Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Chassidic Thought
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Kabbalah & Jewish Mysticism » Chassidic Thought » Insights & Readings » By Yanki Tauber » Days of Awe
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment11 Comments

Days of Awe


Kings have been in rather short supply in recent generations.

Of course, there's still the Queen of England. She has a crown, a throne, a palace, guards, ladies-in-waiting--the works. Theoretically, she can even dismiss her parliament and start issuing decrees. But we all know that she'll never do that. So all the pomp and ceremony has a false ring to it. The crown on her head looks like a Purim costume.

So we're looking for a real despot? There are still some of those around. Saddam Hussein--now there's someone who can bark "Off with his head!" just like in the old days. Still, one would hardly call those fellows "kings". They instill dread, not awe; they possess power, not majesty. A crown on their head would look ludicrous (Saddam knows that--that's why he doesn't wear one).

The kings we remember from our childhood story books had majesty. They evoked fear, but also love. Their subjects trembled before them, but they wanted to tremble before them. There was lots of pomp and ceremony, but the pomp and ceremony meant something, represented something real. The crown on their head looked like it belonged there.


The essence of Rosh Hashanah, our sages tell us, is that it is the day on which we crown G-d king of the universe.

Unless you're particularly religious, "G-d" is probably not a word that you use comfortably. Add to that "king of the universe," and that's enough to make a modern person squirm. When we go to the synagogue on Rosh Hashanah, most of us would not think of it as attending G-d's coronation.

But let us contemplate for a moment what is it that we are missing in our lives. Why it is that we still yearn for those kings of our childhood world.

What we lack in our lives is awe. With a click of the mouse, we can purchase a meal or a house, find a job or a marriage partner. What is much more difficult to find is a source of authority in our lives.

There are, of course, plenty of people out there who are prepared to tell us what to do, including many who, given the opportunity, would force us to do what they are telling us to do. But that's not authority, any more than Saddam Hussein is a king.

And we can, of course, appoint our favorite psychologist, pundit or fashion guru as the authority in our lives. But in the final analysis, that's just another form of take-or-leave-it advice. It's not the authority we need and crave, any more than the Queen of England is a king. It's nice and beautiful and impressive, but at the end of the day, we're left with the same hollowness inside.

True authority is absolute. It commands, not advises. At the same time, it is not something imposed upon us, for it is fully in harmony with our quintessential will. It is something to which we submit wholly and unequivocally, but to which we want to submit wholly and unequivocally because we recognize it as the voice of our deepest self.

On Rosh Hashanah, we devote two days to the search for the voice of authority we so deeply crave, for the king of the universe we have been seeking since our childhood. But don't look for Him in the synagogue, in your prayerbook or in the rabbi's speech. Look for Him in your deepest self: in the things that no one has to tell you, because you already know them absolutely; in the commitments to which you willingly submit, because you recognize them to be expressions of, rather than impositions upon, your true will.

On second thought, do go to the synagogue, where you will be in the company of many others conducting the same search, seeking that same core of truth and source of awe. Do read the verses printed in the prayerbook, which capture humanity's six-thousand-year quest for a king.

When the shofar sounds, close your eyes. Imagine yourself in the midst of a jubilant crowd who has gathered to celebrate the coronation of their king. Hear the trumpet blasts that express the terror and joy of a people submitting to an authority that embodies their own deepest strivings and aspirations.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment11 Comments

By Yanki Tauber   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
By Yanki Tauber; based on the teachings of the Rebbe.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

11 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Sep 29, 2011
G-d
But "god" is not a name, rather it is a title such as "Mr." or "Dr." or "Count". This is particularly true in the case of the Sovereign God, Jehovah, Geova, Yaveh...the scriptures show us there IS no other besides Him.
Across human civilization, myriad "gods" have been worshipped, honored, showered with sacrifices: the Mayan god Acan, the depraved, cruel and immoral Greek and Roman gods; the Egyptian gods Anubis, Osiris, Ra; Ishtar, Baal, the horrible Molech and Adrammelech...with which of these could the Only Sovereign Creator be associated, even in title...?
Posted By Anonymous, CZ, Italy

Posted: Sep 8, 2010
We write "G-d" for two reasons:
a) If someone were to print this article and then throw it out, and we hadn't put the "-" in place of the "o," it would constitute a name of G-d being destroyed.
b) It reminds us that He is the ultimate Mystery, and never completely knowable :)

So you see, it has nothing to with being ashamed. All the best.
Posted By Chana, Brooklyn, NY

Posted: Sep 18, 2009
Why do you never say his name GOD why the subterfuge? "G -D" He is GOD Talk about him without shame. Without hiding his name.
Posted By Anonymous

Posted: Feb 28, 2009
Days of Awe
This Article needs to be brought up to date. Pretty soon some of its' readers will be asking, who is Saddam. Saddam Hussein is dead, your artitlce should say that he is dead or that there was someone named Saddam, and why not replace him Hitler?
I always enjoy reading your articles.
Posted By Lee Pinero, Everett, WA

Posted: Feb 16, 2009
Six of One, Half a Doz of the other?
surf to an article on Prime Minister Balfour of Great Britain and Zionist Israel.

northdaysimage.ca/feb_column06.html

The article will lead to several links on the ethos expressed by British leaders with regard to the safety and also the holiness of those of the lumen.

The problems of Conflict and providing Resolution have been seen to be solved fairly respectably by older hands at Democracy, that is, the British aristocracy, which has held fast to principled ethos, and also the promise of universal love, which is decidedly and recordably, also British.

There will be Zionists who scream that the "Queen" tries to exit all Jews, and that Rt. hon PM Balfour was a forerunner of ill thought toward all of Judaism, sure.
In fact, in the Victorian days, some British Lords criticized Balfour as if he were trying to ghettoize the Jew, rather than to fulfil the quest of re-establishing the land of Israel as Holy. Shalom, Britain fought, died and starved, thereafter,for you.
Posted By sue, Kanata, ON

Posted: Feb 11, 2009
Days of Awe
Removing all of the Jews from England could and would if necessary be done by an order in council, for example if there had been a Nazi invasion during WW2. Jewish children would certainly have been evacuated to Canada, but not to the USA because Jews would have been denied permission to enter the USA.
Posted By Dyslex, London, UK

Posted: Feb 11, 2009
Days of Awe
Re. Queen of England. During 1969 in the U.K. things were so bad that the dissolution of paliament and rule by royal decree was a very real possibility.
Posted By Dyslexia Unlimited, London, UK

Posted: Sep 27, 2008
is it appropriate to mock the qeen of england?
Oh i don't think that conciously anyone thinks, that the pomp and ceremony is fake. None definitely intends it to be. It is very real, and the money and power is very real. Therefore no one is mocking the queen herself, which i clearly stated in my previous response. He is merely implying from the phrase, "the crown on her head looks like a purim costume", that this is something that has a false ring. The love with which we crown Hashem, or allegorically, the love with which the nations had, when they used to crown their authorities, is so extremely different than our authorities nowadays. There is a tremendous contarst.

This is what he means by saying, the crown on er head, looks like a purim costume. You have to admit, ( and of course, no political offense intended), it definitely does. The crown on her head does not in fact, instill in me any sort of awe or fear. Just a smile. And that is the difference.
May the coronation of hashem for this year, grant you and yours a happynewy
Posted By Anonymous

Posted: Sep 25, 2008
Days of Awe.
This is not a relevant answer to the question. I did not say the article was mocking - I asked if it was appropriate to mock the Queen of England. I am not aware that the Queen pretends, or has ever pretended, to have great power. So the pomp and ceremony is not intended to imply that she does. Hence I can not see what is false about that pomp and ceremony - it does not pretend to be something that it isn't.

Jews have always prided themselves on respect for legal authority (in their Shabbat morning prayers for instance), in this case the Queen, who is nominally head of state, but a constitutional monarch, a figurehead.

I question whether it is appropriate to mock a head of state in a religious article unless there is some valid religious reason for doing so. Unless of course Chabad now sees itself as a political satirist. If so, fair enough. Perhaps then it would be appropriate to mock, or have a cheap laugh at, the Chabad leader? I think not somehow.
Posted By N. Bar

Posted: Sep 25, 2008
is it appropriate to mock the queen of england?
This article is not mocking the Queen herself, he is only mocking her position as Queen. That is to say, if she would decide to evacuate all the Jews from England, she would have no army that would positively jump to fulfil her latest command. it would be humiliating for her. That, I think, is what the author means to say.
Posted By Anonymous



 


By Yanki Tauber
Learning to Laugh
Want It All
The Quest for Self
Life in a Box
Why Do We Sleep?
Love, Marriage and Hakafot
How to Change the Past
Days of Awe
Good Thinking
When to Get Divorced
A Choice of Choices
Does G-d Want Us To Enjoy Ourselves?
How To Take the Law Into Your Own Hands
Toddling
A Long Pole
Showing 134 - 148 of 185