Printed from Chabad.org
Contact Us
Visit us on Facebook
Meet the new Chabad.org
Switch to OLD version

240. Givers & Takers

Print
E-mail

Our view of the world and its Creator’s view are very different.

From our perspective, there is always a giver and a taker. Whether the merchandise be knowledge, affection, or money—somebody always comes out on top and the other on the bottom.

In the Creator’s view, giver and taker are one. The taker is really giving and the giver, receiving.

For without the opportunity to give, the giver would be forever imprisoned within his own self.

Based on letters and talks of the Rebbe, Rabbi M. M. Schneerson
From the wisdom of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, of righteous memory; words and condensation by Rabbi Tzvi Freeman. To order Rabbi Freeman’s book, Bringing Heaven Down to Earth, click here.
The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
Print
E-mail
Sort By:
Discussion (2)
March 10, 2011
For Feige in Jerusalem
How taking can be giving is discussed in depth in "The Lunar File"
Rabbi Tzvi Freeman
March 8, 2011
I always enjoy your daily chizuk. It gives me much food for thought as I go about my day.

But this one perplexes me... yes, I understand (between the lines) that we should aim for a higher level to emulate G-d in His Being a simultaneous Giver and Taker.

But I don't understand how the "taker" is really giving in the same moment. Besides a) my giving an acknowledgment of gratitude and b) my feeling that I want to LATER reciprocate (give back to the other person or to Hashem), I assume you're implying something deeper. Do you mean that taking should permeate within me a feeling that I want/need to give back? If so, then I'm always thinking of the quid-proquo and not able to accept and be grateful for the other's "unconditional" giving?

Spiritually, it is clear to me that the "giver also takes" and this is (or should be) even inherent to the unconditional giving process. But I don't understand this inherent parallel to the "taking" process...

Much appreciation If you can clarify!
Feige
Jerusalem, Israel
1000 characters remaining
Email me when new comments are posted.
FEATURED ON CHABAD.ORG