Get Think Jewish Delivered to your Home or Office
HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Texts & Writings
 
Chabad.org » Learning & Values » Texts & Writings » Chassidic Texts » On the Study of Chasidus » On Learning Chassidus » Chapter Nineteen
PrintSend this page to a friendShare thisSubscribe



Book Title On the Study of Chasidus
By Zalman Posner
Published and copyrighted by Kehot Publication Society
« Previous Next »

Chapter Nineteen

Most of the subject matter of Chasidus is explained through logical parallels, drawn predominantly from the powers and faculties of the soul. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence who perseveres and studies assiduously is capable of understanding the subjects clearly, at least on the level of the illustration.

For example: the ten supernal sefirot parallel the ten powers of the soul. In fact, Tanya, chapter 3, describes the soul-powers as descendant from the ten sefirot. Concerning the powers of the soul, we can readily grasp the difference between the mind’s intellect and the heart’s emotions, and [more particularly], the variations among the components of the intellect and the various emotions. This knowledge is tangible, accessible. Through diligent intellectual exercise, one can continue to progress in comprehending the loftiest concepts.

As explained elsewhere1 at length, there are two types of comprehension: 1) elevation of the mind to the subject studied, and 2) descent of the subject to the mind. Each type may be subdivided into numerous categories composed of one or both main types. Essentially, the two general approaches are “abstraction” and “embodiment.” Elevation of mind is abstraction; descent of subject is embodiment.

However, the terms abstraction and embodiment are in general approximate descriptions. For each approach must include processes that are similar to those of the other.

Understanding is the result of either positive or negative reasoning. Superficially, these two processes appear to be antithetical (positive knowledge states in its terms what negative knowledge declares negatively; negative knowledge is the denial of knowing positively), but in actuality they are complementary. Positive reasoning proves the virtue of what we only know negatively; negative reasoning clarifies the positively understood. Each accentuates the virtue of the other.2 The initial step in mastery of a subject must be the knowledge of the positive, what can be known. This applies as well to abstraction and embodiment, first one examines the embodied, or lower plane of the subject.

The first step to learning, however, is [abstraction] the elevation of the mind in the ordinary sense of the word: simply—systematic devotion to intellectual activities. In time, this will lead to the achievement of the most profound, most delicate and abstract concepts.


« Previous
Next »

PrintSend this page to a friendShare thisSubscribe
FOOTNOTES
1. Maamorim, op. cit., Oteh Or 5700; HaTamim I, p. 31.
[“In the union of idea and thinker there are three methods:
a. The idea, the higher, is to descend to the plane of the lower, the thinker. ‘Descent’ is the embodiment of the idea in illustrations and parallels so that the idea is perceptible to the thinker. This method may be compared to the one at the top of a mountain descending to be together with another at the base.
b. The thinker, who is the inferior elevates himself to the higher, the idea. ‘Elevation’ is the refinement of the mind, making it capable of receiving delicate ideas. This comes through practice in abstracting the core of an idea from its illustrations in order to perceive the profundity of the unencumbered idea. . . .
In the first method, one strives with the idea, clothing it in explanations. It is not a different idea; it is the same idea on a lower plane, but whose proper position is on the higher plane.
In the second method, the striving is primarily with the thinker, developing the ability to abstract, to immerse oneself in the ‘soul’ of the idea. For abstraction one must have a powerful mind and familiarity with the processes of thought. It is a precarious path, fraught with the possibility of error. Another difficulty is that ideas lead to conclusions, and conclusions are arrived at through the medium of embodiment, whereas in abstraction the conclusion is not at all evident.”]
2. [Subjects delimited comparably to the limitations of mortal intellect (dimensional in space and time) can be understood positively, i.e. one can know what the subject is.
A supra-dimensional subject, one that transcends the limitations of mortal mind, cannot be understood in terms of what it is, but negatively, in terms of what it is not.
The complementary function of the two processes is: Positive knowledge, as far as it can be exercised, indicates the loftiness of what lies beyond its scope and can be understood only negatively (e.g. G-d is not dimensional). Negative understanding, in turn, gives clarity and definition to the positive knowledge already attained.]

By Zalman Posner   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Translated by Zalman I. Posner
A Chassidic discourse by Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn of Lubavitch.
 


On Learning Chassidus
Chapter Sixteen
Chapter Seventeen
Chapter Eighteen
Chapter Nineteen
Chapter Twenty
Chapter Twenty-One
Chapter Twenty-Two
Showing 18 - 24 of 24

Search On the Study of Chasidus
 


On the Study of Chasidus
  A trilogy of Chasidic essays by Rabbi Yosef Y. Shneersohn of Lubavitch including: Some Aspects of Chabad Chasidism, On The Teachings of Chasidus and On Learning Chasidus.

 Kehot Publication Society and Merkos Publications, the publishing divisions of the Lubavitch movement have brought Torah education to nearly every Jewish community in the world. More than 100,000,000 volumes have been disseminated to date in over 12 languages, both for newcomer as well as for those well versed in Torah knowledge.