The first meal shared by the husband and wife with their
guests has religious significance. It is considered by the law to be a
se’udat mitzvah, a festive meal in fulfillment of a commandment, and serves
an important psychological purpose: le’same-ach chatan ve’kallah, to
"rejoice the groom and bride." The roots of this first meal reach far back into
Jewish history, when Jacob’s father-in-law, Laban, invited all of the local
people to a party immediately after the wedding (Genesis 29:22).
The wedding is the peak of joy. The Rabbis of the Talmud
said, Ein simchah be’li chuppah (there is no real joy outside of the
marriage ceremony) and every mitzvah repast is traced to this prototype. Joy in
the Jewish tradition is never self-contained; it reaches outward. For many
centuries, it was customary to invite the poor to the wedding, in order to bring
happiness into their often drab lives. While nowadays this is largely
impractical, it does teach us to give charity as a sign of gratitude to G-d who
gave us joy.
The purpose of the meal is to instill joy into the hearts
of bride and groom. Superficially, it might appear that since this event in life
is the very epitome of joy, there should be no need to make them rejoice. But
beneath the laughter, the music, and the exchange of mazal tovs, there is
often a tense concern for the future. The responsibilities and adjustments of
living together and raising a family are not always anticipated during the
dating game, and after the wedding the partners may wonder if they have made the
right choice.
Hence when guests rejoice the bride and groom, they
distract them and at least temporarily lift their burden and free their minds to
concentrate on one another. To this end, the greatest and most staid of scholars
would customarily dance with the bride, each holding one end of a napkin or
handkerchief, in what is called a mitzvah tentzel (a mitzvah
dance). One of the auxiliary purposes of this dance is to give the groom more
confidence in his choice, and the bride in hers. Musical instruments, which were
usually discouraged by the Rabbis in memory of the Temple’s destruction, were
not only permitted at a wedding but were considered an integral component of
"rejoicing" the couple. Ran holds that not only at the chuppah are
we instructed to rejoice them, but wherever they go they should find the
community participating in their joy.