, also, that there is nothing else but this G-d--what is there that stands outside isness?

Think simple: You wake up in the morning and, even before coffee, there is As for faith and belief, those are reserved for greater things. Like believing that this great Isness that isifies all that ises cares, knows, has compassion, can be related to. In other words, saying that reality is a caring experience. Which reduces to saying that compassion is real, purpose is real, life is real. That's something you have to believe. But G-d's existence--like most ideas that men argue about--that's just a matter of semantics.

Think simple: You wake up in the morning and, even before coffee, there is. Reality. Existence. Not "the things that exist" but existence itself. The flow. The infinite flow of light and energy. Of being, of existence. Of is. Think of all that flow of isingness all in a single, perfectly simple point. Get into it, commune with it, speak to it, become one with it --that is G-d.

Right there on your night table, too.


Share thisPost a CommentPrintSend this page to a friendSubscribe
37 Comments Posted
FOOTNOTES
1. Yes, I know about the theory of acrophony--that originally the Hebrew letters represented things and that they later were used for the sound associated with that thing. But I think the examples are far-fetched and the evidence is just not there. Just another "canals-on-Mars" idea cooked up by another thing-fixated mind.

By Tzvi Freeman   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Tzvi Freeman heads Chabad.org's Ask The Rabbi team, and is a senior member of the Chabad.org editorial team. He is the author of a number of highly original renditions of Kabbalah and Chassidic teaching, including the universally acclaimed "Bringing Heaven Down to Earth." To order Tzvi's books click here. Rabbi Freeman is available for public speaking and workshops. Read more on his bio page.
About the artist: Sarah Kranz has been illustrating magazines, webzines and books (including five children's books) since graduating from the Istituto Europeo di Design, Milan, in 1996. Her clients have included The New York Times and Money Marketing Magazine of London

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

37 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Nov 11, 2009
The verbs of seeing, hearing and being
The spoken and written traditions together are the means by which G_d raises an inert universe, to the immanent transcendence of Himself (blessed be His holy name).

The illusory and mundane only came into being with "the fall".

Torah (= "to see" from the Hebrew "Yarah") is not so much about "law" but about seeing what G_d sees at "the end of days". It is about partaking "of" His eternal existence and in this sense, is intended for everyone, directly or indirectly.

To think that Torah implies only law, is perhaps one of the greatest illusions of all time.

Great article, by the way!
Posted By Steven Calascione, Malta

Posted: July 12, 2009
There's no such thing as god.
The word 'Elokim' has other meanings than the English word, 'G-d'. I tend to believe that when the Hebrew scriptures went outward into a mostly pagan-polytheistic world, there was no word to describe what HaShem is in their terminologies. The closest words that could have a similarity to the Hebrew "Elokim'' were used in translation such as dios, theos, gut, and later, into G-d. I recall that Torah states specifically, "You shall Not worship Me as they do their gods, for I, YHVH am NOT A God, like their gods." Therefore, it is correct to state that there is no G-d. G-d is the illusion (I am the great & powerful OZ!!!). This has kept the worship in some religions at the same level as idolatry. When you begin to see Hashem's Light shining through the eyes, and the actions of other people; or even the potential of it. Are we not seeing the truth? It 's all in how you see it. We are One if we do it. But He, HaShem is more than any kind of g-d mankind could ever imagine.
Posted By Anonymous, Pasadena, CA

Posted: July 3, 2009
Static Art and Fluid Art
What Rabbi Freeman has stated here is profound and beautiful. However, there is another perspective by which to appreciate still-life art, whether it be a painting, a statue, a photograph, pottery, or whatever. A good still-life captures and calls attention to the precious, poignant eternity that exists in what appear to be fleeting moments. It calls attention to a moment of expanded Now, which is also all that really exists, just as music paradoxically portrays that all that really exists on the relative plane is constant change. Some music forms, as varied as traditional Indian music from the East and bagpipe music from the West, include an underlying drone meant to portray the unchanging Permanent of the Absolute from which the ever-changing melody lines of the Relative temporarily emerge, to later dissolve back in merger with the One.
Posted By Steve Gold/Zorach, Decatur, GA



 


Dear Guad
Sighting Moshiach
What Is G‑d?
Is G‑d an Agnostic?
Is G-d an It, an I, or Nothing?
Unorthodox Judaism
Can I Convert to Judaism?
How Was the Torah Written?
Women in the Synagogue
The Private I
Fantasy
Rotten People
Why Do Things Go Wrong?
Where is Life's “Undo” Function?
Am I just a Figment of Someone's Imagination?