![]() |
| Photo: Y. M. Naama |
It was in the waning days of King Solomon’s reign when G‑d sent the prophet, Achiyah of Shiloh, to rebuke Solomon and inform him that, due to his sins, G‑d would tear the kingdom away from him, but that, in the merit of King David his father, G‑d would tear it away only from King Solomon’s son, leaving him to rule over one tribe.1
Shortly thereafter, in the year 29642 from creation, King Solomon passed away, and the people of Israel gathered in the city of Shechem for the coronation of his son, Rehoboam. Having been burdened with heavy taxes during King Solomon’s reign, the people wished to know what Rehoboam’s policies would be. Taking the bad advice of his younger advisers, Rehoboam confronted the people with the statement:
My father made your yoke heavy, and I will add to your yoke; my father chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpion-thorns.3
Hearing this, the people of Israel dispersed and set up their own kingdom in the northern part of Israel, with Jeroboam the son of Nevat as their king.
Jeroboam feared that if the Jews were allowed to go and bring offerings in the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, their hearts might revert to being faithful to the king of Judea, and he, Jeroboam, would eventually be assassinated. He therefore set up idols at the two ends of his kingdom, one in Bethel and one in Dan, saying, “It is far for you to go up to Jerusalem; here are your gods, O Israel, who have brought you up from the land of Egypt.”4 Additionally, Jeroboam placed sentries and roadblocks on the roads leading to Jerusalem, in order to stop anyone attempting to go up to the Holy Temple. The roads leading to Jerusalem would remain blocked until they were removed by Hoshea, the last king of the northern kingdom.
Only the tribes of Judah and Benjamin5 still recognized the dynasty of King David and his grandson, Rehoboam, under the kingdom of Judea.
The people of the northern kingdom would continue in the sinful and idolatrous ways of their forbears throughout the generations. However, it was during the reign of King Jeroboam the son of Joash (Jeroboam II),6 the thirteenth king of the Northern Kingdom, that the Jews there reached new lows in their evil ways.
King Jeroboam II subdued the neighboring kingdom of Moab, captured parts of Syria, and made peace with the kingdom of Judea. The stable political situation resulted in economic prosperity. They cultivated friendly relations with the Phoenicians, who were the greatest merchants and seafarers of those days, and brought items of rare beauty and luxury into the Jewish kingdom. Unfortunately, the unusual prosperity brought a collapse of moral standards. The Jewish ideals (and commandments) of helping the poor and practicing justice and lovingkindness were ignored. It was an age of corruption. Hand in hand with this degeneration of morals was an increase in idolatry. People built many altars on mountains to serve the Canaanite gods, Baal and Astarte. The golden calves, idols which Jeroboam I had set up in the north and south of the country to turn the people away from the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, were worshipped more than before, and the teachings of Judaism and the holy commandments were viewed with contempt.
G‑d sent the prophet Amos to admonish the Jews and warn them of their impending exile and the destruction of the house of Jeroboam7 if they did not repent and return to G‑d.8 Instead of heeding his warning, they became angry, and their leader, the false priest Amaziah, incited the people to harm Amos.
However, King Jeroboam, in an act of rare respect for the word of G‑d and his prophets, protected the prophet, and did not let harm befall him. It was in the merit of the respect showed to Amos that his reign lasted for 41 years, by far the longest reign of the Northern kings.9
After King Jeroboam II’s demise, the Northern Kingdom started to decline rapidly. A mere six months after his father’s death and his own coronation, King Zechariah was assassinated by Shallum the son of Jabesh.10 After this, almost all of the kings ruled and came to power through the sword. It is for this reason that the subsequent rulers are sometimes referred to as “usurpers” rather than kings.11
In the year 3154, one hundred and ninety years after the two kingdoms had split, Menahem ben Gadi seized the throne by assassinating Shallum—who had ruled for a mere month—and became the sixteenth king of Israel. It was during his reign that the Assyrians invaded the land of Israel.12 King Menahem, a brutal monarch who at the slightest hint of rebellion would destroy entire cities, had to contend both with his rapidly decreasing popularity and with the Assyrian invasion. As such, rather than resist the invaders, he preferred to levy a heavy tax on his subjects in order to pay tribute to the Assyrians in exchange for a promise to support his rule.13
The weight of Assyria’s dominion over the land of Israel began to bear down more heavily. King Pekah seized the throne after assassinating King Pekahiah, Menahem’s son. Seeing that there was no escape from complete subjugation by Assyria, he joined the revolt which King Rezin of Syria had organized against Assyria, in the hope of enlisting Egypt in an effort to stem the tide of the Assyrian conquest.
After King Jotham (and later his son King Ahaz) of Judea refused to join the revolt against the Assyrians, Pekah and Rezin invaded Judea, killing scores of its inhabitants. King Achaz then appealed to King Tiglath-Pileser of Assyria to come to his rescue. King Tiglath-Pileser jumped at the opportunity and marched into Syria, defeated King Rezin and annexed his land, making it one of Assyria’s provinces. He then turned against Israel and annexed part of the land, taking the tribes of Naphtali14 and Zebulun15 captive. Thus it was, in the year 3187, that the first of the ten tribes of the northern kingdom were exiled.16
That very same year, the Assyrian king organized a revolt against King Pekah under the leadership of Hoshea son of Elah, who assassinated the king and was then appointed as a vassal of Assyria.
It was in the year 3195, the eighth year of Hoshea’s service as a vassal to Assyria, that the Assyrians captured the Reubenites, the Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh,17 and exiled them to Halah, Habor, Hara, and the Gozan River.18 taking with them the idol that King Jeroboam had set up in Bethel to replace the Holy Temple.19
Seeing this, Hoshea rebelled against the Assyrians and sent messengers to the king of Egypt for support. He then appointed himself as an independent king over the remnants of the northern kingdom.20 Additionally, he removed the blockade which had stood for hundreds of years on the road to Jerusalem, finally giving the Israelites the choice of either serving G‑d in the Holy Temple or continuing to practice idolatry.21 This is the meaning of what the verse describes with regards to Hoshea: “And he did what was evil in the eyes of the L‑rd, though not like the kings of Israel who had preceded him.”22 Nevertheless, although the sentries were removed, the Jews continued in their idolatrous ways and did not go up to the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.23 When Shalmaneser, who had succeeded Tiglath-Pileser as king of Assyria, heard of Hoshea’s rebellion, he ravaged what was left of the land of Israel and laid siege to the capital city of Samaria. After three years, the city finally fell, and they razed the city to the ground, not even leaving any of its foundations standing.24 They then took all of its inhabitants, including the remaining inhabitants of the northern kingdom and their king, as captives.25
Thus it was in the year 3205, at the end of the reign of King Hoshea, the nineteenth king of the northern tribes—coinciding with the sixth year of the reign of King Hezekiah of Judea—that the northern kingdom fell and the rest of the ten tribes were exiled.
| FOOTNOTES | |
| 1. | |
| 2. |
All years quoted here are based on the traditional works Seder Olam and Seder Hadorot, unless otherwise specified. The year 2011 is equivalent to the year 5771 from creation; thus, 2964 from creation is equivalent to 797 BCE. |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. |
I Kings 12:21. Although we find that the verse stated earlier that only one tribe would remain loyal to the house of King David (see I Kings 11:13 and 12:20), the tribe of Benjamin was considered part of Judah and secondary to it, since Jerusalem, the capital, was in the portions of both Judah and Benjamin, and so the ruler of Jerusalem ruled over both tribes (see commentary of Rabbi David Kimchi ibid.). |
| 6. |
Not to be confused with the previously mentioned Jeroboam son of Nevat, the first ruler of this kingdom. |
| 7. | |
| 8. | |
| 9. |
Tana D’vei Eliyahu Zuta 17; Talmud, Pesachim 87b. |
| 10. | |
| 11. |
See Jerusalem Talmud, Horiot 3:2. |
| 12. |
According to some opinions, it was during his reign that the Assyrians, under the leadership of King Pul, captured the Reubenites, the Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh, and exiled them to Halah, Habor, Hara, and the Gozan River. See I Chronicles 5:26. See commentaries of Rabbi Elijah of Vilna and Rabbi Meir Leibush ben Yechiel Michel (Malbim) ibid. The Midrash (Lamentations Rabbah, Introduction 5) records a dispute as to which tribes were exiled first. Rabbi Elazar is of the opinion that the tribes of Reuben and Gad were exiled first, and Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachman is of the opinion that the tribes of Zebulun and Naphtali were exiled first. This disagreement stems from the fact that the account in Kings (as opposed to the one in Chronicles) makes no mention of King Pul taking the tribes of Reuben and Gad captive. Those who are of the opinion that the Rebunites and Gadites were exiled first are in keeping with the Midrash (Numbers Rabbah 22:7), which states that the tribes of Reuben and Gad were the first to be exiled, as punishment for not wanting to take a portion in the land of Israel proper, and instead settling on “the other side” of the Jordan River. In order to simplify matters, this article follows the opinion of Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki (Rashi) in his commentaries on II Kings 17:1 and Isaiah 8:23, and the simple reading of Kings, which mentions first the exile of the tribe of Naphtali during the reign of King Pekah. |
| 13. | |
| 14. | |
| 15. | |
| 16. |
See, however, footnote 9. According to another opinion, the tribes of Reuben and Gad were exiled earlier. |
| 17. |
I Chronicles 5:26. See also Rashi to II Kings 17:1 and Isaiah 8:23. The verse in Chronicles mentions both Kings Pul and Tillegath-Pilneser as having exiled the tribes of Reuben, Gad and Manasseh. Some commentators (see Malbim to Chronicles ibid.) reconcile this discrepancy by explaining that King Pul exiled only part of those tribes; the rest of them were exiled at a later date. |
| 18. |
The identification of these locations will be discussed in a future installment in this series. |
| 19. |
See commentary of Rashi to II Kings 17:2, and Seder Olam Rabbah 2. The one that Jeroboam had placed in Dan was taken into exile earlier, with the tribes of Zebulun and Naphtali. This was a fulfillment of the prophesy in Hosea 10:5–6: “Because of the calves of Beth-aven, the neighbors in Samaria shall be frightened, for its people shall mourn over it, and its priests would rejoice over it, because of its glory, for it has been exiled from it. That too shall be carried off to Assyria, a gift to King Yareb; Ephraim shall take shame, and Israel shall be ashamed of his counsel.” |
| 20. |
See commentary of Metzudat David to II Kings 17:1. |
| 21. |
Talmud, Taanit 30b–31a and Gittin 88a. |
| 22. |
Kings II 17:2. |
| 23. |
Our sages tell us that it was King Hoshea’s removal of the blockade that brought the final dismantling of the remainder of the northern kingdom. For as long as it was the king’s guards who prevented the Jews from going up to the Holy Temple, the Jews were held only partially responsible. However, once the guards were removed but the Jews nevertheless did not go to serve G‑d in His Holy Temple, the fate of the remnants of the northern kingdom was sealed. Thus the prophet Hosea says (Hosea 5:3): “I knew Ephraim, and Israel was not hidden from Me, for now you have committed harlotry, O Ephraim; Israel was defiled.” In other words, it is only now that their idolatry is compared to harlotry (see Talmud, Gittin 88a). See also Jerusalem Talmud, Taanit 4:7, and Tana D’vei Eliyahu Zuta 9:4, which explain that until now the blame and punishment was on the individual, namely the king, but now he had taken the blame off himself and placed it upon the public. The sages thus say regarding one who starts a good deed but does not finish it, that he is held accountable for the lives of his family. For if King Hoshea would have just taken things a step further and removed the idols and compelled the Jews to go up to Jerusalem, this final exile could have been avoided. |
| 24. | |
| 25. |
Subsequently, the Assyrians resettled the northern kingdom with foreigners. This was in keeping with the Assyrian policy of relocating their captives, in order to strengthen their hand and erase any strong feelings their subjects may have for the land. These new inhabitants are variously called Cutheans and Samaritans (see II Kings 17:24). |
USA
You understand my point.
Jay
Fulton
Bill
cedar hill, Missouri
Shimon was not in the North and was scattered througout Yehuda, so I don't see where they could be included in this count.
Todah
Toronto, Canada
--- How can you describe the Levis and kohanim as a half-tribe anymore than a Jew can be described as a half-Jew?
"If we could say where they are living now, they wouldn't be lost, would they?"
--- That is a very funny rhetorical question.
Portland
This is similar to Jaycee Duggard who was abducted in 1991, imprisoned in the home of a pedophile for 18 years, and bore 2 of his children. After her rescue, she described him as a "great person" who was "good with her kids". She revealed that she built an emotional bond with him. Classic Stockholm Syndrome.
Even though Jaycee and the Northern 10 Tribes identified and bonded with their captors, aren't they still entitled to legal inheritances?
Rogers
Reuben
Simeon
Zebulon
Issacar
Dan
Naphtali
Asher
Gad
Ephraim
Manasseh
The total is ten.
Throughout my reading of the Torah, there are differences in regards to Ephraim, Manasseh, Joseph and Levi.
My knowledge is that Levi and Simeon would be dispursed amoungst the twelve tribes. Who then are the lost ten tribes?
Jay Tompkins
Fulton, MO
dover heights, australia
Willard, Utah
Where ever the descendants of the 10 tribes have settled, whatever their collective nationalities are now, aren't they still bound by covenant? Didn't birthright/blessing follow them even into exile?
Even though the Hebrews resettled and have forgotten their heritage, aren't they still obliged to keep covenant? Pleading ignorance of the law is not excusable in courts of any country, nor in Heaven, I would think.
Rogers , AR