Printed from Chabad.org
Contact Us
Visit us on Facebook
Meet the new Chabad.org
Switch to OLD version

287. Mystical & Practical

Print
E-mail

You cannot separate the mystical from the practical. Each thing has both a body and a soul, and they act as one. Neither can contradict the other, and in each the other can be found.

Based on letters and talks of the Rebbe, Rabbi M. M. Schneerson
From the wisdom of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, of righteous memory; words and condensation by Rabbi Tzvi Freeman. To order Rabbi Freeman’s book, Bringing Heaven Down to Earth, click here.
The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
Print
E-mail
Sort By:
Discussion (2)
March 14, 2008
Yes this is my learning and understanding, however a few weeks ago there was a story about the human nature and animal nature upon which I commented that animal nature is much maligned and more accurately it is our own nature either acting in accordance with G-d or in discord with the potential G-d has given us. I received a most patronizing letter from a man saying animals do not contain the divine spark. G-d is the source of all life, the divine spark is within all it is only the failure of humans to experience, know and acknowledge this and in the process humans do not guard, cherish as precious and care for that which is created by G-d.
Anonymous
Tualatin , Oregon
November 10, 2005
Mystical and Practical
I once debated a Christian via email. He spoke of morality and practicality as if they were two different things. I argued that this was actually an illusion; I argued that what is truly moral is practical, and that what was truly practical is moral. He gave the example of a chashier who accidentally miscalculates and gives back too much change at the end of a sales transaction. He argued that the practical thing for the customer to do would be to keep the extra change, but that the moral thing to do would be for the customer to rectify the situation by returning the excess change to the cashier. I then argued that it would be both moral & practical for the customer to do the honest thing because honesty and accuracy benefit the whole society. If the customer took advantage of the cashier's honest mistake, that would not be practical -- it would simply be greedy and therefore neither moral nor practical.
Rob Willis
Pittsburgh, PA
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG