The famed "Seer of Lublin" (Chassidic master Rabbi Yaakov Yitzchak Horowitz, 1745?-1815) would sometimes interrupt his prayers to take a pinch of tobacco. One of his disciples noticed that and found it disrepectful. So the "Seer" told the following story:
A king heard an old harp player in the street and summoned him to the palace. There he played and the king loved his melodies, but it was annoying that the
old man had to interrupt his songs frequently to tune his rickety instrument.
When the king made a remark about that, the harp player answered him:
"Your majesty, I'm sure that my lord the king has lavishly outfitted chamber
orchestras with new expensive instruments. But if it pleases my lord the king to
listen to the tunes of an old man, his majesty will have to put up with the
limitations and peculiarities of my art and of my tools."
The chassid understood.
But in "The Old Harp" the King is annoyed with the imperfect service. And when He makes a remark about what annoys Him, He is then INFORMED -- so it reads -- that if He wants what the old harp player has to offer, He has to put up with things.
You make a very valid point! HaShem does not have to put up with anything. But He chooses to deal with imperfect humans, although He has His ministering angels to serve Him too. You could compare it to a parent who prefers his or her little daughter to bring them a cup of coffee with all the risks of spilling or coffee that's too strong or too weak rather than have a butler who does anything in a perfect way but without the love and feelings of your sweet little child with his overful cup and non matching saucer with a soggy cooky. I think it's a matter of choice rather than of options, and we should say Barukh haShem for that.
New York, NY
I hope I've misunderstood. I hope that someone, be it author or editor or another person who reads this, will post something that will help me understand...