HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Library
 
Chabad.org » Library » Anthologies » Our Children, Our Selves » The Head


Share thisPost a CommentPrintSend this page to a friendSubscribe
4 Comments Posted

The Head



The Zohar refers to Moses as the raaya meheimna of Israel -- a phrase that translates both as "faithful shepherd" and "shepherd of faith." The latter sense implies that Moses is Israel's faith provider -- a source of, and conduit for, their faith in G-d.

Indeed, when the Torah speaks of Israel's faith in G-d in the wake of the miracles of the Exodus, it says, "They believed in G-d and in Moses His servant" -- using the very same verb (vayaaminu, "and they believed") to connote Israel's belief in Moses and in the Almighty. In its commentary on this verse, the Mechilta goes so far as to derive from this that "one who believes in Moses believes in G-d."

The Talmud goes even further, applying the same to the sages and Torah scholars of all generations. Citing the verse, "To love the L-rd your G-d and to cleave to Him,"1 it asks, "Is it then possible to cleave to the Divine?" and replies: "But whoever attaches himself to a Torah scholar, the Torah considers it as if he had attached himself to G-d."2

A fundamental principle of the Jewish faith is that there are no intermediaries between G-d and His world; our relationship with Him is not facilitated by any third party. So what is the significance of the role of our leaders and Torah scholars in regards to our faith in, and attachment to, G-d?

The Awareness Factor

The explanation, says Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi in his Tanya, lies in understanding the father/child metaphor employed by the Torah to describe our relationship with G-d. "You are children to the L-rd your G-d,"3 says Moses. While we were still in Egypt, G-d speaks of us as "My firstborn child, Israel."4

In what way is G-d our father? There are, of course, the obvious parallels. Like a father, G-d creates us and provides us with sustenance and direction. He loves us with the boundless, all-forgiving love of a father. Rabbi Schneur Zalman delves further into the metaphor, examining the biological and psychological dynamics of the father-child model and employing them to better understand our relationship to each other and to our Father in Heaven.

A microscopic bit of matter, originating in the father's body, triggers the generation of a life. In the mother's womb, a single cell develops into a brain, heart, eyes, ears, arms, legs, toenails; soon it emerges into the world to function as a thinking, feeling, and achieving human being.

Physically, what has originated in the father's body and psyche is now a separate, distinct, and (eventually) independent individual. On a deeper level, however, the child remains inseparable from his begetter. In the words of the Talmud, "A son is a limb of his father." At the very heart of the child's consciousness lies an inescapable truth: he is his father's child, an extension of his being, a projection of his personality. In body, they have become two distinct entities; in essence, they are one.

One may argue: perhaps in the child's mind, the seat of his self-awareness and identity, the singularity of parent and offspring lives on. Here the child's relationship with his father is sensed; here resides the recognition of their intrinsic oneness. But the brain is only one of the child's many organs and limbs. The rest of him may indeed stem from its parental source, but is now a wholly separate entity.

Obviously, this is not the case -- any more than it would be correct to say that the eyes alone see or that just the mouth speaks. The component parts of the human being comprise a single, integrated whole; it is the person who sees, the person who speaks, the person who is aware. The toenail of the child, by virtue of its interconnection with the brain, is no less one with the father than is the brain itself, the organ which facilitates this oneness.

But what if the toenail, or any other limb of the body, severs its connection with the brain? This would cut it off from its own center of vitality and consciousness, and, as a result, also from its parental origins. In other words, the unity of all the child's limbs and organs with the father's essence is dependent upon their maintaining their connection with their own mind, a connection which imbues them all with the awareness of this unity.

The Body Israel

Israel, too, is comprised of many "organs" and "limbs." There are the great sages of each generation who devote their life to the assimilation of the Divine essence of Torah, whose entire being is permeated with the awareness of G-d's truth. These are the mind of the nation. Israel has a heart, individuals whose lives exemplify compassion and piety; and hands, its great builders and achievers. Each and every individual, from the "Moses of the generation"5 to the ordinary "foot soldier," forms an integral part of the body of G-d's firstborn -- each is equally "the limb of the father."

But as with the physical father-child relationship, it is the mind of the child which facilitates the bond with his father. As long as the many organs and limbs of his body remain a single integrated whole, they are all equally the father's child. The mind is not serving as an "intermediary," G-d forbid -- every part of the body, including the toenail, possesses the self-knowledge that makes the two ostensibly distinct bodies of the father and child a single entity. But it is only by virtue of their connection to their mind that this awareness resides within all the child's parts.

The same applies to the "body" that is Israel. It is our life-bond with our "mind" -- the sages and leaders of Israel -- that both integrates us as a single whole and imbues us with our connection to our Creator and Source.

True, a Jew cannot ever sever his or her bond with G-d, any more than even the lowliest toenail of the child's body can choose to go off on its own and undo its relationship with its father. But while we cannot change what we are, we can determine to what extent our identity as G-d's child will be expressed in our daily life. We can choose, G-d forbid, to disassociate ourselves from the leaders whom G-d has implanted in our midst, thus banishing our relationship with Him to the subconscious of our soul. Or we can intensify our bond to the "mind" of Israel, thereby making our bond with the Almighty a tangible and vibrant reality in our lives.6


Share thisPost a CommentPrintSend this page to a friendSubscribe
4 Comments Posted
FOOTNOTES
1. Deuteronomy 30:20.
2. Talmud, Ketubot 111b.
3. Deuteronomy 14:1.
4. Exodus 4:22.
5. As each generation's leader is called -- see Midrash Rabbah, Bereishit 56:7; Tikkunei Zohar 114a; Rashi's commentary on Chullin 93a.
6. Based on Tanya, chapter 2, and the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Sivan 26, 5711 (June 30, 1951).

By Yanki Tauber   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
About the artist: Sarah Kranz has been illustrating magazines, webzines and books (including five children's books) since graduating from the Istituto Europeo di Design, Milan, in 1996. Her clients have included The New York Times and Money Marketing Magazine of London
Originally published in "Week in Review"
Republished with the permission of MeaningfulLife.com. If you wish to republish this article in a periodical, book, or website, please email permissions@meaningfullife.com

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

4 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Feb 8, 2007
Response to onionmix
You are aware of who your father is and of your relationship with him. Which part of you is aware? Just your brain, but not your hand? Is your brain an "intermediary" between your father and the "rest" of you?

You could phrase it that way. But it would be more correct to say that YOU -- all of you -- is aware. Your brain is the part of yourself that is the primary seat of this awareness. Your whole self is aware because you have a brain--(if you didn't have a brain, then you might still be aware on some primal level, but not on a conscious one)--but it's the whole person who is aware.

Now, if your hand would detach itself from the rest of you--and thus also from your brain--it would lose this (conscious) awareness. Again, you could use that as an indication that the brain is an "intermediary." But somehow, my brain doesn't feel like an intermediary between myself and something else. Perhaps "facilitator" would be a better term. But even that rings false. It's ME who knows, because my awareness is not something that's exclusive to any part of me.

As I understand it, this is the implication of the "mind of the child" metaphor in the 2nd chapter of Tanya. The point is twofold: 1) Every part of the child's body is equally an extension of the father's being. The only difference between the brain and the other body parts is the degree of *conscious awareness* of this connection. 2) When the other limbs are connected to the brain, they all share this awareness by virtue of this connection. The point is not that the brain is an "intermediary" but that the body now constitutes a single entity, and it is this holistic entity that is now consciously aware that it is an extension of the father's being.
Posted By Yanki Tauber

Posted: Feb 5, 2007
Article:The Head
The womb contains the body and gives the soul through the Mother. Is there not a danger of imbalance by constantly ignoring the Mother principle as equal with a metophor of Her own? If I am correct, the soul comes through the Mother. Where would Israel exist without Her soul? Is that not the most important element of all?Although, I do acknowledge Chabad as more balanced than I have found elsewhere and am extremely happy to have found such wonderful teachers.
Posted By Linda Scharfman Graham, Powder Springs, Ga.
via chabadenrichment.org

Posted: Feb 4, 2007
I am not clear at all on how the analogy of the mind to the other parts of the body does not indicate an intermediary relationship. Without the mind, the body would cease to function and if our connection to Hashem would lessen or cease to function without the gedolim of the generation, then it sounds exactly like an intermediary. Please clarify.
Posted By onionsoupmix



 


Our Children, Our Selves
Angels
Zeida
My Son's Life
Zahavah's Friend
Songs Of Innocence
A Stupid Little Ruler
A Mother Who Stayed Home
Chaim's Bar Mitzvah
Popular Names
Do You Have a Father?
Serving Father
Serebrinka, 1902
It Is His Turn
The Wonder That Is Woman
The Memory of Water
It's Not Easy To Be a Son
The Fifth Question
The Eyes of a Child
My Child's Window
What Happened on Your Birthday?
The Head
Packaging
Yaakov Lieder