HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Chassidic Thought
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Kabbalah & Jewish Mysticism » Chassidic Thought » Insights & Readings » Other Authors » Kabbalah of Deconstruction
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment19 Comments

The Kabbalah of Deconstruction


Up until the French Revolution in 1789, society was divided into three groups: the church, the aristocracy and the peasants. In the terminology of the post-modern French philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930-2004), the landowners and the church were the center and the peasants were the periphery. The two did not mix. Education, money and power were restricted to the elite; the peasants enjoyed no such privileges. After the French Revolution, the periphery was also given some of the privileges that were previously the exclusive right of the center. Although the landowners and the educated were still regarded as the center, the difference now was that peasants had the possibility of entering this exclusive domain.

The post-modern era, according to Derrida, was a time of "deconstruction." While previously all things were seen in pairs, one superior to the other--rich and poor, educated and ignorant, powerful and powerless, etc.--the deconstructivist view is that rich is not necessarily superior to poor, in fact, being poor can be more advantageous. Seen from this perspective, poor is the new center and rich is the periphery. Derrida goes one step further and says that hierarchy should not exist at all; rather, all boundaries between center and periphery should be deconstructed.1

Western society is, in many ways, a deconstructed civilization. Modern human rights laws have ensured that the views of vulnerable minorities are respected and listened to. Whereas in the past women were seen as inferior, today they are often regarded as superior to men.

In Judaism, too, one can identify these two approaches and philosophies--what I would call the non-Kabbalistic view of Judaism and the Kabbalistic view of Judaism. While both affirm the Thirteen Principles of Faith (the fundamental beliefs and doctrines of Judaism as formulated by Maimonides) and fully adhere to Halachah (Torah law), the former represents an almost "feudal" outlook while the latter is deconstructivist in its perspective.

In non-Kabbalistic Judaism, the center is held distinct from the periphery. An enclave of (male) Torah scholars keeps itself aloof from the unlearned, spiritually disenfranchised masses. Theologically, the center is occupied by the spiritual and the holy; the periphery by the material and the mundane. There is little contact or movement between the center and the periphery, and only for the latter to serve the former.

The Kabbalah, particularly as interpreted by the Chabad school, adds a deconstructivist element to Judaism. It notes the inherent superiority of the female over the male and says that in the messianic epoch women will be perceivably greater than men. Similarly, the Kabbalah deconstructs the boundaries between the physical and the spiritual. Whereas non-Kabbalistic Judaism holds spirituality superior to physicality, the Kabbalah maintains that in the final analysis the physical is more potent.

The principle is simple: the higher the source the lower it reaches. Esau is thus seen as having a higher spiritual antecedent than Jacob. One who meditates may reach lofty spiritual heights; however, the essence of G-d will remain elusive. Ironically, Kabbalah teaches that the only way one can connect to the Divine essence is through the physical. Spiritual levels are by definition constantly cognizant of their dependency on their sources. Conversely, physical objects project auras of egocentricity--they seem to depend on nothing other than themselves for their existence. This aura is, in a sense, a reflection of the the nature of the Divine essence whose existence is truly independent.2 According to the Kabbalists, the ex nihilo nature of the creation of the physical universe necessitates direct intervention of the Divine essence. It is this intervention that allowed the physical to assume its egocentric aura. Thus, there is a unique similarity--at least in terms of language--and connection between the physical and the Divine essence.3

This sheds light on the mitzvot, which are mainly physical acts rather than mystical meditations. It is precisely through the physical act of a mitzvah that the most profound connection with the Divine is forged. In fact, according to a Midrash4--adopted by the Kabbalists--the purpose of creation was for humans to unveil the Divine essence found in those parts of the universe which are most devoid of G-dliness. This stresses the inherent value of the mundane and unrefined aspects of the universe--where the mission is most intense.5 This completely deconstructs the boundaries:6 what was once regarded as the centre--without the Kabbalistic explanation--can now be seen as the periphery, and vice versa.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment19 Comments
FOOTNOTES
1. See Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, John Hopkins, (1976).
2. See Maimonides, The Book of Knowledge, 1:3.
3. For a more in-depth analysis of post-modern parallels with the Chassidic School of Kabbalistic thought, see Naftali Loewenthal's forthcoming article, "Jewish Mysticism in a World of Change: Pre-Modern, Modern and Post-Modern Perspectives," which in part inspired this article.
4. Bamidbar Rabba, 13:6; this Midrash is quoted most frequently in Chabad Chassidic litrature.
5. See Body: The Physical World According to Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi and other articles on the subject of A Dwelling for G-d in the Physical World. For a complete treatise on this subject see Faitel Levin's Heaven on Earth (Kehot 2002).
6. Inherent in deconstructing boundaries is the danger of losing all sense of limits, and thus raising the possibility of further concealing the Divine essence. To forestall this possibility the Halachah (Jewish law) must be steadfastly adhered to at all times.

By Levi Brackman   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Levi I. Brackman is director of Judaism in the Foothills and the author of numerous articles on issues of the day.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

19 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Apr 26, 2007
Deconstruction's focus is on the breaking down of binaries/the Cartesian subject, not the promotion of them. Separating non-kabbalistic Judaism from kabbalistic Judaism just creates another binary system.

Perhaps the kabbalistic influence in deconstruction can be seen through Derrida's concepts of "trace" and "differance".

However, I am glad that you have brought up a Derrida/Maimonides connection because from what I read it seems that there is a lot of Maimonides in Derrida.

Perhaps, though, you should argue that deconstruction is a kabbalistic criticism of structuralism.
Posted By Miri

Posted: Dec 17, 2005
I found this a fascinating article. As a newcomer to Chabad thought, I was struck by the clarity of the distinctions drawn by Rabbi Brackman, distinctions that made me think more about my relationship to other Jews.

Rabbi Brackman makes a tactical error by suggesting that all, or even most non-chabadniks are the caricature he describes. It would be better to establish the target without incriminating so many of us. Nevertheless, I certainly know more than a few people who do match his description!

In the end I judge the article on one criterion: Did it make me think more deeply about my own Judaism? The answer is, decidedly and constructively.

Yasher koach, Rabbi.
Posted By George R. Berman, Boca Raton, FL

Posted: Dec 17, 2005
The Kabbalah of Deconstruction
What an amazing article! I had always felt "out of place" in the realm of serious study, mainly due to the imposed perception of the feminine among the more conventional institutions.
Much thanks for the great release~~
Posted By Sheila E. Lord, Orleans, MA
via chabadcapecod.com

Posted: Dec 17, 2005
Light
Dear Rabbi Brackman: Interesting and informative article. "The Kabbalah deconstructs the boundaries between the physical and the spiritual." The more we can Understand the Singularity (Yachid, as defined in Sefer Yitzerah), the more veils we will pull back and the less duality we will perceive.
Posted By Eric S. Kingston

Posted: Dec 15, 2005
Different, But Who Said Better?
In response to the feedback to this article I would like to say the following: Within Orthodoxy different approaches have been taken to combat the existential threat western style freedom poses to traditional Judaism. In order to conserve the tradition some have understandably built Orthodox enclaves where “outside” influences are shut out.

The Chabad approach to western freedom, based on Kabbalah, is different and more radical. Instead of shutting out the influences it realizes the potent Divinity inherent within them. Thus, Chabad has Telethons, and sends emissaries to inspire non-Orthodox neighborhoods. Recently other Orthodox (outreach) groups have, to varying degrees, adopted this deconstructive approach as well.

In the final analysis no one approach in necessarily better than the other – this article was only meant to explain the differences of approach and, in a subtle way, the phenomena which is modern day Chabad.
Posted By Levi Brackman, Evergreen, Colorado

Posted: Dec 15, 2005
Dear Rabbi Brackman
I feel that this world needs a balance of physical. So male and female aspects are at the right equlibrium. The world needs Torah Scholars just as it needs people that work and do acts of kindness. As Ethics of the Fathers says the world stands on three pillars -- not just Torah Study.
As a chabadnik I feel the whole idea of chassidism in general is to not isolate people but to include them and make them feel like they are making a contribution not just to their own inrichment but to Klal Yisrael as a whole. The whole idea of Chabad in general is to make torah scholars in general that the world is bigger than a Beis Midrash by sending them out to help others. However Torah Scholars that choose not to do this are also making a contribution by learning all day. This is valuable to as they can teach people torah that they learnt. Thanks to the many Kollenim people are going to hear shuirs from great rabbis learning all day and are finding themselves in their Yidishcheit.
Posted By Baruch Gordon, London, England

Posted: Dec 15, 2005
Talmud Chochom's and Non-Chabad
Please, give R. Brackman a break. In an eight-paragraph article, one can hardly cover all the aspects of the attitude of Chabad and how it deals with it's non-Chabad brethern. It is easy to be sensitive and percieve hatred and anger in Internet-based discussions. Just look at the newsgroups and blogs. The acrimony is much higher than face-to-face discussions.

1) RE: "Jewish men are obligated in Torah study". Yes, let's try this as an even ha'bochen (test case). Picture in your mind someone who has limited memorization and mental skills. Whatever he learns is mostly forgtton the next day. (I know of one such very simple sincere indiviiduals. After years he still has no clue as what page Mincha is on). Would this person truley be looked on as as central, and important in many frum communities? If we were truely non-hierarchial we would appreciate this person's simple sincere prayers and mitzvot.

2) Non-Chabadniks often aren't aware of the subtle sub-dialect that Chabadniks use. When they criticize non-Chabad traits, (i.e. misnagdim) this an internally directed criticsim to all-too-human traits that the Chabad Chassid wants to uproot from himself. It is not a slam of a group, but of a way of thinking that needs to be critically uprooted from oneself. Hence the common practice of subtle mussar towards certain attitudes at fabrengens. (This does not mean one does not find individuals who coarsely do apply this critique to elevating themselves, and put others down. But I think that if you check, you will find these individauls are less stellar baley middos, and are not the role models of what a Chassid should be. The existance of coarseness among any Jewish group does not neccessarily say anything of what is the role model and ideal of what one should be).
Posted By Yechezkal, Bostong, MA

Posted: Dec 15, 2005
Excellent Article!
Rabbi Brackman,
That was an awesome article. It reminds me of something I read yesterday. Someone asked the famed Makubal (Kabbalist) Rav Ginsburg if they should listen to and play Jazz music. Rav Ginsburg replied that there is holiness to be found everywhere and even though this aspect is as of yet still to be rectified in Jazz music, perhaps you are the one needed to refine it, to make it a music of hebrew holiness. Meaning to say our own physical interest or hobbies, whatever they may be, are actually the Creator's way of letting us know that these are the areas that need our, and more specifically your help to make them into hebrew holiness.
Posted By yermi

Posted: Dec 14, 2005
Reasoning
Very interesting I never understood the Rabbis and why they treated me on a lower level... I now understand them much better… It takes words to demystify a phenomenon that is happening in my own community…

On the other hand, when the lines are broken, I feel that they are to friendly.. Are they Rabbis or friends, just something else to think about…
Posted By Jim

Posted: Dec 14, 2005
true lack of guidance within Chabad
This article is rife with egotism. Chabad centered egotism that is further adding to the separation from the rest of the the Observant Jewish world. I have yet to see amongst Chabad Chassidim any sign of the inherent superiority of Women. To say that amongst "non-Kabbalistic" Jews Talmidei Chachamim are aloof is falsehood in the highest form. It seems as though the author has 1. A problem with non-chassoidic Jews 2. A feeling as though his Torah is better than a non-Chabadnik....
Posted By Anonymous, Monsey, NY



 


Other Authors
When I Started Praying...
Coming In for a Landing
What's Wrong With Religion?
Fire and Water
Define Your G‑d
A Pillar of Salt
The Art of G-d
Kabbalah of Deconstruction
Faith
A Different Kind of Darkness
The Candle
Reflections
Souls in the Rain
Fins and Scales
Virus Alert!
Showing 10 - 24 of 53