In the early years of AA (1935–39), before the Big Book was written, the fellowship practiced a handful of simple ideas that were handed down orally from one member to another. Essentially, they learned the program from one another, and guided one another in its implementation. However, as the effectiveness of the program became established and the fellowship prepared to expand its horizons, it was deemed necessary to put the basic principles in writing, so that even those who did not have the advantage of one-on-one contact with the original members would be able to grasp the program.
Toward this end, a book was written.
It was cofounder Bill Wilson who was assigned the task of being the primary author—although, as it should already be clear, he was acting more as a scribe than as an innovator. The program was already in practice; it just needed to be put into the right words.
When Bill got to the chapter called “How It Works,” he wanted to set out the basics of the program in a very simple format. Until then, there had never been any official concept of “Steps,” let alone twelve of them. However, as mentioned in an earlier chapter, Bill had received from his friend Ebby some basic ideas about spirituality that Ebby in turn had taken from the Oxford Group. There were six main tenets, although they weren’t officially numbered or even written down anywhere. We’ll repeat them again now:
We admitted we were licked.
We got honest with ourselves.
We talked it over with another person.
We made amends to those we had harmed.
We tried to carry this message to others with no thought of reward.
We prayed to whatever God we thought there was.
It is interesting to note that according to one early AA member’s autobiographical account, Dr. Bob Smith also conveyed six basic principles to newcomers. As the author remembers, these ideas were like a prototype for the Twelve Steps. They were:
We see many of the same themes in both the list of points that Ebby transmitted to Bill and the version taught by Dr. Bob. (See table on p. 46.) “We admitted we were licked” is pretty much the same as “complete deflation,” which leads to “dependence and guidance from a Higher Power.”
These ideas were to form the basis for the first three Steps.
“We got honest with ourselves” may be a part of the initial surrender, and thus related to Steps 1–3, but it may also be a part of taking an unflinching look at one’s own character, in which case it’s the same as “moral inventory,” the basis for Step Four.
“We talked it over with another person” is the same as “confession,” which is the same as what would become Steps 5–7.
“We made amends to those we had harmed” is the same as “restitution.” This is the main idea of what we know today to be Steps 8 and 9.
“We tried to carry this message to others with no thought of reward” is the same as “continued work with other alcoholics,” which is part of Step 12.
“We prayed to whatever God we thought there was,” which is Step 11, isn’t mentioned clearly in the second list, but we can see from the author’s description (ibid.) of how Dr. Bob actually took him through the process that prayer was not only mentioned but also was a major emphasis.
We see that early AA was not about the precise words, but the actions they took. And that worked just fine, as long as newcomers could learn from those who had themselves already begun working the program successfully. However, if the program was to be able to transcend the limits of geographical proximity as well as stand the test of time, then there would have to be some form of codification of its most basic principles.
Bill would later recall that he had at first had a very difficult time with this task:
I was in this anything-but-spiritual mood on the night when the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous were written. I was sore and tired clear through. I lay in bed at 182 Clinton Street with pencil in hand and with a tablet of scratch paper on my knee. I could not get my mind on the job, much less put my heart in it. But here was one of those things that had to be done. . . .
Finally I started to write. I set out to draft more than six steps; how many more I did not know. I relaxed and asked for guidance. With a speed that was astonishing, considering my jangling emotions, I completed the first draft. It took perhaps half an hour. The words kept right on coming. When I reached a stopping point, I numbered the new steps. They added up to twelve. (AA Comes of Age, pp. 160–161)
Bill submitted his manuscript for review by the other members, who suggested certain changes. After incorporating their edits, the Steps took on the form by which they are recognized today:
“Here are the steps we took, which are suggested as a program of recovery:
| Ebby’s Points to Bill | Corresponding Steps | Dr. Bob’s Version | Corresponding Steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| We admitted we were licked. | 1, 2 and 3 | Complete deflation | 1 |
| We got honest with ourselves. | 1 or 4 | Dependence and guidance from a Higher Power | 2, 3 |
| We talked it over with another person. | 5 | Moral inventory | 4 |
| We made amends to those we had harmed. | 8, 9 | Confession | 5, 6, 7 |
| We tried to carry this message to others with no thought of reward. | 12 | Restitution | 8, 9 |
| We prayed to whatever God we thought there was. | 11 | Continued work with other alcoholics | 12 |
A while ago, someone sent me an e-mail that was being forwarded around called “The Twelve Steps Made Simple.” No doubt, some addict or addicts put it together and decided to share it with others.
I think it is especially enlightening for those who are unfamiliar with the program, because it is written in a style that reveals what the Steps mean to someone who has actually worked them. Here they are:
The Twelve Steps Made Simple
Equally edifying, and even more entertaining, is this little stroke of brilliance someone devised, entitled “The Twelve Steps of Insanity.” Here, the anonymous author reveals the essence of each Step—and, indeed, the essence of the program, I think—by turning the entire program on its head. Notice how this parody makes it clear that the central and defining conflict in recovery is between God and ego, the selfless and the selfish. By getting away from ego, one gets better; by becoming wrapped up in ego, one does the exact opposite:
The Twelve Steps Of Insanity
Finally, I’d like to share with you this little jewel of insight and brevity.
Somebody from the program went and distilled each Step down to one word. This list, like the two above, is certainly not definitive, just one person’s take. But again, it’s very helpful in understanding the true spirit of the program.
Each Step in a Word
Of course, if we are really looking to sum up the Steps, we shouldn’t fail to mention the “Twelve Steps in Six Words” formula that is often attributed to AA cofounder Dr. Bob Smith:
Trust God.
Clean House.
Help Others.
Corresponding to the Steps as they are numbered, it looks something like this:
| Two-Word Action | Step(s) |
|---|---|
| Trust God | 1–3 |
| Clean House | 4–11 |
| Help Others | 12 |
In Jewish tradition, trust in God is called bitachon, which literally means “confidence” or “security.” It means that one trusts in God to the extent that one feels certain that everything will be taken care of in the best possible way.
Housecleaning is known as cheshbon ha-nefesh—literally, “spiritual stocktaking.” This includes the process of honestly appraising one’s character and becoming willing to rectify one’s faults.
Helping others is the concept of tzedakah—often mistranslated as “charity,” but really meaning “justice.” Acting charitably means doing something you really don’t have to do, whereas justice means fulfilling a duty.
Fulfilling commandments such as “You shall surely open your hand to your brother” (Deuteronomy 15:11) or “Do not stand idly by your neighbor’s blood” (Leviticus 19:16) is not simply a nice thing to do. It’s an obligation.
These three ideas are the program in a nutshell. In the section that now follows, we will take a closer look at the Steps with a specific eye toward gleaning any information that may indicate more about the underlying theological beliefs of the program.
Excerpted from God of Our Understanding—Jewish Spirituality and Recovery from Addiction, by Rabbi Shais Taub.
San Jose, CA
New Orleans, La