Before birth, a baby lives in its mother’s womb surrounded by water. It doesn’t breathe. Its lungs are collapsed, folded between the two upper chambers of the heart. There’s a hole in its heart so the blood circulates. And there’s a tube connecting the aorta to the pulmonary artery.
Within ten minutes of birth, its lungs have to expand, the hole in its heart has to heal, the tube has to seal off.
In fact, 67 different steps have to happen in sequence so that the baby can go from a creature that lives in water to an oxygen-breathing baby. Miraculously, these things take place routinely every minute of every day.
That is science, when we understand what happens. And we know that no human being or scientist could have developed or engineered this sequence. If a company tried to build it, it wouldn’t work.
Indeed, if we knew what goes on in our very own lives, if we knew what goes on in the birth of a baby, we would get on our knees and thank G-d forever. All of the vast scientific studies that have been made over the past hundred years keep pointing to the concept of order and sequence, and therefore, in my opinion, a creator.
A professor of mathematics came into my study one day. He was a real atheist. He said to me, “I’ve just calculated that it’s impossible to have the human eye evolving in the five billion years that they give us.” He said, “The person who believes in evolution, that is the person making the leap of faith.”
Science doesn’t contradict the Torah. Science teaches us that when the Torah says, “I have created the world,” “I will care for you,” “I will heal you,” and “I will provide,” you know what? G-d was right. In 1998 it was reported for the first time in human history that enough food has been grown to feed every living person on the planet. Theoretically, no one on this earth should have to starve. And there’s a statement in Psalms that says, “You open your hands and you give to all living things its need.” G-d has provided. And that’s what science says: You know what? He was right. When a doctor heals a patient, that’s what science says: You know what? He was right. G-d has provided.
There has never been a rabbi who has ever said to a scientist, “stop searching.” There’s never been a rabbi who has said, “quit looking.” Because the ultimate believer of truth, and the Torah is all truth, will ultimately believe that anything you find in nature that is true will reflect and react to the glory of G-d.
When I was younger, I worked for the NASA program. And I looked for life on Mars. We spent hundreds of millions of dollars looking for life on Mars -- for which, if you haven’t been thanked as taxpayers before, let me thank you. During that time I asked the Lubavitcher Rebbe, “Is this right? Can I really do this? Other religions say you shouldn’t search. And the Torah doesn’t say there’s life on Mars.” The Rebbe replied in Yiddish, “Professor Green, you should look for life on Mars. And if you don’t find it there, you should look elsewhere. And if you don’t find it there, you should look elsewhere. Because for you to sit here and say that G-d didn't create life elsewhere is to put limits on G-d, and no one can do that.”
dar es salaam, tanzania
First is the eye issue. True, you couldn't reverse engineer the eye, but I have no problem conceiving that animals could over time develop light-sensitive cells, and that such a beneficial change would enable that line to thrive and the "eye" to become what we know now.
Second, David wrote the line in Psalm 145 some 3000 years ago. Was it not true all that time, until 1998?
Atlanta, GA
http://vbm-torah.org/archive/bereishit/03bereishit.htm
Carbondale, IL
When younger, during my struggles to know if G-d existed or not, I would have loved to have known that that a professor of mathematics, a real atheist, had said: "The person who believes in evolution, that is the person making the leap of faith.
I can't help but believe that with this article you will reach many people in similar positions such as I was at one time. Thank you for writing it. It's simply terrific.
Last, this tax payer here says (with a grin) - "you're so very welcome."
"One does an injustice to both sides when one tries to harmonize science and religion..." -- WRONG. One does an injustice to both by failing to see how magnificently they complement and fulfill each other.
"There are countless times when science disagrees and/or contradicts the Torah, eg. the age of the earth, the happening-not happening of the flood, etc." -- WRONG. There is not a single place where there is such contradiction. Torah, by definition, is truth; science, by definition, is pursuit of the knowledge of the truth. If the latter would contradict the former (which it doesn't actually), it would, by definition, not be science...
"The Torah is first and foremost a moral and historical document, NOT a scientific one..." -- WRONG. The Torah is a moral, historical, scientific, social, psychological, spiritual, legal and pragmatic document. It is the divine wisdom and our G-d-given blueprint for life.
"there are areas and limits to what scientists can do and study" -- CORRECT (finally!)
"there are a lot of natural events that are amazing, but that doesn't point to there being a G-d controlling them..." -- what then controls them? nature? reality? fate? chance? OK, so we agree. I call him/it "G-d" and you call him/it "nature", 'reality" "chance" etc.
Mike, you made some pretty decisive statements but you didn't back them up. I will back up my statement. It will take about a hundred pages. Thank G-d (yes, Him) the good folks at chabad.org did the work for me. Just follow this link -- www.chabad.org/search/keyword.asp?kid=1361 -- and read EVERYTHING that comes up. If you have the time. (If you don't, pick a lighter subject next time.)
No hard feelings. I'm sure you're a great guy in civilian life