Printed from Chabad.org
Contact Us
Visit us on Facebook
Meet the new Chabad.org
Switch to OLD version

The Abraham Principle

The Logic of Faith

Print
E-mail

One elegant idea, developed by a child some 3,800 years ago, has transformed the world forever. That child was the patriarch Abraham, and his big idea, on closer inspection, seems more akin to ecology than to ethical monotheism.

So what's the big idea? And how did he come to it?

According to tradition, Abraham was born in 1813 BCE in the ancient Iraqi town of Ur Kasdim. As a young child in a pagan culture, he practiced idolatry and prayed to the sun, believing it to have created the heavens and the earth. But something didn't quite click. Whenever the sun set, it was out of the picture and the moon and stars dominated the night sky. Realizing the sun's limitations he prayed to the moon. With time he realized that neither is the ultimate answer, and so he came to the conclusion that there must be one Creator with unlimited power and knowledge.

Abraham was absolutely convinced that the prevailing pagan beliefs were wrong. He set about sharing his findings with everyone he met and successfully persuaded thousands to drop paganism in favor of his "heretical" views. Although popular with the public, Abraham was spurned by both family and the ruling class for bucking the system. After narrowly escaping martyrdom for refusing to deify the emperor, Abraham was forced to flee the country.

Only after all this does Genesis pick up the plot with Abraham's call to the Promised Land and the subsequent history of his descendants, both Jews and Gentiles.

Such is the story. But is it really so simple? If it were you that discovered that the sun and moon aren't the ultimate answer to life's questions, would you desert your family, wage war on the government, and risk martyrdom? So what that the sun and moon don't run the world? Is that a reason to go fanatic?

Let's step back and look at Abraham's quest as a logical problem. He was seeking some entity capable of creating and controlling the world as a whole. With nothing more than the world itself to go by, he had to work by inference. Knowing that everything that happens, happens for a reason, Abraham set out to discover that reason. Put another way, he set out to identify that being responsible for the existence of... well, you name it: Matter, energy, motion, and life on the grandest scale imaginable. A theory of everything, if you will.

No wonder, then, that he started by worshipping the sun. It is huge, powerful, and immensely influential. It is our preeminent source of light and heat. It drives the hydrological cycle and makes the plants grow and the animals thrive. It sets the days and seasons.

Today, we can overlook the sun. There are countless thousands of people who wake up indoors, take elevators down to subways, commute to skyscrapers they access from underground, and return home at the end of the day after shopping, dining and taking in a show, all without stepping outside. But back then, who knows, maybe it was a no brainer to see the sun as the creator of all.

But the sun has its limits. The moon rules the night. The stars, the tides, biorhythms, moods, all seem quite independent of the sun. If the moon can act where the sun cannot, it shows a certain greatness above and beyond the sun itself. So Abraham worshipped the moon.

Now he could have stopped right there, like the rest of his compatriots. Each heavenly body with its own sphere of influence. Radiate and reflect, give and take, positive and negative, masculine and feminine, duality works fine for many cultures and faiths. But not for Abraham. He recognized duality, yet he suspected an underlying unity. But why?

The sun and the moon have a special relationship. While different as night and day (in light, in heat, in motion, in phases, and in seasons), they nevertheless share two remarkable qualities. First, they are exactly the same angular (or apparent) size, even though the sun is huge and far and the moon is small and close. Second, their paths intersect every once in a while resulting in spectacular eclipses. Whoever has witnessed a total solar eclipse knows the awe and wonder this majestic event evokes. It was obvious to Abraham that the coordination of the sun and the moon was not mere chance event.

Abraham understood a most basic principle of human logic, that everything that happens, happens for a reason. The very fact that solar and lunar sizes and motions are coordinated is itself a something, albeit an abstract something, which requires an explanation. The sun and moon should be viewed as an orderly system with a suitable cause.

Now the question was, what could the cause of this systemic property be? Could the two-part, sun-moon system originate in a duality or other plurality, say pantheon, of forces? Remember that Abraham had no clue about monotheism at the time. He addressed his question first using the pagan cognitive tools that were his heritage. Well, he must have thought, if it were the case that some divine plurality created the system, what was coordinating the parts of that higher plurality? And if nothing was coordinating the higher plurality, then how did their coordination come to be? Abraham wasn't ready to drop cause and effect. Ascribing the natural system to a supernatural system only pushes off the coordination issue. Abraham concluded that there had to be ultimately one factor unifying the sun-moon system. But what was it?

One possibility was that the control was within the system. That would mean, in effect, that the sun and the moon were coordinating themselves. But that did not seem feasible because seeing their individual orbits and properties, it was clear that the sun was not controlling the moon and the moon was not controlling the sun. Therefore the control must be some factor which is not the sun and not the moon. Perhaps it was the earth, but that could not be because the earth was itself integrated systematically with the sun and the moon, for after all, that's why Abraham worshipped them originally. The stars and planets too had their regular, integrated motions and specific roles in the grand scheme of things, so they were not the organizing force.

Clearly, whatever that force or being was, had to have two properties. It had to be external to the parts of the system, and it had to be more powerful than them, to keep all the parts in systemic order. Given that the system under consideration was now not just the sun and the moon but indeed the heavens and the earth as a whole, being external to it all implied being transcendent, and being more powerful than it all meant being omnipotent.

Abraham's little idea grew from a child's musings to a rational approach to nature as a whole, to a firm faith in a first cause so well established that most of the world's inhabitants pride themselves in Abraham and his legacy of ethical monotheism.


Let us hope and pray that all Abraham's children take to heart Abraham's message of ethical monotheism. Both the ethical and the monotheism. Both the Divine unity, and the human.

Realistically speaking, as the world looks today, that would take a miracle, compared to which the bringing of Moshiach looks easy. Abraham was one alone, yet he changed the world. Perhaps we can do the same. My advice is this. For Abraham's sake, don't do a random act of kindness. Do a premeditated one.

By Arnie Gotfryd
Dr. Arnie Gotfryd, PhD, is a chassidic Jew and environmental scientist, having earned Canada’s first doctorate in Applied Ecology. He designed and taught an accredited, award-winning undergraduate course called Faith and Science which has been the most popular offering at University of Toronto’s New College for many years.
He writes and speaks extensively on the interplay of science and faith, and what it all means for the individual and the world at large. You can visit his website for more.
The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
Print
E-mail
Sort By:
Discussion (13)
March 16, 2011
discovery of G-d - reply
John, the patriarchs really were not on our level. Sure they were human, but are we? We are not human like they are. Kabbalah refers to them as the merkavah, the Divine chariot - like a vehicle that does the will of the Driver only. Is that what you are? No personal agendas? If so, then maybe you can achieve their level.

There will come a time that we will all experience commune-ication with the Almighty. Just do and teach ethical monotheism ie, the 7 Noahide Laws because G-d said so to Moses at Sinai and your reward in heaven is very great indeed - like that of a Jewish High Priest.
Aryeh (Arnie) Gotfryd, PhD
Thornhill, ON Canada
March 16, 2011
discovery of G-d
My apologies Aryeh, you are right Seth was Adam's son and Shem was Noah's. that was a slip on my part. I agree with you that the discovery of the infinite is a process. However, when G-d was revealed to Abraham the amazing thing is he came to know the maker of the universe personally as G-d was able to speak to him. Was he any different from us? What I read about him he was certainly a flawed human being. This gives me hope that I can know G-d in this same way. Question:- Does G-d make himself know to men in the same way today?
John Swain BA. ChG
Nottingham, UK
March 15, 2011
discovery of G-d - reply
John, Noah did not have a son Seth. You are mixing up Noah and Adam. And regarding Adam's son Shem, he met him after the incident with Nimrod. In any case, there are sources that say Abraham was three and others say in his 40's or 50's. The resolution is that discovery of the Infinite is a process and all sources agree that his was unguided by man or G-d in any explicit way. Only after his discovery did the first revelations occur.
Aryeh (Arnie) Gotfryd, PhD
Thornhill, ON Canada
March 12, 2011
discovery of G-d
Aryeh check again and I think you will find that G-d had spoken to Abraham before that. It was only after his father died that he moved from Haran at the age of 75. He had been called by G-d years earlier when in Ur. Remember Seth, Noah's son was still alive at this time. Maybe Abraham was one of the few that listened to old Seth and took him seriously as he spoke of the time of G-d's judgement which he had experienced. Maybe due to this he he chose not to engage in the pagan worship that he developed and because of this was chosen by G-d to be the father of a nation who destiny is to reveal G-d to the world.
John Swain BA. ChG
Nottingham, UK
March 9, 2011
discovery of G-d - reply
Yes John, but be aware that his discovery far preceded the revelations. The first divine communication was "Go forth" at the age of 75 whereas he already had thousands of followers in Monotheism by that time.
Aryeh (Arnie) Gotfryd, PhD
Thornhill, ON Canada
March 9, 2011
discovery of G-d
What ever route Abraham took to discover G-d the truth remains that it was not a one sided relationship, as G-d spoke to him on more than one occasion. Maybe that's what convinced Abraham of there being an awesome, infinite, bigger than creation being, who is outside both creation and time that we call G-d.
John Swain
Nottingham, UK
March 8, 2011
Response to Michael, Quebec
Answer to Michael. The two persons walking away from the wallet are the sun and the moon, is that what you are suggesting? Let me try this. There may be subconscious clues in the wallet that you absorbed and trigger knowledge of the owner, you may have seen the owner in passing and the wallet he crafted. May be you saw him aiding someone, giving to charity, the homeless or assisting someone short of the right money, getting out his wallet on each occasion, being close enough to the rich man for him to make a subconscious impression on you as a G-dly person: The heart and soul of the man who found the wallet, has a hidden knowledge of the G-dly owner, but does not know fully where it comes from and so visits him and asks the questions needed to discover ownership of these worldly riches (or the world). Upon hearing your SINCERE questions, He responds, and if you actually listen and not disregard the answers you will hear the owner confirm and invite you in and celebrate your discovery.
Mr. D Ward
October 28, 2009
Michael / Montreal
Shalom,
if I were the author, perhaps I would not address your comment. So I will, seems that you are wondering if G-d is real, I assume this because why else would you have read this article [ Chabad ] if you totally believe as an atheist? Say you have never been to Brothers Or., [ pop 16 ] obviously, you would not know it. The only way to truly know it, is to experience it. The same is true with G-d to an infinite degree.

To discover the reality of G-d, your curiosity must become sincere desire, then, with all the might of your will, reach out to Him, perhaps you will have to try very hard, many times. When you connect, G-d will become your reality, as He is mine. There are no travel expenses, and nothing to loose. Find out for FREE! Also, the sincere study of the Torah & Kabbalah will illuminate you. Blessings, may you know.
Tone Lechtzier
Brothers, OR US
March 26, 2009
keep reading
"discovery of G-d" correctly surmises that the Talmudic legend does not give all the details of Abraham's logic.

Unfortunately, however, his post gives no indication of having read past paragraph 3 of a 19 paragraph essay.

His very question is raised in par. 6 and almost all of the rest of the article is busy explaining it in a logically coherent and plain English.

The "Abraham Principle" described herein is a normative, rational analytic tool for analyzing correlation and inferring causation from it.

What many readers react against (for whatever subjective reasons) is that the very same logic, ie, that correlation implies causation, underlies both of those great socio-cultural enterprises: Ethical monotheism and modern science.

Indeed they are synergistic approaches to one and the same world.
Aryeh (Arnie) Gotfryd, PhD
Thornhill, Canada
March 25, 2009
discovery of G-d
"With time he realized that neither [sun or moon] is the ultimate answer, and so he came to the conclusion that there must be one Creator with unlimited power and knowledge"

This citation makes a cause-effect link between discovering that the sun and moon are not rulers of the universe and the consequent existence of a single all mighty G-d.

this way of thinking only inspects the world from a theological perspective and never takes into account the other point of view i.e. that there is no all powerful being ruling the universe.

This logic is analogous with noticing a wallet filled with cash on the floor as 2 individuals are walking away from it. Believing it belongs to one of them, the witness asks both persons if it is their wallet. On getting a negative response from both of them, the witness finally concludes that the wallet stuff with bills must belong to the town's richest man.
This conclusion is as absurd as the one sated above.

Can the author please answer me back.
Michael
Montreal, Quebec
Show all comments
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG