Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Chassidic Thought
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Kabbalah & Jewish Mysticism » Chassidic Thought » Insights & Readings » By Tzvi Freeman » Unidolatry
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment16 Comments

Unidolatry


Model of the Holy Ark and Keruvim (cherubs) created by the Temple Institute in Jerusalem
Model of the Holy Ark and Keruvim (cherubs) created by the Temple Institute in Jerusalem

There is nothing more bizarre: G-d tells us He despises idols -- and He wants us to despise them, as well. He says, "Don't even think of making idols. If idols come to your hands, burn them, destroy them, uproot them. Give your lives rather than give any credence to those idols."

Then, in the innermost chamber of His temple, the place He calls "Holy of Holies," there He tells us to make two golden figurines with wings, one a male, the other a female.

And when we would be at odds with G-d and He with us, these two would face away from one another, back to back. But when the two of us would be in harmony, the temple priests would open the curtains and show us the two figurines entwined in embrace. And they would say, "See how cherished you are by your G-d."1

Meaning that one angel represented us and the other...

We must say that it is not images in and of themselves that He wishes us to despise. After all, wouldn't that just make us into another type of idolater -- idolizing the smashing of idols? So when He tells us, "Make two golden angels," we do that, too. Whatever He says -- because it is to Him we are connecting.

Rather, what He so much despises is anything we might place between Himself and us. And that is idolatry -- the acknowledgment of anything or anybody else in our relationship.

So that the image of these two figurines, in effect, are the opposite of idolatry. They are un-idols. With them, He is saying to us, "If you have a problem, if you want to talk, whenever you are wrestling with your world -- don't come to anyone but Me. Not to the moon, not to the sun, not to an angel, not even to the CEO of your corporation. For I cannot bear that there should be anyone or anything between us. I want to embrace you --you wherever you are and you alone. And I want to be embraced by you as though there is nothing else that exists but you and I. For, in truth there is not."

For such a union, there is no other metaphor in all the physical world but the metaphor of the physical union of two lovers.2

As the words of Genesis, "G-d made Adam in His image, male and female He created them."

Based on Ohr HaTorah of the Tzemach Tzedek (Chassidic master Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Lubavitch, 1789-1866), Parshat Trumah.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment16 Comments
FOOTNOTES
1. Talmud, Yoma 54b; Zohar Chadash 8; Zohar, vil. II, p. 278.
2. "[G-d] desired to use a bodily union as metaphor because this is the ultimate union, a union in which there cannot be any intermediary. It is even stronger when they are intertwined in embrace, as in the verse, "Rejoice in the wife of your youth" (Proverbs 5:18). All this is to express that His bond with us is a great and mighty bond without any intermediary... and this is impossible to communicate through any other metaphor" (Rabbenu Bachya on Exodus 25).

By Tzvi Freeman   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Tzvi Freeman, a senior editor at Chabad.org, also heads our Ask The Rabbi team. He is the author of Bringing Heaven Down to Earth. To subscribe to regular updates of Rabbi Freeman's writing, visit Freeman Files subscription.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

16 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: June 19, 2011
No-THING to idolise?
Yes, I agree. All thought has mass. Mental concepts are idols of the most insidious kind because we are not always aware of when we are doing this. I just read an article on the importance of separating Challah re article: The Mystical Aspect of Challah on "Jewish Woman". This Mitzvah is a practical recognition of the insubstantial nature of the material world and I think incredibly revealing and effective.
I have been a practicing Buddhist for many years; in Buddhism this process is achieved through scripture and the practice of Impermanance. I say practice because it cannot be grasped with the intellect, it must be understood with the intuition through constant observation in meditation and realisation. I have come to think that one must go beyond Idols in any faith; there must perhaps come a point where they are just "in the way".
Where does that leave me? Knowing that the two angels must be facing each other, not away? with no-thing in between...
Posted By Julie, Durham, UK

Posted: June 17, 2011
Idol worship
I realized after this week that I have been guilty of avodah zarah several times in my life.

Not the worship of the actual idol, but the concept. This week I was introduced to a concept regarding self-esteem that appealed to me very deeply. I have had these kinds of "revelations" before.

What happens is I then "glom on" onto these concepts, and, in effect, make them my G-d. I start to worship the concepts instead of incorporating them into the Torah that I am learning. It literally becomes my G-d for several days and it is all I think about.

This is a form of idol worship. I have done it all my life with several concepts. All of a sudden this-and-that concept becomes my "answer" and I look at the totality of my life through that idea.

The idea becomes my G-d and the real G--d goes out the window. This is the epitome of "straying" and my spiritual level inevitably falls because of it.

Self-esteem is great. It is not my G-d and my entire life does not revolve around it
Posted By Steve, Chandler, AZ
via chabadcenter.com

Posted: June 15, 2011
Unidolatry
I think the Jewish people are very, very blessed in that they can go direct to G_d, needing no statues, advocates, saints or objects. This is a very beautiful relationship and the very essense of Truth.
I have always felt paralyzed in life by the distance between the world and the holy but here on this site I see a partnership between this world and G_d. How beautiful, how very very beautiful. Thank you Rabbi Tzvi Freeman for this insightful article.
Posted By Julie, Durham, UK

Posted: Mar 17, 2010
Unidolatry
I once went to a medical conference, at which were several displays of the human brain. One was of the brain sliced into thin sections from front to rear. It had two large spaces in its' central area that were shaped just like the descriptions of the Cherubim on top of the Ark. There was another exhibit of a brain slice from top to bottom and this showed that there were 4 diamond shaped spaces between the frontal lobal areas and the rest of the brain. The doctor who had attended the exhibit had stated that all of us have these spaces in our brains. Within us there appear connections to the name of 4 letters, the Cherubim, the Sefiroth Keter (Crown). Tapping in to the power of the greater 95% of our own consciousness can be done through harnessing the potentials locked in the spaces, of which The Ark and what it contained were a symbol. How can we truly love our neighbor, if we don't love ourselves enough to take the effort of a journey into your own Soul and Spirit? Blessings
Posted By Anonymous, Pasadena, CA

Posted: Mar 16, 2010
Unidolatry
I think it is dimension within a dimension. Kind of like creating a new dimension on the computer.
You are the temple and two lovers embracing are an aspect of your consciousness being shown to you.
It is all a part of you, divided added and equaling.
Posted By Patricia
via chabadpasadena.com

Posted: Mar 15, 2010
Idolatry?
If the Ark and its Cherubim could constitute idolatry, then why place the Decalogue inside the structure? It was not the form of the object in this instance, it was what it contained. The Ark was not the subject of Worship, neither was the Temple. Perhaps this was why G-d had allowed them to be taken? That at some point the spiritual focus became the object rather than what they represented? When a Temple becomes more important than the soul of a single human being should we consider ourselves guilty of breaking the 2nd most important Mitzvah? (i.e.; Love Thy Neighbor) In the book of Jeremiah it is written, " The Ark of The covenant shall never return, and another shall never be made, nor shall it be remembered" (Jer. 3:14 - 18; JPS Tanakh c 1999). Jerusalem itself shall be its substitute, for the entire world.
Posted By Anonymous, Pasadena, CA

Posted: Oct 18, 2009
Re: no intermediary
It is true that Moses himself said, "I stand between you and G-d." There is, however, a fundamental difference between this and the kind of intermediary we are discussing here. An idol becomes a substitute for G-d. Moses stood there in order to connect us directly with G-d--while he remains transparent.

In Chassidus Chabad, we call this a "memutza hamechaber"--a connecting intermediary--as opposed to a "memutza hamafsik"--a separating intermediary.

The same could be said, by the way, about the mitzvah to honor parents. The distinction is also the same.
Posted By Rabbi Tzvi Freeman

Posted: Oct 18, 2009
no intermediary
Hmmm... Is/was the High Priest not an intermediary between us and G-d? Doesn't Chassidic thought teach our tsadek in the form of our Rabbi can be an intermediary and connection between us and G-d? Was not Moshe also an intermediary between us and G-d? ...other prophets?
Posted By Manny, Toronto, Canada

Posted: Aug 29, 2009
kabbalah of embracing
i am reading a book by rabbi mordechai gafni called "the mystery of love" and he says that the cherubim were sexually entwined in the holy of holies. thus if this relationship is a metaphor between humanity and our Creator, it is difficult to grasp how G-d can simultaneously be our parent as well as our lover/spouse. it's mind-blowing really. any thoughts on this dual relationship paradox?

at times S/he is one, at times another, at times something else (judge, king, etc)...

i am looking for that image but no one has been so bold as to post it online...

maybe this kabbalistic secret is unrevealed.
Posted By Anonymous, miami, fl

Posted: Feb 7, 2008
Adam
Thank you Anne, I didnt think it was Adam.
Good luck with the Spouse, you might try Ebay :)
Posted By Patricia
via chabadpasadena.com



 


By Tzvi Freeman
Prayer as Madness
Children of the Universe
The Existential Exodus
Da'at
The Angels and Us
The Heresy of Kindness
Adam
Unidolatry
The Torah as Marriage
The Moon and Us
Me? Myself? I?
Meditations on Purpose
How Sin Started
Words of Song
A Dwelling Below
Showing 4 - 18 of 48