Imagine if you could turn your very worst liabilities into your most precious assets. Nice dream, isn't it?
Well, as it turns out, this is no wistful fancy but a daily reality, according to both cutting edge science and state-of-the-art religion, i.e., Judaism.
To explain, let's peer into the subatomic world of the quantum and explore an amazing property of nature, a weird, almost quirky kind of fact: Wave-particle duality.
The idea is that things are what you choose them to be, literally. For example, when photons pass through a barrier with two slits, you can choose to observe them as waves, in which case they necessarily went through both slits, or as particles, in which case they went through only one. You determine the reality.
But it gets even stranger. An implication of this "observer power" is that once you choose to see the photon as a wave, it was a wave all the way back to when it was emitted. Similarly if you choose to observe it as a particle, it was a particle not only at the time of observation, but retroactively all the way back to its origin.
"Whoa!" says the logical brain. "How can it be that an observation I make now is changing things earlier? It makes no sense. There must be some mistake here."
But there is no mistake. In 1978, physicist John Wheeler concocted a thought experiment to test this time-travel effect observers have on quantum systems, and lo-and-behold by 1984 it was proven in the lab and replicated dozens of times since. Today there is no doubt about it. Observer choices made now determine the history of quanta in the past, whether it's nanoseconds, minutes, or millennia ago.
We recreate all of history and even pre-history just by opening our eyes in the morning! And it's not just a matter of proton here and a neutron there. The entire cosmos is made of this stuff, so it turns out that any observations and all observations share this remarkable property. We recreate all of history and even pre-history just by opening our eyes in the morning!
In Judaic terms it's not all that strange. Jews celebrate the renewal of the universe every day in their morning prayers, which speaks of the Creator's "daily, constant renewal of the work of Creation." And all of that is because of us, as the Talmud states that "every individual is obliged to say: For my sake was the world created."
But this whole retroactive reality business has an even a deeper spiritual significance. It refers to the power of teshuvah, "repentance," more accurately translated "return" or "restoration."
We all have some fixing up to do in preparation for the New Year. But in this there are different levels. There's a basic kind of restoration that rights a wrong, repays a debt, gets us back to level ground. But then there's another, higher mode of teshuvah, where negatives get transformed to positives. A teshuvah where errors become assets, where even intentional sins become merits. Where darkness is transformed to light.
And here's where photons can illuminate our spiritual life as well. By choosing to return in the best possible way, we demonstrate to our Creator that we are in tune with the possibility of reinventing ourselves, of transcending sustainability, surpassing even tikkun olam, achieving a perfection within ourselves and the world.
You just have to be careful not to be too strong in claiming even a good metaphor to be a correct description of such things, as they cannot be measured or defined precisely in the ways the QM can be defined. I like to remind people that religion and science are very different in how they understand reality. I believe that they are complementary rather than contradictory. But I also believe it is dangerous to be too liberal in mixing them together in ways that could cause confusion.
Anyway, Gut Shabbos!
Chicago, IL
Regarding what you say, "The uncertainty principle only dominates on extremely small scales. When you aggregate blobs of matter on human scales, they follow classical determinism." How do you explain that? what introduces 'certainty' simply because of aggregation? if you aggregate small scale "uncertainty" you ought to get large scale "uncertainty"?
1) "By placing [a conscious perspective], you physically interact with the [soul] and limit its [potential expressions] "
2) "So, if you "attract" the [soul] by a [specific conscious perspective], ALL of the [soul] wave must be attracted toward the [consciousness], and the [soul] wave loses the ability to [be] itself.
3) By placing a [particular consciousness], you influence the probability making it more [particular-like].
Looking at it thus, your consciousness has EVERYTHING to do with the results.
I am often frustrated by pop-culture notions of quantum uncertainty to mean that we change reality with our minds. The uncertainty principle only dominates on extremely small scales. When you aggregate blobs of matter on human scales, they follow classical determinism, more or less, and our act of observing has no affect on outcomes.
While I don't think the QM described in the article is uber accurate, I don't think we have to diminish the author's point. As long as people recognize that it is a broad analogy, not a literal description of physics, it is a nice metaphor to suggest that our method for observing our own soul can affect how our soul expresses itself.
Chicago, IL
rustburg, va, usa
www.gresham.ac.uk/event.asp?PageId=108&EventId=271
Careful, it isn't Torah. BUT, it shows that the rest of the world is catching up.
I overinterpreted Feymnan's words.
I said " The fact is that one photon goes through ONLY one slit."
But I can not say that, because no one (but Hashem, of course) knows what the photon did when no one was watching. However, if Feynman is correct, then whenever we meet up with a photon it is always a particle. What it does on it's own time, however, is it's own business.
Sorry for the error.
While it is true that as you say light doesn't "age," all other things being equal, it can appear to change when it's environment changes. As the universe expands, space (which is a component of the universe) expands, and light is "streched." I.e., it's energy decreases relative to it's surroundings. It transfers less enegy to an absorber, and so appears to have "cooled."
The red-shift results from photons emitted at high energies relative to the emitter but having lower energies relative to the receiver it is rushing away from -conservaton of energy.
It is also the same for CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background).
"The universe initially had radiation of an infinitely small wavelength, but the expansion has 'stretched' the radiation out and we now see microwaves. THIS IS JUST ANOTHER TYPE OF REDSHIFT" [my emphasis].
cmb.physics.wisc.edu/polar/ezexp.html
There really is only one and the same theory that applies to both phenomena.
According to Richard Feynman "Newton got it right.", photons are not waves - they are particles. (See his "QED - The Strange Theory Of Light And Matter"). The fact is that one photon goes through ONLY one slit. The weirdness (and the illusion of "waviness") comes in because the photon somehow "knows" (before it chooses!) not only how many slits it has to choose from, but whether or not it's choice is being watched.
Of course, for Dr. Gotfryd's argument it doesn't matter because that difference doesn't affect his conclusions. And, for him to unseat such an ingrained misconception would take a lot more space than is available to him here.
For some information on the wonderful man who shaped Dr. Feynman's scientific thinking, see the Chabad article "A Tanya for Professor Wheeler."
www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=81944
Meriden, Ct