Contact Us

Why Don’t Women Wear Tefillin?

Why Don’t Women Wear Tefillin?


Since time immemorial, the widely accepted practice in the Torah-observant community is that women do not wear tefillin. Let’s explore this issue in the light of halachah.

Do They Need To?

Tefillin is a time-bound positive mitzvah. In plain English, this means that it is something that must be done at a specific time. Women are generally exempt from such mitzvahs.1

But even if they are exempt, shouldn’t they be encouraged to wear tefillin anyway of their own volition? After all, we find that most women do hear shofar on Rosh Hashanah and shake the lulav on Sukkot, even though they are technically not required to. Why whould tefillin be any different?

Man’s Clothing

Our first point of reference is the biblical prohibition against crossdressing. The Torah states,2 “A man’s attire shall not be on a woman, nor may a man wear a woman’s garment, because whoever does these [things] is an abomination to the L‑rd, your G‑d.”3

The great Talmudic sage Yonatan ben Uziel, in his elucidated translation of the Torah,4 sees this as precluding a woman from wearing a tallit or tefillin, since they are male apparel.5

Others, however, are of the opinion that the prohibition of crossdressing applies only to clothing worn for style or appearance, but it would not apply to ritual items like tefillin.6 Accordingly, this prohibition alone would not be sufficient reason for women to refrain from doing this mitzvah.7

Excessive Piety

Halacha teaches that when someone does a non-obligatory pious act that is not performed by the vast majority of their peers, it draws undue attention to their excessive piety in an inappropriately ostentatious manner, and is to be discouraged.8 For this reason, there are some who say that women wishing to go the extra mile may not put on tefillin.

This may help explain why women refrain from putting on tefillin publicly. However, it is not clear that this reason would apply to those who wish to do so in the privacy of their own homes.

Extreme Holiness of Tefillin

While our discussion centers on why women don’t wear tefillin, the truth is that this isn’t the only question.

Let’s take a step back and ask ourselves why men don’t wear tefillin the whole day. After all, the mitzvah isn’t to wear tefillin just during the Shema and prayers, but applies from early morning to evening.9 Indeed, in ancient times, it was the custom of many to wear tefillin the entire day. So, what changed?

Another strange phenomenon we find with regards to tefillin: We train our children to do almost all mitzvahs at a young age, so that these habits are deeply ingrained by the time they reach the age of majority. When it comes to tefillin, which is a lot more complex than other mitzvahs, we wait until weeks (at most two months) before he turns 13 to start training. Why the delay?

The reason for all this can be traced to the exceptional degree of holiness of the tefillin. Due to this sanctity, wearing tefillin requires purity of thought and body.

While some view this requirement as going so far that one needs to be pure of sin to wear tefillin,10 most explain it to mean that when one wears tefillin, he must foster an awareness of G‑d and strive to constantly be conscious of the tefillin he is wearing. A high degree of physical cleanliness11 is required as well.12

The importance of all this cannot be overstated. In fact, if a man cannot meet these requirements,13 he doesn’t put on tefillin (although a rabbi should be consulted). It is for this reason that nowadays, to avoid compromising the holiness of tefillin, men wear tefillin only during prayers, when they are in a state of awareness of G‑d and of cleanliness.14

This is also the reason why boys are not taught to wear tefillin until close to their bar mitzvah.

It seems that this requirement is also one of the reasons that there was a period of time when many men refrained from wearing tefillin altogether. Rabbi Moshe of Coucy (13th century) relates that he traveled throughout Western Europe, exhorting men to wear tefillin during the morning prayers, teaching that they could maintain cleanliness and purity of thought for at least the duration of the services.15

In light of the above, since women are not obligated to wear tefillin, the Code of Jewish Law rules that they should not do so, as it would mean voluntarily positioning themselves to perhaps wear tefillin in an inappropriate state.16

The Historical Exception

Having discussed some of the reasons why women don’t put on tefillin, it must be noted that historically we find rare exceptions.

(There is the famous legend that that the pious and learned daughters of the renowned commentator Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki (Rashi) used to put on tefillin, but this is most certainly a myth.17)

The Talmud notes that Princess Michal, daughter of King Saul and wife of King David, used to put on tefillin.18

Already in Talmudic times, the rabbis disputed whether her behavior was condoned by the sages of her era.19 Those who say that the sages protested are of the opinion that women are explicitly prohibited from wearing tefillin.20

Others explain that due to Michal’s extraordinary piousness and the fact that she was a princess and queen,21 she was able to maintain purity of body and thought when putting on tefillin.22

Regardless, it seems quite clear that her actions were not intended to set public precedent. Indeed, the very fact that the Talmud needs to go back more than a thousand years to the days of King Saul to find an example of a woman wearing tefillin indicates that it was a unique occurrence.23

On a deeper level, the Kabbalists explain that although for mystical reasons (as well as those outlined above) women do not put on tefillin, Michal, being the deeply spiritual woman she was, knew that she was a reincarnation of a male soul (which also explains why she bore no children), and it is for that reason that she wore tefillin.24

Please see also Is it appropriate for a woman to wear a tallit?

Mishnah, Berachot 3:3; Talmud, Kiddushin 33b–34a.

There is a debate in the Talmud whether the mitzvah of tefillin applies at night and/or on Shabbat and Yom Tov. The halachah follows the view that at the very least it does not apply on Shabbat and Yom Tov, making it a time-sensitive mitzvah. See Talmud, Eruvin 96a, and Rashi to Kiddushin ibid.
See Levush, Orach Chaim 17:2.
Deuteronomy, ibid.
See Kaf ha-Chaim, Orach Chaim 38:9.
See Eliyah Rabbah 17:2, Eliyah Zuta 17:3, and responsa of Maharam Schick, Yoreh De’ah 173.
This opinion holds that since Yonatan ben Uziel’s interpretation is not in the Talmud, it is not necessarily binding.
See for example Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 34:3.
Tur, Orach Chaim 37.
See Shibbolei ha-Leket (Buber ed., p. 382); Chatam Sofer, commentary to Talmud, Shabbat 49a (see also Tzitz Eliezer 13:10).
For example, one must be constantly vigilant not to flatulate while wearing tefillin.
Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 37:2.
For example, a man who cannot control his bowels or is having stomach problems may not wear tefillin. See Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 38:1.
Tur, ibid.; Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 37:2.
Semag, positive commandment 3.
See Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 38:3; Magen Avraham ad loc; Shulchan Aruch ha-Rav 38:3.
There does not seem to be any pre–20th century mention of this legend.
Talmud, Eruvin 96a–b and Tosafot ad loc. See also Jerusalem Talmud, Berachot 2:3 and Eruvin 10:1; Pesikta Rabbati 22.
See Gra on Shulchan Aruch ad loc.
Additionally, she had no children who would have caused her to become sullied.
Rabbi Shlomo Luria, Yam Shel Shlomo, Kiddushin 1:64.

It should be noted that from the wording in Yam Shel Shlomo it appears that the remark that she was a princess is to address the general issue of cleanliness. See also Levush 17:2, who writes that the issue of crossdressing applies only if there is a chance that a woman may mix with men; here, however, since she was a princess and queen recognized by all, there was no chance of this. However, see Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De’ah 182, that the halachah seems to follow the opinion that even in such a situation the prohibition of crossdressing applies (although tefillin may still be an exception, as explained earlier).
Note that in generations after the Talmud, especially in medieval times, there is evidence of other women having worn tefillin. See, for example, Rabbi Avigdor Tzarfati, in his Sefer Perushim Upesakim al haTorah.
Kaf ha-Chaim, Orach Chaim 38:8–9.
Rabbi Yehuda Shurpin responds to questions for's Ask the Rabbi service.
© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with's copyright policy.
Join the Discussion
Sort By:
1000 characters remaining
Deborah Ademola June 21, 2017

On the topic of a clean body-- would the fact of women's menstruation (and the seven days wait afterwards) also have an effect on the feasibility of women wearing tefillin? Personally, I am not convinced by the argument that women not being required to wear tefillin means that we are being denied a more fulfilling mode of religious expression. Reply

Yehuda Shurpin (Author) June 23, 2017
in response to Deborah Ademola:

There indeed some who say that. As for being spiritually fulfilled, on the contrary, it is a lot harder and takes a lot more work for a man to achieve spirituality than it does for women who are naturally more spiritually attuned. This is why men need more tools to do so. Reply

Folke i Holtz Upplands-Bro via August 6, 2017
in response to Yehuda Shurpin (Author):

While this is true, it is still no halachik prohibition against wearing tefillin for woman. Reply

Related Topics