Head and Beginning
There is nothing arbitrary about a name given in the Holy
Tongue: the very letters that constitute such a name disclose the intrinsic
nature of the entity named.1
The name of the New Year festival, “Rosh HaShanah,” literally means not
“beginning of the year,” but “head of the year.” I.e., the relationship of Rosh
HaShanah to the other days of the year2
parallels the relationship of the head to the other organs of the body.
There are three dimensions to the relationship between the
head and the body. First, the brain controls the functioning of the body as a
whole, as well as that of its individual organs. Second, the life-energy of all
the organs is centered in the brain, each of whose components is connected to
one of the organs. Finally, the brain is the seat of the power of thought, the
highest of human faculties.
Our divine service on Rosh HaShanah is characterized by
spiritual parallels to each of these three physical functions.
First, on Rosh HaShanah we resolve to advance in all aspects
of our Torah observance, and the resolutions undertaken at this time influence
the quality of our divine service throughout the coming year.
Second, with Rosh HaShanah we begin the Ten Days of
Teshuvah (usually translated “repentance”; better: “return”). Since
teshuvah comprises all the other mitzvos, it can atone for
deficiencies in the observance of any of the mitzvos.
Finally, the divine service of Rosh HaShanah involves a level of absolute
connection between man and G‑d. Our Sages3
teach that on Rosh HaShanah G‑d asks man to “accept Me as King over you,” and in
fact the recognition of G‑d’s sovereignty is a major theme of the Rosh HaShanah
service.4
This act of recognition establishes a bond between the essence of man and the
essence of G‑d.
Three Levels of Connection
These three elements of Rosh HaShanah are related to three levels of
connection with G‑d.
(a) The first bond is established through Torah observance. Because G‑d’s will is manifest in the Torah and its mitzvos, by observing
them we connect our thoughts, words and actions with Him.5
(b) There is, however, a second and deeper bond with G‑d. For while it is
true that observance of mitzvos establishes a connection with G‑d, the
conditions of this relationship presuppose that the individual is a separate
entity who desires to connect to G‑d through this observance.
Teshuvah, by contrast, involves a bond which relates man to G‑d directly,
without the medium of mitzvos.
Each of us shares a bond with G‑d that is not at all dependent on our deeds.
For this reason, even a person who has failed to establish a connection with G‑d
through mitzvos or who has obstructed
that connection by his conduct, is still capable of feeling a desire to return
to Him.6
A person’s desire to return to G‑d evokes a response from Him. Like a father
who loves his children regardless of their conduct, G‑d maintains a bond with us
which continues even when our conduct appears to draw us away from Him. And when
a person turns to G‑d in teshuvah, this bond
surfaces and makes its presence felt.
Since the connection to G‑d established through teshuvah
is deeper than that which is established through the observance of mitzvos,
it can compensate for any deficiencies in our observance of the mitzvos.
Nothing can block the expression of this deep connection we share with G‑d.
(c) Nevertheless, despite the depth of the connection with G‑d established
through teshuvah, a certain distance remains between man and G‑d. In
fact, it is our feeling of separation from Him that motivates our desire to
return to Him. By contrast, our willingness to accept G‑d as King expresses the
idea of man’s absolute bond with G‑d.7 Man accepts G‑d’s sovereignty because he cannot conceive of any alternative; he
cannot conceive of the possibility of living without a King.
(This understanding of the King-subject relationship also applies to G‑d.
G‑d, so to speak, cannot conceive of being without subjects. It is for this
reason that He turns to man and asks of him to “accept Me as King over you.”)8
Accepting G‑d’s Sovereignty
Our Sages9 teach that G‑d tells man, “Accept My
sovereignty and then accept My decrees.” The connection with G‑d which is
established through observing the mitzvos
(“My decrees”) is only possible after His sovereignty has been established. Even
teshuvah is possible only after G‑d’s sovereignty has been established.
For the essence of teshuvah is regret over one’s past conduct and a firm
resolution to fulfill G‑d’s will in the future,10 and this
presupposes an existing subject-king relationship.
In our divine service on Rosh HaShanah, we therefore focus on the core of our
relationship with G‑d, the acceptance of His sovereignty, for this serves as the
foundation both for our observance of mitzvos and for
our ability to do teshuvah.
A Selfless Self
Why is our absolute bond with G‑d established through the acceptance of His
Kingship? The answer lies in realizing that deep down, underlying the varied
peripheral facets of our personalities, the very core of our being is our divine
soul, an “actual part of G‑d from above.”11 Therefore,
it is not free self-expression, “being ourselves,” that expresses who we really
are. Rather it is in the acceptance of G‑d’s sovereignty that our inner G‑dly
potential finds expression. By getting to the core of our relationship with G‑d,
we give voice to the core of our own being, to that quintessential element that
is most truly ourselves.
Thus when a person requests of G‑d: “Reign over the entire world in Your
glory,”12 his request should be a deeply felt desire, not
merely a superficial statement. Every aspect of our being — and the essence of
our being — should be given over to G‑d.
Our acceptance of G‑d’s Kingship on Rosh HaShanah hastens the ultimate
expression of His Kingship that will take place in the Era of Redemption. For
then “G‑d will be King of the entire world; and on that day, He will be One and
His Name will be One.”13 May
this become manifest in the immediate future.
Adapted from Likkutei Sichos
Vol. IV, Rosh HaShanah;Vol. XIX, Sukkos