Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info News & Current Events
 
Chabad.org » Community & Family » News & Current Events » Editorial & Commentary » Of Rubles and Dollars
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment9 Comments

Of Rubles and Dollars


G-d is in the news these days, with the recent tumult in regards to the placement of reminders about Him on public property. There's a Supreme Court decision in the works, newspaper editorials and talk-shows galore, heated discussions around the water cooler.

I'm reminded of a recent trip to Russia. In the Moscow airport, long, dimly lit, dead-silent hallways recall an era not many have forgotten. On the walls still hang symbols of a regime that banned all expressions of faith, banned the very word "G-d" from every piece of printed matter. If one did not forget one's religious beliefs, they scraped it off one's soul (or tried to). For three generations, hundreds of millions of Soviet citizens forced themselves to forget G-d, to expunge Him from their daily conversations, to rid themselves of all materials with mention of His name. Those that did not were either tortured, exiled to Siberia or went underground with their faith.

From the airport, a Volvo carries me through the Moscow streets to Europe’s largest hotel. It is a hot spot of activity, people going in and out. At each of its four entrances there are some forty prostitutes milling about, some no older than 16-17, smoking and drinking alcohol, eyeing every man that walks through the doors.

This grand hotel is across the street from the Kremlin, center of the former Soviet Union’s communist government. The hotel, I am told by the receptionist, is full of gangsters and the mafia. "You look like a good Jewish boy," she says, "you shouldn't be here." She explains that she recognizes me as a religious Jew because she is a regular at the Chabad synagogue in Moscow. "Make sure your door is locked, and don't leave your money in the room!"

A few weeks later I'm in a different hotel room, this one in downtown Philadelphia. It's a very different atmosphere. I find a Bible on the nighttable. I buy a coke from the bartender and pay with money that's inscribed with the message, "In G-d We Trust." A very different atmosphere.

G-d is not a stranger to us Americans. Most of us were raised with the idea that there is "an Eye that sees, an Ear that hears" our every action -- a Higher Authority to whom we are answerable. We are fortunate that our great forefathers believed in G-d. We have them largely to thank that the "Moscow Hotel" scene is the exception rather than the norm in America's cities and towns.

Things are changing, though. The "fear of Heaven" of our grandparents has been replaced by other fears. Today, we are law-abiding citizens largely because we're afraid of what our neighbors might say, or we're afraid of being caught by the police or the IRS. But when we're certain that no one is looking, that no one will ever know... Our grandparents, in contrast, worried about what G-d would think about their next action.

That's why I think that all the debate regarding G-d's "place" in public life is a good thing. It stirs people, causes them to think about G-d, about what He wants from them and how they could apply His truths to their lives.

Judaism gives a simple recommendation: every morning when you wake up, the first thing you should do is thank G-d for restoring your soul to your body. Before you brush your teeth or wash you face, even before you get out of bed, your first thought is about G-d.

A "moment of silence" at the start of the school day serves the same purpose: that the child should have a daily reminder that there is a Superior Being in the world.

With the knowledge and awareness that G-d creates the world, gives us life and expects us to behave responsibly and morally in His world, we could become better people and raise better children.

Unfortunately, some would interpret the U.S. Constitution as precluding G-d and religious belief from American public life. Such an interpretation runs contrary to the Constitution's own most basic underpinnings. Our constitution was created "by the people for the people." Its purpose is to achieve peace, harmony, honesty and integrity among the citizens of our country. The Founding Fathers saw the Creator as the ultimate source and guarantor of our unalienable rights and freedoms. Everything in the American tradition -- from the swearing-in of government officers on a Bible to the Pledge of Allegiance to the inscription on our currencies -- affirms this principle.

In the words of Senator Joseph Lieberman, "As a U.S. Senator, I truly cherish our Bill of Rights, yet I believe that the First Amendment has been misinterpreted when it comes to the role of religion in public life. Our forefathers promised freedom of religion, not freedom from religion, and our society suffers when we are prevented from embracing our most fundamental beliefs through the expression of faith in our daily lives."

I keep thinking of the new emerging contrast between East and West: the difference between a society that was extremely law-abiding -- but only for as long as a police state struck terror in its heart -- and a society where the awareness of a Higher Authority is the underlying regulator of moral behavior. I keep thinking of the difference of a society emerging from 70 years of G-dlessness, and one that's the product of 230 years of G-d-awareness. I keep thinking of the difference between a society that has "Ten Rubles" inscribed on its money, and one in which the currency carries the message, "In G-d We Trust."

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment9 Comments

By Dovid Zaklikowski   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Dovid Zaklikowski is the director of Lubavitch Archives and is on the editorial staff of Chabad.org. Dovid and his wife Chana Raizel are the proud parents of four: Motti, Meir, Shaina & Moshe Binyomin.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Jan 9, 2007
No religion in Russia
You know, for a place where they murdered so many believers, they sure do have a lot of old churches. Maybe they were there to conduct massive sting operations.
Posted By Larry Stein

Posted: Mar 19, 2005
Money....Talks
Who would have thought that the Of Rubles and Dollars article would wrench up some deep rooted sentiments. I for one do not trust in the dollar. My trust is in HaShem therefore I am never let down.

Living in the United States, there is no way, as of today, that we will get around not using the current currency. Thanks to the European Economy we will soon be heading towards a non-monetary exchange system.... Haven't you ever wondered why ATM Cards are so prevalent? Isn't it amazing that people who could not otherwise obtain a high interest or balance transferred credit card have the spending power (limited to their available funds) with the logo of a certain credit card company on it, can charge under the guise of established credit? Oh believe me, people when I say this.... The least of your worries should be taking out the In G-d We Trust, just give it another five or so years... and those words will be gone completely.
Posted By Chaya, Augusta, GA

Posted: Mar 19, 2005
Trust
I'm unsure as to what G-D's feelings are concerning having been trusted with backing the monetary instrument in America. Has anyone noticed recently what it has been used for? The juxtaposition of the brutal regime of a communist country and the American hegemony is ill based (irony has it that Karl Marx, a Jew, was behind the Communist Manifesto). Every time I see In Trust it serves as an instant reminder that this countrys porous, assimilating society is still not a Jewish one. This movement creates an American civil religion dividing the members, aka citizens, of the human secularist nation. Instead of tracing the matriarchal lineage to designate religious affiliation, membership is ratified on a seemingly egalitarian preceptsalute the idol flag and believe in a G-D of your choosing...
Posted By Brad P, marlboro, nj

Posted: Mar 17, 2005
To Bernard Cohen
How do we really know who translated the Bible correctly and who has not? Don't almost all of us believe that 'we' -- whoever we are -- have the correct translation, and that 'they' do not?
Posted By Helga Hudspeth

Posted: Mar 17, 2005
The classic mistake
In response to Helga:

Christians have for centuries translated and misinterpreted the Bible, creating many flaws and misunderstandings. One of their major mistranslations is in the quote from the Ten Commandments "Loi Tirtzach." They translate it as "Thou shalt not kill." In Hebrew that would have been "Loi Taharoig." However, "Tirtzach" translates "Murder."

Murder translates in the dictionary, "The unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice." Capitol punishment is not murder or unlawful.
Posted By Bernard Cohen, Phildelphia , PA

Posted: Mar 16, 2005
I have just 2 opinions, so far
I don't yet know what Senator Lieberman's words ("...Our forefathers promised freedom of religion, not freedom from religion ") should mean when translated into action. In the year 2000 and prior to that I would have 'known' -- and had it been totally up to me at that time, God would have had no mention of any kind in or on any public whatever.

Now I simply don't know what is fair to everyone when it comes to mentioning God, and where the reminders of Him should and shouldn't be. There are only 2 things I feel certain about, at this point:

1) The 10 Commandments should not be displayed at courthouses, having nothing to do with separation of church and state, for me. "Thou shalt not kill" and the death penalty do not go hand in hand.

2) I would love it if public schools would have a few moments of silence. In those moments people can think about whatever they want (hopefully about God), but nothing is forced upon them.

I'm not yet that advanced to have 3).
Posted By Helga Hudspeth

Posted: Mar 16, 2005
in g-d we trust
In my humble opinion the only difference between America and the former Soviet Union is not religious freedom or monetary slogans. Having been born in America and having lived there for 47 years before making aliya b"h, I am well aware of the fact that the monetary "logo", "in G-d we trust" means not that "we trust in G-d", rather , "that money is our g-od". America is for and about "money"!!!!! They worship it , judge others by the amount they have, or lack thereof, manipulate the world with it, as per recently controlling our spineless government with it. The fact that America has done some splendid things with its tremendous resources cannot be denied . I am not another Americia "basher" it is a wonderful country as countries go one of if not the best among the goyim world. How ever all that they do has the proverbial "hidden" agenda...
Posted By benyamin ezra tzeon, beersheva, israel

Posted: Mar 15, 2005
in china we have mao
in the renminbi, Yuan, we have the Chinese leader of communism Mao on the face of every hundred dollar/yuan, the angle face of a devil mortal soul still creeping into the mind of every my country fellow of the horror communism and cultureal revolution, why, because, there is no g-d there......
Posted By supermind

Posted: Mar 13, 2005
It not about relegion, per se !!!
Kootoes to the editorial staff of Chabad.org for courageously venturing into the political arena, despite their nonpartisan posture !

If the Big Ten were a *religious symbol* (as this article insinuates), dangerous precedents could be set allowing Gov. endorsed nativity scenes, crosses in public cemeteries, & Christian prayers in school (its all been done). This is where the historical/religious argument for the Big Ten unravels. As a Jew, I strongly believe the Gov. shouldn’t peddle us Christian values, as did Thomas Jefferson in his 1802 letter where we inherit the phrase *wall of separation* b/w church & state.

The truth is, much of U.S. jurisprudence is rooted in the Big Ten. The BT serves as the philosophical universalistic bedrock for a moral & just society, not as some abstract *religious* message. So too, a moment of silence, public menorah lightings (symbolizing the right to freely practice religion) etc. stand as universal messages, not necessarily *religious* ones.
Posted By eli federman, Milwaukee, WI



 


Editorial & Commentary
A New Road Map for Peace
The Power of Speech
Expand The Terry Schiavo Controversy
The Terry Schiavo Controversy
Of Rubles and Dollars
Expand Faith in the Path of the Tsunami
Faith in the Path of the Tsunami
Supporting Israel in 1798
Replacing Fundamentalism... With What?
Showing 45 - 51 of 95